Before Homes Are Even Rebuilt in the Ruins of the Gaza Strip, Another War Looms

[flacaltenn]

Crappy piece of journalist opinion that OP link was.. No wonder P.F. liked it..

Instead of accepting Hamas 10 year truce -- Israel and it's evil allies decided on a 51 day war... WHAT -- ANOTHER 10 year truce? Where is THIS ONE? By the same guy who was angered that the USA took out that great Muslim warrior bin Laden?

So many offers of 10 year truces -- that appear only in the NYTimes Op Ed page.. Last year's war had NOTHING to do with miles of military tunnels under Israel or rocket attacks == did it??

Snore........

Miles of military tunnels under Israel, oh please...

Man if I lived in Gaza I'd want a bomb shelter. (it was just an excuse to invade) Israel lies so much, one can't believe anything they say.

Good point there Penelope.. Why WEREN'T Gazans provided with safe zones, bomb shelters, and evac plans? WHY were they told to stay in place during hostilities? Where are the civil defense priorities of Hamas for "the next war" ???

Israeli propaganda crapola.

I'm SHOCKED P.F. that you have so little concern for the civil defense and safety of the Gazans. You must agree pretty totally with the priorities of Hamas and the radicals. Not so much with the welfare of the AVERAGE Gazan who -- when polled -- DISAGREED with the rocket attacks and the continuance of hostilities.

Actually -- not shocked.. You can be as co-dependent as you want to be. But you value those lives a little less than the cages of puppies and kitties at a shelter..

 

[P F Tinmore]

Crappy piece of journalist opinion that OP link was.. No wonder P.F. liked it..

Instead of accepting Hamas 10 year truce -- Israel and it's evil allies decided on a 51 day war... WHAT -- ANOTHER 10 year truce? Where is THIS ONE? By the same guy who was angered that the USA took out that great Muslim warrior bin Laden?

So many offers of 10 year truces -- that appear only in the NYTimes Op Ed page.. Last year's war had NOTHING to do with miles of military tunnels under Israel or rocket attacks == did it??

Snore........

Miles of military tunnels under Israel, oh please...

Man if I lived in Gaza I'd want a bomb shelter. (it was just an excuse to invade) Israel lies so much, one can't believe anything they say.

Good point there Penelope.. Why WEREN'T Gazans provided with safe zones, bomb shelters, and evac plans? WHY were they told to stay in place during hostilities? Where are the civil defense priorities of Hamas for "the next war" ???

Israeli propaganda crapola.

I'm SHOCKED P.F. that you have so little concern for the civil defense and safety of the Gazans. You must agree pretty totally with the priorities of Hamas and the radicals. Not so much with the welfare of the AVERAGE Gazan who -- when polled -- DISAGREED with the rocket attacks and the continuance of hostilities.

Actually -- not shocked.. You can be as co-dependent as you want to be. But you value those lives a little less than the cages of puppies and kitties at a shelter..

So now we are going to get that racist little value of life bullcrap. You play every card that Israel deals you. Don't you ever do any independent research?

Oh, that's right, you don't have time to learn anything.

 

[Hossfly]

Crappy piece of journalist opinion that OP link was.. No wonder P.F. liked it..

Instead of accepting Hamas 10 year truce -- Israel and it's evil allies decided on a 51 day war... WHAT -- ANOTHER 10 year truce? Where is THIS ONE? By the same guy who was angered that the USA took out that great Muslim warrior bin Laden?

So many offers of 10 year truces -- that appear only in the NYTimes Op Ed page.. Last year's war had NOTHING to do with miles of military tunnels under Israel or rocket attacks == did it??

Snore........

Miles of military tunnels under Israel, oh please...

Man if I lived in Gaza I'd want a bomb shelter. (it was just an excuse to invade) Israel lies so much, one can't believe anything they say.

Good point there Penelope.. Why WEREN'T Gazans provided with safe zones, bomb shelters, and evac plans? WHY were they told to stay in place during hostilities? Where are the civil defense priorities of Hamas for "the next war" ???

Gaza wsa given concrete and materials a few years ago, to build bomb shelters but Hamass used them for tunnels.

 

[Penelope]

Crappy piece of journalist opinion that OP link was.. No wonder P.F. liked it..

Instead of accepting Hamas 10 year truce -- Israel and it's evil allies decided on a 51 day war... WHAT -- ANOTHER 10 year truce? Where is THIS ONE? By the same guy who was angered that the USA took out that great Muslim warrior bin Laden?

So many offers of 10 year truces -- that appear only in the NYTimes Op Ed page.. Last year's war had NOTHING to do with miles of military tunnels under Israel or rocket attacks == did it??

Snore........

Miles of military tunnels under Israel, oh please...

Man if I lived in Gaza I'd want a bomb shelter. (it was just an excuse to invade) Israel lies so much, one can't believe anything they say.

Good point there Penelope.. Why WEREN'T Gazans provided with safe zones, bomb shelters, and evac plans? WHY were they told to stay in place during hostilities? Where are the civil defense priorities of Hamas for "the next war" ???

The only place to go is down, can't go up or out to sea, and they are fenced it. As you are aware Gaza is the most densely populated place on earth.

Even in densely populated areas, a few bomb shelters can be built. Somehow they find the space to build tunnels.

Tunnels are the best. By the way, where are Israel's military bases? That's right they can shoot rockets more than 10 miles and they have planes to drop bombs.

If there was a bomb shelter and Israel bombed it , you can be assured Israel did not know and it was a bomb shelter. The Gazans can't win, there is no recourse. Also only a stupid Hamas would build a military base to be blasted by Israel. Israel knows they are killing innocents to even bomb or go in with their tanks and blast a building,

They don't care.

 

[Hossfly]

Crappy piece of journalist opinion that OP link was.. No wonder P.F. liked it..

Instead of accepting Hamas 10 year truce -- Israel and it's evil allies decided on a 51 day war... WHAT -- ANOTHER 10 year truce? Where is THIS ONE? By the same guy who was angered that the USA took out that great Muslim warrior bin Laden?

So many offers of 10 year truces -- that appear only in the NYTimes Op Ed page.. Last year's war had NOTHING to do with miles of military tunnels under Israel or rocket attacks == did it??

Snore........

A blockade is an act of war. The rockets are a response to that aggression.

The tunnels were not used to attack civilians. They were only used to take out attacking military forces. A legitimate form of defense by any standards.

Israel rejects a truce because they would not be able to steal any more land.

Wrong on all three points and laughable.

 

[Hossfly]

Follow the trends. Connect the dots.

Palestinians in Gaza need only look 80 kilometers west to the gilded Bantustans of the Palestinian Authority (PA) to see what they would get if they agreed to disarm. After years of fruitless negotiations, Israel has rewarded Palestinians living under the rule of PA President Mahmoud Abbas with the record growth of Jewish settlements, major new land annexations, nightly house raids, and the constant humiliation and dangers of daily interactions with Israeli soldiers and fanatical Jewish settlers. Rather than resist the occupation, Abbas’s Western-trained security forces coordinate directly with the occupying Israeli army, assisting Israel in the arrest and even torture of fellow Palestinians, including the leadership of rival political factions.

As punishing as life in Gaza might be, the West Bank model does not offer a terribly attractive alternative. Yet this is exactly the kind of “solution” the Israeli government seeks to impose on Gaza. As former Interior Minister Yuval Steinitz declared last year, “We want more than a ceasefire, we want the demilitarization of Gaza... Gaza will be exactly like [the West Bank city of] Ramallah.”

The Fire Next Time Max Blumenthal​

What's this little incident all about, Tinmore?

Israel strikes Gaza in response to rocket fire, no injuries

JERUSALEM (AP) — The Israeli military says its warplanes have struck the Gaza Strip in response to a rocket launched from the coastal area into southern Israel.

The military says the rocket landed early Thursday in an open area near the city of Ashkelon. It says Israeli warplanes retaliated by targeting a "terror infrastructure" in the Palestinian territory.

Palestinian media in Gaza reported two Israeli airstrikes, in the north and central Gaza Strip. One targeted a watchtower near the Gaza-Israel border and the other a militant training site.



Israel strikes Gaza in response to rocket fire no injuries - AOL.com

I wonder who fired the rocket?

Was there even a rocket?

Actually, no. It was a loud camel fart.

 

[Penelope]

Crappy piece of journalist opinion that OP link was.. No wonder P.F. liked it..

Instead of accepting Hamas 10 year truce -- Israel and it's evil allies decided on a 51 day war... WHAT -- ANOTHER 10 year truce? Where is THIS ONE? By the same guy who was angered that the USA took out that great Muslim warrior bin Laden?

So many offers of 10 year truces -- that appear only in the NYTimes Op Ed page.. Last year's war had NOTHING to do with miles of military tunnels under Israel or rocket attacks == did it??

Snore........

Miles of military tunnels under Israel, oh please...

Man if I lived in Gaza I'd want a bomb shelter. (it was just an excuse to invade) Israel lies so much, one can't believe anything they say.

Good point there Penelope.. Why WEREN'T Gazans provided with safe zones, bomb shelters, and evac plans? WHY were they told to stay in place during hostilities? Where are the civil defense priorities of Hamas for "the next war" ???

Gaza wsa given concrete and materials a few years ago, to build bomb shelters but Hamass used them for tunnels.

Tunnels are safer, in a tornado one goes to the basement.

 

[Penelope]

Follow the trends. Connect the dots.

Palestinians in Gaza need only look 80 kilometers west to the gilded Bantustans of the Palestinian Authority (PA) to see what they would get if they agreed to disarm. After years of fruitless negotiations, Israel has rewarded Palestinians living under the rule of PA President Mahmoud Abbas with the record growth of Jewish settlements, major new land annexations, nightly house raids, and the constant humiliation and dangers of daily interactions with Israeli soldiers and fanatical Jewish settlers. Rather than resist the occupation, Abbas’s Western-trained security forces coordinate directly with the occupying Israeli army, assisting Israel in the arrest and even torture of fellow Palestinians, including the leadership of rival political factions.

As punishing as life in Gaza might be, the West Bank model does not offer a terribly attractive alternative. Yet this is exactly the kind of “solution” the Israeli government seeks to impose on Gaza. As former Interior Minister Yuval Steinitz declared last year, “We want more than a ceasefire, we want the demilitarization of Gaza... Gaza will be exactly like [the West Bank city of] Ramallah.”

The Fire Next Time Max Blumenthal​

What's this little incident all about, Tinmore?

Israel strikes Gaza in response to rocket fire, no injuries

JERUSALEM (AP) — The Israeli military says its warplanes have struck the Gaza Strip in response to a rocket launched from the coastal area into southern Israel.

The military says the rocket landed early Thursday in an open area near the city of Ashkelon. It says Israeli warplanes retaliated by targeting a "terror infrastructure" in the Palestinian territory.

Palestinian media in Gaza reported two Israeli airstrikes, in the north and central Gaza Strip. One targeted a watchtower near the Gaza-Israel border and the other a militant training site.



Israel strikes Gaza in response to rocket fire no injuries - AOL.com

I wonder who fired the rocket?

Was there even a rocket?

Actually, no. It was a loud camel fart.

That's about it.

 

[montelatici]

Follow the trends. Connect the dots.

Palestinians in Gaza need only look 80 kilometers west to the gilded Bantustans of the Palestinian Authority (PA) to see what they would get if they agreed to disarm. After years of fruitless negotiations, Israel has rewarded Palestinians living under the rule of PA President Mahmoud Abbas with the record growth of Jewish settlements, major new land annexations, nightly house raids, and the constant humiliation and dangers of daily interactions with Israeli soldiers and fanatical Jewish settlers. Rather than resist the occupation, Abbas’s Western-trained security forces coordinate directly with the occupying Israeli army, assisting Israel in the arrest and even torture of fellow Palestinians, including the leadership of rival political factions.

As punishing as life in Gaza might be, the West Bank model does not offer a terribly attractive alternative. Yet this is exactly the kind of “solution” the Israeli government seeks to impose on Gaza. As former Interior Minister Yuval Steinitz declared last year, “We want more than a ceasefire, we want the demilitarization of Gaza... Gaza will be exactly like [the West Bank city of] Ramallah.”

The Fire Next Time Max Blumenthal​

What's this little incident all about, Tinmore?

Israel strikes Gaza in response to rocket fire, no injuries

JERUSALEM (AP) — The Israeli military says its warplanes have struck the Gaza Strip in response to a rocket launched from the coastal area into southern Israel.

The military says the rocket landed early Thursday in an open area near the city of Ashkelon. It says Israeli warplanes retaliated by targeting a "terror infrastructure" in the Palestinian territory.

Palestinian media in Gaza reported two Israeli airstrikes, in the north and central Gaza Strip. One targeted a watchtower near the Gaza-Israel border and the other a militant training site.



Israel strikes Gaza in response to rocket fire no injuries - AOL.com

I wonder who fired the rocket?

Was there even a rocket?

Actually, no. It was a loud camel fart.

And you post the usual horseshit, as your name implies.

 

[Hollie]

Crappy piece of journalist opinion that OP link was.. No wonder P.F. liked it..

Instead of accepting Hamas 10 year truce -- Israel and it's evil allies decided on a 51 day war... WHAT -- ANOTHER 10 year truce? Where is THIS ONE? By the same guy who was angered that the USA took out that great Muslim warrior bin Laden?

So many offers of 10 year truces -- that appear only in the NYTimes Op Ed page.. Last year's war had NOTHING to do with miles of military tunnels under Israel or rocket attacks == did it??

Snore........

Miles of military tunnels under Israel, oh please...

Man if I lived in Gaza I'd want a bomb shelter. (it was just an excuse to invade) Israel lies so much, one can't believe anything they say.

Good point there Penelope.. Why WEREN'T Gazans provided with safe zones, bomb shelters, and evac plans? WHY were they told to stay in place during hostilities? Where are the civil defense priorities of Hamas for "the next war" ???

Gaza wsa given concrete and materials a few years ago, to build bomb shelters but Hamass used them for tunnels.

Tunnels are safer, in a tornado one goes to the basement.

In the case of the Hamas terrorists, retaliation by Israel for being attacked by islamo-rocket fire will be the excuse needed to go begging before the UN for more kafir welfare dollars.

 

[Penelope]

Israel should be made to pay for their war crimes and to rebuild gaza. Israel now wants more money from the US, an extra billion a year for 10 years due to the Iran deal. We are nuts to give them even a dime more from our tax money. they are the welfare suckers.

 

[Phoenall]

Follow the trends. Connect the dots.

Palestinians in Gaza need only look 80 kilometers west to the gilded Bantustans of the Palestinian Authority (PA) to see what they would get if they agreed to disarm. After years of fruitless negotiations, Israel has rewarded Palestinians living under the rule of PA President Mahmoud Abbas with the record growth of Jewish settlements, major new land annexations, nightly house raids, and the constant humiliation and dangers of daily interactions with Israeli soldiers and fanatical Jewish settlers. Rather than resist the occupation, Abbas’s Western-trained security forces coordinate directly with the occupying Israeli army, assisting Israel in the arrest and even torture of fellow Palestinians, including the leadership of rival political factions.

As punishing as life in Gaza might be, the West Bank model does not offer a terribly attractive alternative. Yet this is exactly the kind of “solution” the Israeli government seeks to impose on Gaza. As former Interior Minister Yuval Steinitz declared last year, “We want more than a ceasefire, we want the demilitarization of Gaza... Gaza will be exactly like [the West Bank city of] Ramallah.”

The Fire Next Time Max Blumenthal​

That would place them right in the middle of the Mediterranean sea 80k to the west of gaza. And then saying they are south African is a bigger faux pass Just anthjer example of your islamonazi propaganda and lies designed to racially abuse the Jews. The Palestinians have brought everything on themselves through their violence and terrorism.

The post bears no relationship to the heading as I cant find any mention of re building homes or of a war looming, so why do you LIE

 

[Phoenall]

Yes those in gaza allied to the muslim brotherhood

 

[Phoenall]

He didn't think he was, apart from being an Ameri

He was an American.

He didn't think he was, apart from being an American by proxy

 

[Phoenall]

Crappy piece of journalist opinion that OP link was.. No wonder P.F. liked it..

Instead of accepting Hamas 10 year truce -- Israel and it's evil allies decided on a 51 day war... WHAT -- ANOTHER 10 year truce? Where is THIS ONE? By the same guy who was angered that the USA took out that great Muslim warrior bin Laden?

So many offers of 10 year truces -- that appear only in the NYTimes Op Ed page.. Last year's war had NOTHING to do with miles of military tunnels under Israel or rocket attacks == did it??

Snore........

A blockade is an act of war. The rockets are a response to that aggression.

The tunnels were not used to attack civilians. They were only used to take out attacking military forces. A legitimate form of defense by any standards.

Israel rejects a truce because they would not be able to steal any more land.

LINK to the law that says a blockade is an act of war. The blockade was in response to the rockets which came first, which puts that LIE to bed.

The tunnels where destined to be used to blow up Israeli schools when the children where in them so they were to be used against innocent unarmed civilians. Not a legitimate form of defence, and nor is kidnapping soldiers. So LIE two put to bed

How about a LINK to this as Israel refused the truce because it was not a real truce and had clauses that meant hamas could end it without warning. What land has Israel stolen that was not theirs to begin with ? LIE 3 ran screaming to bed.

 

[Phoenall]

What do you find funny about the way International law works, find one instance of Israel starting a fight with the Palestinians that was not provoked by the Palestinians, and you can say that Israel was the aggressor...............

 

[P F Tinmore]

What do you find funny about the way International law works, find one instance of Israel starting a fight with the Palestinians that was not provoked by the Palestinians, and you can say that Israel was the aggressor...............

How about a hundred years ago when the Palestinians were at home minding their own business when a bunch of foreigners came out of Europe and kicked most of the natives out.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Crappy piece of journalist opinion that OP link was.. No wonder P.F. liked it..

Instead of accepting Hamas 10 year truce -- Israel and it's evil allies decided on a 51 day war... WHAT -- ANOTHER 10 year truce? Where is THIS ONE? By the same guy who was angered that the USA took out that great Muslim warrior bin Laden?

So many offers of 10 year truces -- that appear only in the NYTimes Op Ed page.. Last year's war had NOTHING to do with miles of military tunnels under Israel or rocket attacks == did it??

Snore........

A blockade is an act of war. The rockets are a response to that aggression.

The tunnels were not used to attack civilians. They were only used to take out attacking military forces. A legitimate form of defense by any standards.

Israel rejects a truce because they would not be able to steal any more land.

LINK to the law that says a blockade is an act of war. The blockade was in response to the rockets which came first, which puts that LIE to bed.

Israel viewed the Naval Blockade on the Straits of Tiran as an act of war.

What's good for the goose...

The tunnels where destined to be used to blow up Israeli schools when the children where in them so they were to be used against innocent unarmed civilians. Not a legitimate form of defence, and nor is kidnapping soldiers. So LIE two put to bed

Soldiers are not kidnapped. They are captured. One lie.

The tunnels were only used against troops. No civilians were attacked. Another lie.

How about a LINK to this as Israel refused the truce because it was not a real truce and had clauses that meant hamas could end it without warning. What land has Israel stolen that was not theirs to begin with ? LIE 3 ran screaming to bed.

Israel will not agree to anything were they must stop attacking Palestinians.

Unless you can prove otherwise.

 

[Hollie]

What do you find funny about the way International law works, find one instance of Israel starting a fight with the Palestinians that was not provoked by the Palestinians, and you can say that Israel was the aggressor...............

How about a hundred years ago when the Palestinians were at home minding their own business when a bunch of foreigners came out of Europe and kicked most of the natives out.

It's only an exercise in propaganda to suggest your mythical characterization of "Palestonians" is accurate.

About a hundred year ago, the Arab squatters in the geographic no-mans land were a motley collection of Syrians, Lebanese, Egyptians, etc., in an a land area previously conquered by the Ottomans.

The phony "Palestonian" label was a 1960's invention of Yassir "where's my UN welfare check" Arafat.

Really, tinny. You're a propagandist, and an uninformed one.

 

[Hollie]

Crappy piece of journalist opinion that OP link was.. No wonder P.F. liked it..

Instead of accepting Hamas 10 year truce -- Israel and it's evil allies decided on a 51 day war... WHAT -- ANOTHER 10 year truce? Where is THIS ONE? By the same guy who was angered that the USA took out that great Muslim warrior bin Laden?

So many offers of 10 year truces -- that appear only in the NYTimes Op Ed page.. Last year's war had NOTHING to do with miles of military tunnels under Israel or rocket attacks == did it??

Snore........

A blockade is an act of war. The rockets are a response to that aggression.

The tunnels were not used to attack civilians. They were only used to take out attacking military forces. A legitimate form of defense by any standards.

Israel rejects a truce because they would not be able to steal any more land.

LINK to the law that says a blockade is an act of war. The blockade was in response to the rockets which came first, which puts that LIE to bed.

Israel viewed the Naval Blockade on the Straits of Tiran as an act of war.

What's good for the goose...

The tunnels where destined to be used to blow up Israeli schools when the children where in them so they were to be used against innocent unarmed civilians. Not a legitimate form of defence, and nor is kidnapping soldiers. So LIE two put to bed

Soldiers are not kidnapped. They are captured. One lie.

The tunnels were only used against troops. No civilians were attacked. Another lie.

How about a LINK to this as Israel refused the truce because it was not a real truce and had clauses that meant hamas could end it without warning. What land has Israel stolen that was not theirs to begin with ? LIE 3 ran screaming to bed.

Israel will not agree to anything were they must stop attacking Palestinians.

Unless you can prove otherwise.

As usual, tinny, you're a failure as a propaganda spokes-slob for Islamic terrorists.

You fail to acknowledge that the Hamas terrorists use their tunnels for smuggling arms and ammunition used to attack Israeli citizens. Your Hamas terrorists continue to wage acts of war against Israel, therefore when Israel responds and your cowardly heroes use Palestonians as human shields, you'll need to make accommodation for dead Palestonians.