Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
only a true pervert would see that picture as sexual.The point is that its wrong to ASSSume gay parents would molest their children because their children are wanted and loved. Not to mention that being homosexual IS NOT related to being a pedophile. Educate yourself.
Hmmm... Definitely gays want children. The word "loved" is open to interpretation. Gay icon Harvey Milk "wanted" the orphaned boys he took off the streets to officiate as their father figure/guarian while he "loved" them in the anus.
I think people have a problem with gays doing surrogacy or adopting because of the OP in this thread and the 1st photo in the OP: http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...-forced-to-adopt-orphans-to-these-people.html
Photos have an effect on people. They really are worth a thousand words. For that matter, the author of the OP misjudged radically the visceral reaction of readers here seeing two half-naked dudes groping onto each other as they hold a newborn baby.
Let's just say that if anyone was on the fence one way or the other about gay marriage, that picture just took and shoved them hard off that fence. Be sure you're certain about which direction that shove sent them: [Check out the poll results at the top of the thread] http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...o-accomodate-for-homosexual-weddings-120.html
There is no other reason for homos to want a child raised in their home except to legally be able to molest them. ...
link shitforbrains?
Faggots being allowed to raise children is the most despicable form of child abuse. ..
I'm sure they'll rear that child in fine fashion.
I agree with you. Two loving parents are the best gift one can give to a child. May they remain a family for a long time to come.
Filthy, rotten people intentionally robbing a kid of the opportunity to be raised by his real parents. Scumbag, selfish homos.
Trash!
only a true pervert would see that picture as sexual.The point is that its wrong to ASSSume gay parents would molest their children because their children are wanted and loved. Not to mention that being homosexual IS NOT related to being a pedophile. Educate yourself.
Hmmm... Definitely gays want children. The word "loved" is open to interpretation. Gay icon Harvey Milk "wanted" the orphaned boys he took off the streets to officiate as their father figure/guarian while he "loved" them in the anus.
I think people have a problem with gays doing surrogacy or adopting because of the OP in this thread and the 1st photo in the OP: http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...-forced-to-adopt-orphans-to-these-people.html
Photos have an effect on people. They really are worth a thousand words. For that matter, the author of the OP misjudged radically the visceral reaction of readers here seeing two half-naked dudes groping onto each other as they hold a newborn baby.
Let's just say that if anyone was on the fence one way or the other about gay marriage, that picture just took and shoved them hard off that fence. Be sure you're certain about which direction that shove sent them: [Check out the poll results at the top of the thread] http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...o-accomodate-for-homosexual-weddings-120.html
^ Jake Starkey sock. You need to switch up your m-o if you don't want to get called out, Jake.only a true pervert would see that picture as sexual.The point is that its wrong to ASSSume gay parents would molest their children because their children are wanted and loved. Not to mention that being homosexual IS NOT related to being a pedophile. Educate yourself.
Hmmm... Definitely gays want children. The word "loved" is open to interpretation. Gay icon Harvey Milk "wanted" the orphaned boys he took off the streets to officiate as their father figure/guarian while he "loved" them in the anus.
I think people have a problem with gays doing surrogacy or adopting because of the OP in this thread and the 1st photo in the OP: http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...-forced-to-adopt-orphans-to-these-people.html
Photos have an effect on people. They really are worth a thousand words. For that matter, the author of the OP misjudged radically the visceral reaction of readers here seeing two half-naked dudes groping onto each other as they hold a newborn baby.
Let's just say that if anyone was on the fence one way or the other about gay marriage, that picture just took and shoved them hard off that fence. Be sure you're certain about which direction that shove sent them: [Check out the poll results at the top of the thread] http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...o-accomodate-for-homosexual-weddings-120.html
Disgusting...sick bastards.
What kind of a sick dement woman would birth a child and then immediately give the baby to a couple of homos?
Knowing full well that her infant son was going to be molested and sexually abused growing up by these two perverts. ..
Seeing aman hugging a baby isn't sexual if it is to you you are a pervert.^ Jake Starkey sock. You need to switch up your m-o if you don't want to get called out, Jake.
I didn't call you a name Jake. Nor did I say what they were doing was sexual. I said it looked disgusting(which it does)& that I had never heard of this "rub the baby on your naked flesh" as a technique to calm the baby.
The picture has it's funny points too. The dude holding the baby like he can breast feed it, crying like he pushed the baby out of his butthole is hilarious!
This stuff is so wrong, when the child molestation rates start going up because left wing reality-deniers like yourself wanted to normalize a vile perversion(so you could pretend you were some civil rights struggle supporter, lol), if you have a soul(we know most of you don't), you will be sorry for being so stupid as to support this crap.
Bringing up family members is against the rules......you are being reported. ..
I deleted the offending mention from my post..
But you admit you committed the offence.
I'm not saying all would be. I think a lot will be. Sucks that we will have to just wait until it happens instead of using common sense and not creating the scenario in the first place.
You did, because your argument is irrational and fallacious.I didn't call you a name Jake.
If it disgusts you, don't do it.Nor did I say what they were doing was sexual. I said it looked disgusting(which it does)&
You're at a computer or phone with access to the internet, Google it, otherwise don't blame the world for your ignorance.that I had never heard of this "rub the baby on your naked flesh" as a technique to calm the baby.
Foolish people find humor is some strange places, apparently it isn't, that disgusting to you.The picture has it's funny points too. The dude holding the baby like he can breast feed it, crying like he pushed the baby out of his butthole is hilarious!
What you think is wrong has no value to others.This stuff is so wrong,
I am not left wing so here we go with more ad hominem because you can't make a rational argument. And child molestation is overwhelmingly a crime committed by straight people. Unlike you I don't blame everybody in your sexuality for it. But that is another common fallacy of failing arguments.when the child molestation rates start going up because left wing reality-deniers like yourself
Nobody cares what you think is a perversion.wanted to normalize a vile perversion(so you could pretend you were some civil rights struggle supporter, lol), if you have a soul(we know most of you don't), you will be sorry for being so stupid as to support this crap.
Well, go be insulted. That's your right, enjoy.It's an insult to humanity & nature itself, to give a kid to two males or two women over a real married couple.
I don't think Seawytch agrees with your position. I certainly don't. Why should anybody care about your ridiculous unjustifiable ethics?It isn't just because it's "icky", it's that it's social experimentation on children in order to give people something they cannot naturally have themselves. It's not in the best interest of the children, and you know this.