Battle of Kharkiv , February 24, 2022 I Animated Analysis

can you give me the list of the BIG, INDUSTRIAL wars , when Moscow fought WITHOUT SUPPORT OF The Anglosphere & France

PS


The only ones I care about?

The American Revolution & the Civil War.

In these, Russia sided against the global ruling elites, and on the side of the American government.

Legacy of the war in Russia and America​

"Unbeknownst to many, Russia played a significant role in the American Revolutionary War. First and foremost, Catherine the Great's position as perhaps the foremost sponsor of ongoing mediations between the European powers and America, that transpired during the war years, ultimately served as a means of legitimizing and rallying support for the American cause, amongst the other European powers.[30] Her political and military positions acted to further isolate the British within greater European politics, and in the final analysis, to help pave the way for the eventual victory of the young republic. "The proclamation of the Declaration of Armed Neutrality by Russia, which received the official approval of the Continental Congress of the United States in October 1780, had great international significance."[31] If Catherine the Great had not politically maneuvered with other imperial powers and negotiated neutrality with other potentially belligerent states, and if instead, she had chosen to support the British position, then perhaps the American Revolution may have been a somewhat different story. . . . "

It prevented France and Great Britain from entering on the side of the confederacy, and kept our nation together.

How Russia guaranteed a Union victory in the Civil War​


". . . Clay was so infuriating to his pro-slavery opponents, they hired a political gun to assassinate him. The would-be assassin shot Clay in the chest, but the bullet didn't kill him. Despite being restrained by the assassin's friends, Clay drew his Bowie knife and cut off the man's nose and left ear, then gouged out his eye before throwing him over a wall and into a nearby river.

The Russian-British rivalry raged during the American Civil War. British politicians openly advocated intervention in the war and even had a secret plan to burn Boston and New York in sneak attacks from Canada. E. D. Adams' Great Britain and the American Civil War notes the U.S. considered Russia a "true friend" and was suspicious of British neutrality while Secretary of State William Seward actively advocated war with France.

While in St. Petersburg, Clay won the support of Russia for the Union cause and convinced Tsar Alexander II to threaten worldwide war with England and France to keep them from intervening on the side of the Confederacy, with whom they both sympathized. The Russian Baltic Fleet arrived in New York harbor in in September 1863 and the Russian Far East Fleet arrived in San Francisco that October. The Tsar ordered his Navy to be under Lincoln's command if war broke out.

Clay was recalled by Lincoln in 1862 and commissioned a Major General in the Union Army. He refused to accept the commission unless Lincoln freed slaves under Confederate control. The President ordered him to Kentucky to assess the effect of Emancipation on the population there, as Kentucky was seen as a vital border state. When Clay returned, Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation. He left for Russia again the next year and served there until 1869, where he helped secure the Purchase of Alaska, presumably because the Tsar was afraid of him.. . . "


Americans will always owe a great debt to Russia.

I have a long memory.
 
Why are you not at the front lines happily killing Russians?
i DO MY PART, MUCH LIKE YOU DO YOUR 🐷 🇷🇺 PART, you are fully ON Moscow horde side


Fp1ugoCXgAILtdN.jpg
 
The only ones I care about?

The American Revolution & the Civil War.

In these, Russia sided against the global ruling elites, and on the side of the American government.

Legacy of the war in Russia and America​

"Unbeknownst to many, Russia played a significant role in the American Revolutionary War. First and foremost, Catherine the Great's position as perhaps the foremost sponsor of ongoing mediations between the European powers and America, that transpired during the war years, ultimately served as a means of legitimizing and rallying support for the American cause, amongst the other European powers.[30] Her political and military positions acted to further isolate the British within greater European politics, and in the final analysis, to help pave the way for the eventual victory of the young republic. "The proclamation of the Declaration of Armed Neutrality by Russia, which received the official approval of the Continental Congress of the United States in October 1780, had great international significance."[31] If Catherine the Great had not politically maneuvered with other imperial powers and negotiated neutrality with other potentially belligerent states, and if instead, she had chosen to support the British position, then perhaps the American Revolution may have been a somewhat different story. . . . "

It prevented France and Great Britain from entering on the side of the confederacy, and kept our nation together.

How Russia guaranteed a Union victory in the Civil War​


". . . Clay was so infuriating to his pro-slavery opponents, they hired a political gun to assassinate him. The would-be assassin shot Clay in the chest, but the bullet didn't kill him. Despite being restrained by the assassin's friends, Clay drew his Bowie knife and cut off the man's nose and left ear, then gouged out his eye before throwing him over a wall and into a nearby river.

The Russian-British rivalry raged during the American Civil War. British politicians openly advocated intervention in the war and even had a secret plan to burn Boston and New York in sneak attacks from Canada. E. D. Adams' Great Britain and the American Civil War notes the U.S. considered Russia a "true friend" and was suspicious of British neutrality while Secretary of State William Seward actively advocated war with France.

While in St. Petersburg, Clay won the support of Russia for the Union cause and convinced Tsar Alexander II to threaten worldwide war with England and France to keep them from intervening on the side of the Confederacy, with whom they both sympathized. The Russian Baltic Fleet arrived in New York harbor in in September 1863 and the Russian Far East Fleet arrived in San Francisco that October. The Tsar ordered his Navy to be under Lincoln's command if war broke out.

Clay was recalled by Lincoln in 1862 and commissioned a Major General in the Union Army. He refused to accept the commission unless Lincoln freed slaves under Confederate control. The President ordered him to Kentucky to assess the effect of Emancipation on the population there, as Kentucky was seen as a vital border state. When Clay returned, Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation. He left for Russia again the next year and served there until 1869, where he helped secure the Purchase of Alaska, presumably because the Tsar was afraid of him.. . . "


Americans will always owe a great debt to Russia.

I have a long memory.

Mark Hertling - How Fragile would the horde ’s Autocratic System be After a Major Battlefield Defeat​

 
It’s not WWII and the USSR was terminated PEACEFULLY by the Russians now in power.

Get to the front lines you Chicken shit coward.
Do you notice when these propagandists, no matter the issue, start losing on the facts and logical arguments. . . they always desperately resort to name calling and fallacies?

:eusa_think:
 

Mark Hertling - How Fragile would the horde ’s Autocratic System be After a Major Battlefield Defeat​


I stopped listening after. . . "war of attrition."

:auiqs.jpg:

.. . . and you should have too.

Do you, factually, have any idea of the population of both of these nations?
 
Listen to Douglas Macgregor! He predicted that if in fact Ukraine does attack it will be the end of them!
Can you tell us one single prediction that MacGregor has been correct on? He has been predicting the imminent collapse of Ukraine since the first day.
Russia let the Ukrainians into Bakmhut and eliminated then, they will trade space to let Ukrainians walk into a trap. There will be nothing left to stand against the Russians, they will occupy Kharkov and Odessa before year end
I have read a lot of really dumb things on this board, this has to be in the top 5.

Russia didn't "let the Ukrainians into Bakhmut". Bakhmut was always in Ukrainian hands. The attack on Bakhmut was the culmination of Russia's winter offensive (and a marginally significant "win" at best).

Putin let Wagner empty out Russia's prisons, and threw 50K convicts at Ukrainian positions in endless waves until the AFU ran out of mortar shells. The carnage inflicted on the prison recruits was just completely off the charts.

No one on the Russian side cares, because those people don't count. It was the Ukrainians that withdrew before the advancing Wagners, mining and booby-trapping as they went. The casualties were many times worse for Russia than for Ukraine, and Prigozhin has alluded to that on several occasions.

With no respect to MacGregor (none is due), it is way too early in the offensive to make predictions. But it is clear from reporting on both sides that Ukraine is making tactical advances in several areas.

As always, Russian claims of AFU losses are grossly exaggerated. There are losses, but nothing like what some of you guys are thinking (7K troops, hundreds of vehicles...total bullshit) The bulk of the AFU's new Bde's have not even been committed yet.

"As of 15:30 Lobkove, Neskuchne and Levadne, during fierce battles and at the cost of huge losses of personnel, were occupied by the enemy," said Vladimir Novikov, commander of the Russian Troy Volunteer Batallion."

 
"Operation Z" on Telegram:

The enemy breakthrough at the junction of the Zaporozhye Front has expanded: ours cover the lost positions and counterattack
▪️A difficult situation is developing in the South Donetsk direction, the enemy, after using large forces and flank attacks, occupied 3 small villages on the Vremevsky ledge.
▪️Under the threat of encirclement after attacks in the rear near Levadnoe and Urozhaynoye, our people left Neskuchnoe, Blagodatnoe and Storozhevoe, they report from the spot.
▪️In today's report of the Ministry of Defense for yesterday, it directly confirms the advance of the enemy on the Vremevsky ledge, it says that aviation hit the accumulations of manpower and equipment of the 1st brigade of the President of Ukraine, the 110th brigade of the TerO, the 72nd mechanized and 1st tank brigades Armed Forces of Ukraine in the areas of N. p. Novodonetskoye, Neskuchnoye, Storozhevoye and the state farm "October" of the DPR (just 3 villages where the breakthrough of the Armed Forces of Ukraine). ❗️Earlier it was reported that our units were forced to leave Neskuchnoe and Blagodatnoe, and now also Storozhevoe, retreating to positions where they are not threatened by encirclement.
▪️Today, heavy MLRS are already hitting the enemy. Ukrainian military propagandists describe the situation as follows: "The Armed Forces of Ukraine have entrenched themselves south of the village of Neskuchnoye. ➨ Part of the village of Storozhevoe has moved into the gray zone. ➨ Russian troops launched a series of counterattacks in the direction of the village of Neskuchnoye and the village of Blagodatnoye.
▪️VKS of the Russian Federation and artillery continue to strike at places of accumulation of enemy forces at the tip in the abandoned points and throughout the area.
▪️The fighting continues.

 
I stopped listening after. . . "war of attrition."

:auiqs.jpg:

.. . . and you should have too.

Do you, factually, have any idea of the population of both of these nations?
Good it seems the counter offensive is in swing to Zaporozie. The first defensive line seems to have been breached in several places and Ukranians are moving forward. This should have happened a week from now so they seem to be on schedule. Some reports say that Russian main units were in first line which is weird but if true then its a massive success but I doubt it. First line was breached too fast.

The question is if the first line was the more experienced units or fodder. Intelligence reports said that the first line had proper units instead of mobiks. Usually doctrine says that it should be mobik fodder in first line. Perhaps they were afraid that mobiks will run and it will collapse the front so they put experienced units in front. But that begs the question, who will counter attack then?

 
Do you, factually, have any idea of the population of both of these nations?
Blocks , we are far , far larger than Moscow empire ( who have 0 allies )

do you think that Mongol, RAPISTS , LOOTERS cowards do have a chance against PATRIOTIC WHITE MEN , LIKE HIM ?

ps

 

Forum List

Back
Top