- Oct 20, 2013
- 55,724
- 17,695
- 2,250
Just imagine if the site of the congressional baseball game was a “gun-free zone”. No mystery. As Senator Rand Paul said >> “It would have been a massacre.” That’s absolutely right. Once again, it is proven that the only thing stopping a bad guy with a gun, is a GOOD GUY WITH A GUN.
The disturbing and very dangerous phenomenon known as the “gun-free zone” came about during the Obama administration. This is the prohibition of guns, even by law-abiding licensed carriers. And the Jihadist-in-Chief succeeded in getting at least 76 Americans killed as a result of in (in Fort Hood, TX, San Bernardino, CA, and the Pulse Club, in Orlando, FL).
These places, often labeled with stickers showing a gun with a diagonal line drawn through it, are invitations to terrorists, and bad guys of all sorts. Unlike previous gun attacks where good guys were unarmed, (like the 3 mentioned above), the attack against Republican members of Congress, did have 2 good guys with guns. These armed security guys fought it out with the attacker, and killed him.
This is reminiscient of the 2002 LAX attack, when a Muslim jihadist, Ahmed Mohemmed Hadayet, entered Los Angelses Airport, with 2 handguns, and hundreds of rounds of ammunition. LAX was filled with people at the time, and Hadayet could have enacted a bloodbath. He did kill 2 people and wounded some others, but was shot to death right on the spot by a security guard.
Both of these incidents show the critical necessity of the “good guy with a gun”, as opposed to the reckless Obama policy of leaving Americans unarmed and defenseless, against armed attackers. In liberal cities (ex. San Francisco, New York, etc) this lamebrain policy is extended over the entire city, putting everyone at risk, and the bad guys in control.
The disturbing and very dangerous phenomenon known as the “gun-free zone” came about during the Obama administration. This is the prohibition of guns, even by law-abiding licensed carriers. And the Jihadist-in-Chief succeeded in getting at least 76 Americans killed as a result of in (in Fort Hood, TX, San Bernardino, CA, and the Pulse Club, in Orlando, FL).
These places, often labeled with stickers showing a gun with a diagonal line drawn through it, are invitations to terrorists, and bad guys of all sorts. Unlike previous gun attacks where good guys were unarmed, (like the 3 mentioned above), the attack against Republican members of Congress, did have 2 good guys with guns. These armed security guys fought it out with the attacker, and killed him.
This is reminiscient of the 2002 LAX attack, when a Muslim jihadist, Ahmed Mohemmed Hadayet, entered Los Angelses Airport, with 2 handguns, and hundreds of rounds of ammunition. LAX was filled with people at the time, and Hadayet could have enacted a bloodbath. He did kill 2 people and wounded some others, but was shot to death right on the spot by a security guard.
Both of these incidents show the critical necessity of the “good guy with a gun”, as opposed to the reckless Obama policy of leaving Americans unarmed and defenseless, against armed attackers. In liberal cities (ex. San Francisco, New York, etc) this lamebrain policy is extended over the entire city, putting everyone at risk, and the bad guys in control.