Bain Capital Explained By Tony Soprano (VIDEO)

[Artevelde]

the number of lies in that post is staggering. Truly, you are a mental midget. Possibly the 'biggest' mental midget on this board.

I'll let others decide on my forensic acumen, KKKonservative. You don't have the credibility to pose any real threat to it. All you are is a simpleton apologist for you and your teabagging stupes.

you? talking about a lack of credibility?

TM has more credibility than you do here!

Take deep breaths Conservative. We wouldn't want to lose you.

And PS: truly, nobody is more of a pathetic liar than TM, although there is hard competition.

 

[Dick Tuck]

Quoting an Actor? The people in that video no nothing about what they are talking about.
They don't know anything about what venture capitalism is.
Then left uses Dem's terms like vulture capitalism when it isn't.Yet they put the right down when they use Repub talking points.
Venture Capitalism is about trying to save companies that are in trouble from mismanagement.They are called in for that very purpose.
Bain Capital has a very good record in saving companies that are going down to begin with.
They have an 80% success rate, that is very good, not bad.
It's you lefties who are believing the Dem's lying spin on this issue.

Several Dem's are saying the same thing. That it is the wrong way to go, for President Obama. Even his own aids are telling him he should back off because it's going to backfire on him.

Some things are better left to the private sector rather than government.
There was a large sector of American taxpayers who did want their tax money going to Solyndra.

First off, I don't care what Obama's advisors are telling him. I post for the entertainment value.

Second, comparing Solyndra to what Bain did to CST makes no sense in terms of comparison. The grant money they received did not straddle them with unsustainable debt, nor did it force them to ask for a taxpayer financed bail out of their pension fund.

Solyndra's big problem was the Chinese dumping solar panels on the American market. That's not even close to the bust out that Don Mitt pulled at Bain.

 

[Dick Tuck]

Transparently one-sided and fully dishonest HuffNPuff bullshit endorsed by DicklessFuck. Surprise.

Yes, it's satire. But it sure comes close to life imitating art. It's not dishonest, btw. It certainly comes close to what Romney did at Bain.

repeat your lies all you like. No amount of wishing will make them true, or you a real boy, Pinocchio.

Sorry, KKKonservative. It comes very close to what Don Mittens did. He straddled them with unsustainable debt, pulled out his money and a huge profit. In the process of going after them, like a termite goes after wood, underfunded their pension, and left the American taxpayer to pick up the pieces.

 

[Artevelde]

That's a rhetorical question of course.

 

[Conservative]

Yes, it's satire. But it sure comes close to life imitating art. It's not dishonest, btw. It certainly comes close to what Romney did at Bain.

repeat your lies all you like. No amount of wishing will make them true, or you a real boy, Pinocchio.

Sorry, KKKonservative. It comes very close to what Don Mittens did. He straddled them with unsustainable debt, pulled out his money and a huge profit. In the process of going after them, like a termite goes after wood, underfunded their pension, and left the American taxpayer to pick up the pieces.

lie... repeat... lie... that's all you know how to do. sad.

 

[Liability]

Transparently one-sided and fully dishonest HuffNPuff bullshit endorsed by DicklessFuck. Surprise.

Yes, it's satire. But it sure comes close to life imitating art. It's not dishonest, btw. It certainly comes close to what Romney did at Bain.

No. It doesn't come close at all. In fact, it has almost no connection at all to what Romney did at Bain or what Bain did.

YOUR endorsement of the claim itself in the HuffNPuff propaganda smear piece is just you vouching for the lie and the distortions. But you have no credibility, either, being the dishonest sack of crap you always are.

 

[Trajan]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KR2p9p21Q8M&feature=fvwrel]Elephant farts!!! - YouTube[/ame]

 

[g5000]

Warren Buffet doesn't rape the companies he buys, he builds them.

Oh...really?

Lewiston Evening Journal - Google News Archive Search

Bershire demands a decrease from six to one holiday a year

Ford increased social insurance against illness and accident; Berkshire demands a decrease of more than 50%

Ford increased pension benefits; Berkshire Hathaway, which pays no pensions, would wipe out the meager retirement severance now in effect

Berkshire Hathaway demands the right to lay off older workers at will, with no benefits whatever

The Layoff Kings: The 25 Companies Responsible for 700,000 Lost Jobs - DailyFinance

17. Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Number of jobs cut since recession began: 16,900

Berkshire Hathaway has over 80 operating units. It instituted layoffs at half of them in 2008 and 2009. Among the types of companies hardest hit: insurance and manufacturing.

All I did was google "Berkshire Hathaway laid off workers" and those two links were in the first three results.

 

[Dick Tuck]

repeat your lies all you like. No amount of wishing will make them true, or you a real boy, Pinocchio.

Sorry, KKKonservative. It comes very close to what Don Mittens did. He straddled them with unsustainable debt, pulled out his money and a huge profit. In the process of going after them, like a termite goes after wood, underfunded their pension, and left the American taxpayer to pick up the pieces.

lie... repeat... lie... that's all you know how to do. sad.

Liar. You know those are fact, you pathetic little brownshirt.

As Carly Simon said, I think this song is about you.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSelg8rZrog]The Ramones - Pleasant Dreams (CD) - YouTube[/ame]

 

[g5000]

15 biggest job losers - Berkshire Hathaway (6) - FORTUNE

Jobs lost: 24,083
% drop (1 year): 10%
Remaining employees*: 222,000
Fortune 500 rank: 11

Warren Buffett's diversified holding company saw staff reductions at a few of its core businesses: more than 8,000 workers were pink-slipped at Fruit of the Loom, carpeting manufacturer Shaw Industries cut 3,500 employees, and Russell Corporation laid off 2,500 workers. Berkshire's acquisition of Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation (and 35,000 jobs) earlier this year increased the company's total headcount to 257,000.

 

[g5000]

Here is a list of newspapers owned by Buffett and their layoffs

NetJets Announces Major Pilot Layoffs

NetJets Inc., the fractional ownership and plane leasing company owned by Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Inc., has announced major layoffs. Due to a slowdown in business travel and the overall usage of private jets the company is firing 495 pilots.

 

[Dick Tuck]

Warren Buffet doesn't rape the companies he buys, he builds them.

Oh...really?

Lewiston Evening Journal - Google News Archive Search

Bershire demands a decrease from six to one holiday a year

Berkshire Hathaway demands the right to lay off older workers at will, with no benefits whatever

The Layoff Kings: The 25 Companies Responsible for 700,000 Lost Jobs - DailyFinance

17. Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Number of jobs cut since recession began: 16,900

Berkshire Hathaway has over 80 operating units. It instituted layoffs at half of them in 2008 and 2009. Among the types of companies hardest hit: insurance and manufacturing.

All I did was google "Berkshire Hathaway laid off workers" and those two links were in the first three results.

That's certainly all you did. Here's the date on your article:

By Douglas McIntyre
Posted 7:00AM 08/18/10

But you're also way off topic. The issue is whether Don Mittens bought a company, saddled it with unsustainable debt, used those loans to cover their investment, with a huge profit, underfunded their pension fund, and left the taxpayers to bail that out.

 

[g5000]

Warren Buffet doesn't rape the companies he buys, he builds them.

Oh...really?

Lewiston Evening Journal - Google News Archive Search







The Layoff Kings: The 25 Companies Responsible for 700,000 Lost Jobs - DailyFinance




All I did was google "Berkshire Hathaway laid off workers" and those two links were in the first three results.

That's certainly all you did. Here's the date on your article:

By Douglas McIntyre
Posted 7:00AM 08/18/10

Hey, dipshit, what dates did Romney run Bain?

[But you're also way off topic.

Hey, dipshit, who brought up St. Warren Buffett?

Sorry to make your butt hurt.

 

[Dick Tuck]

Oh...really?

Lewiston Evening Journal - Google News Archive Search







The Layoff Kings: The 25 Companies Responsible for 700,000 Lost Jobs - DailyFinance




All I did was google "Berkshire Hathaway laid off workers" and those two links were in the first three results.

That's certainly all you did. Here's the date on your article:

Hey, dipshit, when was Romney running Bain?

[But you're also way off topic.

You opened the door by brining up what a saint Warren Buffett is.

Don Mittens was running the place when they issued preferred shares, that allowed Bain to suck money, giving them a profit, and saddling the company with unsustainable debt.

 

[grunt11b]

Only the left could rely so much on hollywood propaganda and call it facts.

 

[Conservative]

Warren Buffet doesn't rape the companies he buys, he builds them.

Oh...really?

Lewiston Evening Journal - Google News Archive Search







The Layoff Kings: The 25 Companies Responsible for 700,000 Lost Jobs - DailyFinance




All I did was google "Berkshire Hathaway laid off workers" and those two links were in the first three results.

That's certainly all you did. Here's the date on your article:

By Douglas McIntyre
Posted 7:00AM 08/18/10

But you're also way off topic. The issue is whether Don Mittens bought a company, saddled it with unsustainable debt, used those loans to cover their investment, with a huge profit, underfunded their pension fund, and left the taxpayers to bail that out.

the GST stuff is 10 years old, the Berkshire stuff above is 2 years old... yet the Berkshire stuff doesn't matter because of it's age?

You are so fucking pathetic.

 

[Dick Tuck]

Transparently one-sided and fully dishonest HuffNPuff bullshit endorsed by DicklessFuck. Surprise.

Yes, it's satire. But it sure comes close to life imitating art. It's not dishonest, btw. It certainly comes close to what Romney did at Bain.

No. It doesn't come close at all. In fact, it has almost no connection at all to what Romney did at Bain or what Bain did.

YOUR endorsement of the claim itself in the HuffNPuff propaganda smear piece is just you vouching for the lie and the distortions. But you have no credibility, either, being the dishonest sack of crap you always are.

The claim is still satire, and hits close to home, weasel. What Don Mittens did to CST is pretty damn close to what Tony was talking about. It's a whole lot closer than real venture capitalists looking to invest in the next good idea.

Your pathetic flames are joke. They have been since you posted on Hannity. Why did Hannity throw you under the bus? You were always a loyal rat boy over there.

 

[Conservative]

that's certainly all you did. Here's the date on your article:

hey, dipshit, when was romney running bain?

[but you're also way off topic.

you opened the door by brining up what a saint warren buffett is.

don mittens was running the place when they issued preferred shares, that allowed bain to suck money, giving them a profit, and saddling the company with unsustainable debt.

lair.

 

[Conservative]

Yes, it's satire. But it sure comes close to life imitating art. It's not dishonest, btw. It certainly comes close to what Romney did at Bain.

No. It doesn't come close at all. In fact, it has almost no connection at all to what Romney did at Bain or what Bain did.

YOUR endorsement of the claim itself in the HuffNPuff propaganda smear piece is just you vouching for the lie and the distortions. But you have no credibility, either, being the dishonest sack of crap you always are.

The claim is still satire, and hits close to home, weasel. What Don Mittens did to CST is pretty damn close to what Tony was talking about. It's a whole lot closer than real venture capitalists looking to invest in the next good idea.

Your pathetic flames are joke. They have been since you posted on Hannity. Why did Hannity throw you under the bus? You were always a loyal rat boy over there.

GST, dipshit. If you're going to lie about what Romney actually did, you should at LEAST not get the company name wrong!

 

[Dick Tuck]

Oh...really?

Lewiston Evening Journal - Google News Archive Search







The Layoff Kings: The 25 Companies Responsible for 700,000 Lost Jobs - DailyFinance




All I did was google "Berkshire Hathaway laid off workers" and those two links were in the first three results.

That's certainly all you did. Here's the date on your article:

By Douglas McIntyre
Posted 7:00AM 08/18/10

But you're also way off topic. The issue is whether Don Mittens bought a company, saddled it with unsustainable debt, used those loans to cover their investment, with a huge profit, underfunded their pension fund, and left the taxpayers to bail that out.

the GST stuff is 10 years old, the Berkshire stuff above is 2 years old... yet the Berkshire stuff doesn't matter because of it's age?

You are so fucking pathetic.

Romney is still claiming that experience is important. Well, he lied and claimed that after he punked out of running for reelection in '07 that he was going back to the private sector. In fact he launched his first LOSER campaign for president a month later.

He's your boy, KKKonservative, own it.