Bachmann's Census Bashing May Come Back to Haunt Her

[xotoxi]

Just because you are heartless and would kick your child out does not mean I would.

How liberal of you.

I would be on his ass and force him to be an adult, rather than enabling him to be a lazy fuck.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Well, yeah....25 and doesn't work and lives at home? Really?

Just because you are heartless and would kick your child out does not mean I would. I guess I should cart him down to social services so he can apply for Food Stamps, after all my income will have no bearing on whether he gets them or not due to the fact legally he can not be my dependent according to retards like you.

It's called....ENABLING. But, whatever floats your boat.

Wrong you fucking retard, he has a medical condition that prevents him from working, but since I can not afford to pay for the doctors to document it it is undocumented.

Perhaps next fucking time you may actually learn of what you pretend to speak of before opening that idiotic mouth and shoving both feet in?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

ZOMGGGGG!!! I just heard someone call into a right wing hate radio show, identify themselves as a teabagger and say that right wing teabaggers should write "FED" across the census and mail it back!!!

ZOMG!!! I can't wait until Jon Stewart reports this!!!

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Just because you are heartless and would kick your child out does not mean I would.

How liberal of you.

I would be on his ass and force him to be an adult, rather than enabling him to be a lazy fuck.

Ohh look another FUCKING MORON speaking out of his ass with no facts or even a semblance of trying to discern facts before announcing loudly to the rest of the board what a pea brained fucking RETARD he really is.

 

[bodecea]

Just because you are heartless and would kick your child out does not mean I would. I guess I should cart him down to social services so he can apply for Food Stamps, after all my income will have no bearing on whether he gets them or not due to the fact legally he can not be my dependent according to retards like you.

It's called....ENABLING. But, whatever floats your boat.

Wrong you fucking retard, he has a medical condition that prevents him from working, but since I can not afford to pay for the doctors to document it it is undocumented.

Uh huh....

Perhaps next fucking time you may actually learn of what you pretend to speak of before opening that idiotic mouth and shoving both feet in?

Someone seems a little overly defensive. Hmmmm. I can certainly understand why now.

 

[xotoxi]

Just because you are heartless and would kick your child out does not mean I would.

How liberal of you.

I would be on his ass and force him to be an adult, rather than enabling him to be a lazy fuck.

Ohh look another FUCKING MORON speaking out of his ass with no facts or even a semblance of trying to discern facts before announcing loudly to the rest of the board what a pea brained fucking RETARD he really is.

Okay...maybe you can give us some more facts.

Does your son have a disability which precludes him from working or living on his own?

If so, I applaud you for supporting him...and I think it is wrong that you are not able to consider him a dependent.

Now that you've opened up about your son...you probably should just spill it, so that people don't mistakenly assume that you are just supporting a freeloading bum.

 

[bodecea]

ZOMGGGGG!!! I just heard someone call into a right wing hate radio show, identify themselves as a teabagger and say that right wing teabaggers should write "FED" across the census and mail it back!!!

ZOMG!!! I can't wait until Jon Stewart reports this!!!

You have to be very careful. If you allow that envelope in your house, it will secretly plant bugs inside your home so that Obama can hear everything you and your family says...and then his secret police can come put you in a camp.........after they are done taking away all the guns.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

How liberal of you.

I would be on his ass and force him to be an adult, rather than enabling him to be a lazy fuck.

Ohh look another FUCKING MORON speaking out of his ass with no facts or even a semblance of trying to discern facts before announcing loudly to the rest of the board what a pea brained fucking RETARD he really is.

Okay...maybe you can give us some more facts.

Does your son have a disability which precludes him from working or living on his own?

If so, I applaud you for supporting him...and I think it is wrong that you are not able to consider him a dependent.

Now that you've opened up about your son...you probably should just spill it, so that people don't mistakenly assume that you are just supporting a freeloading bum.

First off it is NONE of your business. Second off even IF he were a freeloader, THAT is MY business and until 3 years ago he could be claimed as a dependent.

My Mother in Law who is 80 is our dependent also. And we have to jump through hoops for her as well. She lives here on a green card and does not collect social security.

It is MY business whom I chose to support. And if I am providing complete and total support of them, they are MY dependent. All that is required for the Government is their social security number to verify they are not working. DIRECT family members not Joe blow off the street.

 

[bodecea]

Ohh look another FUCKING MORON speaking out of his ass with no facts or even a semblance of trying to discern facts before announcing loudly to the rest of the board what a pea brained fucking RETARD he really is.

Okay...maybe you can give us some more facts.

Does your son have a disability which precludes him from working or living on his own?

If so, I applaud you for supporting him...and I think it is wrong that you are not able to consider him a dependent.

Now that you've opened up about your son...you probably should just spill it, so that people don't mistakenly assume that you are just supporting a freeloading bum.

First off it is NONE of your business.

Of course, that then begs the question why did you bring him up?

Second off even IF he were a freeloader, THAT is MY business and until 3 years ago he could be claimed as a dependent.

You mean YOUR business that YOU brought up as an example in this thread.

My Mother in Law who is 80 is our dependent also. And we have to jump through hoops for her as well. She lives here on a green card and does not collect social security.

It is MY business whom I chose to support. And if I am providing complete and total support of them, they are MY dependent. All that is required for the Government is their social security number to verify they are not working. DIRECT family members not Joe blow off the street.

Can everyone just imagine if people were allowed to declare ANYONE THEY WANT to be dependents without a verifiable, legitimate reason?

Talk about your Welfare State......but I guess it's ok if YOU are doing it, right Clerk?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Okay...maybe you can give us some more facts.

Does your son have a disability which precludes him from working or living on his own?

If so, I applaud you for supporting him...and I think it is wrong that you are not able to consider him a dependent.

Now that you've opened up about your son...you probably should just spill it, so that people don't mistakenly assume that you are just supporting a freeloading bum.

First off it is NONE of your business.

Of course, that then begs the question why did you bring him up?

Second off even IF he were a freeloader, THAT is MY business and until 3 years ago he could be claimed as a dependent.

You mean YOUR business that YOU brought up as an example in this thread.

My Mother in Law who is 80 is our dependent also. And we have to jump through hoops for her as well. She lives here on a green card and does not collect social security.

It is MY business whom I chose to support. And if I am providing complete and total support of them, they are MY dependent. All that is required for the Government is their social security number to verify they are not working. DIRECT family members not Joe blow off the street.

Can everyone just imagine if people were allowed to declare ANYONE THEY WANT to be dependents without a verifiable, legitimate reason?

Talk about your Welfare State......but I guess it's ok if YOU are doing it, right Clerk?

MORON, already covered it. And last I checked if I am footing the entire bill for someones upkeep and daily living they are NOT on public dole of ANYKIND. Further I covered direct family members, which you chose to ignore.

Now just admit you put both your feet in your mouth and shut up. Or just shut up, either is acceptable.

 

[bodecea]

First off it is NONE of your business.

Of course, that then begs the question why did you bring him up?



You mean YOUR business that YOU brought up as an example in this thread.

My Mother in Law who is 80 is our dependent also. And we have to jump through hoops for her as well. She lives here on a green card and does not collect social security.

It is MY business whom I chose to support. And if I am providing complete and total support of them, they are MY dependent. All that is required for the Government is their social security number to verify they are not working. DIRECT family members not Joe blow off the street.

Can everyone just imagine if people were allowed to declare ANYONE THEY WANT to be dependents without a verifiable, legitimate reason?

Talk about your Welfare State......but I guess it's ok if YOU are doing it, right Clerk?

MORON, already covered it. And last I checked if I am footing the entire bill for someones upkeep and daily living they are NOT on public dole of ANYKIND. Further I covered direct family members, which you chose to ignore.

Now just admit you put both your feet in your mouth and shut up. Or just shut up, either is acceptable.

Again, I don't get this you announcing yourself at the beginning of your posts.

Fine, you are footing the bill...then don't bitch about the census. Take it like a man...instead of a whining clerk.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Of course, that then begs the question why did you bring him up?



You mean YOUR business that YOU brought up as an example in this thread.



Can everyone just imagine if people were allowed to declare ANYONE THEY WANT to be dependents without a verifiable, legitimate reason?

Talk about your Welfare State......but I guess it's ok if YOU are doing it, right Clerk?

MORON, already covered it. And last I checked if I am footing the entire bill for someones upkeep and daily living they are NOT on public dole of ANYKIND. Further I covered direct family members, which you chose to ignore.

Now just admit you put both your feet in your mouth and shut up. Or just shut up, either is acceptable.

Again, I don't get this you announcing yourself at the beginning of your posts.

Fine, you are footing the bill...then don't bitch about the census. Take it like a man...instead of a whining clerk.

Making ignorant assumptions again I see. Now be so kind as to go back through this thread and quote where I said I had any problem with the census. That I was not going to participate?

 

[bodecea]

The key issue here is that according to current population estimates, Minnesota is right on the cusp of losing one of its eight seats in Congress

Isn't that Bachmann's wish?

Smaller government?

RETARD ALERT, RETARD ALERT. Hate to break it to you moron but no census will ever shrink the Government. Its purpose is to ensure the ALLOWED Representatives are properly apportioned through out the several States based on population. It further is to ensure the proper taxes, levies and duties are UNIFORMLY applied to each State based on population. Something that has lost a lot of umpfy since we have INCOME TAX now.

Bumpity

 

[bodecea]

Why does the Government need to know any more then how many people live in a household? The Representative Seats are apportioned based on population alone, nothing else matters.

When this came around ten years ago...did you say the same thing?

10 years ago the Government was not trying to establish who is or is not mentally ill for one. 10 years ago the census was not political, this being the first Administration to EVER move the Census into the White House and try to use a n openly BIASED (ACORN) organization to run the census. 10 Years ago the party in power was not threatened with losing seats in their strong hold States to traditionally their opponent States.

BUT to the point, the op claimed that the congressperson was in danger of something for pointing out the basic simple LEGAL fact that all the Government needs to apportion house seats is the NUMBER of people living in each location. The purpose of the Census is to apportion seats and to ensure fair and uniform taxation, levies and duties are applied. Or perhaps you can show us some other purpose in the Constitution?

Bumpity deux

 

[bodecea]

Hmm, Why Has Bachmann Stopped Bashing The Census? | TPMDC

The state of Minnesota could be on the verge of losing a House seat after 2010 -- and interestingly enough, it's been a while since we heard Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) talk about refusing to participate in the Census.

Last year, Bachmann repeatedly said she would defy the Census by not completely filling out the information on the forms, but would instead only give the number of people in her household. She said that Census data was used to conduct the 1940's Japanese-American internment, and warned that the government was seeking to gather information about people's mental health. But as far as we can tell, her last anti-Census public statement was in August.

The largest newspaper in Minnesota, the Star-Tribune, is calling on the state's citizens to vigorously participate in the Census. The key issue here is that according to current population estimates, Minnesota is right on the cusp of losing one of its eight seats in Congress, and will be in a close competition with Missouri, Texas and California for that district. The Strib points out that "Minnesota traditionally has had one big advantage -- the cooperation of its civic-minded citizens."

And this situation proves that despite her rhetoric, Bachmann is just another politician, although a bit more loony than the usual cast of characters.

Why does the Government need to know any more then how many people live in a household? The Representative Seats are apportioned based on population alone, nothing else matters.

Bumpity Tres

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Hmm, Why Has Bachmann Stopped Bashing The Census? | TPMDC



And this situation proves that despite her rhetoric, Bachmann is just another politician, although a bit more loony than the usual cast of characters.

Why does the Government need to know any more then how many people live in a household? The Representative Seats are apportioned based on population alone, nothing else matters.

Bumpity Tres

Now go though the three posts you quoted and show where I said I was not going to participate, that I would not allow the census in my house, that I would not answer the questions asked on said census. I realize critical thinking is not your strong suit, but actually try it.

 

[del]

Hmm, Why Has Bachmann Stopped Bashing The Census? | TPMDC



And this situation proves that despite her rhetoric, Bachmann is just another politician, although a bit more loony than the usual cast of characters.

Why does the Government need to know any more then how many people live in a household? The Representative Seats are apportioned based on population alone, nothing else matters.

Bumpity Tres

and yet there's nothing here or in the other two posts about not participating in the census.

fail

 

[bodecea]

Why does the Government need to know any more then how many people live in a household? The Representative Seats are apportioned based on population alone, nothing else matters.

Bumpity Tres

Now go though the three posts you quoted and show where I said I was not going to participate,

I will do that as soon as you show where in any of MY posts I made the claim that you said you weren't going to participate.

that I would not allow the census in my house, that I would not answer the questions asked on said census. I realize critical thinking is not your strong suit, but actually try it.

Actually, it is YOU who is quite obviously in over your head. But I'm beginning to get a bigger picture of why.

 

[bodecea]

Why does the Government need to know any more then how many people live in a household? The Representative Seats are apportioned based on population alone, nothing else matters.

Bumpity Tres

and yet there's nothing here or in the other two posts about not participating in the census.

fail

Del, in all honesty....find where I said that the Clerk claimed he was not participating in the census. I said he was bitching about the census. Would you like me to point it out again?

 

[del]

Bumpity Tres

and yet there's nothing here or in the other two posts about not participating in the census.

fail

Del, in all honesty....find where I said that the Clerk claimed he was not participating in the census. I said he was bitching about the census. Would you like me to point it out again?

in all honesty, he asked you to show where he said he wouldn't participate and you bumped three posts, none of which showed that.

fail