Astroturf . . . Paid Trolls Floods Social Media to Counteract Negative News About Hillary . . .

If the system was not so corrupt and Obama actually listened to the people Trump would not have happened.

Nah, if the Republicans chose to be represented by John Kasich or Marco Rubio, a crooked fag like Donald would not of happened.


ROFL! You think some open borders douche bag like Kasih or Rubio would be a benefit to the working people of this country? Just admit you're a Hillary butthole sucking douche bag and get it over with.
 
Do you have a comprehension problem? I said because Obama fucked this country over people did not trust or want any politician. They saw a chance to stop the madness.

Yeah, when people get sick of the way doctors treat them they should go to the garbage man for surgery.
 
A "real candidate" like Bush or Kasich? I'd rather have Hillary win that vote for either of those douche bags.

I'd throw Cruz in there too but based on that statement, I can't help you. That's the problem. It's really easy to bash libs but at least they stay together.
 
It appears we have some of these paid trolls posting right here in USMB. Oreo is one of them.

https://stream.org/astroturf-outrage-machine-of-paid-trolls-floods-social-media-to-counteract-negative-news-about-hillary-clinton/

A significant portion of online support for Hillary Clinton is manufactured by paid “astroturf” trolls: a large team of supporters who spend long hours responding to negative news on the internet about her. The Clinton SuperPAC Correct the Record, which is affiliated with her campaign, acknowledged in an April press release that it was spending $1 million on project “Breaking Barriers” to pay people to respond to negative information about Clinton on social media sites like Facebook, Reddit, Instagram and Twitter. That amount has since increased to over $6 million. The trolls create a false impression that Clinton has more support than she really does, because one supporter will frequently create multiple anonymous accounts.

Libby Watson of The Sunlight Foundation observed that the astroturf effort goes far beyond merely defending Clinton, to targeting and intimidating those who criticize her. She told The Daily Beast, “This seems to be going after essentially random individuals online.”

Brian Donahue, chief executive of the consulting firm Craft Media/Digital, explained the troll operation to The Los Angeles Times, “It is meant to appear to be coming organically from people and their social media networks in a groundswell of activism, when in fact it is highly paid and highly tactical.” He went on, “That is what the Clinton campaign has always been about. It runs the risk of being exactly what their opponents accuse them of being: a campaign that appears to be populist but is a smokescreen that is paid and brought to you by lifetime political operatives and high-level consultants.”

Why would they be trolls?

Are you calling every poster on USMB who 'counteracts' negative posting about Trump a 'TROLL'?
 
ROFL! You think some open borders douche bag like Kasih or Rubio would be a benefit to the working people of this country?

Loaded question. Neither were for open borders.

Open borders are better for the economy though. We had too many unfilled laborer jobs even during the recession. Although a lot of people whine about it, competitive labor is good for the economy.
 
A "real candidate" like Bush or Kasich? I'd rather have Hillary win that vote for either of those douche bags.

I am calling bullshit on your lesser of two evils nonsense.

It is quite obvious that you are acting like a rebellious little girl. You do not actually care for right or wrong.
 
A "real candidate" like Bush or Kasich? I'd rather have Hillary win that vote for either of those douche bags.

I'd throw Cruz in there too but based on that statement, I can't help you. That's the problem. It's really easy to bash libs but at least they stay together.
Are you pretending that you aren't some leftwing douche bag?
 
A "real candidate" like Bush or Kasich? I'd rather have Hillary win that vote for either of those douche bags.

I am calling bullshit on your lesser of two evils nonsense.

It is quite obvious that you are acting like a rebellious little girl. You do not actually care for right or wrong.
So if Hitler was running for office, you wouldn't vote for his main competitor?

Is that really what you're saying?
 
ROFL! You think some open borders douche bag like Kasih or Rubio would be a benefit to the working people of this country?

Loaded question. Neither were for open borders.

Open borders are better for the economy though. We had too many unfilled laborer jobs even during the recession. Although a lot of people whine about it, competitive labor is good for the economy.
They were both for amnesty, which is the same as being for open borders. Furthermore, if you give 30 million illegal aliens the right to vote, you can kiss good by to the chances of ever electing a Republican to the presidency.
 
So if Hitler was running for office, you wouldn't vote for his main competitor?

Is that really what you're saying?

Are you comparing John Kasich and Ted Cruz to Hitler?

You just said you would of rather voted for Hillary Clinton rather than those two blokes. It is quite obvious that you are bullshitting yourself.
 
It appears we have some of these paid trolls posting right here in USMB. Oreo is one of them.

https://stream.org/astroturf-outrage-machine-of-paid-trolls-floods-social-media-to-counteract-negative-news-about-hillary-clinton/

A significant portion of online support for Hillary Clinton is manufactured by paid “astroturf” trolls: a large team of supporters who spend long hours responding to negative news on the internet about her. The Clinton SuperPAC Correct the Record, which is affiliated with her campaign, acknowledged in an April press release that it was spending $1 million on project “Breaking Barriers” to pay people to respond to negative information about Clinton on social media sites like Facebook, Reddit, Instagram and Twitter. That amount has since increased to over $6 million. The trolls create a false impression that Clinton has more support than she really does, because one supporter will frequently create multiple anonymous accounts.

Libby Watson of The Sunlight Foundation observed that the astroturf effort goes far beyond merely defending Clinton, to targeting and intimidating those who criticize her. She told The Daily Beast, “This seems to be going after essentially random individuals online.”

Brian Donahue, chief executive of the consulting firm Craft Media/Digital, explained the troll operation to The Los Angeles Times, “It is meant to appear to be coming organically from people and their social media networks in a groundswell of activism, when in fact it is highly paid and highly tactical.” He went on, “That is what the Clinton campaign has always been about. It runs the risk of being exactly what their opponents accuse them of being: a campaign that appears to be populist but is a smokescreen that is paid and brought to you by lifetime political operatives and high-level consultants.”

Why would they be trolls?

Are you calling every poster on USMB who 'counteracts' negative posting about Trump a 'TROLL'?
It's hard to know. You certainly all behave like paid trolls.
 
Are you pretending that you aren't some leftwing douche bag?

Are you pretending to be this stupid or does it come naturally? Wait, if they're all like you it would explain how you guys were dumb enough to nominate Trump.
 
They were both for amnesty, which is the same as being for open borders.

Not really.

Furthermore, if you give 30 million illegal aliens the right to vote, you can kiss good by to the chances of ever electing a Republican to the presidency.

On the contrary, the GOP war on immigration has actually disenfranchised Republicans from the very important Latino minority vote. The immigrant populations are more socially and fiscally conservative, but they allign with the Democrats due to their status as immigrants.

Anyways, I do not want a Republican or a Democrat president. I find your silly political games to be amusing though, like how your tool ass got tricked into voting for a big government socialist just because he calls himself a Republican.
 
They were both for amnesty, which is the same as being for open borders.

Not really.

Furthermore, if you give 30 million illegal aliens the right to vote, you can kiss good by to the chances of ever electing a Republican to the presidency.

On the contrary, the GOP war on immigration has actually disenfranchised Republicans from the very important Latino minority vote. The immigrant populations are more socially and fiscally conservative, but they allign with the Democrats due to their status as immigrants.

Anyways, I do not want a Republican or a Democrat president. I find your silly political games to be amusing though, like how your tool ass got tricked into voting for a big government socialist just because he calls himself a Republican.

You keep attacking Trump and defending Hillary. Who do you think you're fooling?
 
Furthermore, if you give 30 million illegal aliens the right to vote, you can kiss good by to the chances of ever electing a Republican to the presidency.

This is exactly what makes you a moron. If you idiots think for one minute (I know, it hurts but try anyway) there's AT LEAST 2 candidates that could have appealed to women and the minority vote. Instead you nominate an idiot who alienates them.

Now the only support is from the people who love the sound of a wall.
 
Last edited:
Furthermore, if you give 30 million illegal aliens the right to vote, you can kiss good by to the chances of ever electing a Republican to the presidency.

This is exactly what makes you a moron. If you idiots think for one minute (I know, it hurts but try anyway) there's AT LEAST

What have you posted that indicates you aren't a Hillary butthole sucking douche bag?
 

Forum List

Back
Top