Yes you did. He has done nothing to counter your citattions or their support for your statement.No we are back to it's only in your head. I gave you 2 supreme court rulings that ruled the only weapons the second amendment protects are those suitable for military use. A state cannot create laws that will violate the constitution or go beyond the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court.
The premise of the OP stands, that 'assault weapons' are the best example of the sort of 'arms' protected by the constitution, and as such any ban in them is necessarily constitutional.
I have done nothing? I see. Well.... you all enjoy your circle jerk.
He's right you have not countered any argument against your claim.