As we all know, Trump is under investigation in GA........

[berg80]

No, they didn’t. They weren’t taken up based on procedural grounds. No court case even looked at the evidence, that’s how scared they were of it.

That is factually incorrect. You are either misinformed or lying.

 

[harmonica]

MORE PROOF you act like a nazi--indicted does not mean guilty

I can't help noticing you still haven't refuted any of the evidence against him.


E. Efforts to fire Mueller

Obstructive act (p. 87): Former White House Counsel Don McGahn is a “credible witness” in providing evidence that Trump indeed attempted to fire Mueller. This “would qualify as an obstructive act” if the firing “would naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.”

Nexus (p. 89): “Substantial evidence” indicates that, at this point, Trump was aware that “his conduct was under investigation by a federal prosecutor who could present any evidence of federal crimes to a grand jury.”

Intent (p. 89): “Substantial evidence indicates that the President’s attempts to remove the Special Counsel were linked to the Special Counsel’s oversight of investigations that involved the President’s conduct[.]”

.....your mind is warped--no need to refute it --hasn't been proved..EXACTLY like saying there is a god--not need to prove there isn't a god when no one has proved there is one

 

[Moonglow]

Trump clearly tried to influence the people in control of the election numbers to sway a positive result for him.

Cheating in the tens of millions column influenced the election

Yeah, tens of millions of people cheated the system because there is no security in place to keep people from doing that...

No, because the game is rigged by those in control. It is 95% complete.

Really, so now you admit that Trump was elected via cheating and fraud. How nice of you to admit.

 

[berg80]

.....your mind is warped--no need to refute it

IOW, you can't refute the evidence. Got it.


I. Order to McGahn to deny Trump’s order to fire Mueller

Obstructive act (p. 118): This effort “would qualify as an obstructive act if it had the natural tendency to constrain McGahn from testifying truthfully or to undermine his credibility as a potential witness[.]” There is “some evidence” that Trump genuinely believed press reports that he had ordered McGahn to fire Mueller were wrong. However, “[o]ther evidence cuts against that understanding of the president’s conduct”—and the special counsel lists a great deal more evidence on this latter point.

Nexus (p. 119): At this point “the Special Counsel’s use of a grand jury had been further confirmed by the return of several indictments.” Mueller’s office had indicated to Trump’s lawyers that it was investigating obstruction, and Trump knew that McGahn had already been interviewed by Mueller on the topic. “That evidence indicates the President’s awareness” that his efforts to fire Mueller were relevant to official proceedings. Trump “likely contemplated the ongoing investigation and any proceedings arising from it” in directing McGahn to create a false record of the earlier interaction.

Intent (p. 120): “Substantial evidence indicates that … the President acted for the purpose of influencing McGahn’s account in order to deflect or prevent further scrutiny” of Trump.

 

[berg80]

.....your mind is warped--no need to refute it

Face it. You are not equipped to deal with the facts.

 

[harmonica]

.....your mind is warped--no need to refute it

Face it. You are not equipped to deal with the facts.

..it's innocent before guilty--not your nazi crap

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Cheating in the tens of millions column influenced the election

Now all you need is proof.

No proof is necessary as evidenced by 2 House impeachments. Democrats set the precident and now suddenly don’t want to follow it.

The two impeachment aquitals prove nothing except that most Reblicans are spineless cowards that will not buck Trump or his base of moronic minions

Really? MeBelle | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum ....Please don't try to tell anyone that the outcome exonerated him.

 

[berg80]

.....your mind is warped--no need to refute it

Face it. You are not equipped to deal with the facts.

..it's innocent before guilty--not your nazi crap

Face it. You are not equipped to deal with the facts.

 

[berg80]

Explainer: Trump's acts as president are 'fair game' for criminal charges

Donald Trump's legal troubles are far from over, despite his acquittal in the U.S. Senate impeachment trial that ended on Saturday.

www.reuters.com

 

[Hellbilly]

TDS: no sure, bend the curve. Post less demented TDS stuff than you did yesterday

They came up with a cure for TDS. Its called getting your ass kicked by Joe Biden in the election.
Bong!

 

[wamose]

All Trump ever did with any of his questioning was to try to get at the real results of the voting.

Did you notice all his court cases failed due to a lack of evidence?

Did you notice we don't have a justice system any more?

 

[berg80]

Did you notice we don't have a justice system any more?

No. It's just your perception because the courts through out Trump's baseless cases.

 

[The Mean One]

Ok, you're being investigated by GA.....would you rather be Pres. Trump or this pavement ape?

Nice deflection. Trump is facing criminal charges. Warnock is under investigation (Repubs are pissed he won the election) because the voter registration organization he sat on the board of turned in some forms 10 days late. BTW, I reported your racist references to Warnock.

I didn't think a fucking idiot like you would figure it out... that was for the normal people to decide who is in more trouble in GA.

BTW, I'm a Trumpanzee, remember? If you associate an ape reference to black people that's YOUR racist problem.

Filthy fucking animal.

Boy! You're really mad... go drink some moonshine and hump your sister/wife. Bubba

 

[surada]

....just like Russian Collusion/etc--fool me once-----twice-shame on you--you are stupid

It was proven he had unauthorized contact with Ruskies but get this, the GOP claimed the Dominion machines could not be manipulated by the Ruskies to change votes or create votes, then Trump says they can.. What a nut house.

How? They aren't connected to the internet.

 

[berg80]

I will never understand the slavish devotion of Trump's cult following to someone so undeserving.

 

[wamose]

I will never understand the slavish devotion of Trump's cult following to someone so undeserving.

It's not the person. What you don't understand are the ideas and the ambition and balls it takes to get them done.

 

[bripat9643]

Trump clearly tried to influence the people in control of the election numbers to sway a positive result for him.

So?

 

[Nostra]

......due to the call he made to various state officials trying to convince them to change the result of their election, which Biden won. An act that was included in the single article of impeachment. Would you be astonished, as I am, to learn GA Repubs are trying to amend their constitution in order to protect Dear Leader?

Georgia Republicans Are Trying to Change the Rules for Fani Willis’s Prosecution of Donald Trump for Election Crimes

It’s been less than a week since Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis publicly began an investigation into Donald Trump‘s phone call to Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, and Georgia Republicans are already trying in earnest to change the rules that apply to prosecutions of election crimes.

Georgia state Republicans introduced a resolution Thursday that seeks to change the Georgia State Constitution to mandate the use of state-wide grand juries in prosecutions involving election crimes. The move would force prosecutors to draw more grand jurors from predominantly Republican rural areas of the state.
https://lawandcrime.com/2020-electi...secution-of-donald-trump-for-election-crimes/

Now that's blind devotion, right out in the open. Showing just how important GA Repubs believe the cult of personality surrounding Crooked Donald is to the fortunes of the POT.

That's not the only thing angry Repubs are doing in the wake of Don's defeat.

State GOP lawmakers propose flurry of voting restrictions to placate Trump supporters, spurring fears of a backlash

GOP state lawmakers across the country have proposed a flurry of voting restrictions that they say are needed to restore confidence in U.S. elections, an effort intended to placate supporters of former president Donald Trump who believe his false claims that the 2020 outcome was rigged.

But the effort is dividing Republicans, some of whom are warning that it will tar the GOP as the party of voter suppression and give Democrats ammunition to mobilize their supporters ahead of the 2022 midterms.

The proposals include measures that would curtail eligibility to vote by mail and prohibit the use of ballot drop boxes. One bill in Georgia would block early voting on Sundays, which critics quickly labeled a flagrant attempt to thwart Souls to the Polls, the Democratic turnout effort that targets Black churchgoers on the final Sunday before an election.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...fab224-72ca-11eb-85fa-e0ccb3660358_story.html

State Republicans push new voting restrictions after Trump’s loss
State Republicans push new voting restrictions after Trump’s loss


Pennsylvania G.O.P.’s Push for More Power Over Judiciary Raises Alarms

When the Pennsylvania Supreme Court unanimously rejected a Republican attempt to overturn the state’s election results in November, Justice David N. Wecht issued his own pointed rebuke, condemning the G.O.P. effort as “futile” and “a dangerous game.”

“It is not our role to lend legitimacy to such transparent and untimely efforts to subvert the will of Pennsylvania voters,” wrote Justice Wecht, a Democrat who was elected to a 10-year term on the bench in 2016. “Courts should not decide elections when the will of the voters is clear.”

Now Pennsylvania Republicans have a plan to make it less likely that judges like Justice Wecht get in their way.
Pennsylvania G.O.P.’s Push for More Power Over Judiciary Raises Alarms

It used to be losing elections caused a different kind of response. A recognition of the need to make changes to the party's message, working harder, organizing better, maybe raising more money. The POT's response, perhaps a reflection of Dear Leader's proclivity for cheating (he has done it his whole life), is to change the rules.

“The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion." Chomsky

“Not merely the validity of experience, but the very existence of external reality was tacitly denied by their philosophy." Orwell

Get better soon.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Trump clearly tried to influence the people in control of the

And he clearly targeted more heavily black areas in his running diatribe, both in Georgia and in other states (PA, MI). So i can see how his legal team might be terrified of having too many minorities on the jury.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

In the court of public opinion?? No it isn't. And someone so innocent wouldn't be trying to change the rules to keep from being proven guilty, now would they?