As if we had any doubt.

[Czernobog]

Now that Social Conservatives are applauding, and support this:

Trump to roll back ObamaCare contraceptive mandate

while, simultaneously, applauding, and supporting this:

House passes 20-week abortion ban

They need to give up any pretence that their goal is anything short of ensuring that women are reduced to nothing more than baby-making procreation machines.

Now, some on the right are going to run in here, and whine about "free birth control", "Why should I pay..." blah, blah, blah. The problem is that the Contraception mandate wasn't about free birth control, and wasn't about government provided birth control. It was about requiring that employers insure that health coverage offered to their employees - which employees actually pay for - include provisions for birth control. So, it isn't free, and you aren't paying for dick.

Now, I'm certain that Republicans would love everyone to review these actions as separate, and unrelated - which is why they don't normally do things like this, at the same time. That way, they can justify removing birth control access with, "Whaddoyucare? You can always get an abortion". And the typical response to the abortion issue is. "Why should the woman get a do-over, if she's too irresponsible to use her `free' birth control,"

It's kinda delicious that Republicans were incompetent enough to do both of these things, at. the. Same. Time. It removes from them the ability to use either of those disingenuous arguments.

Which leaves us with only the thing that we knew all along: Social Conservatives expect women to be nothing more than baby-making, reproductive procreation machines, and living incubators.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Now, some on the right are going to run in here, and whine about "free birth control", "Why should I pay..." blah, blah, blah. The problem is that the Contraception mandate wasn't about free birth control, and wasn't about government provided birth control. It was about requiring that employers insure that health coverage offered to their employees - which employees actually pay for - include provisions for birth control. So, it isn't free, and you aren't paying for dick.

Of course we are, stupid. The more you require insurance companies to cover, the higher premiums we all have to pay to cover it. Apparently, you failed math class.

Furthermore, please tell me what the fuck your employer has to do with your sex life.

 

[Czernobog]

Now, some on the right are going to run in here, and whine about "free birth control", "Why should I pay..." blah, blah, blah. The problem is that the Contraception mandate wasn't about free birth control, and wasn't about government provided birth control. It was about requiring that employers insure that health coverage offered to their employees - which employees actually pay for - include provisions for birth control. So, it isn't free, and you aren't paying for dick.

Of course we are, stupid. The more you require insurance companies to cover, the higher premiums we all have to pay to cover it. Apparently, you failed math class.

Furthermore, please tell me what the fuck your employer has to do with your sex life.

Hey, stupid. Prescription coverage is already covered in most insurance ;policies. There is zero evidence that including birth control in that prescription coverage changes the premiums. Furthermore, dumbass, did I say that the employer was involved in a person's sex life? Employers don't seem to have any problem with insurance covering your Viagra for your limp dick, but suddenly birth control is "involving your employer in your sex life"?!? Fuck off with that lame bullshit!

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Now that Social Conservatives are applauding, and support this:

Trump to roll back ObamaCare contraceptive mandate

while, simultaneously, applauding, and supporting this:

House passes 20-week abortion ban

They need to give up any pretence that their goal is anything short of ensuring that women are reduced to nothing more than baby-making procreation machines.

Now, some on the right are going to run in here, and whine about "free birth control", "Why should I pay..." blah, blah, blah. The problem is that the Contraception mandate wasn't about free birth control, and wasn't about government provided birth control. It was about requiring that employers insure that health coverage offered to their employees - which employees actually pay for - include provisions for birth control. So, it isn't free, and you aren't paying for dick.

Now, I'm certain that Republicans would love everyone to review these actions as separate, and unrelated - which is why they don't normally do things like this, at the same time. That way, they can justify removing birth control access with, "Whaddoyucare? You can always get an abortion". And the typical response to the abortion issue is. "Why should the woman get a do-over, if she's too irresponsible to use her `free' birth control,"

It's kinda delicious that Republicans were incompetent enough to do both of these things, at. the. Same. Time. It removes from them the ability to use either of those disingenuous arguments.

Which leaves us with only the thing that we knew all along: Social Conservatives expect women to be nothing more than baby-making, reproductive procreation machines, and living incubators.

another set back for the ol hammer and sickle gang I see...look at the bright side, the yankees are in the post season

 

[AVISSSER]

Now that Social Conservatives are applauding, and support this:

Trump to roll back ObamaCare contraceptive mandate

while, simultaneously, applauding, and supporting this:

House passes 20-week abortion ban

They need to give up any pretence that their goal is anything short of ensuring that women are reduced to nothing more than baby-making procreation machines.

Now, some on the right are going to run in here, and whine about "free birth control", "Why should I pay..." blah, blah, blah. The problem is that the Contraception mandate wasn't about free birth control, and wasn't about government provided birth control. It was about requiring that employers insure that health coverage offered to their employees - which employees actually pay for - include provisions for birth control. So, it isn't free, and you aren't paying for dick.

Now, I'm certain that Republicans would love everyone to review these actions as separate, and unrelated - which is why they don't normally do things like this, at the same time. That way, they can justify removing birth control access with, "Whaddoyucare? You can always get an abortion". And the typical response to the abortion issue is. "Why should the woman get a do-over, if she's too irresponsible to use her `free' birth control,"

It's kinda delicious that Republicans were incompetent enough to do both of these things, at. the. Same. Time. It removes from them the ability to use either of those disingenuous arguments.

Which leaves us with only the thing that we knew all along: Social Conservatives expect women to be nothing more than baby-making, reproductive procreation machines, and living incubators.

another set back for the ol hammer and sickle gang I see...look at the bright side, the yankees are in the post season

Not for long!

 

[AVISSSER]

Now, some on the right are going to run in here, and whine about "free birth control", "Why should I pay..." blah, blah, blah. The problem is that the Contraception mandate wasn't about free birth control, and wasn't about government provided birth control. It was about requiring that employers insure that health coverage offered to their employees - which employees actually pay for - include provisions for birth control. So, it isn't free, and you aren't paying for dick.

Of course we are, stupid. The more you require insurance companies to cover, the higher premiums we all have to pay to cover it. Apparently, you failed math class.

Furthermore, please tell me what the fuck your employer has to do with your sex life.

Hey, stupid. Prescription coverage is already covered in most insurance ;policies. There is zero evidence that including birth control in that prescription coverage changes the premiums. Furthermore, dumbass, did I say that the employer was involved in a person's sex life? Employers don't seem to have any problem with insurance covering your Viagra for your limp dick, but suddenly birth control is "involving your employer in your sex life"?!? Fuck off with that lame bullshit!

Every dime an insurance company pays affects premiums. ALL costs are passed to the consumer.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Now that Social Conservatives are applauding, and support this:

Trump to roll back ObamaCare contraceptive mandate

while, simultaneously, applauding, and supporting this:

House passes 20-week abortion ban

They need to give up any pretence that their goal is anything short of ensuring that women are reduced to nothing more than baby-making procreation machines.

Now, some on the right are going to run in here, and whine about "free birth control", "Why should I pay..." blah, blah, blah. The problem is that the Contraception mandate wasn't about free birth control, and wasn't about government provided birth control. It was about requiring that employers insure that health coverage offered to their employees - which employees actually pay for - include provisions for birth control. So, it isn't free, and you aren't paying for dick.

Now, I'm certain that Republicans would love everyone to review these actions as separate, and unrelated - which is why they don't normally do things like this, at the same time. That way, they can justify removing birth control access with, "Whaddoyucare? You can always get an abortion". And the typical response to the abortion issue is. "Why should the woman get a do-over, if she's too irresponsible to use her `free' birth control,"

It's kinda delicious that Republicans were incompetent enough to do both of these things, at. the. Same. Time. It removes from them the ability to use either of those disingenuous arguments.

Which leaves us with only the thing that we knew all along: Social Conservatives expect women to be nothing more than baby-making, reproductive procreation machines, and living incubators.

another set back for the ol hammer and sickle gang I see...look at the bright side, the yankees are in the post season

Not for long!

Indians look tough...very good team...Francona is so underrated...yanks should never ever be counted out though

 

[EvilCat Breath]

This is not a prohibition of contraception. Contraception is not banned. It gives employers who have strong feelings about contracaption an option. Most employers will still cover some form of contracaption. They don't cover condoms now. They don't cover cervical caps. They don't cover plan b. They don't cover birth control pills bought over the counter on a pharmacist written prescription.

Insurance doesn't cover many kinds of medications. Most in fact. So what's the big deal?

 

[AVISSSER]

Now that Social Conservatives are applauding, and support this:

Trump to roll back ObamaCare contraceptive mandate

while, simultaneously, applauding, and supporting this:

House passes 20-week abortion ban

They need to give up any pretence that their goal is anything short of ensuring that women are reduced to nothing more than baby-making procreation machines.

Now, some on the right are going to run in here, and whine about "free birth control", "Why should I pay..." blah, blah, blah. The problem is that the Contraception mandate wasn't about free birth control, and wasn't about government provided birth control. It was about requiring that employers insure that health coverage offered to their employees - which employees actually pay for - include provisions for birth control. So, it isn't free, and you aren't paying for dick.

Now, I'm certain that Republicans would love everyone to review these actions as separate, and unrelated - which is why they don't normally do things like this, at the same time. That way, they can justify removing birth control access with, "Whaddoyucare? You can always get an abortion". And the typical response to the abortion issue is. "Why should the woman get a do-over, if she's too irresponsible to use her `free' birth control,"

It's kinda delicious that Republicans were incompetent enough to do both of these things, at. the. Same. Time. It removes from them the ability to use either of those disingenuous arguments.

Which leaves us with only the thing that we knew all along: Social Conservatives expect women to be nothing more than baby-making, reproductive procreation machines, and living incubators.

another set back for the ol hammer and sickle gang I see...look at the bright side, the yankees are in the post season

Not for long!

Indians look tough...very good team...Francona is so underrated...yanks should never ever be counted out though

Just as I am talking all this smack I turn on the TV and the Yanks hit their third of the night to go up 8-3 on the Tribe. lol!

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Now that Social Conservatives are applauding, and support this:

Trump to roll back ObamaCare contraceptive mandate

while, simultaneously, applauding, and supporting this:

House passes 20-week abortion ban

They need to give up any pretence that their goal is anything short of ensuring that women are reduced to nothing more than baby-making procreation machines.

Now, some on the right are going to run in here, and whine about "free birth control", "Why should I pay..." blah, blah, blah. The problem is that the Contraception mandate wasn't about free birth control, and wasn't about government provided birth control. It was about requiring that employers insure that health coverage offered to their employees - which employees actually pay for - include provisions for birth control. So, it isn't free, and you aren't paying for dick.

Now, I'm certain that Republicans would love everyone to review these actions as separate, and unrelated - which is why they don't normally do things like this, at the same time. That way, they can justify removing birth control access with, "Whaddoyucare? You can always get an abortion". And the typical response to the abortion issue is. "Why should the woman get a do-over, if she's too irresponsible to use her `free' birth control,"

It's kinda delicious that Republicans were incompetent enough to do both of these things, at. the. Same. Time. It removes from them the ability to use either of those disingenuous arguments.

Which leaves us with only the thing that we knew all along: Social Conservatives expect women to be nothing more than baby-making, reproductive procreation machines, and living incubators.

another set back for the ol hammer and sickle gang I see...look at the bright side, the yankees are in the post season

Not for long!

Indians look tough...very good team...Francona is so underrated...yanks should never ever be counted out though

Just as I am talking all this smack I turn on the TV and the Yanks hit their third of the night to go up 8-3 on the Tribe. lol!

meh...sports is all about talking smack.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Hey, stupid. Prescription coverage is already covered in most insurance ;policies.

Well then, you have nothing to worry about, so you can stop pretending you are so outraged

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Now that Social Conservatives are applauding, and support this:

Trump to roll back ObamaCare contraceptive mandate

while, simultaneously, applauding, and supporting this:

House passes 20-week abortion ban

They need to give up any pretence that their goal is anything short of ensuring that women are reduced to nothing more than baby-making procreation machines.

Now, some on the right are going to run in here, and whine about "free birth control", "Why should I pay..." blah, blah, blah. The problem is that the Contraception mandate wasn't about free birth control, and wasn't about government provided birth control. It was about requiring that employers insure that health coverage offered to their employees - which employees actually pay for - include provisions for birth control. So, it isn't free, and you aren't paying for dick.

Now, I'm certain that Republicans would love everyone to review these actions as separate, and unrelated - which is why they don't normally do things like this, at the same time. That way, they can justify removing birth control access with, "Whaddoyucare? You can always get an abortion". And the typical response to the abortion issue is. "Why should the woman get a do-over, if she's too irresponsible to use her `free' birth control,"

It's kinda delicious that Republicans were incompetent enough to do both of these things, at. the. Same. Time. It removes from them the ability to use either of those disingenuous arguments.

Which leaves us with only the thing that we knew all along: Social Conservatives expect women to be nothing more than baby-making, reproductive procreation machines, and living incubators.

another set back for the ol hammer and sickle gang I see...look at the bright side, the yankees are in the post season

Not for long!

Indians look tough...very good team...Francona is so underrated...yanks should never ever be counted out though

Just as I am talking all this smack I turn on the TV and the Yanks hit their third of the night to go up 8-3 on the Tribe. lol!

One heck of a comeback brother...and love "THE JAKE", awesome place.

 

[hadit]

Stop making me pay for somebody's boner pills. I have no problem with that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[hadit]

This is not a prohibition of contraception. Contraception is not banned. It gives employers who have strong feelings about contracaption an option. Most employers will still cover some form of contracaption. They don't cover condoms now. They don't cover cervical caps. They don't cover plan b. They don't cover birth control pills bought over the counter on a pharmacist written prescription.

Insurance doesn't cover many kinds of medications. Most in fact. So what's the big deal?

The big deal is emotion. That's what's fueling most of these diatribes. Facts and logic need not be present. They were told that the big mean people don't want women to have birth control, and that's all they need to start ranting and raving.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk