Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Your Indian name is Foot In Mouth.
You just applied selective contextualism like a good political bigot.
Okay, bud... so what context should we honor theConfederates.
Here's the thing In Germany, you won't find one monument to Hitler or his Generals. The Germans simply can't stop apologizing for what they did in WWII.
TheSouth should follow their fine example.
Sure.. Let's see. Who ELSE wants to erase ACTUAL history and in some cases -- just blow it up? Oh yeah. ISIS, the Taliban and most tyrannical govts.. That's who..
Censoring the story of Gettysburg at the Gettysburg memorial will just create a country of morons. That's the goal -- isn't it Joe??
?
Washington and Jefferson are of course everywhere throughout the nation, statues, streets, buildings, schools, our money, etc.
They're of course even on Mt Rushmore.
They owned slaves, so obviously at some point the focus will turn to these two as well as others, as today's liberals seek to cleanse the nation of anything pertaining to past sins.
They'll be coming folks, there is no question. You might not hear the footsteps now, but they'll be coming, it's simply a matter of time.
After the Confederates, Who's Next?
On Sept. 1, 1864, Union forces under Gen. William Tecumseh Sherman, victorious at Jonesborough, burned Atlanta and began the March to the Sea where Sherman's troops looted and pillaged farms and towns all along the 300-mile road to Savannah.
Captured in the Confederate defeat at Jonesborough was William Martin Buchanan of Okolona, Mississippi, who was transferred by rail to the Union POW stockade at Camp Douglas, Illinois.
By the standards of modernity, my great-grandfather, fighting to prevent the torching of Georgia's capital, was engaged in a criminal and immoral cause. And "Uncle Billy" Sherman was a liberator.
Under President Grant, Sherman took command of the Union army and ordered Gen. Philip Sheridan, who had burned the Shenandoah Valley to starve Virginia into submission, to corral the Plains Indians on reservations.
It is in dispute as to whether Sheridan said, "The only good Indian is a dead Indian." There is no dispute as to the contempt Sheridan had for the Indians, killing their buffalo to deprive them of food.
Today, great statues stand in the nation's capital, along with a Sherman and a Sheridan circle, to honor these most ruthless of generals in that bloodiest of wars that cost 620,000 American lives.
After the Confederates, Who's Next?
If we are to remove all the monuments to slavery, racism, segregation, etc., why don't we start with it's source, Democrat party?
Sure.. Let's see. Who ELSE wants to erase ACTUAL history and in some cases -- just blow it up? Oh yeah. ISIS, the Taliban and most tyrannical govts.. That's who..
Censoring the story of Gettysburg at the Gettysburg memorial will just create a country of morons. That's the goal -- isn't it Joe??
Naw, we already have a country of morons... We proved that back in November.
But here's the thing. The history was already censored. We let the South rewrite history so that they could about claiming it wasn't about slavery (it was) or that slavery wasn't that bad. You get awful movies like Gone with the Wind and Birth of a Nation that showed a sanitized version of history.
Here's the thing, there are no statues to Benedict Arnold. Why not? He's part of history.
Censoring history would be erasing Nathan Forrest from the Historical Record. No one wants to do that. Kids should be taught who he was and what he did. He just shouldn't be honored with a statue.
If we are to remove all the monuments to slavery, racism, segregation, etc., why don't we start with it's source, Democrat party?
When the Republicans stop being run by racists and religious nuts, we'll consider it. Unfortunately, only the Democrats seem to be on the right side of this issue.
If we are to remove all the monuments to slavery, racism, segregation, etc., why don't we start with it's source, Democrat party?
When the Republicans stop being run by racists and religious nuts, we'll consider it. Unfortunately, only the Democrats seem to be on the right side of this issue.
Bush was a POS so don't even try and pull that bullshit on me. Lincoln was an abolitionist? Not according to that letter.
The fact he abolished slavery says otherwise, Cocksucker Dale.
Sure.. Let's see. Who ELSE wants to erase ACTUAL history and in some cases -- just blow it up? Oh yeah. ISIS, the Taliban and most tyrannical govts.. That's who..
Censoring the story of Gettysburg at the Gettysburg memorial will just create a country of morons. That's the goal -- isn't it Joe??
Naw, we already have a country of morons... We proved that back in November.
But here's the thing. The history was already censored. We let the South rewrite history so that they could about claiming it wasn't about slavery (it was) or that slavery wasn't that bad. You get awful movies like Gone with the Wind and Birth of a Nation that showed a sanitized version of history.
Here's the thing, there are no statues to Benedict Arnold. Why not? He's part of history.
Censoring history would be erasing Nathan Forrest from the Historical Record. No one wants to do that. Kids should be taught who he was and what he did. He just shouldn't be honored with a statue.
We've seen it throughout the history: slavery, Jim Crow, KKK, segregation, lynching laws... yep, Democrats are always on the "right" side of the issue.
Slow Joe, why hasn't Albert Pike's statute been removed from a prominent place in Washington, D.C? He was a confederate general and started the KKK with the leadership based on Scottish Rite Freemasonry????
The fact that he said stated his goal was to save the union whether slavery was abolished or not says otherwise,
Like all wars, it came down to money and the ones that stood the most to gain from it like the ones financing.
I know that you want to believe that you have some kind of moral high ground and gives you a reason to look down on southern states unless they vote "leftard"....but like everything else in your miserable little life, you are wrong and totally misguided.
You only care about "minorities" if they vote leftard....anyone else is an "Uncle Tom" to your ilk and that's just the way it is.
Hillary on Negroes...
We've seen it throughout the history: slavery, Jim Crow, KKK, segregation, lynching laws... yep, Democrats are always on the "right" side of the issue.
Yes, when the Democrats were the conservative party, they stood for some shitty things. Now theyare the liberal party and they don't.
Slow Joe, why hasn't Albert Pike's statute been removed from a prominent place in Washington, D.C? He was a confederate general and started the KKK with the leadership based on Scottish Rite Freemasonry????
Probably because Pike was a Lizard person and the other Lizard People are against it.. We all know the Freemasons are a Lizard Man Front Group.
Oh, the KKK was actually started by Nathan Forrest, and they DO want to take his statue down.
The fact that he said stated his goal was to save the union whether slavery was abolished or not says otherwise,
really, because he said that to one person...
Here's let's play a Word Association game. I'll say the words that they didn't mean, you name the President.
"I am Not A Crook!"
"I did not trade arms for hostages"
"Read my Lips, No New Taxes"
"I did not have sex with that woman!"
"Mission Accomplished"
"If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor"...
So your whole argument here is that the Civil War wasn't about slavery because Lincoln PinkySwore to Horace Greeley that it wasn't... After which they no doubt did a Lizardman Freemason handshake.
I'm sorry,dude, I'm really trying to take you seriously, but it just ain't possible.
Okay, moving on...
Like all wars, it came down to money and the ones that stood the most to gain from it like the ones financing.
Exactly. The rich white people who were making a lot of money off of slavery started the war. That's the point. The dumb inbred southerner who got to catch musket balls and got their limbs sawn off with a rusty blade and no anesthetic, they didn't get anything out of it. But they fought for it anyway... that's what made them... stupid.
I know that you want to believe that you have some kind of moral high ground and gives you a reason to look down on southern states unless they vote "leftard"....but like everything else in your miserable little life, you are wrong and totally misguided.
There are many reasons to look down on the Southern States... This is just one of them. Thevery fact they still want to honor these people is the problem.
You see, any nation can be talked into the stupidity of war. But when you realize you were in the wrong, you don't honor the people who got you into this mess. It's why there are no statues to Hitler or his cronies in Germany today.
So that's what this is really about... not some obscure general like Pike who even history majors aren't familiar with. It's about people in the South just being unwilling to admit they were wrong.
You only care about "minorities" if they vote leftard....anyone else is an "Uncle Tom" to your ilk and that's just the way it is.
Well, yes, the 4% of blacks who vote Republican are pretty serious Uncle Toms. But in my lifetime (I don't belong to either political party) Democrats have done more for blacks than the GOP have. That's why they vote 96% Democratic.
No, Albert Pike was also a founder of the KKK and his book "Morals and Dogma is considered required reading for those introduced into the higher levels of Scottish Rite Freemasonry and the leadership of the KKK was like that of the masonic order.
No, Albert Pike was also a founder of the KKK and his book "Morals and Dogma is considered required reading for those introduced into the higher levels of Scottish Rite Freemasonry and the leadership of the KKK was like that of the masonic order.
The leadership of the Mormon Church was a bad knockoff of Masonry, too.
And Masonry is really big in the black community today, for some reason.
Damn, those Lizard People are devious!!!!
So, it is your contention that Union soldiers fought for the freeing of blacks in the south??? Is that what you are contending??? Yes or No........this is important before moving forward.......
So what is your fascination with lizard people? LMAO!!!!! Dude, try and defend your position instead of deflecting....
So what is your fascination with lizard people? LMAO!!!!! Dude, try and defend your position instead of deflecting....
Because when you go off spouting about Freemasons, Trilateralists, Bilderbergers, False Flags, 9/11 was a hoax, Jesuits, Bohemian Grove, the CFR, all you really need are Lizard People for a complete box set of crazy.
