This case is moving along quite nicely:
State's highest court to review fine for faith
Justices agree to reconsider penalty for New Mexico photographer
Published: 16 hours ago
by BOB UNRUH
State’s highest court to review fine for faith
This is an extremely important case if it ever gets to the SCOTUS.
One possible ruling says that artists must work for anybody willing to hire them. That is the exact opposite of the garbage the National Endowment for the Arts promotes to justify the filth government-approved artists put out with tax dollars.
Another possible ruling says artists decide for themselves which is more in line with NEA thinking, but it flies in the face of gay Rights, equal Rights, and liberalism's blah, blah, blah.
A third possible ruling says that there are two sets of rules; one for government “artists” and another set of rules for private sector artists.
For once in my life I would like to hear the ACLU’s take on a case in progress. I’d also like to hear what that old ACLU hack, Ruth Ginsburg, has to say if she writes the majority or minority opinion.
In a procedural notification signed by Joey D. Moya, the chief clerk of the New Mexico Supreme Court, the owners of Elane Photography and Vanessa Willock were told of the next step in the long-standing case, a schedule for briefs to be filed with the high court.
At issue is the demand from Willock and her then-partner that Elane Photography, owned and operated by Christians, provide their artistic talents for a same-sex commitment ceremony, even though the state does not recognize either civil unions or “marriage” between parties of the same sex.
XXXXX
“The Constitution clearly prohibits the state from forcing unwilling artists to advance a message with which they disagree,” he said.
State's highest court to review fine for faith
Justices agree to reconsider penalty for New Mexico photographer
Published: 16 hours ago
by BOB UNRUH
State’s highest court to review fine for faith
This is an extremely important case if it ever gets to the SCOTUS.
One possible ruling says that artists must work for anybody willing to hire them. That is the exact opposite of the garbage the National Endowment for the Arts promotes to justify the filth government-approved artists put out with tax dollars.
Another possible ruling says artists decide for themselves which is more in line with NEA thinking, but it flies in the face of gay Rights, equal Rights, and liberalism's blah, blah, blah.
A third possible ruling says that there are two sets of rules; one for government “artists” and another set of rules for private sector artists.
For once in my life I would like to hear the ACLU’s take on a case in progress. I’d also like to hear what that old ACLU hack, Ruth Ginsburg, has to say if she writes the majority or minority opinion.
Last edited: