Arizona sovereignty back on ballot
What this is:
Guess they've never heard of the 10th Amendment.
The funny thing about this is the Fed is usually the one providing the staffing, resources, and funding.
Seem like more a symbolic act of stupidity.
There really is no "ignoring" of federal laws -- they can opt-out of federal programs and turn down funding if they choose, but then their citizens may suffer unfairly. But which federal laws do they think they can ignore?
And AZ is always complaining that the Fed doesn't do enough immigration enforcement.
Make up your minds AZ.
What this is:
The 2014 election is more than 14 months away, and the field from governor to Legislature is far from set. But one thing is certain: Voters will get to decide on another state-sovereignty issue.
The yet-unnamed measure differs from the one voters defeated just last year. This measure, which the Legislature referred to the ballot, would let voters decide if they want to ignore some federal laws.
This has to do with any federal action the people or the Legislature deems to be unconstitutional, said state Sen. Chester Crandell, R-Heber,the measures primary author.
If voters approve the measure, it would allow lawmakers, or the voters directly, to decide on a case-by-case basis if the state should withhold staffing or other resources needed to carry out a federal policy. Topics could range from federal efforts to close roads in the national forests to air-pollution issues to highway construction.
Guess they've never heard of the 10th Amendment.
The funny thing about this is the Fed is usually the one providing the staffing, resources, and funding.
Seem like more a symbolic act of stupidity.
There really is no "ignoring" of federal laws -- they can opt-out of federal programs and turn down funding if they choose, but then their citizens may suffer unfairly. But which federal laws do they think they can ignore?
And AZ is always complaining that the Fed doesn't do enough immigration enforcement.
Make up your minds AZ.