Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Bullfighter continues to lie. Mexico declared war in 1942 on the Axis, fought against German submarines in the Gulf of Mexico, and had combat and service units in the Pacific. Bullfighter's family sat out the war in Argentina. He is just a racist oik.
Who the fuck care what Mexico did in WW II?
We're talking about what an American sheriff is doing in 2010. Save the history lesson for the history category. There's a place to post crap like that where people who care about it can read it, Snarkey.
Who the fuck care what Mexico did in WW II?
We're talking about what an American sheriff is doing in 2010. Save the history lesson for the history category. There's a place to post crap like that where people who care about it can read it, Snarkey.
You know, Great Britain bore the major brunt of WWII for years before the US entered, and has been one of our greatest allies for a long, long time. I don't want British people coming here illegally, either. The two have nothing to do with each other.
Who the fuck care what Mexico did in WW II?
We're talking about what an American sheriff is doing in 2010. Save the history lesson for the history category. There's a place to post crap like that where people who care about it can read it, Snarkey.
Who the fuck care what Mexico did in WW II?
We're talking about what an American sheriff is doing in 2010. Save the history lesson for the history category. There's a place to post crap like that where people who care about it can read it, Snarkey.
You know, Great Britain bore the major brunt of WWII for years before the US entered, and has been one of our greatest allies for a long, long time. I don't want British people coming here illegally, either. The two have nothing to do with each other.
Precisely right!
If we had men like Sheriff Arpaio in every county across America, we wouldn't have a problem with these damn illegal aliens.
Someone willing to enforce the law... what a concept.
If we had a Sheriff Joe in every county across the country, this country would literally go broke in a matter of months. Do you have any idea how many times he has been sued and he lost. Who do you think pays for it when he looses?
If we had men like Sheriff Arpaio in every county across America, we wouldn't have a problem with these damn illegal aliens.
Someone willing to enforce the law... what a concept.
If we had a Sheriff Joe in every county across the country, this country would literally go broke in a matter of months. Do you have any idea how many times he has been sued and he lost. Who do you think pays for it when he looses?
Total cost of Sheriff Joe's suits: $41 million.
Given how long he's been there and how out in front he's been, sounds like the county is getting a deal!
If we had a Sheriff Joe in every county across the country, this country would literally go broke in a matter of months. Do you have any idea how many times he has been sued and he lost. Who do you think pays for it when he looses?
Total cost of Sheriff Joe's suits: $41 million.
Given how long he's been there and how out in front he's been, sounds like the county is getting a deal!
I find it to be an intriguing take on the subject that we are supposed to decide how to enforce the law based on how many expensive lawsuits criminals and their allies can bring against us. I'm a bit confused, though, as to why leftists think law-abiding citizens should give in to intimidation tactics.
If we had a Sheriff Joe in every county across the country, this country would literally go broke in a matter of months. Do you have any idea how many times he has been sued and he lost. Who do you think pays for it when he looses?
Total cost of Sheriff Joe's suits: $41 million.
Given how long he's been there and how out in front he's been, sounds like the county is getting a deal!
I find it to be an intriguing take on the subject that we are supposed to decide how to enforce the law based on how many expensive lawsuits criminals and their allies can bring against us. I'm a bit confused, though, as to why leftists think law-abiding citizens should give in to intimidation tactics.
Who the fuck care what Mexico did in WW II?
We're talking about what an American sheriff is doing in 2010. Save the history lesson for the history category. There's a place to post crap like that where people who care about it can read it, Snarkey.
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The sheriff of the most populous county in Arizona says he's "not going to put up with any civil disobedience" when the state's new immigration law takes effect.
Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio says that if protesters want to block his jail, he'll put them in it.
The Arizona law, which takes effect Thursday, requires officers enforcing other laws to check a person's immigration status if they suspect the person is in the country illegally.
Arpaio told ABC's "Good Morning America" he doesn't know "what the big hype is."
He says it's "a crime to be here illegally and everyone should enforce" the law.
© 2010 The Associated Press
News from The Associated Press
---------------------------------------------------
Let's hope his police force is like Chicago's from the late 60's.
The "skull crackers"!
Lots of noise on this thread, even some who know and may practice law seem to miss the issue of jurisdiction.
Protesting is legal. If a protester violates a law they are subject to arrest. Arestees are guaranteed specific rights which cannot be abused under the color of authority.
All the bloviation aside the sheriff may notify federal authorities in the event a protester has violated a law and is determined to be in the U.S. illegally. That's it.
A complaint or information must be filed by the prosecutor within 72 hours of the arrest and reasonable bail set. Notwithstanding the actions of the Bush Administration this remains the United States of America:
"Habeas Corpus is an ancient common law prerogative writ - a legal procedure to which you have an undeniable right. It is an extraordinary remedy at law. Upon proper application, or even on naked knowledge alone, a court is empowered, and is duty bound, to issue the Extraordinary Writ of Habeas Corpus commanding one who is restraining liberty to forthwith produce before the court the person who is in custody and to show cause why the liberty of that person is being restrained. Absent a sufficient showing for a proper restraint of liberty, the court is duty bound to order the restraint eliminated and the person discharged. Habeas Corpus is fundamental to American and all other English common law derivative systems of jurisprudence. It is the ultimate lawful and peaceable remedy for adjudicating the providence of libertys restraint."
Funny how the RW hopes to see "busted heads" on this thread but demand liberty for themselves on others. Never underestimate the stupidity of the RWers, what can be done to others can be done to them, an observation they are too stupid to understand.
