I have to confess I never saw the United Nations coming in the many threads I posted over the years about judges and psychiatrists abusing the law no less than they did in the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany. It can only get worse with the UN’s ugly hand on the tiller.
Deborah C. Tyler’s details in a fabulous, informative, article is worth reading several times. Here is a little taste:
Morally defective personality (F60.2) made WHO's list of personality disorders. They must have been looking for research subjects in the lounges at the U.N. The term “defective” has been considered unethical and abusive for years. It is a disgrace to psychiatry and psychology to accept a document that has the term “defective” in it. Who are moral defectives today? Gun owners? Christians?
October 12, 2015
ICD-10: The U.N. Occupies Medicine
By Deborah C. Tyler
Articles: ICD-10: The U.N. Occupies Medicine
ICD-10: The U.N. Occupies Medicine
By Deborah C. Tyler
Articles: ICD-10: The U.N. Occupies Medicine
The United Nations controls so many of America’s policies —— education, immigration, medicine, and the environment for starters —— I can be pardoned for letting the UN’s plans for “mental health” slip pass me in a thread I posted in 2013. Make no mistake about psychiatry. Anything the United Nations gets it hands on spills over into every aspect our daily lives one way or another.
Without mentioning the United Nations this excerpt should score a few points for trying:
Obamacare and the DSM-5: Be Afraid; Be Very Afraid
Erik Rush Friday, February 8, 2013
Obamacare and the DSM-5: Be Afraid; Be Very Afraid
Erik Rush Friday, February 8, 2013
Obamacare and the DSM-5: Be Afraid; Be Very Afraid
Rush does not touch on one of my long running objections; i.e., psychiatrists deciding the degree of guilt and punishment. Individuals who choose to see a psychiatrist is not the same thing as placing the force of law in the hands of psychiatrists. It is not smart lawyers who save murderers from the death penalty, it is liberals trying to abolish the death penalty who protect “insane” murderers who often go free after a period of confinement.
Psychiatrists who are so inclined use the power the government gave them to protect murderers from the death penalty. Where the hell does that authority originate? and who gave it to them? And where’s the proof that criminals cannot fool a psychiatrist. Bottom line: There is a huge difference between character witnesses and experts. I’m not even sure character witnesses should be allowed in capital cases until witnesses testifying to a defendant’s bad character are heard.
Every mass murderer who doesn’t pull his own plug ends up with an insanity defense. The irony is that psychiatry, an elitist control-tool at best, saves mass murderers from the death penalty. Those are the same people who would abolish the Second Amendment. Think about that for a while.
It is the ideology behind parasite-driven laws that needs to be questioned. The parasite class promotes legislation that provides tax dollar employment wherever possible. Parasites care about one thing only and it ain’t the mentally disturbed as evidenced by the array of drugs forced upon patients in today’s government-funded version of Bedlam monitored by the courts. It is tax dollar incomes buttressed by lifetime tenure at the public trough that draws the meanest of parasites to the mentally ill.
Psychiatric evaluations, psychological counseling, and all the rest of the liberal garbage placed thousands of new parasites into education bureaucracies. Their mandate is to brainwash the non-violent young who show signs of resisting socialism’s doctrine. Result: Personality-engineering has become a mainstay in America’s schools.