are the dems that doubt barrs summary

[leftwinger]

Conspiracy theorists?
You know, they say that everytime you doubt the fed gov. Even when actual cables and emails get leaked..
What do you think? It definitely seems consistent logic

Four pages that quote only 1.5 sentences of the report can't possibly convey the information that we need and deserve from that report. It would hardly be adequate for a Jr High book report. Release the report, and then those questions will be answered.

The most important sentence from Mule team: "No Russian Collusion by DJT or anyone associated with the campaign"

After 3 other investigations also found "No Russian Collusion".


You don't know when a horse is dead. Maybe you will do better on the Tax returns.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Conspiracy theorists?
You know, they say that everytime you doubt the fed gov. Even when actual cables and emails get leaked..
What do you think? It definitely seems consistent logic

Four pages that quote only 1.5 sentences of the report can't possibly convey the information that we need and deserve from that report. It would hardly be adequate for a Jr High book report. Release the report, and then those questions will be answered.

Great point, genius. That probably has nothing to do with it being called a summary.
Not to mention, my point still stands. Hell man, the fed gov could not even say something to a leak and the left would call it a conspiracy. Or far right. Or whatever.
But thanks for playing

Barr was not legally tasked with giving a summary, other than by Trump. He even said today that his note was specifically not a summary of the report. He is tap dancing at Trump's behest to hide the report from us. Even you can't be dumb enough to think a note or two from Barr is enough to bury Mueller's report.

Hiding the report? How many times has Barr said that he is releasing the report?

Are you deaf, and blind? If you are, congrats on learning to use a computer!

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Conspiracy theorists?
You know, they say that everytime you doubt the fed gov. Even when actual cables and emails get leaked..
What do you think? It definitely seems consistent logic

Everyone who considered the collusion delusion as serious is a conspiracy theorist

...Comey, Rosenstein, Mueller are conspiracy theorists? Is that your final answer?

God, you're an insufferable dumb fuck. Even with confirmantion that the Trump/Russia CONSPIRACY THEORY was goddamn bullshit, you are still NOT giving up hope.

Be a fucking idiot if you want. Just please stop voting. You are too dumb for that.

 

[AntonToo]

Conspiracy theorists?
You know, they say that everytime you doubt the fed gov. Even when actual cables and emails get leaked..
What do you think? It definitely seems consistent logic

Everyone who considered the collusion delusion as serious is a conspiracy theorist

...Comey, Rosenstein, Mueller are conspiracy theorists? Is that your final answer?

God, you're an insufferable dumb fuck. Even with confirmantion that the Trump/Russia CONSPIRACY THEORY was goddamn bullshit, you are still NOT giving up hope.

Be a fucking idiot if you want. Just please stop voting. You are too dumb for that.

Tell me ,when Hillary got cleared on emails did you also belive Comey was investigating a conpiracy theory and he was a conspiracy theorist?

Mueller did seem to clear Trump on the narrow charge of criminal conspiracy with Kremlin, but it was a serious investigation, based on probable cause.

 

[Rustic]

Conspiracy theorists?
You know, they say that everytime you doubt the fed gov. Even when actual cables and emails get leaked..
What do you think? It definitely seems consistent logic

Everyone who considered the collusion delusion as serious is a conspiracy theorist

...Comey, Rosenstein, Mueller are conspiracy theorists? Is that your final answer?

God, you're an insufferable dumb fuck. Even with confirmantion that the Trump/Russia CONSPIRACY THEORY was goddamn bullshit, you are still NOT giving up hope.

Be a fucking idiot if you want. Just please stop voting. You are too dumb for that.

Tell me ,when Hillary got cleared on emails did you also belive Comey was investigating a conpiracy theory and he was a conspiracy theorist?

Mueller did seem to clear Trump on the narrow charge of criminal conspiracy with Kremlin, but it was a serious investigation, based on probable cause.

 

[BULLDOG]

Conspiracy theorists?
You know, they say that everytime you doubt the fed gov. Even when actual cables and emails get leaked..
What do you think? It definitely seems consistent logic

Four pages that quote only 1.5 sentences of the report can't possibly convey the information that we need and deserve from that report. It would hardly be adequate for a Jr High book report. Release the report, and then those questions will be answered.

Great point, genius. That probably has nothing to do with it being called a summary.
Not to mention, my point still stands. Hell man, the fed gov could not even say something to a leak and the left would call it a conspiracy. Or far right. Or whatever.
But thanks for playing

Barr was not legally tasked with giving a summary, other than by Trump. He even said today that his note was specifically not a summary of the report. He is tap dancing at Trump's behest to hide the report from us. Even you can't be dumb enough to think a note or two from Barr is enough to bury Mueller's report.

Hiding the report? How many times has Barr said that he is releasing the report?

Are you deaf, and blind? If you are, congrats on learning to use a computer!

Let me know when that happens.

 

[NoVote]

Libtards and RINO's are about to pay the price for their complicity in the charade that's been going on for the last 8 years. They ignored 2010, 2012 and 2014 and the ones losing their jobs in 2016 will never figure out why. They are The Stupid People, even chickens are not THAT stupid.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Conspiracy theorists?
You know, they say that everytime you doubt the fed gov. Even when actual cables and emails get leaked..
What do you think? It definitely seems consistent logic

Four pages that quote only 1.5 sentences of the report can't possibly convey the information that we need and deserve from that report. It would hardly be adequate for a Jr High book report. Release the report, and then those questions will be answered.

Great point, genius. That probably has nothing to do with it being called a summary.
Not to mention, my point still stands. Hell man, the fed gov could not even say something to a leak and the left would call it a conspiracy. Or far right. Or whatever.
But thanks for playing

Barr was not legally tasked with giving a summary, other than by Trump. He even said today that his note was specifically not a summary of the report. He is tap dancing at Trump's behest to hide the report from us. Even you can't be dumb enough to think a note or two from Barr is enough to bury Mueller's report.

The next time you tell the truth will be the first time.

From the FAR left Brookings.

{At the conclusion of a special counsel’s investigation, section 600.9(a)(3) requires the Attorney General to provide to the chairs and ranking minority members of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees, “to the extent consistent with applicable law, a description and explanation of instances (if any)” in which the Attorney General overruled a proposed action by a special counsel. The purpose of this report, and also reports on the appointment or removal of special counsel, is “to help ensure congressional and public confidence in the integrity of the process.” 64 Fed. Reg. 37041.}

Attorney General’s Special Counsel Regulations

 

[Uncensored2008]

Conspiracy theorists?
You know, they say that everytime you doubt the fed gov. Even when actual cables and emails get leaked..
What do you think? It definitely seems consistent logic

Everyone who considered the collusion delusion as serious is a conspiracy theorist

...Comey, Rosenstein, Mueller are conspiracy theorists? Is that your final answer?

Or traitors, which is the more likely explanation, We know for a fact Rosenstein is, and was involved in a third world level coup with McCabe.

 

[BULLDOG]

Conspiracy theorists?
You know, they say that everytime you doubt the fed gov. Even when actual cables and emails get leaked..
What do you think? It definitely seems consistent logic

Four pages that quote only 1.5 sentences of the report can't possibly convey the information that we need and deserve from that report. It would hardly be adequate for a Jr High book report. Release the report, and then those questions will be answered.

Great point, genius. That probably has nothing to do with it being called a summary.
Not to mention, my point still stands. Hell man, the fed gov could not even say something to a leak and the left would call it a conspiracy. Or far right. Or whatever.
But thanks for playing

Barr was not legally tasked with giving a summary, other than by Trump. He even said today that his note was specifically not a summary of the report. He is tap dancing at Trump's behest to hide the report from us. Even you can't be dumb enough to think a note or two from Barr is enough to bury Mueller's report.

The next time you tell the truth will be the first time.

From the FAR left Brookings.

{At the conclusion of a special counsel’s investigation, section 600.9(a)(3) requires the Attorney General to provide to the chairs and ranking minority members of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees, “to the extent consistent with applicable law, a description and explanation of instances (if any)” in which the Attorney General overruled a proposed action by a special counsel. The purpose of this report, and also reports on the appointment or removal of special counsel, is “to help ensure congressional and public confidence in the integrity of the process.” 64 Fed. Reg. 37041.}

Attorney General’s Special Counsel Regulations

Did you read the words to your link? That only says he should tell if he stopped Muller from any part of his investigation. It has nothing to do with Barr characterizing anything that might be in the report. That part was just him trying to protect Trump.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Conspiracy theorists?
You know, they say that everytime you doubt the fed gov. Even when actual cables and emails get leaked..
What do you think? It definitely seems consistent logic

As a liberal that will ignore his summary, I'm more in the position of waiting to see for myself.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Conspiracy theorists?
You know, they say that everytime you doubt the fed gov. Even when actual cables and emails get leaked..
What do you think? It definitely seems consistent logic

Four pages that quote only 1.5 sentences of the report can't possibly convey the information that we need and deserve from that report. It would hardly be adequate for a Jr High book report. Release the report, and then those questions will be answered.

Great point, genius. That probably has nothing to do with it being called a summary.
Not to mention, my point still stands. Hell man, the fed gov could not even say something to a leak and the left would call it a conspiracy. Or far right. Or whatever.
But thanks for playing

Barr was not legally tasked with giving a summary, other than by Trump. He even said today that his note was specifically not a summary of the report. He is tap dancing at Trump's behest to hide the report from us. Even you can't be dumb enough to think a note or two from Barr is enough to bury Mueller's report.

The next time you tell the truth will be the first time.

From the FAR left Brookings.

{At the conclusion of a special counsel’s investigation, section 600.9(a)(3) requires the Attorney General to provide to the chairs and ranking minority members of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees, “to the extent consistent with applicable law, a description and explanation of instances (if any)” in which the Attorney General overruled a proposed action by a special counsel. The purpose of this report, and also reports on the appointment or removal of special counsel, is “to help ensure congressional and public confidence in the integrity of the process.” 64 Fed. Reg. 37041.}

Attorney General’s Special Counsel Regulations

Did you read the words to your link? That only says he should tell if he stopped Muller from any part of his investigation. It has nothing to do with Barr characterizing anything that might be in the report. That part was just him trying to protect Trump.

Wrong, he should tell what the findings are.


You made a stupid claim because you are manipulated by the hate sites, which are in a panic because the coup has failed.

You're right to panic. Barr said he would prosecute McCabe. Just HOW deep does the conspiracy go? Comey is toast, no question. But what of Lynch? Yeats? Obama?

 

[Crepitus]

Conspiracy theorists?
You know, they say that everytime you doubt the fed gov. Even when actual cables and emails get leaked..
What do you think? It definitely seems consistent logic

Did you notice that Barr now doubts Barr's summary?

 

[BULLDOG]

Four pages that quote only 1.5 sentences of the report can't possibly convey the information that we need and deserve from that report. It would hardly be adequate for a Jr High book report. Release the report, and then those questions will be answered.

Great point, genius. That probably has nothing to do with it being called a summary.
Not to mention, my point still stands. Hell man, the fed gov could not even say something to a leak and the left would call it a conspiracy. Or far right. Or whatever.
But thanks for playing

Barr was not legally tasked with giving a summary, other than by Trump. He even said today that his note was specifically not a summary of the report. He is tap dancing at Trump's behest to hide the report from us. Even you can't be dumb enough to think a note or two from Barr is enough to bury Mueller's report.

The next time you tell the truth will be the first time.

From the FAR left Brookings.

{At the conclusion of a special counsel’s investigation, section 600.9(a)(3) requires the Attorney General to provide to the chairs and ranking minority members of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees, “to the extent consistent with applicable law, a description and explanation of instances (if any)” in which the Attorney General overruled a proposed action by a special counsel. The purpose of this report, and also reports on the appointment or removal of special counsel, is “to help ensure congressional and public confidence in the integrity of the process.” 64 Fed. Reg. 37041.}

Attorney General’s Special Counsel Regulations

Did you read the words to your link? That only says he should tell if he stopped Muller from any part of his investigation. It has nothing to do with Barr characterizing anything that might be in the report. That part was just him trying to protect Trump.

Wrong, he should tell what the findings are.


You made a stupid claim because you are manipulated by the hate sites, which are in a panic because the coup has failed.

You're right to panic. Barr said he would prosecute McCabe. Just HOW deep does the conspiracy go? Comey is toast, no question. But what of Lynch? Yeats? Obama?

That's not what his specific requirements call for. Reread it for yourself.

 

[sakinago]

Conspiracy theorists?
You know, they say that everytime you doubt the fed gov. Even when actual cables and emails get leaked..
What do you think? It definitely seems consistent logic

Four pages that quote only 1.5 sentences of the report can't possibly convey the information that we need and deserve from that report. It would hardly be adequate for a Jr High book report. Release the report, and then those questions will be answered.

Great point, genius. That probably has nothing to do with it being called a summary.
Not to mention, my point still stands. Hell man, the fed gov could not even say something to a leak and the left would call it a conspiracy. Or far right. Or whatever.
But thanks for playing

Can you believe the audacity of Barr to summerize a 300 page report, and then call it a summery. Corruption at its finest

 

[imawhosure]

Conspiracy theorists?
You know, they say that everytime you doubt the fed gov. Even when actual cables and emails get leaked..
What do you think? It definitely seems consistent logic

As a liberal that will ignore his summary, I'm more in the position of waiting to see for myself.

Four pages that quote only 1.5 sentences of the report can't possibly convey the information that we need and deserve from that report. It would hardly be adequate for a Jr High book report. Release the report, and then those questions will be answered.

Great point, genius. That probably has nothing to do with it being called a summary.
Not to mention, my point still stands. Hell man, the fed gov could not even say something to a leak and the left would call it a conspiracy. Or far right. Or whatever.
But thanks for playing

Barr was not legally tasked with giving a summary, other than by Trump. He even said today that his note was specifically not a summary of the report. He is tap dancing at Trump's behest to hide the report from us. Even you can't be dumb enough to think a note or two from Barr is enough to bury Mueller's report.

The next time you tell the truth will be the first time.

From the FAR left Brookings.

{At the conclusion of a special counsel’s investigation, section 600.9(a)(3) requires the Attorney General to provide to the chairs and ranking minority members of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees, “to the extent consistent with applicable law, a description and explanation of instances (if any)” in which the Attorney General overruled a proposed action by a special counsel. The purpose of this report, and also reports on the appointment or removal of special counsel, is “to help ensure congressional and public confidence in the integrity of the process.” 64 Fed. Reg. 37041.}

Attorney General’s Special Counsel Regulations

Did you read the words to your link? That only says he should tell if he stopped Muller from any part of his investigation. It has nothing to do with Barr characterizing anything that might be in the report. That part was just him trying to protect Trump.

Wrong, he should tell what the findings are.


You made a stupid claim because you are manipulated by the hate sites, which are in a panic because the coup has failed.

You're right to panic. Barr said he would prosecute McCabe. Just HOW deep does the conspiracy go? Comey is toast, no question. But what of Lynch? Yeats? Obama?

Conspiracy theorists?
You know, they say that everytime you doubt the fed gov. Even when actual cables and emails get leaked..
What do you think? It definitely seems consistent logic

Did you notice that Barr now doubts Barr's summary?

Great point, genius. That probably has nothing to do with it being called a summary.
Not to mention, my point still stands. Hell man, the fed gov could not even say something to a leak and the left would call it a conspiracy. Or far right. Or whatever.
But thanks for playing

Barr was not legally tasked with giving a summary, other than by Trump. He even said today that his note was specifically not a summary of the report. He is tap dancing at Trump's behest to hide the report from us. Even you can't be dumb enough to think a note or two from Barr is enough to bury Mueller's report.

The next time you tell the truth will be the first time.

From the FAR left Brookings.

{At the conclusion of a special counsel’s investigation, section 600.9(a)(3) requires the Attorney General to provide to the chairs and ranking minority members of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees, “to the extent consistent with applicable law, a description and explanation of instances (if any)” in which the Attorney General overruled a proposed action by a special counsel. The purpose of this report, and also reports on the appointment or removal of special counsel, is “to help ensure congressional and public confidence in the integrity of the process.” 64 Fed. Reg. 37041.}

Attorney General’s Special Counsel Regulations

Did you read the words to your link? That only says he should tell if he stopped Muller from any part of his investigation. It has nothing to do with Barr characterizing anything that might be in the report. That part was just him trying to protect Trump.

Wrong, he should tell what the findings are.


You made a stupid claim because you are manipulated by the hate sites, which are in a panic because the coup has failed.

You're right to panic. Barr said he would prosecute McCabe. Just HOW deep does the conspiracy go? Comey is toast, no question. But what of Lynch? Yeats? Obama?

That's not what his specific requirements call for. Reread it for yourself.

Conspiracy theorists?
You know, they say that everytime you doubt the fed gov. Even when actual cables and emails get leaked..
What do you think? It definitely seems consistent logic

Four pages that quote only 1.5 sentences of the report can't possibly convey the information that we need and deserve from that report. It would hardly be adequate for a Jr High book report. Release the report, and then those questions will be answered.

Great point, genius. That probably has nothing to do with it being called a summary.
Not to mention, my point still stands. Hell man, the fed gov could not even say something to a leak and the left would call it a conspiracy. Or far right. Or whatever.
But thanks for playing

Can you believe the audacity of Barr to summerize a 300 page report, and then call it a summery. Corruption at its finest

As a Conservative person, not only did I hope that Trump did not commit treason, but I also hope that the rest of Washington wasn't duplicit in trying to take him down. In other words, I hope it was ALL A BIG MISTAKE.

Sadly, I don't think so. How this would end has been played throughout conservative news for a very long time. Of course, the exact opposite result was played throughout the MSM also. And yet, only 3 results have come in. One from the House Intelligence Agency, one from the Senate Intelligence Agency, and one from the Special Counsel, and they all answered the question----------->Did Trump and his campaign collude with the Russians.

Notice-----------------> No where does it address the DNC, Hillary Clinton, John Brennan, or Clapper.

These are now the questions that have to be answered for the good of the country, and if the Trump Administration has anything, you will surely find out BEFORE the release of the Mueller report. It is the way politics work.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

No where does it address the DNC, Hillary Clinton, John Brennan, or Clapper.

Correct, because that wasn't the focus. And that is because of trump's own behavior.

 

[rightwinger]

Conspiracy theorists?
You know, they say that everytime you doubt the fed gov. Even when actual cables and emails get leaked..
What do you think? It definitely seems consistent logic

Four pages that quote only 1.5 sentences of the report can't possibly convey the information that we need and deserve from that report. It would hardly be adequate for a Jr High book report. Release the report, and then those questions will be answered.

Great point, genius. That probably has nothing to do with it being called a summary.
Not to mention, my point still stands. Hell man, the fed gov could not even say something to a leak and the left would call it a conspiracy. Or far right. Or whatever.
But thanks for playing

Barr was not legally tasked with giving a summary, other than by Trump. He even said today that his note was specifically not a summary of the report. He is tap dancing at Trump's behest to hide the report from us. Even you can't be dumb enough to think a note or two from Barr is enough to bury Mueller's report.

Trump has been screaming for this for two years

Barr gave him what he was asking for

 

[BULLDOG]

Conspiracy theorists?
You know, they say that everytime you doubt the fed gov. Even when actual cables and emails get leaked..
What do you think? It definitely seems consistent logic

Four pages that quote only 1.5 sentences of the report can't possibly convey the information that we need and deserve from that report. It would hardly be adequate for a Jr High book report. Release the report, and then those questions will be answered.

Great point, genius. That probably has nothing to do with it being called a summary.
Not to mention, my point still stands. Hell man, the fed gov could not even say something to a leak and the left would call it a conspiracy. Or far right. Or whatever.
But thanks for playing

Can you believe the audacity of Barr to summerize a 300 page report, and then call it a summery. Corruption at its finest

That wasn't a summary. That was an attempt to protect Trump.

 

[sakinago]

Conspiracy theorists?
You know, they say that everytime you doubt the fed gov. Even when actual cables and emails get leaked..
What do you think? It definitely seems consistent logic

Four pages that quote only 1.5 sentences of the report can't possibly convey the information that we need and deserve from that report. It would hardly be adequate for a Jr High book report. Release the report, and then those questions will be answered.

Great point, genius. That probably has nothing to do with it being called a summary.
Not to mention, my point still stands. Hell man, the fed gov could not even say something to a leak and the left would call it a conspiracy. Or far right. Or whatever.
But thanks for playing

Can you believe the audacity of Barr to summerize a 300 page report, and then call it a summery. Corruption at its finest

That wasn't a summary. That was an attempt to protect Trump.

So sad...