Are liberals more like animals or American Indians?

Liberals speak favorably of animals and Indians because animals and Indians share the wealth and minimize the importance of personal land and property. Society matters, not the individual. As BO would communistically say, "we're all in this together."

In reality animals and Indians are very very territorial or possessive. If another tries to invade their property war will usually result because they know personal property is necessary for survival.

So much for another important aspect of liberalism.

 

Animals and Indians were eating, killing and scalping one another long before modern society came around, whimsical revisioning, notwithstanding.


LOL

 

yes the lovely socialist Indians shared about as well as Hitler and Stalin!

 

dude

 

What's the point of this thread? A strawman is created and now the wingnuts are going to pile on?

 

Forgot the Thanksgiving story, eh? I win! I win!

 

Sort of like one of them attention-whore Libertarian threads!

 

Liberals are about the furthest thing from animals or Indians (Natives in PC-speak). In addition to the previously noted characteristic of territoriality, both animals and Natives live bluntly honest, natural lives. They accept the fact that "life isn't fair", not for individuals, and not for any specific species.
Now we can expect the usual liberal talking points about wolves and such....

 

OK, Rat fan.

 

I feel certain that this thread will only contribute to the overall intellectualism of this section of the board.