Are liberals more like animals or American Indians?

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Liberals speak favorably of animals and Indians because animals and Indians share the wealth and minimize the importance of personal land and property. Society matters, not the individual. As BO would communistically say, "we're all in this together."

In reality animals and Indians are very very territorial or possessive. If another tries to invade their property war will usually result because they know personal property is necessary for survival.

So much for another important aspect of liberalism.

 

[SniperFire]

Animals and Indians were eating, killing and scalping one another long before modern society came around, whimsical revisioning, notwithstanding.


LOL

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Animals and Indians were eating, killing and scalping one another long before modern society came around, whimsical revisioning, notwithstanding.


LOL

yes the lovely socialist Indians shared about as well as Hitler and Stalin!

 

[occupied]

dude

 

[konradv]

What's the point of this thread? A strawman is created and now the wingnuts are going to pile on?

 

[konradv]

Animals and Indians were eating, killing and scalping one another long before modern society came around, whimsical revisioning, notwithstanding.

yes the lovely socialist Indians shared about as well as Hitler and Stalin!

Forgot the Thanksgiving story, eh? I win! I win!

 

[SniperFire]

What's the point of this thread? A strawman is created and now the wingnuts are going to pile on?

Sort of like one of them attention-whore Libertarian threads!

 

[gallantwarrior]

Liberals are about the furthest thing from animals or Indians (Natives in PC-speak). In addition to the previously noted characteristic of territoriality, both animals and Natives live bluntly honest, natural lives. They accept the fact that "life isn't fair", not for individuals, and not for any specific species.
Now we can expect the usual liberal talking points about wolves and such....

 

[SniperFire]

Animals and Indians were eating, killing and scalping one another long before modern society came around, whimsical revisioning, notwithstanding.

yes the lovely socialist Indians shared about as well as Hitler and Stalin!

Forgot the Thanksgiving story, eh? I win! I win!

OK, Rat fan.

 

[catzmeow]

I feel certain that this thread will only contribute to the overall intellectualism of this section of the board.

 

[ducks102]

so this white guy is calling the majoirty of black people animals

typical white republican

 

[konradv]

What's the point of this thread? A strawman is created and now the wingnuts are going to pile on?

Sort of like one of them attention-whore Libertarian threads!

So you're admittimg this is designed as a strawman thread for the CONS to pile on! Then after that it's a Rep circle-jerk, eh?

 

[UpAndAbout]

Animals and Indians fended for themselves without any help from the government. of course once upon a time there WAS no government, but . . . They certainly didn't tolerate slacking and everyone pulled his/her weight, had a job to do and did it. Not unlike the Amish of today.

 

[UpAndAbout]

What's the point of this thread? A strawman is created and now the wingnuts are going to pile on?

Sort of like one of them attention-whore Libertarian threads!

So you're admittimg this is designed as a strawman thread for the CONS to pile on! Then after that it's a Rep circle-jerk, eh?

It's for discussion. Pure and simple. don't like it, don't contribute, don't read it, nobody's forcing you. For God's sake!

 

[Peach]

what's the point of this thread? A strawman is created and now the wingnuts are going to pile on?

sort of like one of them attention-whore libertarian threads!

so you're admittimg this is designed as a strawman thread for the cons to pile on! Then after that it's a rep circle-jerk, eh?

bingo!

 

[UpAndAbout]

so this white guy is calling the majoirty of black people animals

typical white republican

What are you sniffing?

 

[konradv]

Liberals are about the furthest thing from animals or Indians (Natives in PC-speak). In addition to the previously noted characteristic of territoriality, both animals and Natives live bluntly honest, natural lives. They accept the fact that "life isn't fair", not for individuals, and not for any specific species.
Now we can expect the usual liberal talking points about wolves and such....

You mean like "natural rights"? At least we agree that they don't exist. Any rights we have are a direct result of our banding together and forming governments. Even native-Americans knew that and the Indians, too!

 

[konradv]

Sort of like one of them attention-whore Libertarian threads!

So you're admittimg this is designed as a strawman thread for the CONS to pile on! Then after that it's a Rep circle-jerk, eh?

It's for discussion. Pure and simple. don't like it, don't contribute, don't read it, nobody's forcing you. For God's sake!

Got a problem with me pointing out hypocrisy? I will read and contribute anytime I damn well please, thank you. Strawman arguments don't get a free pass, they get EXPOSED.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Animals and Indians were eating, killing and scalping one another long before modern society came around, whimsical revisioning, notwithstanding.

yes the lovely socialist Indians shared about as well as Hitler and Stalin!

Forgot the Thanksgiving story, eh? I win! I win!

Actually Thanksgiving was not typical, en masse slaughter was

 

[SniperFire]

So you're admittimg this is designed as a strawman thread for the CONS to pile on! Then after that it's a Rep circle-jerk, eh?

It's for discussion. Pure and simple. don't like it, don't contribute, don't read it, nobody's forcing you. For God's sake!

Got a problem with me pointing out hypocrisy? I will read and contribute anytime I damn well please, thank you. Strawman arguments don't get a free pass, they get EXPOSED.

You don't even know what a strawman argument is, Ratbird fan.