They are fully on board with quantity over quality
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Do a bit of reading about the effects that such speed creates on the leading edge of such weapons. The sensors in the weapon cannot see through the plasma that is generated at that speed, so they have to slow appreciably as they cover the final distance to the target. When they slow down to see the target, guess what happens?Radar would simply not even see them
Because they don't have an effective catapult system, and their jets have weak engines.Do you know why China still chooses the ramped up deck over the angle deck design? Is it more versatile for larger and slower aircraft?
That's silly, they have better iin mostly everything.Because they don't have an effective catapult system, and their jets have weak engines.
Wrong but I like your enthusiasm for CommunismThat's silly, they have better iin mostly everything.
No. They don't. You clearly don't know what you are talking about. Their jet engines are so weak that their fighters can't even launch from thier carrier decks with a full payload.That's silly, they have better iin mostly everything.
We'll have to wait for somebody who has the answer. At least we know that steam catapult technology has been around for decades.No. They don't. You clearly don't know what you are talking about. Their jet engines are so weak that their fighters can't even launch from thier carrier decks with a full payload.
Its an old design that china bought from russiaDo you know why China still chooses the ramped up deck over the angle deck design? Is it more versatile for larger and slower aircraft?
Are their aircraft carriers sitting ducks?China is a paper tiger.
I just gave you the answer fool...We'll have to wait for somebody who has the answer. At least we know that steam catapult technology has been around for decades.
It's more likely that it was Russia's choice when they started and that would be because they envisioned that they would suit Russia's purpose better.Its an old design that china bought from russia
Yep , there are more Firearms in Private ( Non Military / Non Law Enforcement ) Hands In Anchorage Alaska than there are Firearms in Private Hands In all of China .China is a paper tiger.
China bought an aircraft carrier from russia and it came with the lower quality launching designIt's more likely that it was Russia's choice when they started and that would be because they envisioned that they would suit Russia's purpose better.
Russia and China aren't primarily involved with aggression, nearly as much ad defensive strategies.
Their second and third Carriers are more & more proprietary ( and the 2 keels they have laid and one keel in prep are even more soChina bought an aircraft carrier from russia and it came with the lower quality launching design
There is no reason to think they prefer being 2nd best
But beggars cant be choosy
CAn you envision a situation in which Alaska's guns could be used against China and/or Russia?Yep , there are more Firearms in Private ( Non Military / Non Law Enforcement ) Hands In Anchorage Alaska than there are Firearms in Private Hands In all of China .
Yes, their designs are evolvingTheir second and third Carriers are more & more proprietary ( and the 2 keels they have laid and one keel in prep are even more so
Proprietary? proprietory?Their second and third Carriers are more & more proprietary ( and the 2 keels they have laid and one keel in prep are even more so
They are drifting from the Early Russian design and incorporating their own “ Proprietary “ designs into the Carriers built since thePurchase from India of the old Russian problematic Carrier .Proprietary? proprietory?
You'll have to elaborate.