Applied Geometry In Economic Fiscal And Monetary Policy

mascale

Gold Member
Feb 22, 2009
6,836
800
130
The Democrats can, and maybe will, be using the Minimum Wage increase movements as their basis of compare and contrast with GOP. It is widely unknown that Quantitative Easing mainly created wealth for the weatlhy. A low upper income tax policy didn't hurt. What never even gets discussed in the schools is the actual geometric pogression of Federal Disaster Making in Support of "Capitalism."

Reagan had sent his federal deficit dollars to the already prosperous defense contractors. Obama sent his federal deficit dollars to the already prosperous, bureaucrats and public school teachers instead. That was called, "Priming the Pump," probably near a convenience store, anywhere nationwide. Anyone normal, or poor, was left out. Bush II, Term I, at least explained that in his Ivy League, that is what he had been taught. . . .If not in those kinds of words. . . .or maybe even sober.

But that is only current events, on top of other current events in response to other current events(?),

After The Reagan Trajectory--Later, The Obama Plan--came the Bush I recession. After the GOP, TARP bailout--from all the high-tech based war spending(?)--then the Stimulus Bailout from both of those bailouts tends to support a geometric-level increase of fiscal and monetary policy--Problem Making. The bail-outs of this century are already three. $1.0 tril. went to chase Osama bin laden, hiding in Pakistan, everywhere in Iraq(?). That as an intentional act. The basis was widely noted fraudulent. Nearly $1.0 tril. then had to be sent to failed Ivy League banking principles. Those are in place even in the Schvartz Ivy League, and at the Public Universities and colleges. Those were mainly famous for more diversity. TARP was mostly likely, mostly sent to support the Ivy League trained. Maybe some Schvartz Ivy Leaguers got some of the money. The Stimulus after that was more or less in the same magnitude.

In Matthew 25:14-30, the lower income usury earnings are shown worthless. It is like burying the money in the ground. The gap between the rich and the poor dramatically increases, even in the little story. In 2008 the low-income mortgages had become worthless. There was weeping and gnashing of teeth! The original story, likely Adam Smith had overlooked: As the basis problem of the capitalist market place. A regulated usury was proposed in "Wealth of Nations." The Ivy League does not comment that Adam Smith was desperately wrong. The Impact of Usury, with basis in an income scale, is not allowed even to be ackowledged in the Ivy League. Then as for the Schvartz Ivy League, and the Public Universities and Colleges--then the Signature George M. Cohan closing remark- - - -itself really goes without saying(?).

Look at Matthew 25:14-30 again. An upside-down right triangle can be created. The income to the servants is the scale with a top number five. That gets doubled. Draw in perpendicular lines, another number five. The square root of five squared, plus the square root of five squared, is about Seven. The household should have been enriched talents. It was only enriched the seven. Famously, Jesus ben Joseph, Son Of Mary, called, "O'Christ," was not in a civilization advanced to the decimal point invention.,

In Matthew 20:1-16, The Equal Amount increase of the denarius--to the workers of the one hour, like for the workers for all the day--tends to draw all income recipients into the marketplace. The Increase of Minimum Wage tends to draw more purchasing power into the workplace. The current levels are like dumping the Servant's Talent into the ground. It is worthless. Then ignoring that, Even The Obama-Biden Make-Work-Pay-Refundable-Income-Tax-Credit was taken away by the Republicans. They proceeded to run their Mormon version for President instead. The Republicans were calling the Matthew 20:1-16, plan, "Socialism." As for Obama and Biden. . .you could even throw in Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi as being "Socialists." RNC had the word for them. They could claim their usual belief in an "O'Christ," several times per day. That would easily be said Irish, and very white.

A prosperous free-market has been nowhere on radar at GOP from the Start. Lincoln even started killing off all the White Males in the United States--in rebellion or not--from the very start. Grannie plowing the fields became a fixture icon of what the rural economies were thought to be, GOP created. Grandpa was either dead or disabled. There were 700,000 dead. Mostly everyone else was disabled. There were military doctors, back then. GOP had horror on the brain. "Minimum Wage Increase" is not even in any of their blood.
Granny already had her hands full--of Republican Family Values. Minimum Wages are still not popular with the GOP.

Lincoln and Karl Marx may both have visited City of New York at about the same time. Neither seemed to know much about Adam Smith. Smith seems to have not been too far into the geometry known of the Greeks. Tthe famous prevailing deities of the Conquering civiizations of the West were also religion at the alleged timing of the ministry of Jesus. Israel had been conquered, twice. Household deities were common, and generally respected in the Roman Empire. The Roman Empire was a very large tent.

So in contrast to the Republican Agenda, Seattle recently raised the Minimum Wage. The Mayor of Los Angeles created a Minimum Wage proposal on Labor Day. Living Wage movments are in dozens of states. On "CanNeverBeCapable" of market-friendly business, NBC--just today--there is screaming about robots going to work at McDonald's. That is being blamed even on discussion of an increase of Minimum Wage. . .or something.

There is no concept of working people doing an even higher-priced lunch, at all. Everyone will say, "Oh, Poor McDonald's." McDonald's will more likely go back to basics, like in the below.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Many White Eyes know lunch. . .and even cocktails. . .now on Lands of Many Nations!)
 
Last edited:
Raising the minimum wage is a clever political device to move people from working to welfare. If the value of someone's skills does not exceed his wage, he will not be hired. 90% of workers make more than minimum wage already. Why penalize the 10% who are trying to climb the ladder?
 
The Penalty of the 10% underpaid is when the mortgages, and other bills--do not get paid. The origins of Lehman Brothers are Jewish. Likely no one paid much attention when the company finally folded in 2008. People went on collecting pay, and spending. The Germans in The Holocaust timeframe went on collecting pay, and spending. Everything was wonderful, if basic habits were to be thought the evidence. Both groups of folks are the same bunch of people--Jews, Gentiles, and "Other" alike.

Christian clergy tend to think that everything is wonderful in the Matthew 25:14-30 story. Likely especially Reformed Jewish rabbis think that everything is wonderful in that story. Adam Smith, of "Wealth of Nations," appears to have thought that everything was wonderful, in the story. The basis Moses Atrocity, Deuteronomy 23:19-20, prohibits that kind of usury--that of the exchangers--among the deity believers. Foreigners only, were allowed to be the victims. Even Adam Smith likely knew his "laissez faire" model. Looking at Modern Day Israel, likely the Conservative Rabbis understand that best. Probably the Kinesset, and the Prime Minister, understand that best. Mostly usury is not allowed in Moslem business, though profits from savings-based investment are even advertised at Bank of Dhubai. Palestinians most likely understand what the Conservative Rabbis understand.

So actually, the lower-level earnings from usury are basically worthless. That is not unlike the problem of the lowest 10 per cent. When the poor can't pay, the rich houses all come tumbling on down. If the 90% follow along the basis Moses Atrocity--the concept, "Screw 'Em!" is actually not a basis of world harmony and peace. Not even economic prosperity is an outcome. Even in the story in Matthew 25, the household that likely should have been enriched the eight talents, was only enriched the seven. In the next go-around, the disparity between the upper income receiving, compared with the lower, gets even worse. To stay rich, the rich need the money. If the poor are a drain on that, then the 90% all want a bail-out(?).

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Clearly: Teaching is not possible at any grade level, without the doctoral degree--Unless it is believed that some kids are better than other kids, and that all the other kids are not worth the extra effort. Moses could easily relate to that. Mostly, the old wrong ways are thought wonderful! Schvartz are not thought. . . . .well!)
 
A low upper income tax policy didn't hurt.
low???? the top 1% pays 40% of all federal income taxes. NY and CA get 50% of their budgets from top 1%. No country counts on top 1% as much as USA. Bottom 45% pays no federal income tax!!

See why we say liberalism is based in pure ignorance?
 
The centuries-old failure of laissez-faire is in propaganda again. Top 1% pay a lot, since bottom 45% pay nothing.

Obviously.

Stupid anti-market conservatives only believe in Matthew 25:14-30, Adam Smith supported usury. The money-changers, even now, are not a government agency.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Lands of Many Nations now welcome even White Eyes on government supported lands--in name of Great Spirit, "Seven-Come-Eleven!" These are not failed states!)
 
I hated geometry in high school...

Ancient Babylonians 'first to use geometry'
29 Jan.`16 | Sophisticated geometry - the branch of mathematics that deals with shapes - was being used at least 1,400 years earlier than previously thought, a study suggests.
Research shows that the Ancient Babylonians were using geometrical calculations to track Jupiter across the night sky. Previously, the origins of this technique had been traced to the 14th Century. The new study is published in Science. Its author, Prof Mathieu Ossendrijver, from the Humboldt University of Berlin, Germany, said: "I wasn't expecting this. It is completely fundamental to physics, and all branches of science use this method."

_87978230_trapezoid-textb-empty.jpg

Five Babylonian tablets revealed that these ancient people were using sophisticated geometry​

Stargazers

The Ancient Babylonians once lived in what is now Iraq and Syria. The civilisation emerged in about 1,800 BC. Clay tablets engraved with their Cuneiform writing system have already shown these people were advanced in astronomy. "They wrote reports about what they saw in the sky," Prof Ossendrijver told the BBC World Service's Science in Action programme. "And they did this over a very long period of time, over centuries." But this latest research shows they were also way ahead when it came to maths. It had been thought that complex geometry was first used by scholars in Oxford and Paris in medieval times. They used curves to trace the position and velocity of moving objects. But now scientists believe the Babylonians developed this technique around 350 BC.

Prof Ossendrijver examined five Babylonian tablets that were excavated in the 19th Century, and which are now held in the British Museum's archives. The script reveals that they were using four-sided shapes, called trapezoids, to calculate when Jupiter would appear in the night sky, and also the speed and distance that it travelled. "This figure - a rectangle with a slanted top - describes how the velocity of a planet, which is Jupiter, changes with time," he said. "We have a figure where one axis, the horizontal side, represents time, and the other axis, the vertical side, represents velocity. "The area of trapezoid gives you the distance travelled by Jupiter along its orbit. "What is so special is this type of graph is unknown from antiquity - so making figures of motion in this rather abstract space of velocity against time - this is something very, very new."

_87978232_trapezoid-texta-empty.jpg

The Babylonians detailed their use of trapezoids to track the planet Jupiter​

He added that there was evidence that the Greeks used a "more straightforward" form of geometry, which dealt with the spatial relationships between the Earth and the planets rather than the concepts of time and velocity. Prof Ossendrijver told the BBC that it was unclear how common this technique was. "It could be that there was an earlier tablet, written by a genius, by one individual, who came up with this new way of doing astronomy. "It could also be that in fact this is a method that was more widely applied by different scholars. We don't know."

Ancient Babylonians 'first to use geometry' - BBC News
 

Forum List

Back
Top