Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
These are people who refer to minorities as dogs or animals. They brag about the good old days when lynching was a fun way to spend the weekend. There is no way to avoid another civil war unless middle class suburbia wakes up to where we are headed.People are people. I know a few Antifa who are conservative or libertarian. Not liking fascists is something we all should agree on.So you agree the manual is fake?
You are talking to Antifa right here and I happen to know a little about it. Quite a few of Antifa are anarchists. Others are democratic socialist like Sanders. I consider myself to be a progressive conservative, i.e., change when change is needed.
The only antifa I have talked with in depth were in Berkeley and they were all hard core socialist. To date I have not met a single one that was an anarchist.
Anyone with a brain does, however, if you engage in acts of violence against people who are having a rally, and those people happen to have a philosophy that you don't approve of, you are engaging in fascist behavior. This is the USA and the ONLY language that is protected by the COTUS is hate speech. Lovey dovey speech doesn't need to be protected, but hate speech does. This country was founded on the principle that if you are a moron, and you want to tell the world just how big a moron you are, you have that Right. No one has the Right to shut them up.
Stop normalizing and protecting white supremacists. That allows them to think they are mainstream.
Yeah? So? That is what the First Amendment was written for. To protect imbeciles like that. I am not the one protecting them, the FIRST AMENDMENT is. If you don't like living in a country where people are encouraged to speak their minds then I suggest this isn't the country for you to live in.
I watched some of it. They try to say the roots of Antifa are with fighting fascists in the 30-40s in Europe (aka Hitler and Mussolini).
Not really, there's actually far more similarities between Republicans, and Democrats than between the groups you're describing.
It turns out most modern Republicans, and Democrats are probably actually Liberals by definition....
Liberalism - Wikipedia
Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas and programmes such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free markets, civil rights, democratic societies, secular governments, gender equality and international cooperation.
Wrong. There are only two governmental types. Collectivist and individualist. Totalitarian dictatorship is the ultimate form of collectivist government, and absolute anarchy is the ultimate form of individualist non government. Fascism, socialism, and communism are all fundamentally collectivist. Thus they are all left wing.Not really, there's actually far more similarities between Republicans, and Democrats than between the groups you're describing.
It turns out most modern Republicans, and Democrats are probably actually Liberals by definition....
Liberalism - Wikipedia
Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas and programmes such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free markets, civil rights, democratic societies, secular governments, gender equality and international cooperation.
Wrong. There are only two governmental types. Collectivist and individualist. Totalitarian dictatorship is the ultimate form of collectivist government, and absolute anarchy is the ultimate form of individualist non government. Fascism, socialism, and communism are all fundamentally collectivist. Thus they are all left wing.
Oh please, Anarchy would lead to a society filled with Immigrants, Abortion, Druggies ,Porn, and Gay Marriage ( Social Liberalism) because they wouldn't do anything about these.
Most Fascists understand that in order to keep a Socially Conservative environment Totalitarianism is needed.
That's EXACTLY why Republicans have been failing, they support the freedom to be dominated by Liberalism, and Free markets sells out to Liberalism overwhelmingly.
Pure ignorance! You are a very unintelligent guy.
Totalitarianism, in the form of an unelected dictator, in theory could be a good thing if you get a good, strong and kind leader. A great King who makes all the right choices!
Yet that is a very rare occurrence. The vast majority of dictators let the power corrupt them, they create an elitist group of their cronies and the common folk suffer. They eventually are about only personal gain and see the people as pawns for their gain. Even if you get that very rare great and kind leader, they are usually followed by a unqualified child who led a privileged life and knows nothing of or doesn’t care about the suffering of others. Either way it leads to the same oppressive regime.
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Wrong, you are the very unintelligent guy, like most of the Jews on this forum.
You didn't cover anything of what I said about lack of government leading to Social Liberalism.... You went off on some tirade about oppression....
Actually even Communist regimes were generally more Socially Conservative than Capitalist regimes.
Some Nationalists in Eastern Europe want Communism back, because Communism had much less immigration, worse rights for Gays, and less rights for Jews.
You’re not a smart guy. In a dictatorship you would be one of the oppressed.
You didn't watch the video.
Not really, there's actually far more similarities between Republicans, and Democrats than between the groups you're describing.
It turns out most modern Republicans, and Democrats are probably actually Liberals by definition....
Liberalism - Wikipedia
Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas and programmes such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free markets, civil rights, democratic societies, secular governments, gender equality and international cooperation.
Wrong. There are only two governmental types. Collectivist and individualist. Totalitarian dictatorship is the ultimate form of collectivist government, and absolute anarchy is the ultimate form of individualist non government. Fascism, socialism, and communism are all fundamentally collectivist. Thus they are all left wing.Not really, there's actually far more similarities between Republicans, and Democrats than between the groups you're describing.
It turns out most modern Republicans, and Democrats are probably actually Liberals by definition....
Liberalism - Wikipedia
Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas and programmes such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free markets, civil rights, democratic societies, secular governments, gender equality and international cooperation.
Wrong. There are only two governmental types. Collectivist and individualist. Totalitarian dictatorship is the ultimate form of collectivist government, and absolute anarchy is the ultimate form of individualist non government. Fascism, socialism, and communism are all fundamentally collectivist. Thus they are all left wing.
Oh please, Anarchy would lead to a society filled with Immigrants, Abortion, Druggies ,Porn, and Gay Marriage ( Social Liberalism) because they wouldn't do anything about these.
Most Fascists understand that in order to keep a Socially Conservative environment Totalitarianism is needed.
That's EXACTLY why Republicans have been failing, they support the freedom to be dominated by Liberalism, and Free markets sells out to Liberalism overwhelmingly.
Pure ignorance! You are a very unintelligent guy.
Totalitarianism, in the form of an unelected dictator, in theory could be a good thing if you get a good, strong and kind leader. A great King who makes all the right choices!
Yet that is a very rare occurrence. The vast majority of dictators let the power corrupt them, they create an elitist group of their cronies and the common folk suffer. They eventually are about only personal gain and see the people as pawns for their gain. Even if you get that very rare great and kind leader, they are usually followed by a unqualified child who led a privileged life and knows nothing of or doesn’t care about the suffering of others. Either way it leads to the same oppressive regime.
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Wrong, you are the very unintelligent guy, like most of the Jews on this forum.
You didn't cover anything of what I said about lack of government leading to Social Liberalism.... You went off on some tirade about oppression....
Actually even Communist regimes were generally more Socially Conservative than Capitalist regimes.
Some Nationalists in Eastern Europe want Communism back, because Communism had much less immigration, worse rights for Gays, and less rights for Jews.
In dictatorships it is forced upon people. Gun rights? Nope, your dictator hero’s always disarm the common folk.
Furthermore, fascist, socialist, and communist are all the same. They are all collectivist idealogies that advocate for a strong central government, and no power in the hands of the people.
Not really, there's actually far more similarities between Republicans, and Democrats than between the groups you're describing.
It turns out most modern Republicans, and Democrats are probably actually Liberals by definition....
Liberalism - Wikipedia
Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas and programmes such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free markets, civil rights, democratic societies, secular governments, gender equality and international cooperation.
Wrong. There are only two governmental types. Collectivist and individualist. Totalitarian dictatorship is the ultimate form of collectivist government, and absolute anarchy is the ultimate form of individualist non government. Fascism, socialism, and communism are all fundamentally collectivist. Thus they are all left wing.Furthermore, fascist, socialist, and communist are all the same. They are all collectivist idealogies that advocate for a strong central government, and no power in the hands of the people.
Not really, there's actually far more similarities between Republicans, and Democrats than between the groups you're describing.
It turns out most modern Republicans, and Democrats are probably actually Liberals by definition....
Liberalism - Wikipedia
Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas and programmes such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free markets, civil rights, democratic societies, secular governments, gender equality and international cooperation.
Wrong. There are only two governmental types. Collectivist and individualist. Totalitarian dictatorship is the ultimate form of collectivist government, and absolute anarchy is the ultimate form of individualist non government. Fascism, socialism, and communism are all fundamentally collectivist. Thus they are all left wing.
Oh please, Anarchy would lead to a society filled with Immigrants, Abortion, Druggies ,Porn, and Gay Marriage ( Social Liberalism) because they wouldn't do anything about these.
Most Fascists understand that in order to keep a Socially Conservative environment Totalitarianism is needed.
That's EXACTLY why Republicans have been failing, they support the freedom to be dominated by Liberalism, and Free markets sells out to Liberalism overwhelmingly.
Pure ignorance! You are a very unintelligent guy.
Totalitarianism, in the form of an unelected dictator, in theory could be a good thing if you get a good, strong and kind leader. A great King who makes all the right choices!
Yet that is a very rare occurrence. The vast majority of dictators let the power corrupt them, they create an elitist group of their cronies and the common folk suffer. They eventually are about only personal gain and see the people as pawns for their gain. Even if you get that very rare great and kind leader, they are usually followed by a unqualified child who led a privileged life and knows nothing of or doesn’t care about the suffering of others. Either way it leads to the same oppressive regime.
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Totalitarianism usually favors Majorities over Minorities, or at least Might is Right.
How do you argue that's Left Wing social values?
Yes, that's kind of the appeal... Yes I do want to strengthen the power of the Majority to dominate the Minority.... Unlike our Liberal society which supports Minority over Majority.
But, NO, Truth be told I don't support extreme Totalitarianism.
I support enough Totalitarianism to combat our issues.
Plans include.
1.) Crack down on Hollywood, Media, and Academia promoting Liberalism. (Create a micro-managed Hollywood, Media, and Academia in it's place, where there's balance against Liberalism)
2.) Crack down on Capitalists who hire Immigrant foreigners. ( Jail those who hire them)
3.) Crack down on those who Outsource jobs. (Jail those who hire them)
4.) Support Racial separatism by revoking the citizenship of Blacks, Native Americans, and Hispanics. (Create more Black, and Native American homelands)
5.) Crack down on Abortion, Gay Marriage etc.
6.) Reward high IQ, non criminals for having kids with Tax Incentives, punish low IQ, Criminals for having more than 1 Kid with Fines. (To combat dysgenics)
I fail to see how "Individualists for Liberty" could possibly turn the tide on these issues?
The truth is my ideals only target degenerated Minorities who have for too long used Liberty to wield power of Liberalism over the Majority.
No, I don't support massive Totalitarianism, just as little as can be done to fix our society.
Furthermore, fascist, socialist, and communist are all the same. They are all collectivist idealogies that advocate for a strong central government, and no power in the hands of the people.You came here accusing me of being a fascist without knowing the difference between fascist and anti-fascist, so let me help you out.
characteristics of fascism
pro dictatorship and anti-democracy
pro military, pro police
pro imperialist foreign policy
pro state, nationalist, xenophobic
pro toxic masculinity
racist, anti-semitic
characteristics of anti-fascism
pro peaceful foreign policy
pro community, pro worker rights
pro feminist and anti-racist
Not really, there's actually far more similarities between Republicans, and Democrats than between the groups you're describing.
It turns out most modern Republicans, and Democrats are probably actually Liberals by definition....
Liberalism - Wikipedia
Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas and programmes such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free markets, civil rights, democratic societies, secular governments, gender equality and international cooperation.
Wrong. There are only two governmental types. Collectivist and individualist. Totalitarian dictatorship is the ultimate form of collectivist government, and absolute anarchy is the ultimate form of individualist non government. Fascism, socialism, and communism are all fundamentally collectivist. Thus they are all left wing.Furthermore, fascist, socialist, and communist are all the same. They are all collectivist idealogies that advocate for a strong central government, and no power in the hands of the people.You came here accusing me of being a fascist without knowing the difference between fascist and anti-fascist, so let me help you out.
characteristics of fascism
pro dictatorship and anti-democracy
pro military, pro police
pro imperialist foreign policy
pro state, nationalist, xenophobic
pro toxic masculinity
racist, anti-semitic
characteristics of anti-fascism
pro peaceful foreign policy
pro community, pro worker rights
pro feminist and anti-racist
Not really, there's actually far more similarities between Republicans, and Democrats than between the groups you're describing.
It turns out most modern Republicans, and Democrats are probably actually Liberals by definition....
Liberalism - Wikipedia
Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas and programmes such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free markets, civil rights, democratic societies, secular governments, gender equality and international cooperation.
Wrong. There are only two governmental types. Collectivist and individualist. Totalitarian dictatorship is the ultimate form of collectivist government, and absolute anarchy is the ultimate form of individualist non government. Fascism, socialism, and communism are all fundamentally collectivist. Thus they are all left wing.
Oh please, Anarchy would lead to a society filled with Immigrants, Abortion, Druggies ,Porn, and Gay Marriage ( Social Liberalism) because they wouldn't do anything about these.
Most Fascists understand that in order to keep a Socially Conservative environment Totalitarianism is needed.
That's EXACTLY why Republicans have been failing, they support the freedom to be dominated by Liberalism, and Free markets sells out to Liberalism overwhelmingly.
Even if you get that very rare great and kind leader, they are usually followed by a unqualified child who led a privileged life and knows nothing of or doesn’t care about the suffering of others. Either way it leads to the same oppressive regime.
Wrong. There are only two governmental types. Collectivist and individualist. Totalitarian dictatorship is the ultimate form of collectivist government, and absolute anarchy is the ultimate form of individualist non government. Fascism, socialism, and communism are all fundamentally collectivist. Thus they are all left wing.Wrong. There are only two governmental types. Collectivist and individualist. Totalitarian dictatorship is the ultimate form of collectivist government, and absolute anarchy is the ultimate form of individualist non government. Fascism, socialism, and communism are all fundamentally collectivist. Thus they are all left wing.
Oh please, Anarchy would lead to a society filled with Immigrants, Abortion, Druggies ,Porn, and Gay Marriage ( Social Liberalism) because they wouldn't do anything about these.
Most Fascists understand that in order to keep a Socially Conservative environment Totalitarianism is needed.
That's EXACTLY why Republicans have been failing, they support the freedom to be dominated by Liberalism, and Free markets sells out to Liberalism overwhelmingly.
Pure ignorance! You are a very unintelligent guy.
Totalitarianism, in the form of an unelected dictator, in theory could be a good thing if you get a good, strong and kind leader. A great King who makes all the right choices!
Yet that is a very rare occurrence. The vast majority of dictators let the power corrupt them, they create an elitist group of their cronies and the common folk suffer. They eventually are about only personal gain and see the people as pawns for their gain. Even if you get that very rare great and kind leader, they are usually followed by a unqualified child who led a privileged life and knows nothing of or doesn’t care about the suffering of others. Either way it leads to the same oppressive regime.
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Wrong, you are the very unintelligent guy, like most of the Jews on this forum.
You didn't cover anything of what I said about lack of government leading to Social Liberalism.... You went off on some tirade about oppression....
Actually even Communist regimes were generally more Socially Conservative than Capitalist regimes.
Some Nationalists in Eastern Europe want Communism back, because Communism had much less immigration, worse rights for Gays, and less rights for Jews.
In dictatorships it is forced upon people. Gun rights? Nope, your dictator hero’s always disarm the common folk.
Hitler actually supported more Guns for Germans, however Jews on the other hand were disarmed.
Wrong. There are only two governmental types. Collectivist and individualist. Totalitarian dictatorship is the ultimate form of collectivist government, and absolute anarchy is the ultimate form of individualist non government. Fascism, socialism, and communism are all fundamentally collectivist. Thus they are all left wing.
Wrong, Fascists are usually very Socially Conservative, and for Hierarchy, and Tradition. therefor they are moslty Right-Wing.
Economically Liberalism actually means Free Markets.
Most Americans are very, very Liberal.... Individualists are the true Liberals.
Right-wing politics - Wikipedia
Right-wing politics hold that certain social orders and hierarchies are inevitable, natural, normal or desirable,[1][2][3] typically supporting this position on the basis of natural law, economics or tradition.[4]. 693, 721[5][6][7][8][9][page needed] Hierarchy and inequality may be viewed as natural results of traditional social differences[10][11]or the competition in market economies.[12][13] The term right-wing can generally refer to "the conservative or reactionary section of a political party or system".[14]
Economic liberalism - Wikipedia
Economic liberalism is an economic system organized on individual lines, which means the greatest possible number of economic decisions are made by individuals or households than by collective institutions or organizations.[1] It includes a spectrum of different economic policies, such as freedom of movement, but its basis is on strong support for a market economy and private property in the means of production. Although economic liberalism can also be supportive of government regulation to a certain degree, it tends to oppose government intervention in the free market when it inhibits free trade and open competition.
Economic liberalism is most often associated with support for free markets and private ownership of capital assets. Historically, economic liberalism arose in response to mercantilism and feudalism. Today, economic liberalism is also considered opposed to non-capitalist economic orders, such as socialism and planned economies.[2] It also contrasts with protectionism because of its support for free trade and open markets.
An economy that is managed according to these precepts may be described as a liberal economy.
That's Fabian Socialist propaganda. Collectivist/Anarchy. Those are the two extremes dude.
The term Left-Wing terms come from Europe.... They seem to be not well understood in the U.S.A... Because our school systems don't focus much, if at all on them... If they do it's too late.
I don't deny that yes Nazis did have some Left Wing workers rights of Socialism.
However, everything else about Nazis was Far Right having an extreme support of Hierarchy, and extreme focus on Traditions, (Social Conservative values)
Aaaaaaand the Soviet Union under Stalin was what exactly?
Stalin obviously did believe in some ethnic hierarchy. struggles... So absolutely he's not a pure Leftist Communist by definition.
That's not to say that violence is necessary in ethnic disputes.... Obviously Stalin thought so in some cases.
That okay Stalin's mass-murder of Poles with bullets was a violent ethnic hierarchy struggle.
Polish Operation of the NKVD - Wikipedia
'
But, that say Polish Soviet Golulka's anti-Zionist purge was which didn't really harm much of anything, was more of a assertive, but overall a non-violent ethnic hierarchy struggle.
1968 Polish political crisis - Wikipedia
Not really, there's actually far more similarities between Republicans, and Democrats than between the groups you're describing.
It turns out most modern Republicans, and Democrats are probably actually Liberals by definition....
Liberalism - Wikipedia
Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas and programmes such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free markets, civil rights, democratic societies, secular governments, gender equality and international cooperation.
Wrong. There are only two governmental types. Collectivist and individualist. Totalitarian dictatorship is the ultimate form of collectivist government, and absolute anarchy is the ultimate form of individualist non government. Fascism, socialism, and communism are all fundamentally collectivist. Thus they are all left wing.Not really, there's actually far more similarities between Republicans, and Democrats than between the groups you're describing.
It turns out most modern Republicans, and Democrats are probably actually Liberals by definition....
Liberalism - Wikipedia
Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas and programmes such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free markets, civil rights, democratic societies, secular governments, gender equality and international cooperation.
Wrong. There are only two governmental types. Collectivist and individualist. Totalitarian dictatorship is the ultimate form of collectivist government, and absolute anarchy is the ultimate form of individualist non government. Fascism, socialism, and communism are all fundamentally collectivist. Thus they are all left wing.
Oh please, Anarchy would lead to a society filled with Immigrants, Abortion, Druggies ,Porn, and Gay Marriage ( Social Liberalism) because they wouldn't do anything about these.
Most Fascists understand that in order to keep a Socially Conservative environment Totalitarianism is needed.
That's EXACTLY why Republicans have been failing, they support the freedom to be dominated by Liberalism, and Free markets sells out to Liberalism overwhelmingly.
Pure ignorance! You are a very unintelligent guy.
Totalitarianism, in the form of an unelected dictator, in theory could be a good thing if you get a good, strong and kind leader. A great King who makes all the right choices!
Yet that is a very rare occurrence. The vast majority of dictators let the power corrupt them, they create an elitist group of their cronies and the common folk suffer. They eventually are about only personal gain and see the people as pawns for their gain. Even if you get that very rare great and kind leader, they are usually followed by a unqualified child who led a privileged life and knows nothing of or doesn’t care about the suffering of others. Either way it leads to the same oppressive regime.
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Totalitarianism usually favors Majorities over Minorities, or at least Might is Right.
How do you argue that's Left Wing social values?
Yes, that's kind of the appeal... Yes I do want to strengthen the power of the Majority to dominate the Minority.... Unlike our Liberal society which supports Minority over Majority.
But, NO, Truth be told I don't support extreme Totalitarianism.
I support enough Totalitarianism to combat our issues.
Plans include.
1.) Crack down on Hollywood, Media, and Academia promoting Liberalism. (Create a micro-managed Hollywood, Media, and Academia in it's place, where there's balance against Liberalism)
2.) Crack down on Capitalists who hire Immigrant foreigners. ( Jail those who hire them)
3.) Crack down on those who Outsource jobs. (Jail those who hire them)
4.) Support Racial separatism by revoking the citizenship of Blacks, Native Americans, and Hispanics. (Create more Black, and Native American homelands)
5.) Crack down on Abortion, Gay Marriage etc.
6.) Reward high IQ, non criminals for having kids with Tax Incentives, punish low IQ, Criminals for having more than 1 Kid with Fines. (To combat dysgenics)
I fail to see how "Individualists for Liberty" could possibly turn the tide on these issues?
The truth is my ideals only target degenerated Minorities who have for too long used Liberty to wield power of Liberalism over the Majority.
No, I don't support massive Totalitarianism, just as little as can be done to fix our society.
There is just no getting through to this mental midget. Totalitarian dictators do not need to appeal to the majority or the minority. All they need to appeal to is the tiny elitist class at the top keeping them in power. Hence why dictatorships whether it is Kings and Monarchs or Socialist leaders like Stalin and NK Little Kim always fail.
Your list is a fuck joke:
1. Crack down on media. See a dumbfuck like you believes the Jews control the media for a diabolical reason. Yet it is not even remotely true, esp in Europe which is 99% antiIsrael. Silencing free press will lead to what? It will lead to fake news. Just ask North Koreans.
2. Capitalism has brought wealth to a world where most people used to live in poverty. I am all for a ban on illegals, but many legal immigrants do great things for this country. I used to be Compliance for eBusiness. Sorry part is that you can’t fill the roles without grabbing people from Indian on H1B visas.
3. Crack down on outsourcing: Not a solution, rather would create bigger problems. The solution is make the US more attractive to insourcing, which Trump has done.
4. Racial segregation: Lol I don’t need to answer this.
5. What does cracking down on abortion and gay marriage do for a prosperous society?
6. The last one punished you sir. In all honesty this country rewards high IQ people who work hard: scholarships, rewarding careers and money. This one is solved. This child tax credits don’t provide even a percent of what children cost. I have 4 kids. All of them go back to their Ruskie roots and are on ice. My son’s hockey ice time cost $4k a yr, plus travel, hotels, gear etc. my 3 girls figure skate I pay $1300 a month ($15.6k a yr) for ice and coach time plus costumes, travel etc. Then you have food, school, camp, vacations, clothes etc. Kids never save anyone money, esp not the poor.
Smh
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Wrong, Fascists are usually very Socially Conservative, and for Hierarchy, and Tradition. therefor they are moslty Right-Wing.
Economically Liberalism actually means Free Markets.
Most Americans are very, very Liberal.... Individualists are the true Liberals.
Right-wing politics - Wikipedia
Right-wing politics hold that certain social orders and hierarchies are inevitable, natural, normal or desirable,[1][2][3] typically supporting this position on the basis of natural law, economics or tradition.[4]
Economic liberalism - Wikipedia
Economic liberalism is an economic system organized on individual lines, which means the greatest possible number of economic decisions are made by individuals or households than by collective institutions or organizations.[1] It includes a spectrum of different economic policies, such as freedom of movement, but its basis is on strong support for a market economy and private property in the means of production. Although economic liberalism can also be supportive of government regulation to a certain degree, it tends to oppose government intervention in the free market when it inhibits free trade and open competition.
Economic liberalism is most often associated with support for free markets and private ownership of capital assets. Historically, economic liberalism arose in response to mercantilism and feudalism. Today, economic liberalism is also considered opposed to non-capitalist economic orders, such as socialism and planned economies.[2] It also contrasts with protectionism because of its support for free trade and open markets.
An economy that is managed according to these precepts may be described as a liberal economy.
That's Fabian Socialist propaganda. Collectivist/Anarchy. Those are the two extremes dude.
The term Left-Wing terms come from Europe.... They seem to be not well understood in the U.S.A... Because our school systems don't focus much, if at all on them... If they do it's too late.
I don't deny that yes Nazis did have some Left Wing workers rights of Socialism.
However, everything else about Nazis was Far Right having an extreme support of Hierarchy, and extreme focus on Traditions, (Social Conservative values)
Aaaaaaand the Soviet Union under Stalin was what exactly?
Stalin obviously did believe in some ethnic hierarchy. struggles... So absolutely he's not a pure Leftist Communist by definition.
That's not to say that violence is necessary in ethnic disputes.... Obviously Stalin thought so in some cases.
That okay Stalin's mass-murder of Poles with bullets was a violent ethnic hierarchy struggle.
Polish Operation of the NKVD - Wikipedia
'
But, that say Polish Soviet Golulka's anti-Zionist purge was which didn't really harm much of anything, was more of a assertive, but overall a non-violent ethnic hierarchy struggle.
1968 Polish political crisis - Wikipedia
You are merely regurgitating Fabian socialist propaganda. Collectivist governments concentrate power in the hands of the few. Individualist governments take power away from the few. Feel free to show us the difference in practical terms between the citizens experience had they lived in either the Soviet Union or fascist Germany.
List out the differences.
Oh please, Anarchy would lead to a society filled with Immigrants, Abortion, Druggies ,Porn, and Gay Marriage ( Social Liberalism) because they wouldn't do anything about these.
Most Fascists understand that in order to keep a Socially Conservative environment Totalitarianism is needed.
That's EXACTLY why Republicans have been failing, they support the freedom to be dominated by Liberalism, and Free markets sells out to Liberalism overwhelmingly.
Pure ignorance! You are a very unintelligent guy.
Totalitarianism, in the form of an unelected dictator, in theory could be a good thing if you get a good, strong and kind leader. A great King who makes all the right choices!
Yet that is a very rare occurrence. The vast majority of dictators let the power corrupt them, they create an elitist group of their cronies and the common folk suffer. They eventually are about only personal gain and see the people as pawns for their gain. Even if you get that very rare great and kind leader, they are usually followed by a unqualified child who led a privileged life and knows nothing of or doesn’t care about the suffering of others. Either way it leads to the same oppressive regime.
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Wrong, you are the very unintelligent guy, like most of the Jews on this forum.
You didn't cover anything of what I said about lack of government leading to Social Liberalism.... You went off on some tirade about oppression....
Actually even Communist regimes were generally more Socially Conservative than Capitalist regimes.
Some Nationalists in Eastern Europe want Communism back, because Communism had much less immigration, worse rights for Gays, and less rights for Jews.
In dictatorships it is forced upon people. Gun rights? Nope, your dictator hero’s always disarm the common folk.
Hitler actually supported more Guns for Germans, however Jews on the other hand were disarmed.
That is false. The ONLY Germans who could get gun permits were Party members. They constituted less than 10% of the population of Germany. Gun control is used to separate the elite from the chattel. The book, The Nazi Seizure of Power go's in to great detail about how every weapon was regulated, including bayonets. You are quite astonishingly wrong on this account.
Ok this guy is definitely a troll.Furthermore, fascist, socialist, and communist are all the same. They are all collectivist idealogies that advocate for a strong central government, and no power in the hands of the people.
Not really, there's actually far more similarities between Republicans, and Democrats than between the groups you're describing.
It turns out most modern Republicans, and Democrats are probably actually Liberals by definition....
Liberalism - Wikipedia
Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas and programmes such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free markets, civil rights, democratic societies, secular governments, gender equality and international cooperation.
Wrong. There are only two governmental types. Collectivist and individualist. Totalitarian dictatorship is the ultimate form of collectivist government, and absolute anarchy is the ultimate form of individualist non government. Fascism, socialism, and communism are all fundamentally collectivist. Thus they are all left wing.Furthermore, fascist, socialist, and communist are all the same. They are all collectivist idealogies that advocate for a strong central government, and no power in the hands of the people.
Not really, there's actually far more similarities between Republicans, and Democrats than between the groups you're describing.
It turns out most modern Republicans, and Democrats are probably actually Liberals by definition....
Liberalism - Wikipedia
Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas and programmes such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free markets, civil rights, democratic societies, secular governments, gender equality and international cooperation.
Wrong. There are only two governmental types. Collectivist and individualist. Totalitarian dictatorship is the ultimate form of collectivist government, and absolute anarchy is the ultimate form of individualist non government. Fascism, socialism, and communism are all fundamentally collectivist. Thus they are all left wing.
Oh please, Anarchy would lead to a society filled with Immigrants, Abortion, Druggies ,Porn, and Gay Marriage ( Social Liberalism) because they wouldn't do anything about these.
Most Fascists understand that in order to keep a Socially Conservative environment Totalitarianism is needed.
That's EXACTLY why Republicans have been failing, they support the freedom to be dominated by Liberalism, and Free markets sells out to Liberalism overwhelmingly.
Even if you get that very rare great and kind leader, they are usually followed by a unqualified child who led a privileged life and knows nothing of or doesn’t care about the suffering of others. Either way it leads to the same oppressive regime.
I think that some groups are just more violent.... I think Government only is minimal in it..
But... Here's the thing... We could only cleanse the society of most of it's violence by Totalitarian Eugenics.
Some nasty genocides / mass murder events have indeed come from limited Governments too.
No government.
Massacres of Poles in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia - Wikipedia
Small government.
Rwandan genocide - Wikipedia
Very limited government.
Rhineland massacres - Wikipedia
No government.
Selk'nam genocide - Wikipedia
Virtually no government.
1971 Bangladesh genocide - Wikipedia
No government.
Darfur genocide - Wikipedia
Totalitarian dictators do not need to appeal to the majority or the minority. All they need to appeal to is the tiny elitist class at the top keeping them in power. Hence why dictatorships whether it is Kings and Monarchs or Socialist leaders like Stalin and NK Little Kim always fail.Not really, there's actually far more similarities between Republicans, and Democrats than between the groups you're describing.
It turns out most modern Republicans, and Democrats are probably actually Liberals by definition....
Liberalism - Wikipedia
Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas and programmes such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free markets, civil rights, democratic societies, secular governments, gender equality and international cooperation.
Wrong. There are only two governmental types. Collectivist and individualist. Totalitarian dictatorship is the ultimate form of collectivist government, and absolute anarchy is the ultimate form of individualist non government. Fascism, socialism, and communism are all fundamentally collectivist. Thus they are all left wing.Not really, there's actually far more similarities between Republicans, and Democrats than between the groups you're describing.
It turns out most modern Republicans, and Democrats are probably actually Liberals by definition....
Liberalism - Wikipedia
Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas and programmes such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free markets, civil rights, democratic societies, secular governments, gender equality and international cooperation.
Wrong. There are only two governmental types. Collectivist and individualist. Totalitarian dictatorship is the ultimate form of collectivist government, and absolute anarchy is the ultimate form of individualist non government. Fascism, socialism, and communism are all fundamentally collectivist. Thus they are all left wing.
Oh please, Anarchy would lead to a society filled with Immigrants, Abortion, Druggies ,Porn, and Gay Marriage ( Social Liberalism) because they wouldn't do anything about these.
Most Fascists understand that in order to keep a Socially Conservative environment Totalitarianism is needed.
That's EXACTLY why Republicans have been failing, they support the freedom to be dominated by Liberalism, and Free markets sells out to Liberalism overwhelmingly.
Pure ignorance! You are a very unintelligent guy.
Totalitarianism, in the form of an unelected dictator, in theory could be a good thing if you get a good, strong and kind leader. A great King who makes all the right choices!
Yet that is a very rare occurrence. The vast majority of dictators let the power corrupt them, they create an elitist group of their cronies and the common folk suffer. They eventually are about only personal gain and see the people as pawns for their gain. Even if you get that very rare great and kind leader, they are usually followed by a unqualified child who led a privileged life and knows nothing of or doesn’t care about the suffering of others. Either way it leads to the same oppressive regime.
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Totalitarianism usually favors Majorities over Minorities, or at least Might is Right.
How do you argue that's Left Wing social values?
Yes, that's kind of the appeal... Yes I do want to strengthen the power of the Majority to dominate the Minority.... Unlike our Liberal society which supports Minority over Majority.
But, NO, Truth be told I don't support extreme Totalitarianism.
I support enough Totalitarianism to combat our issues.
Plans include.
1.) Crack down on Hollywood, Media, and Academia promoting Liberalism. (Create a micro-managed Hollywood, Media, and Academia in it's place, where there's balance against Liberalism)
2.) Crack down on Capitalists who hire Immigrant foreigners. ( Jail those who hire them)
3.) Crack down on those who Outsource jobs. (Jail those who hire them)
4.) Support Racial separatism by revoking the citizenship of Blacks, Native Americans, and Hispanics. (Create more Black, and Native American homelands)
5.) Crack down on Abortion, Gay Marriage etc.
6.) Reward high IQ, non criminals for having kids with Tax Incentives, punish low IQ, Criminals for having more than 1 Kid with Fines. (To combat dysgenics)
I fail to see how "Individualists for Liberty" could possibly turn the tide on these issues?
The truth is my ideals only target degenerated Minorities who have for too long used Liberty to wield power of Liberalism over the Majority.
No, I don't support massive Totalitarianism, just as little as can be done to fix our society.
Furthermore, fascist, socialist, and communist are all the same. They are all collectivist idealogies that advocate for a strong central government, and no power in the hands of the people.You came here accusing me of being a fascist without knowing the difference between fascist and anti-fascist, so let me help you out.
characteristics of fascism
pro dictatorship and anti-democracy
pro military, pro police
pro imperialist foreign policy
pro state, nationalist, xenophobic
pro toxic masculinity
racist, anti-semitic
characteristics of anti-fascism
pro peaceful foreign policy
pro community, pro worker rights
pro feminist and anti-racist
Not really, there's actually far more similarities between Republicans, and Democrats than between the groups you're describing.
It turns out most modern Republicans, and Democrats are probably actually Liberals by definition....
Liberalism - Wikipedia
Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas and programmes such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free markets, civil rights, democratic societies, secular governments, gender equality and international cooperation.
Wrong. There are only two governmental types. Collectivist and individualist. Totalitarian dictatorship is the ultimate form of collectivist government, and absolute anarchy is the ultimate form of individualist non government. Fascism, socialism, and communism are all fundamentally collectivist. Thus they are all left wing.Furthermore, fascist, socialist, and communist are all the same. They are all collectivist idealogies that advocate for a strong central government, and no power in the hands of the people.You came here accusing me of being a fascist without knowing the difference between fascist and anti-fascist, so let me help you out.
characteristics of fascism
pro dictatorship and anti-democracy
pro military, pro police
pro imperialist foreign policy
pro state, nationalist, xenophobic
pro toxic masculinity
racist, anti-semitic
characteristics of anti-fascism
pro peaceful foreign policy
pro community, pro worker rights
pro feminist and anti-racist
Not really, there's actually far more similarities between Republicans, and Democrats than between the groups you're describing.
It turns out most modern Republicans, and Democrats are probably actually Liberals by definition....
Liberalism - Wikipedia
Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas and programmes such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free markets, civil rights, democratic societies, secular governments, gender equality and international cooperation.
Wrong. There are only two governmental types. Collectivist and individualist. Totalitarian dictatorship is the ultimate form of collectivist government, and absolute anarchy is the ultimate form of individualist non government. Fascism, socialism, and communism are all fundamentally collectivist. Thus they are all left wing.
Oh please, Anarchy would lead to a society filled with Immigrants, Abortion, Druggies ,Porn, and Gay Marriage ( Social Liberalism) because they wouldn't do anything about these.
Most Fascists understand that in order to keep a Socially Conservative environment Totalitarianism is needed.
That's EXACTLY why Republicans have been failing, they support the freedom to be dominated by Liberalism, and Free markets sells out to Liberalism overwhelmingly.
The vast majority of dictators let the power corrupt them, they create an elitist group of their cronies and the common folk suffer. They eventually are about only personal gain and see the people as pawns for their gain. Even if you get that very rare great and kind leader, they are usually followed by a unqualified child who led a privileged life and knows nothing of or doesn’t care about the suffering of others. Either way it leads to the same oppressive regime.
Ok this guy is definitely a troll.Not really, there's actually far more similarities between Republicans, and Democrats than between the groups you're describing.
It turns out most modern Republicans, and Democrats are probably actually Liberals by definition....
Liberalism - Wikipedia
Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas and programmes such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free markets, civil rights, democratic societies, secular governments, gender equality and international cooperation.
Wrong. There are only two governmental types. Collectivist and individualist. Totalitarian dictatorship is the ultimate form of collectivist government, and absolute anarchy is the ultimate form of individualist non government. Fascism, socialism, and communism are all fundamentally collectivist. Thus they are all left wing.Not really, there's actually far more similarities between Republicans, and Democrats than between the groups you're describing.
It turns out most modern Republicans, and Democrats are probably actually Liberals by definition....
Liberalism - Wikipedia
Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas and programmes such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free markets, civil rights, democratic societies, secular governments, gender equality and international cooperation.
Wrong. There are only two governmental types. Collectivist and individualist. Totalitarian dictatorship is the ultimate form of collectivist government, and absolute anarchy is the ultimate form of individualist non government. Fascism, socialism, and communism are all fundamentally collectivist. Thus they are all left wing.
Oh please, Anarchy would lead to a society filled with Immigrants, Abortion, Druggies ,Porn, and Gay Marriage ( Social Liberalism) because they wouldn't do anything about these.
Most Fascists understand that in order to keep a Socially Conservative environment Totalitarianism is needed.
That's EXACTLY why Republicans have been failing, they support the freedom to be dominated by Liberalism, and Free markets sells out to Liberalism overwhelmingly.
Even if you get that very rare great and kind leader, they are usually followed by a unqualified child who led a privileged life and knows nothing of or doesn’t care about the suffering of others. Either way it leads to the same oppressive regime.
I think that some groups are just more violent.... I think Government only is minimal in it..
But... Here's the thing... We could only cleanse the society of most of it's violence by Totalitarian Eugenics.
Some nasty genocides / mass murder events have indeed come from limited Governments too.
No government.
Massacres of Poles in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia - Wikipedia
Small government.
Rwandan genocide - Wikipedia
Very limited government.
Rhineland massacres - Wikipedia
No government.
Selk'nam genocide - Wikipedia
Virtually no government.
1971 Bangladesh genocide - Wikipedia
No government.
Darfur genocide - Wikipedia
But Antifa doesn’t confront radical Islam! They push a fascist and much more dangerous movement of Sharia Law. They don’t confront Islam, because it takes courage and it is a tough battle. Like most leftists, they are cowards so they ally with radical Islam instead of fighting it, destroying any so-called creditability they had.
Definitely one of the funnier aspects of this board is the group of posters who constantly they've "beaten" or "bitch-slapped" or "smacked around" someone, as if they're keeping some kind of goofy tally in their heads.These are people who refer to minorities as dogs or animals. They brag about the good old days when lynching was a fun way to spend the weekend. There is no way to avoid another civil war unless middle class suburbia wakes up to where we are headed.People are people. I know a few Antifa who are conservative or libertarian. Not liking fascists is something we all should agree on.
Anyone with a brain does, however, if you engage in acts of violence against people who are having a rally, and those people happen to have a philosophy that you don't approve of, you are engaging in fascist behavior. This is the USA and the ONLY language that is protected by the COTUS is hate speech. Lovey dovey speech doesn't need to be protected, but hate speech does. This country was founded on the principle that if you are a moron, and you want to tell the world just how big a moron you are, you have that Right. No one has the Right to shut them up.
Stop normalizing and protecting white supremacists. That allows them to think they are mainstream.
USMB is infested with white supremacists so this is a good place as any for me to pimp slap these retarded crybabies.
USMB is generally very fair,and that fairness has allowed for it to attract many Alt-Right peoples including White Supremacist's.
With that said, I would think that it would be difficult for anyone to smack me around intellectually.
I've spent a lot of time for years thinking, and researching, and I think that 95% of the time I dominate on this, or any forum in terms of intellect... (A much higher amount of debate wins, than debate losses vs almost anyone here)
Not really, there's actually far more similarities between Republicans, and Democrats than between the groups you're describing.
It turns out most modern Republicans, and Democrats are probably actually Liberals by definition....
Liberalism - Wikipedia
Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas and programmes such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free markets, civil rights, democratic societies, secular governments, gender equality and international cooperation.
Wrong. There are only two governmental types. Collectivist and individualist. Totalitarian dictatorship is the ultimate form of collectivist government, and absolute anarchy is the ultimate form of individualist non government. Fascism, socialism, and communism are all fundamentally collectivist. Thus they are all left wing.Not really, there's actually far more similarities between Republicans, and Democrats than between the groups you're describing.
It turns out most modern Republicans, and Democrats are probably actually Liberals by definition....
Liberalism - Wikipedia
Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas and programmes such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free markets, civil rights, democratic societies, secular governments, gender equality and international cooperation.
Wrong. There are only two governmental types. Collectivist and individualist. Totalitarian dictatorship is the ultimate form of collectivist government, and absolute anarchy is the ultimate form of individualist non government. Fascism, socialism, and communism are all fundamentally collectivist. Thus they are all left wing.
Oh please, Anarchy would lead to a society filled with Immigrants, Abortion, Druggies ,Porn, and Gay Marriage ( Social Liberalism) because they wouldn't do anything about these.
Most Fascists understand that in order to keep a Socially Conservative environment Totalitarianism is needed.
That's EXACTLY why Republicans have been failing, they support the freedom to be dominated by Liberalism, and Free markets sells out to Liberalism overwhelmingly.
Pure ignorance! You are a very unintelligent guy.
Totalitarianism, in the form of an unelected dictator, in theory could be a good thing if you get a good, strong and kind leader. A great King who makes all the right choices!
Yet that is a very rare occurrence. The vast majority of dictators let the power corrupt them, they create an elitist group of their cronies and the common folk suffer. They eventually are about only personal gain and see the people as pawns for their gain. Even if you get that very rare great and kind leader, they are usually followed by a unqualified child who led a privileged life and knows nothing of or doesn’t care about the suffering of others. Either way it leads to the same oppressive regime.
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Totalitarianism usually favors Majorities over Minorities, or at least Might is Right.
How do you argue that's Left Wing social values?
Yes, that's kind of the appeal... Yes I do want to strengthen the power of the Majority to dominate the Minority.... Unlike our Liberal society which supports Minority over Majority.
But, NO, Truth be told I don't support extreme Totalitarianism.
I support enough Totalitarianism to combat our issues.
Plans include.
1.) Crack down on Hollywood, Media, and Academia promoting Liberalism. (Create a micro-managed Hollywood, Media, and Academia in it's place, where there's balance against Liberalism)
2.) Crack down on Capitalists who hire Immigrant foreigners. ( Jail those who hire them)
3.) Crack down on those who Outsource jobs. (Jail those who hire them)
4.) Support Racial separatism by revoking the citizenship of Blacks, Native Americans, and Hispanics. (Create more Black, and Native American homelands)
5.) Crack down on Abortion, Gay Marriage etc.
6.) Reward high IQ, non criminals for having kids with Tax Incentives, punish low IQ, Criminals for having more than 1 Kid with Fines. (To combat dysgenics)
I fail to see how "Individualists for Liberty" could possibly turn the tide on these issues?
The truth is my ideals only target degenerated Minorities who have for too long used Liberty to wield power of Liberalism over the Majority.
No, I don't support massive Totalitarianism, just as little as can be done to fix our society.
. Yet it is not even remotely true, esp in Europe which is 99% antiIsrael. Silencing free press will lead to what
Not really, there's actually far more similarities between Republicans, and Democrats than between the groups you're describing.
It turns out most modern Republicans, and Democrats are probably actually Liberals by definition....
Liberalism - Wikipedia
Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas and programmes such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free markets, civil rights, democratic societies, secular governments, gender equality and international cooperation.
Wrong. There are only two governmental types. Collectivist and individualist. Totalitarian dictatorship is the ultimate form of collectivist government, and absolute anarchy is the ultimate form of individualist non government. Fascism, socialism, and communism are all fundamentally collectivist. Thus they are all left wing.Not really, there's actually far more similarities between Republicans, and Democrats than between the groups you're describing.
It turns out most modern Republicans, and Democrats are probably actually Liberals by definition....
Liberalism - Wikipedia
Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas and programmes such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free markets, civil rights, democratic societies, secular governments, gender equality and international cooperation.
Wrong. There are only two governmental types. Collectivist and individualist. Totalitarian dictatorship is the ultimate form of collectivist government, and absolute anarchy is the ultimate form of individualist non government. Fascism, socialism, and communism are all fundamentally collectivist. Thus they are all left wing.
Oh please, Anarchy would lead to a society filled with Immigrants, Abortion, Druggies ,Porn, and Gay Marriage ( Social Liberalism) because they wouldn't do anything about these.
Most Fascists understand that in order to keep a Socially Conservative environment Totalitarianism is needed.
That's EXACTLY why Republicans have been failing, they support the freedom to be dominated by Liberalism, and Free markets sells out to Liberalism overwhelmingly.
Pure ignorance! You are a very unintelligent guy.
Totalitarianism, in the form of an unelected dictator, in theory could be a good thing if you get a good, strong and kind leader. A great King who makes all the right choices!
Yet that is a very rare occurrence. The vast majority of dictators let the power corrupt them, they create an elitist group of their cronies and the common folk suffer. They eventually are about only personal gain and see the people as pawns for their gain. Even if you get that very rare great and kind leader, they are usually followed by a unqualified child who led a privileged life and knows nothing of or doesn’t care about the suffering of others. Either way it leads to the same oppressive regime.
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Totalitarianism usually favors Majorities over Minorities, or at least Might is Right.
How do you argue that's Left Wing social values?
Yes, that's kind of the appeal... Yes I do want to strengthen the power of the Majority to dominate the Minority.... Unlike our Liberal society which supports Minority over Majority.
But, NO, Truth be told I don't support extreme Totalitarianism.
I support enough Totalitarianism to combat our issues.
Plans include.
1.) Crack down on Hollywood, Media, and Academia promoting Liberalism. (Create a micro-managed Hollywood, Media, and Academia in it's place, where there's balance against Liberalism)
2.) Crack down on Capitalists who hire Immigrant foreigners. ( Jail those who hire them)
3.) Crack down on those who Outsource jobs. (Jail those who hire them)
4.) Support Racial separatism by revoking the citizenship of Blacks, Native Americans, and Hispanics. (Create more Black, and Native American homelands)
5.) Crack down on Abortion, Gay Marriage etc.
6.) Reward high IQ, non criminals for having kids with Tax Incentives, punish low IQ, Criminals for having more than 1 Kid with Fines. (To combat dysgenics)
I fail to see how "Individualists for Liberty" could possibly turn the tide on these issues?
The truth is my ideals only target degenerated Minorities who have for too long used Liberty to wield power of Liberalism over the Majority.
No, I don't support massive Totalitarianism, just as little as can be done to fix our society.
There is just no getting through to this mental midget. Totalitarian dictators do not need to appeal to the majority or the minority. All they need to appeal to is the tiny elitist class at the top keeping them in power. Hence why dictatorships whether it is Kings and Monarchs or Socialist leaders like Stalin and NK Little Kim always fail.
Your list is a fuck joke:
1. Crack down on media. See a dumbfuck like you believes the Jews control the media for a diabolical reason. Yet it is not even remotely true, esp in Europe which is 99% antiIsrael. Silencing free press will lead to what? It will lead to fake news. Just ask North Koreans.
