Another missle launch off the coast of Texas?

[American Horse]

Not sure but some are speculating.

Corpus Christi 2Jan2011 - 2ND Mystery Missile Launch
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKNFYvCHoTw

I don't see any real movement of it above the apparent cloud level. I have seen actual rocket/missile launches leaving from KSC, and they don't end abruptly like that one did, and their speed is more like the California event; undeniably not an airplane which that one could've been. The female voice said "see how fast it's moving" but in the clip it didn't seem to be moving fast at all, and appears to very possibly be a plane, even a smaller jet like a military jet would seem to be possible leaving a trail that would appear to be vertical if the jet was coming directly towards the viewer and increasing altitude which could get it above an elevation at which no sound would be heard.
And what about the sound?

Another voice said it was unknow if it was in California, and if he was describing that event, than it couldn't be a sea (Gulf) launch if they were in Texas, and it's a long way to California, so judgements appear to be irrational in this video.

 

[daveman]

Yeah those evil B-17 bombers were spraying "chemtrails" all over the place


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfOrez6q7WM

The difference between contrails and chemtrails.
CONTRAILS START TO EVAPORATE WITH IN A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME CHEMTRAILS DON'T.

No such thing as chemtrails. Contrails evaporate or expand depending on atmospheric conditions.

 

[westwall]

Yeah those evil B-17 bombers were spraying "chemtrails" all over the place


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfOrez6q7WM

The difference between contrails and chemtrails.
CONTRAILS START TO EVAPORATE WITH IN A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME CHEMTRAILS DON'T.


Have you ever noticed on a clear day and wacthed some planes flying around and soon the skies became cloudy

As a pilot I can gurantee you that even flying a single engined aircraft I can make some amazing contrails if the atmospheric conditions are correct, and I have one ten thousandth the amount of power a airliner has.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Yeah those evil B-17 bombers were spraying "chemtrails" all over the place


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfOrez6q7WM

The difference between contrails and chemtrails.
CONTRAILS START TO EVAPORATE WITH IN A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME CHEMTRAILS DON'T.


Have you ever noticed on a clear day and wacthed some planes flying around and soon the skies became cloudy

As a pilot I can gurantee you that even flying a single engined aircraft I can make some amazing contrails if the atmospheric conditions are correct, and I have one ten thousandth the amount of power a airliner has.

I just gave you some examples, if you say they don't exist they don't exist. But I have a question how long does it take for a contrail to break up? 6 OR 7 HOURS?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Yeah those evil B-17 bombers were spraying "chemtrails" all over the place


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfOrez6q7WM

The difference between contrails and chemtrails.
CONTRAILS START TO EVAPORATE WITH IN A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME CHEMTRAILS DON'T.

No such thing as chemtrails. Contrails evaporate or expand depending on atmospheric conditions.

They don't exist? Even if the government says they do?
The Pentagon has previously revealed information on tests of chemical and biological warfare agents aboard US Navy ships at sea.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/2315081.stm
US planes sprayed Wiltshire with Sarin
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article1169264.ece

 

[westwall]

The difference between contrails and chemtrails.
CONTRAILS START TO EVAPORATE WITH IN A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME CHEMTRAILS DON'T.


Have you ever noticed on a clear day and wacthed some planes flying around and soon the skies became cloudy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEFITGpXwZk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EOJ4z8yqa54&NR=1

As a pilot I can gurantee you that even flying a single engined aircraft I can make some amazing contrails if the atmospheric conditions are correct, and I have one ten thousandth the amount of power a airliner has.

I just gave you some examples, if you say they don't exist they don't exist. But I have a question how long does it take for a contrail to break up? 6 OR 7 HOURS?

It can take many hours for contrail to dissipate. I don't know what the record duration is but 3 to 4 hours is pretty common.

 

[daveman]

The difference between contrails and chemtrails.
CONTRAILS START TO EVAPORATE WITH IN A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME CHEMTRAILS DON'T.

No such thing as chemtrails. Contrails evaporate or expand depending on atmospheric conditions.

They don't exist? Even if the government says they do?

Where did the government say they do?

 

[uscitizen]

Iron Man has been spotted yet again

 

[bigrebnc1775]

HR 2977 IH


(B) Such terms include exotic weapons systems such as--

(i) electronic, psychotronic, or information weapons;

(ii) chemtrails;
(iii) high altitude ultra low frequency weapons systems;

(iv) plasma, electromagnetic, sonic, or ultrasonic weapons;

(v) laser weapons systems;

(vi) strategic, theater, tactical, or extraterrestrial weapons; and

(vii) chemical, biological, environmental, climate, or tectonic weapons.

(C) The term `exotic weapons systems' includes weapons designed to damage space or natural ecosystems (such as the ionosphere and upper atmosphere) or climate, weather, and tectonic systems with the purpose of inducing damage or destruction upon a target population or region on earth or in space.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c107:H.R.2977.IH:

 

[bigrebnc1775]

No such thing as chemtrails. Contrails evaporate or expand depending on atmospheric conditions.

They don't exist? Even if the government says they do?

Where did the government say they do?

HR 2977 IH


(B) Such terms include exotic weapons systems such as--

(i) electronic, psychotronic, or information weapons;

(ii) chemtrails;
(iii) high altitude ultra low frequency weapons systems;

(iv) plasma, electromagnetic, sonic, or ultrasonic weapons;

(v) laser weapons systems;

(vi) strategic, theater, tactical, or extraterrestrial weapons; and

(vii) chemical, biological, environmental, climate, or tectonic weapons.

(C) The term `exotic weapons systems' includes weapons designed to damage space or natural ecosystems (such as the ionosphere and upper atmosphere) or climate, weather, and tectonic systems with the purpose of inducing damage or destruction upon a target population or region on earth or in space.
Bill Text - 107th Congress (2001-2002) - THOMAS (Library of Congress)

 

[hortysir]

I showed where the other "missile" was, in fact, an airliner.

This one is, too. It's flying horizontally overhead, not vertically. It's not accelerating as a missile under boost would; it's travelling at a constant speed.

I must've missed it.
Can you re-post, Dave?

Thanks

It's linked in the post you quoted. http://www.usmessageboard.com/3006416-post40.html

:doh:
Sorry about that.
I have this thing called "smartlinks" that sometimes underlines relevant words and terms. I had dismissed "an airliner" as one of those terms.

While I'm here, before I check out your link, the video I see embedded showing a really wide contrail is obviously one that has been wind-blown at a higher elevation.