Another Lie debunked-IG report concludes FBI did not spy on trump campaign

I already gave links to Russians breaking into election systems. But it started with breaking into the DNC server and weaponizing the data. That is the first thing Russia did. The broke into the RNC and the DNC but only released Democratic emails.
Yeah....not so much. Just about everything you just said has been debunked.

Let's start with the fact of how Barry made a prominent member of CrowdStrike - a company linked to George Soros & Hillary - a member of his administration....

Let's then go to Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, former DNC Chairwoman who initially hired thre Pakistani spies who illegally accessed tera-bytes of classified House data from their server, who then hired Awan after this was discovered and the Pakistanis were banned from the House and House computers, how she not only gave them access to House servers again but also gave them access to all the DNC's e-mails, usernames, and passwords.....

....Let's talk about how not long after THIS the Democrats' personal e-mails began surfacing, exposing not only e-mails that contained racist, sexist, homophobic, and anti-Semitic content but also revealed the DNC had stacked the deck against Sanders in their Primaries, had helped Hillary cheat in debates, funneled donations earmarked for other Dems in other races to Hillary's campaign, and eventually GAVE Hillary what she could not win - the DNC nomination.
** Donna Brazile, the next DNC Chairwoman, publicly admitted all of this happened.

...Let's talk about how when what DWS had done- rehiring Awan and giving him access to every DNC e-mail, username, & password - she was fired...and THAT SAME DAY she ran to the Hillary campaign and was immediately hired to join Hillary's team.

...Let's talk about how the Democrats masterfully switched into 'PR Spin' mode and began pushing the 'The Russians hacked our server' BS narrative to distract the American people (at least the sheep) from the fact that they had just been exposed for being a bunch of 'closet' racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-Semites AND had been exposed for rigging the 2017 Primaries / Election for Hillary!

...Let's talk about how the DNC refused to give up their server to prove they had been hacked by the Russians an instead agree to let CrowdStrike 'image' their entire server to analyze instead and how CrowdStrike - part of the Obama administration, tied to George Soros, tied to Hillary's team, and tied to HUGE donors and supporters of Hillary - was the ONLY ones to claim to have evidence that the Russians aired the Democrats' 'Dirty Laundry'!

Before you start screaming how this is all opinion and unsupported claims just go to the 'CrowdStrike' thread here and enjoy reading all the many links proving all of this...then come back and talk to me.
 
I already gave links to Russians breaking into election systems. But it started with breaking into the DNC server and weaponizing the data. That is the first thing Russia did. The broke into the RNC and the DNC but only released Democratic emails.
Yeah....not so much. Just about everything you just said has been debunked.

Let's start with the fact of how Barry made a prominent member of CrowdStrike - a company linked to George Soros & Hillary - a member of his administration....

Let's then go to Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, former DNC Chairwoman who initially hired thre Pakistani spies who illegally accessed tera-bytes of classified House data from their server, who then hired Awan after this was discovered and the Pakistanis were banned from the House and House computers, how she not only gave them access to House servers again but also gave them access to all the DNC's e-mails, usernames, and passwords.....

....Let's talk about how not long after THIS the Democrats' personal e-mails began surfacing, exposing not only e-mails that contained racist, sexist, homophobic, and anti-Semitic content but also revealed the DNC had stacked the deck against Sanders in their Primaries, had helped Hillary cheat in debates, funneled donations earmarked for other Dems in other races to Hillary's campaign, and eventually GAVE Hillary what she could not win - the DNC nomination.
** Donna Brazile, the next DNC Chairwoman, publicly admitted all of this happened.

...Let's talk about how when what DWS had done- rehiring Awan and giving him access to every DNC e-mail, username, & password - she was fired...and THAT SAME DAY she ran to the Hillary campaign and was immediately hired to join Hillary's team.

...Let's talk about how the Democrats masterfully switched into 'PR Spin' mode and began pushing the 'The Russians hacked our server' BS narrative to distract the American people (at least the sheep) from the fact that they had just been exposed for being a bunch of 'closet' racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-Semites AND had been exposed for rigging the 2017 Primaries / Election for Hillary!

...Let's talk about how the DNC refused to give up their server to prove they had been hacked by the Russians an instead agree to let CrowdStrike 'image' their entire server to analyze instead and how CrowdStrike - part of the Obama administration, tied to George Soros, tied to Hillary's team, and tied to HUGE donors and supporters of Hillary - was the ONLY ones to claim to have evidence that the Russians aired the Democrats' 'Dirty Laundry'!

Before you start screaming how this is all opinion and unsupported claims just go to the 'CrowdStrike' thread here and enjoy reading all the many links proving all of this...then come back and talk to me.

Crowdstrike? Still hanging your hat on an actual debunked conspiracy theory? Everything I posted was fact, backed up by our intelligence agencies. Nothing you said is supported by facts.
 
trump lied to you. And you fell for it. There are at least 8 heads that need to roll Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani, Energy Secretary Rick Perry, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, ex-national security adviser John Bolton, acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney, Vice President Mike Pence, trump and I am including William Barr. There was no deep state. There was no coup. There is no witch hunt or hoax.

There was nothing but a bunch of trumps lies.

The time has come for trump.

In a huge blow to Trump, the DOJ watchdog found no evidence to support the claim that the FBI spied on his 2016 campaign
View attachment 292008

Sonam Sheth and Eliza Relman

The Justice Department's inspector general found no evidence to support President Donald Trump's claim that the FBI inserted spies in his 2016 presidential campaign, The New York Times reported on Wednesday, citing people familiar with a draft of the report.

Trump has repeatedly and baselessly alleged that the FBI inserted covert operators in his campaign.

He also alleged, without evidence, that former President Barack Obama had intelligence officials tap his phones, a claim the report is also expected to undercut.

Sources told The Times and The Washington Post that while the report undermines Trump's most extreme claims, it also faults the FBI for making bureaucratic mistakes when applying for a warrant to surveil Carter Page, a former Trump campaign aide.

The Justice Department's inspector general found no evidence to support President Donald Trump's claim that the FBI spied on his 2016 presidential campaign while investigating whether the campaign was conspiring with the Russian government to interfere in the election, The New York Times reported on Wednesday, citing people familiar with a draft of the report.

In a huge blow to Trump, the DOJ watchdog found no evidence to support the claim that the FBI spied on his 2016 campaign


Susan Rice sought ‘detailed spreadsheets’ on Trump aide calls: Report
 
I already gave links to Russians breaking into election systems. But it started with breaking into the DNC server and weaponizing the data. That is the first thing Russia did. The broke into the RNC and the DNC but only released Democratic emails.
Yeah....not so much. Just about everything you just said has been debunked.

Let's start with the fact of how Barry made a prominent member of CrowdStrike - a company linked to George Soros & Hillary - a member of his administration....

Let's then go to Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, former DNC Chairwoman who initially hired thre Pakistani spies who illegally accessed tera-bytes of classified House data from their server, who then hired Awan after this was discovered and the Pakistanis were banned from the House and House computers, how she not only gave them access to House servers again but also gave them access to all the DNC's e-mails, usernames, and passwords.....

....Let's talk about how not long after THIS the Democrats' personal e-mails began surfacing, exposing not only e-mails that contained racist, sexist, homophobic, and anti-Semitic content but also revealed the DNC had stacked the deck against Sanders in their Primaries, had helped Hillary cheat in debates, funneled donations earmarked for other Dems in other races to Hillary's campaign, and eventually GAVE Hillary what she could not win - the DNC nomination.
** Donna Brazile, the next DNC Chairwoman, publicly admitted all of this happened.

...Let's talk about how when what DWS had done- rehiring Awan and giving him access to every DNC e-mail, username, & password - she was fired...and THAT SAME DAY she ran to the Hillary campaign and was immediately hired to join Hillary's team.

...Let's talk about how the Democrats masterfully switched into 'PR Spin' mode and began pushing the 'The Russians hacked our server' BS narrative to distract the American people (at least the sheep) from the fact that they had just been exposed for being a bunch of 'closet' racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-Semites AND had been exposed for rigging the 2017 Primaries / Election for Hillary!

...Let's talk about how the DNC refused to give up their server to prove they had been hacked by the Russians an instead agree to let CrowdStrike 'image' their entire server to analyze instead and how CrowdStrike - part of the Obama administration, tied to George Soros, tied to Hillary's team, and tied to HUGE donors and supporters of Hillary - was the ONLY ones to claim to have evidence that the Russians aired the Democrats' 'Dirty Laundry'!

Before you start screaming how this is all opinion and unsupported claims just go to the 'CrowdStrike' thread here and enjoy reading all the many links proving all of this...then come back and talk to me.

Crowdstrike? Still hanging your hat on an actual debunked conspiracy theory? Everything I posted was fact, backed up by our intelligence agencies. Nothing you said is supported by facts.





There is nothing debunked about that sweetcheeks. You pay too much attention to propagandists and not enough to actual legal professionals.
 
I already gave links to Russians breaking into election systems. But it started with breaking into the DNC server and weaponizing the data. That is the first thing Russia did. The broke into the RNC and the DNC but only released Democratic emails.
Yeah....not so much. Just about everything you just said has been debunked.

Let's start with the fact of how Barry made a prominent member of CrowdStrike - a company linked to George Soros & Hillary - a member of his administration....

Let's then go to Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, former DNC Chairwoman who initially hired thre Pakistani spies who illegally accessed tera-bytes of classified House data from their server, who then hired Awan after this was discovered and the Pakistanis were banned from the House and House computers, how she not only gave them access to House servers again but also gave them access to all the DNC's e-mails, usernames, and passwords.....

....Let's talk about how not long after THIS the Democrats' personal e-mails began surfacing, exposing not only e-mails that contained racist, sexist, homophobic, and anti-Semitic content but also revealed the DNC had stacked the deck against Sanders in their Primaries, had helped Hillary cheat in debates, funneled donations earmarked for other Dems in other races to Hillary's campaign, and eventually GAVE Hillary what she could not win - the DNC nomination.
** Donna Brazile, the next DNC Chairwoman, publicly admitted all of this happened.

...Let's talk about how when what DWS had done- rehiring Awan and giving him access to every DNC e-mail, username, & password - she was fired...and THAT SAME DAY she ran to the Hillary campaign and was immediately hired to join Hillary's team.

...Let's talk about how the Democrats masterfully switched into 'PR Spin' mode and began pushing the 'The Russians hacked our server' BS narrative to distract the American people (at least the sheep) from the fact that they had just been exposed for being a bunch of 'closet' racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-Semites AND had been exposed for rigging the 2017 Primaries / Election for Hillary!

...Let's talk about how the DNC refused to give up their server to prove they had been hacked by the Russians an instead agree to let CrowdStrike 'image' their entire server to analyze instead and how CrowdStrike - part of the Obama administration, tied to George Soros, tied to Hillary's team, and tied to HUGE donors and supporters of Hillary - was the ONLY ones to claim to have evidence that the Russians aired the Democrats' 'Dirty Laundry'!

Before you start screaming how this is all opinion and unsupported claims just go to the 'CrowdStrike' thread here and enjoy reading all the many links proving all of this...then come back and talk to me.

Crowdstrike? Still hanging your hat on an actual debunked conspiracy theory? Everything I posted was fact, backed up by our intelligence agencies. Nothing you said is supported by facts.





There is nothing debunked about that sweetcheeks. You pay too much attention to propagandists and not enough to actual legal professionals.

Everything about it has been.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ough-pinocchios-trumps-crowdstrike-obsession/

Debunked Ukraine conspiracy theory is knocked down - again
 
I already gave links to Russians breaking into election systems. But it started with breaking into the DNC server and weaponizing the data. That is the first thing Russia did. The broke into the RNC and the DNC but only released Democratic emails.
Yeah....not so much. Just about everything you just said has been debunked.

Let's start with the fact of how Barry made a prominent member of CrowdStrike - a company linked to George Soros & Hillary - a member of his administration....

Let's then go to Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, former DNC Chairwoman who initially hired thre Pakistani spies who illegally accessed tera-bytes of classified House data from their server, who then hired Awan after this was discovered and the Pakistanis were banned from the House and House computers, how she not only gave them access to House servers again but also gave them access to all the DNC's e-mails, usernames, and passwords.....

....Let's talk about how not long after THIS the Democrats' personal e-mails began surfacing, exposing not only e-mails that contained racist, sexist, homophobic, and anti-Semitic content but also revealed the DNC had stacked the deck against Sanders in their Primaries, had helped Hillary cheat in debates, funneled donations earmarked for other Dems in other races to Hillary's campaign, and eventually GAVE Hillary what she could not win - the DNC nomination.
** Donna Brazile, the next DNC Chairwoman, publicly admitted all of this happened.

...Let's talk about how when what DWS had done- rehiring Awan and giving him access to every DNC e-mail, username, & password - she was fired...and THAT SAME DAY she ran to the Hillary campaign and was immediately hired to join Hillary's team.

...Let's talk about how the Democrats masterfully switched into 'PR Spin' mode and began pushing the 'The Russians hacked our server' BS narrative to distract the American people (at least the sheep) from the fact that they had just been exposed for being a bunch of 'closet' racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-Semites AND had been exposed for rigging the 2017 Primaries / Election for Hillary!

...Let's talk about how the DNC refused to give up their server to prove they had been hacked by the Russians an instead agree to let CrowdStrike 'image' their entire server to analyze instead and how CrowdStrike - part of the Obama administration, tied to George Soros, tied to Hillary's team, and tied to HUGE donors and supporters of Hillary - was the ONLY ones to claim to have evidence that the Russians aired the Democrats' 'Dirty Laundry'!

Before you start screaming how this is all opinion and unsupported claims just go to the 'CrowdStrike' thread here and enjoy reading all the many links proving all of this...then come back and talk to me.

Crowdstrike? Still hanging your hat on an actual debunked conspiracy theory? Everything I posted was fact, backed up by our intelligence agencies. Nothing you said is supported by facts.





There is nothing debunked about that sweetcheeks. You pay too much attention to propagandists and not enough to actual legal professionals.

Everything about it has been.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ough-pinocchios-trumps-crowdstrike-obsession/

Debunked Ukraine conspiracy theory is knocked down - again





I hate to break it to ya hon, but that is nothing more than BS propaganda from the usual suspects. Only morons, and fellow travelers pay any attention to that crapola.
 
I already gave links to Russians breaking into election systems. But it started with breaking into the DNC server and weaponizing the data. That is the first thing Russia did. The broke into the RNC and the DNC but only released Democratic emails.
Yeah....not so much. Just about everything you just said has been debunked.

Let's start with the fact of how Barry made a prominent member of CrowdStrike - a company linked to George Soros & Hillary - a member of his administration....

Let's then go to Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, former DNC Chairwoman who initially hired thre Pakistani spies who illegally accessed tera-bytes of classified House data from their server, who then hired Awan after this was discovered and the Pakistanis were banned from the House and House computers, how she not only gave them access to House servers again but also gave them access to all the DNC's e-mails, usernames, and passwords.....

....Let's talk about how not long after THIS the Democrats' personal e-mails began surfacing, exposing not only e-mails that contained racist, sexist, homophobic, and anti-Semitic content but also revealed the DNC had stacked the deck against Sanders in their Primaries, had helped Hillary cheat in debates, funneled donations earmarked for other Dems in other races to Hillary's campaign, and eventually GAVE Hillary what she could not win - the DNC nomination.
** Donna Brazile, the next DNC Chairwoman, publicly admitted all of this happened.

...Let's talk about how when what DWS had done- rehiring Awan and giving him access to every DNC e-mail, username, & password - she was fired...and THAT SAME DAY she ran to the Hillary campaign and was immediately hired to join Hillary's team.

...Let's talk about how the Democrats masterfully switched into 'PR Spin' mode and began pushing the 'The Russians hacked our server' BS narrative to distract the American people (at least the sheep) from the fact that they had just been exposed for being a bunch of 'closet' racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-Semites AND had been exposed for rigging the 2017 Primaries / Election for Hillary!

...Let's talk about how the DNC refused to give up their server to prove they had been hacked by the Russians an instead agree to let CrowdStrike 'image' their entire server to analyze instead and how CrowdStrike - part of the Obama administration, tied to George Soros, tied to Hillary's team, and tied to HUGE donors and supporters of Hillary - was the ONLY ones to claim to have evidence that the Russians aired the Democrats' 'Dirty Laundry'!

Before you start screaming how this is all opinion and unsupported claims just go to the 'CrowdStrike' thread here and enjoy reading all the many links proving all of this...then come back and talk to me.

Crowdstrike? Still hanging your hat on an actual debunked conspiracy theory? Everything I posted was fact, backed up by our intelligence agencies. Nothing you said is supported by facts.





There is nothing debunked about that sweetcheeks. You pay too much attention to propagandists and not enough to actual legal professionals.

Everything about it has been.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ough-pinocchios-trumps-crowdstrike-obsession/

Debunked Ukraine conspiracy theory is knocked down - again





I hate to break it to ya hon, but that is nothing more than BS propaganda from the usual suspects. Only morons, and fellow travelers pay any attention to that crapola.
Irony poisoning.

Tell us, where did you get your intel? Where do we get the "real" story? (This ought to be good)
 
The fact that snowflakes think all the connections between the anti-Trump / pro-Socialist Democrats can be kept hidden in this day and age is laughable.

Obama, Clapper, Brennan, Rosenstein, Comey, McCabe, Strzok - they all thought they could get away with their crimes because Hillary would win.

Layer by layer has been peeled back since Trump won.
 
who exactly are these "historians" give us their names, where they work, and party affiliation. Or, alternatively you could STFU, stop lying, and go away.

Click the link. Has no one taught you how to use the internet?


yes, moron, I did open the link. the list consists of employees at left leaning colleges, the only significance of this list and the comments of those listed, is that they are 700 votes against Trump next year, if you think those 700 votes are going to keep Trump from winning, I have a bridge across the mighty Mississippi that I would like to sell you.

Hint: no one with any brains listens to left wing college profs who have no idea how the real world works.

If you clicked on the link then you could have seen all the names. The link to the list and where they work is all in the link in my signature. You obviously aren't savvy enough so I'll give you the direct link to all the names. Its well over 700 now.

Grid view - Airtable


I already looked at the list of names and places of employment------------I'm not impressed that a bunch of left wing academic loons want Trump out of office. These fools have no credibility.

No one is fooled by that BS, witchey--------------except maybe you.

It obviously got you riled up enough to dismiss them all as "liberal professors" ...which is just another case of you doing the sour grapes dance.


that's exactly what they are. Prove me wrong.
 
I already gave links to Russians breaking into election systems. But it started with breaking into the DNC server and weaponizing the data. That is the first thing Russia did. The broke into the RNC and the DNC but only released Democratic emails.
Yeah....not so much. Just about everything you just said has been debunked.

Let's start with the fact of how Barry made a prominent member of CrowdStrike - a company linked to George Soros & Hillary - a member of his administration....

Let's then go to Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, former DNC Chairwoman who initially hired thre Pakistani spies who illegally accessed tera-bytes of classified House data from their server, who then hired Awan after this was discovered and the Pakistanis were banned from the House and House computers, how she not only gave them access to House servers again but also gave them access to all the DNC's e-mails, usernames, and passwords.....

....Let's talk about how not long after THIS the Democrats' personal e-mails began surfacing, exposing not only e-mails that contained racist, sexist, homophobic, and anti-Semitic content but also revealed the DNC had stacked the deck against Sanders in their Primaries, had helped Hillary cheat in debates, funneled donations earmarked for other Dems in other races to Hillary's campaign, and eventually GAVE Hillary what she could not win - the DNC nomination.
** Donna Brazile, the next DNC Chairwoman, publicly admitted all of this happened.

...Let's talk about how when what DWS had done- rehiring Awan and giving him access to every DNC e-mail, username, & password - she was fired...and THAT SAME DAY she ran to the Hillary campaign and was immediately hired to join Hillary's team.

...Let's talk about how the Democrats masterfully switched into 'PR Spin' mode and began pushing the 'The Russians hacked our server' BS narrative to distract the American people (at least the sheep) from the fact that they had just been exposed for being a bunch of 'closet' racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-Semites AND had been exposed for rigging the 2017 Primaries / Election for Hillary!

...Let's talk about how the DNC refused to give up their server to prove they had been hacked by the Russians an instead agree to let CrowdStrike 'image' their entire server to analyze instead and how CrowdStrike - part of the Obama administration, tied to George Soros, tied to Hillary's team, and tied to HUGE donors and supporters of Hillary - was the ONLY ones to claim to have evidence that the Russians aired the Democrats' 'Dirty Laundry'!

Before you start screaming how this is all opinion and unsupported claims just go to the 'CrowdStrike' thread here and enjoy reading all the many links proving all of this...then come back and talk to me.

Crowdstrike? Still hanging your hat on an actual debunked conspiracy theory? Everything I posted was fact, backed up by our intelligence agencies. Nothing you said is supported by facts.





There is nothing debunked about that sweetcheeks. You pay too much attention to propagandists and not enough to actual legal professionals.

Everything about it has been.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ough-pinocchios-trumps-crowdstrike-obsession/

Debunked Ukraine conspiracy theory is knocked down - again


got news for ya, posting a propaganda piece from the DNC mouthpiece Wash post proves nothing except your gullibility.
 
Yeah....not so much. Just about everything you just said has been debunked.

Let's start with the fact of how Barry made a prominent member of CrowdStrike - a company linked to George Soros & Hillary - a member of his administration....

Let's then go to Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, former DNC Chairwoman who initially hired thre Pakistani spies who illegally accessed tera-bytes of classified House data from their server, who then hired Awan after this was discovered and the Pakistanis were banned from the House and House computers, how she not only gave them access to House servers again but also gave them access to all the DNC's e-mails, usernames, and passwords.....

....Let's talk about how not long after THIS the Democrats' personal e-mails began surfacing, exposing not only e-mails that contained racist, sexist, homophobic, and anti-Semitic content but also revealed the DNC had stacked the deck against Sanders in their Primaries, had helped Hillary cheat in debates, funneled donations earmarked for other Dems in other races to Hillary's campaign, and eventually GAVE Hillary what she could not win - the DNC nomination.
** Donna Brazile, the next DNC Chairwoman, publicly admitted all of this happened.

...Let's talk about how when what DWS had done- rehiring Awan and giving him access to every DNC e-mail, username, & password - she was fired...and THAT SAME DAY she ran to the Hillary campaign and was immediately hired to join Hillary's team.

...Let's talk about how the Democrats masterfully switched into 'PR Spin' mode and began pushing the 'The Russians hacked our server' BS narrative to distract the American people (at least the sheep) from the fact that they had just been exposed for being a bunch of 'closet' racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-Semites AND had been exposed for rigging the 2017 Primaries / Election for Hillary!

...Let's talk about how the DNC refused to give up their server to prove they had been hacked by the Russians an instead agree to let CrowdStrike 'image' their entire server to analyze instead and how CrowdStrike - part of the Obama administration, tied to George Soros, tied to Hillary's team, and tied to HUGE donors and supporters of Hillary - was the ONLY ones to claim to have evidence that the Russians aired the Democrats' 'Dirty Laundry'!

Before you start screaming how this is all opinion and unsupported claims just go to the 'CrowdStrike' thread here and enjoy reading all the many links proving all of this...then come back and talk to me.

Crowdstrike? Still hanging your hat on an actual debunked conspiracy theory? Everything I posted was fact, backed up by our intelligence agencies. Nothing you said is supported by facts.





There is nothing debunked about that sweetcheeks. You pay too much attention to propagandists and not enough to actual legal professionals.

Everything about it has been.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ough-pinocchios-trumps-crowdstrike-obsession/

Debunked Ukraine conspiracy theory is knocked down - again





I hate to break it to ya hon, but that is nothing more than BS propaganda from the usual suspects. Only morons, and fellow travelers pay any attention to that crapola.
Irony poisoning.

Tell us, where did you get your intel? Where do we get the "real" story? (This ought to be good)





Wall street journal, fox news. The economist, Forbes, you know, legit sources.
 
Crowdstrike? Still hanging your hat on an actual debunked conspiracy theory? Everything I posted was fact, backed up by our intelligence agencies. Nothing you said is supported by facts.





There is nothing debunked about that sweetcheeks. You pay too much attention to propagandists and not enough to actual legal professionals.

Everything about it has been.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ough-pinocchios-trumps-crowdstrike-obsession/

Debunked Ukraine conspiracy theory is knocked down - again





I hate to break it to ya hon, but that is nothing more than BS propaganda from the usual suspects. Only morons, and fellow travelers pay any attention to that crapola.
Irony poisoning.

Tell us, where did you get your intel? Where do we get the "real" story? (This ought to be good)





Wall street journal, fox news. The economist, Forbes, you know, legit sources.

And yet all of those sites call the Crowdstrike malarky just that.
 
Click the link. Has no one taught you how to use the internet?


yes, moron, I did open the link. the list consists of employees at left leaning colleges, the only significance of this list and the comments of those listed, is that they are 700 votes against Trump next year, if you think those 700 votes are going to keep Trump from winning, I have a bridge across the mighty Mississippi that I would like to sell you.

Hint: no one with any brains listens to left wing college profs who have no idea how the real world works.

If you clicked on the link then you could have seen all the names. The link to the list and where they work is all in the link in my signature. You obviously aren't savvy enough so I'll give you the direct link to all the names. Its well over 700 now.

Grid view - Airtable


I already looked at the list of names and places of employment------------I'm not impressed that a bunch of left wing academic loons want Trump out of office. These fools have no credibility.

No one is fooled by that BS, witchey--------------except maybe you.

It obviously got you riled up enough to dismiss them all as "liberal professors" ...which is just another case of you doing the sour grapes dance.


that's exactly what they are. Prove me wrong.
They aren't all "liberal professors" . Ever heard of Ken Burns? He signed it. Pulitzer prize-winning author Robert Caro also signed it. You make it way too easy to prove you wrong.
 
I already gave links to Russians breaking into election systems. But it started with breaking into the DNC server and weaponizing the data. That is the first thing Russia did. The broke into the RNC and the DNC but only released Democratic emails.
Yeah....not so much. Just about everything you just said has been debunked.

Let's start with the fact of how Barry made a prominent member of CrowdStrike - a company linked to George Soros & Hillary - a member of his administration....

Let's then go to Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, former DNC Chairwoman who initially hired thre Pakistani spies who illegally accessed tera-bytes of classified House data from their server, who then hired Awan after this was discovered and the Pakistanis were banned from the House and House computers, how she not only gave them access to House servers again but also gave them access to all the DNC's e-mails, usernames, and passwords.....

....Let's talk about how not long after THIS the Democrats' personal e-mails began surfacing, exposing not only e-mails that contained racist, sexist, homophobic, and anti-Semitic content but also revealed the DNC had stacked the deck against Sanders in their Primaries, had helped Hillary cheat in debates, funneled donations earmarked for other Dems in other races to Hillary's campaign, and eventually GAVE Hillary what she could not win - the DNC nomination.
** Donna Brazile, the next DNC Chairwoman, publicly admitted all of this happened.

...Let's talk about how when what DWS had done- rehiring Awan and giving him access to every DNC e-mail, username, & password - she was fired...and THAT SAME DAY she ran to the Hillary campaign and was immediately hired to join Hillary's team.

...Let's talk about how the Democrats masterfully switched into 'PR Spin' mode and began pushing the 'The Russians hacked our server' BS narrative to distract the American people (at least the sheep) from the fact that they had just been exposed for being a bunch of 'closet' racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-Semites AND had been exposed for rigging the 2017 Primaries / Election for Hillary!

...Let's talk about how the DNC refused to give up their server to prove they had been hacked by the Russians an instead agree to let CrowdStrike 'image' their entire server to analyze instead and how CrowdStrike - part of the Obama administration, tied to George Soros, tied to Hillary's team, and tied to HUGE donors and supporters of Hillary - was the ONLY ones to claim to have evidence that the Russians aired the Democrats' 'Dirty Laundry'!

Before you start screaming how this is all opinion and unsupported claims just go to the 'CrowdStrike' thread here and enjoy reading all the many links proving all of this...then come back and talk to me.

Crowdstrike? Still hanging your hat on an actual debunked conspiracy theory? Everything I posted was fact, backed up by our intelligence agencies. Nothing you said is supported by facts.





There is nothing debunked about that sweetcheeks. You pay too much attention to propagandists and not enough to actual legal professionals.

Everything about it has been.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ough-pinocchios-trumps-crowdstrike-obsession/

Debunked Ukraine conspiracy theory is knocked down - again


got news for ya, posting a propaganda piece from the DNC mouthpiece Wash post proves nothing except your gullibility.

So now even the Associated press is propaganda to you? You really are irony deficient. You spout nothing but thoroughly and completely debunked conspiracy theories and believe the words coming out of Trump's cat anus mouth but call me gullible. Too rich...
 
Yeah....not so much. Just about everything you just said has been debunked.

Let's start with the fact of how Barry made a prominent member of CrowdStrike - a company linked to George Soros & Hillary - a member of his administration....

Let's then go to Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, former DNC Chairwoman who initially hired thre Pakistani spies who illegally accessed tera-bytes of classified House data from their server, who then hired Awan after this was discovered and the Pakistanis were banned from the House and House computers, how she not only gave them access to House servers again but also gave them access to all the DNC's e-mails, usernames, and passwords.....

....Let's talk about how not long after THIS the Democrats' personal e-mails began surfacing, exposing not only e-mails that contained racist, sexist, homophobic, and anti-Semitic content but also revealed the DNC had stacked the deck against Sanders in their Primaries, had helped Hillary cheat in debates, funneled donations earmarked for other Dems in other races to Hillary's campaign, and eventually GAVE Hillary what she could not win - the DNC nomination.
** Donna Brazile, the next DNC Chairwoman, publicly admitted all of this happened.

...Let's talk about how when what DWS had done- rehiring Awan and giving him access to every DNC e-mail, username, & password - she was fired...and THAT SAME DAY she ran to the Hillary campaign and was immediately hired to join Hillary's team.

...Let's talk about how the Democrats masterfully switched into 'PR Spin' mode and began pushing the 'The Russians hacked our server' BS narrative to distract the American people (at least the sheep) from the fact that they had just been exposed for being a bunch of 'closet' racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-Semites AND had been exposed for rigging the 2017 Primaries / Election for Hillary!

...Let's talk about how the DNC refused to give up their server to prove they had been hacked by the Russians an instead agree to let CrowdStrike 'image' their entire server to analyze instead and how CrowdStrike - part of the Obama administration, tied to George Soros, tied to Hillary's team, and tied to HUGE donors and supporters of Hillary - was the ONLY ones to claim to have evidence that the Russians aired the Democrats' 'Dirty Laundry'!

Before you start screaming how this is all opinion and unsupported claims just go to the 'CrowdStrike' thread here and enjoy reading all the many links proving all of this...then come back and talk to me.

Crowdstrike? Still hanging your hat on an actual debunked conspiracy theory? Everything I posted was fact, backed up by our intelligence agencies. Nothing you said is supported by facts.





There is nothing debunked about that sweetcheeks. You pay too much attention to propagandists and not enough to actual legal professionals.

Everything about it has been.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ough-pinocchios-trumps-crowdstrike-obsession/

Debunked Ukraine conspiracy theory is knocked down - again


got news for ya, posting a propaganda piece from the DNC mouthpiece Wash post proves nothing except your gullibility.

So now even the Associated press is propaganda to you? You really are irony deficient. You spout nothing but thoroughly and completely debunked conspiracy theories and believe the words coming out of Trump's cat anus mouth but call me gullible. Too rich...





Yes, they have been caught lying on multiple occasions. Brainless fools ignore their lies because they agree with them.

Do you care about accurate reporting, or are you fine with propaganda?
 
There is nothing debunked about that sweetcheeks. You pay too much attention to propagandists and not enough to actual legal professionals.

Everything about it has been.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ough-pinocchios-trumps-crowdstrike-obsession/

Debunked Ukraine conspiracy theory is knocked down - again





I hate to break it to ya hon, but that is nothing more than BS propaganda from the usual suspects. Only morons, and fellow travelers pay any attention to that crapola.
Irony poisoning.

Tell us, where did you get your intel? Where do we get the "real" story? (This ought to be good)





Wall street journal, fox news. The economist, Forbes, you know, legit sources.

And yet all of those sites call the Crowdstrike malarky just that.





Ummmmm, no They don't.
 
Crowdstrike? Still hanging your hat on an actual debunked conspiracy theory? Everything I posted was fact, backed up by our intelligence agencies. Nothing you said is supported by facts.





There is nothing debunked about that sweetcheeks. You pay too much attention to propagandists and not enough to actual legal professionals.

Everything about it has been.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ough-pinocchios-trumps-crowdstrike-obsession/

Debunked Ukraine conspiracy theory is knocked down - again


got news for ya, posting a propaganda piece from the DNC mouthpiece Wash post proves nothing except your gullibility.

So now even the Associated press is propaganda to you? You really are irony deficient. You spout nothing but thoroughly and completely debunked conspiracy theories and believe the words coming out of Trump's cat anus mouth but call me gullible. Too rich...





Yes, they have been caught lying on multiple occasions. Brainless fools ignore their lies because they agree with them.

Do you care about accurate reporting, or are you fine with propaganda?

Really? So why don't you link to these "multiple times" they were caught lying? Let me guess, you'll get them "later"?

You can't spout complete debunked nonsense about Crowdstrike and say anything to ANYONE about propaganda. You are parroting actual Russian propaganda.

Charges of Ukrainian Meddling? A Russian Operation, U.S. Intelligence Says
 





I hate to break it to ya hon, but that is nothing more than BS propaganda from the usual suspects. Only morons, and fellow travelers pay any attention to that crapola.
Irony poisoning.

Tell us, where did you get your intel? Where do we get the "real" story? (This ought to be good)





Wall street journal, fox news. The economist, Forbes, you know, legit sources.

And yet all of those sites call the Crowdstrike malarky just that.





Ummmmm, no They don't.

Ummmmmmm, so give us a link that supports whatever conspiracy you're spouting.
 
I hate to break it to ya hon, but that is nothing more than BS propaganda from the usual suspects. Only morons, and fellow travelers pay any attention to that crapola.
Irony poisoning.

Tell us, where did you get your intel? Where do we get the "real" story? (This ought to be good)





Wall street journal, fox news. The economist, Forbes, you know, legit sources.

And yet all of those sites call the Crowdstrike malarky just that.





Ummmmm, no They don't.

Ummmmmmm, so give us a link that supports whatever conspiracy you're spouting.









Sure thing sweetcheeks. Here are just a very, very few..... let your brain do some searching and you will be amazed by what you find. Of course, you have to have a brain first. So far we have no evidence of that.


December 1: The 27-Cent Foreclosure
At Politico on December 1, Lorraine Woellert published a shocking essay claiming that Trump’s pick for secretary of the Treasury, Steve Mnuchin, had overseen a company that “foreclosed on a 90-year-old woman after a 27-cent payment error.” According to Woellert: “After confusion over insurance coverage, a OneWest subsidiary sent [Ossie] Lofton a bill for $423.30. She sent a check for $423. The bank sent another bill, for 30 cents. Lofton, 90, sent a check for three cents. In November 2014, the bank foreclosed.”

The story received widespread coverage, being shared nearly 17,000 times on Facebook. The New York Times’s Steven Rattner shared it on Twitter (1,300 retweets), as did NBC News’s Brad Jaffy (1,200 retweets), the AP’s David Beard (1,900 retweets) and many others.

The problem? The central scandalous claims of Woellert’s article were simply untrue. As the Competitive Enterprise Institute’s Ted Frank pointed out, the woman in question was never foreclosed on, and never lost her home. Moreover, “It wasn’t Mnuchin’s bank that brought the suit.”

Politico eventually corrected these serious and glaring errors. But the damage was done: the story had been repeated by numerous media outlets including Huffington Post (shared 25,000 times on Facebook), the New York Post, Vanity Fair, and many others.


January 20: The Nonexistent Climate Change Website ‘Purge’
Also on the day of the inauguration, New York Times writer Coral Davenport published an article on the Times’s website whose headline claimed that the Trump administration had “purged” any “climate change references” from the White House website. Within the article, Davenport acknowledged that the “purge” (or what she also called “online deletions”) was “not unexpected” but rather part of a routine turnover of digital authority between administrations.

To call this action a “purge” was thus at the height of intellectual dishonesty: Davenport was styling the whole thing as a kind of digital book-burn rather than a routine part of American government. But of course that was almost surely the point. The inflammatory headline was probably the only thing that most people read of the article, doubtlessly leading many readers (the article was shared nearly 50,000 times on Facebook) to believe something that simply wasn’t true.


January 29: The Reuters Account Hoax
Following the Quebec City mosque massacre, the Daily Beast published a story that purported to identify the two shooters who had perpetrated the crime. The problem? The story’s source was a Reuters parody account on Twitter. Incredibly, nobody at the Daily Beast thought to check the source to any appreciable degree.


February 2: Renaming Black History Month
At the start of February, which is Black History Month in the United States, Trump proclaimed the month “National African American History Month.” Many outlets tried to spin the story in a bizarre way: TMZ claimed that a “senior administration official” said that Trump believed the term “black” to be outdated. “Every U.S. president since 1976 has designated February as Black History Month,” wrote TMZ. BET wrote the same thing.

The problem? It’s just not true. President Obama, for example, declared February “National African American History Month” as well. TMZ quickly updated their piece to fix their embarrassing error.

Wow, CNN Admits Democrats Lied About Trump's Ukraine Call
Wow, CNN Admits Democrats Lied About Trump's Ukraine Call
 
Irony poisoning.

Tell us, where did you get your intel? Where do we get the "real" story? (This ought to be good)





Wall street journal, fox news. The economist, Forbes, you know, legit sources.

And yet all of those sites call the Crowdstrike malarky just that.





Ummmmm, no They don't.

Ummmmmmm, so give us a link that supports whatever conspiracy you're spouting.









Sure thing sweetcheeks. Here are just a very, very few..... let your brain do some searching and you will be amazed by what you find. Of course, you have to have a brain first. So far we have no evidence of that.


December 1: The 27-Cent Foreclosure
At Politico on December 1, Lorraine Woellert published a shocking essay claiming that Trump’s pick for secretary of the Treasury, Steve Mnuchin, had overseen a company that “foreclosed on a 90-year-old woman after a 27-cent payment error.” According to Woellert: “After confusion over insurance coverage, a OneWest subsidiary sent [Ossie] Lofton a bill for $423.30. She sent a check for $423. The bank sent another bill, for 30 cents. Lofton, 90, sent a check for three cents. In November 2014, the bank foreclosed.”

The story received widespread coverage, being shared nearly 17,000 times on Facebook. The New York Times’s Steven Rattner shared it on Twitter (1,300 retweets), as did NBC News’s Brad Jaffy (1,200 retweets), the AP’s David Beard (1,900 retweets) and many others.

The problem? The central scandalous claims of Woellert’s article were simply untrue. As the Competitive Enterprise Institute’s Ted Frank pointed out, the woman in question was never foreclosed on, and never lost her home. Moreover, “It wasn’t Mnuchin’s bank that brought the suit.”

Politico eventually corrected these serious and glaring errors. But the damage was done: the story had been repeated by numerous media outlets including Huffington Post (shared 25,000 times on Facebook), the New York Post, Vanity Fair, and many others.


January 20: The Nonexistent Climate Change Website ‘Purge’
Also on the day of the inauguration, New York Times writer Coral Davenport published an article on the Times’s website whose headline claimed that the Trump administration had “purged” any “climate change references” from the White House website. Within the article, Davenport acknowledged that the “purge” (or what she also called “online deletions”) was “not unexpected” but rather part of a routine turnover of digital authority between administrations.

To call this action a “purge” was thus at the height of intellectual dishonesty: Davenport was styling the whole thing as a kind of digital book-burn rather than a routine part of American government. But of course that was almost surely the point. The inflammatory headline was probably the only thing that most people read of the article, doubtlessly leading many readers (the article was shared nearly 50,000 times on Facebook) to believe something that simply wasn’t true.


January 29: The Reuters Account Hoax
Following the Quebec City mosque massacre, the Daily Beast published a story that purported to identify the two shooters who had perpetrated the crime. The problem? The story’s source was a Reuters parody account on Twitter. Incredibly, nobody at the Daily Beast thought to check the source to any appreciable degree.


February 2: Renaming Black History Month
At the start of February, which is Black History Month in the United States, Trump proclaimed the month “National African American History Month.” Many outlets tried to spin the story in a bizarre way: TMZ claimed that a “senior administration official” said that Trump believed the term “black” to be outdated. “Every U.S. president since 1976 has designated February as Black History Month,” wrote TMZ. BET wrote the same thing.

The problem? It’s just not true. President Obama, for example, declared February “National African American History Month” as well. TMZ quickly updated their piece to fix their embarrassing error.

Wow, CNN Admits Democrats Lied About Trump's Ukraine Call
Wow, CNN Admits Democrats Lied About Trump's Ukraine Call

I linked to the Associated Press. None of your links referenced the AP. Making a mistake and issuing a correction is common. Except for over at Fox...they don't usually correct their errors or retract bogus stories.

They did, finally, retract this one, but they are still being sued...

UPDATE 1-Lawsuit against Fox News over retracted Seth Rich story is revived
 

Forum List

Back
Top