CDZ Another conversation about Universal Income

Discussion in 'Clean Debate Zone' started by Mac1958, Nov 6, 2017.

  1. danielpalos
    Online

    danielpalos Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2015
    Messages:
    25,123
    Thanks Received:
    664
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Location:
    Alta California, federalist.
    Ratings:
    +3,080
    lol. Are you on the right wing?

    Recourse to an income on an at-will basis, solves for the UBI dilemma.
     
  2. Bonzi
    Offline

    Bonzi Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2015
    Messages:
    41,758
    Thanks Received:
    15,464
    Trophy Points:
    2,290
    Ratings:
    +29,617
    Like Monopoly, it's a bit luck, but, ultimately, the winner is the most persuasive, persistent and creative with their money management
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  3. danielpalos
    Online

    danielpalos Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2015
    Messages:
    25,123
    Thanks Received:
    664
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Location:
    Alta California, federalist.
    Ratings:
    +3,080
    I don't ignore anyone; I prefer to "argue them into submission".
     
  4. danielpalos
    Online

    danielpalos Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2015
    Messages:
    25,123
    Thanks Received:
    664
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Location:
    Alta California, federalist.
    Ratings:
    +3,080
    How does, means tested welfare, help with capital management?
     
  5. Bonzi
    Offline

    Bonzi Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2015
    Messages:
    41,758
    Thanks Received:
    15,464
    Trophy Points:
    2,290
    Ratings:
    +29,617
    It's gives them a temporary base to build upon. Temporary being the key.
     
  6. danielpalos
    Online

    danielpalos Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2015
    Messages:
    25,123
    Thanks Received:
    664
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Location:
    Alta California, federalist.
    Ratings:
    +3,080
    Not with capital management. That "stagnates as a market based skill".
     
  7. Xelor
    Offline

    Xelor Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2017
    Messages:
    8,178
    Thanks Received:
    1,200
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Location:
    D.C.
    Ratings:
    +4,234
    WTF? If by "it" you mean "solving poverty on an at-will basis," your clarifying sentences can be rewritten as:

    "Solving poverty on an at-will basis would be recourse to an income on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States. It solves the UBI dilemma, in a market friendly manner using existing infrastructure."​

    That makes no more sense to me than does the remark for which I requested clarification (below), which presumably the remarks above are your attempt at providing such.

    I can't compel you to respond with fully formed coherent ideas; however, if you're going to persist in "tweeting" at me on a matter as complex as UBI and implementing it, I can stop responding to you. I'm fine with discussing UBI, but I'm not going to try to inject substance into what amounts to a "tweet." You can and may indeed laugh at what I've written, but it's you who has been asked to expound cogently on what you've written so that we may have a substantive conversation about it and who has yet not done so.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    Last edited: Nov 12, 2017
  8. Bonzi
    Offline

    Bonzi Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2015
    Messages:
    41,758
    Thanks Received:
    15,464
    Trophy Points:
    2,290
    Ratings:
    +29,617
    True, but that's more permanent.... I don't agree with that at all
     
  9. danielpalos
    Online

    danielpalos Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2015
    Messages:
    25,123
    Thanks Received:
    664
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Location:
    Alta California, federalist.
    Ratings:
    +3,080
    What part of my assertions, are You not bright enough to understand?
     
  10. danielpalos
    Online

    danielpalos Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2015
    Messages:
    25,123
    Thanks Received:
    664
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Location:
    Alta California, federalist.
    Ratings:
    +3,080
    Means testing means Persons on welfare cannot practice capital management and prefer cash transactions.
     

Share This Page