An Internet Autopsy: How did Ambassador Stevens Die?

[Wehrwolfen]

Stevens was the personal representative of the President of the United States. The rupture of that personal relationship is the great shame of Benghazi​

Author
By Robert Klein Engler
March 23, 2013


According to a CBS News/AP story, posted on the Internet (September 12, 2012, 10:37 AM), US ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens died of “severe asphyxia,” sometimes referred to as smoke inhalation. It was reported to the media by a Libyan doctor, but was not an official autopsy report. In spite of this unofficial report, most Americans believe the ambassador was murdered.

To date, no official cause of death has been released. The results of an autopsy done on Stevens’ body after it was returned to the United States, has not been made public. In spite of that, rumors still persist that Stevens was tortured and raped before and after his death.

Grim photos of Stevens after the terrorist attack at the Benghazi mission are posted on the Internet. Most of them seem to have been taken with cell phone cameras. It is difficult to determine from this photographic evidence what happened to Stevens. Severe asphyxia is not readily photographed.

If we look at four of these photographs with a critical eye, we notice some unusual details that cause us to question the official explanation. The four photos at issue are labeled thusly:

1. Stevens on the ground.
2. Stevens on his back.
3. Stevens being carried through the street.
4. Stevens at a Benghazi morgue.
(See article for photos)

The photo of Stevens seemingly on the ground with his T-shirt under his armpits is most interesting (#1). Stevens’ face and stomach look to be covered in soot. There is what looks like a red gash on the left side of his forehead. This wound does not show up in any the other photos of Stevens after the attack. It is not seen in the photo taken of his body in the Libyan morgue. Was the body cleaned of evidence while the doctors waited for the Americans to claim it?




{excerpt]

Read more:
An Internet Autopsy: How did Ambassador Stevens Die?

 

[Lakhota]

I heard he was killed by Ben Ghazi.

 

[TheOldSchool]

His death is a very sad oocurrence perpetrated by evil people.

Now Republicans... how much fucking longer are you going to beat this dead horse?

 

[Wehrwolfen]

His death is a very sad oocurrence perpetrated by evil people.

Now Republicans... how much fucking longer are you going to beat this dead horse?

Dead Horse? How about Four Dead Americans and nearly three dozen independent contractors some of which are still recuperating from wounds inflicted on 9/11/12 by terrorists our president and the Secretary of State lied to the America claiming they were demonstrators.

 

[OKTexas]

His death is a very sad oocurrence perpetrated by evil people.

Now Republicans... how much fucking longer are you going to beat this dead horse?

Dead Horse? How about Four Dead Americans and nearly three dozen independent contractors some of which are still recuperating from wounds inflicted on 9/11/12 by terrorists our president and the Secretary of State lied to the America claiming they were demonstrators.

They don't care, it's not politically pretty for their dear leader, so it has to be a dead something. They really don't care what they call it, just try to defelct.

 

[Avatar4321]

I heard he was killed by Ben Ghazi.

Do you usually joke about people who have been murdered?

 

[Avatar4321]

His death is a very sad oocurrence perpetrated by evil people.

Now Republicans... how much fucking longer are you going to beat this dead horse?

Dead horse? There is still absolutely no answers to why the administration was trying to cover up what actually happened. Why the heck would anyone who cares about this country stop asking questions about the situation until we have answers?

 

[Care4all]

Obviously, the author took GREAT LIBERTY with his presumptions....the supposed gash on his forehead was NOT a gash and was soot from the smoke, of COURSE the face would be wiped clean at the hospital, and why would the person with the phone in the mouth put the phone in his pocket if it were his phone, and NOT put the phone in his pocket if it were the Ambassador's phone? The entire article is a disgrace and filled with pure unGodly gossip....yet you all eat it up like it is ice cream...how sad is that...?

 

[Lakhota]

I heard he was killed by Ben Ghazi.

Do you usually joke about people who have been murdered?

Sometimes, when unscrupulous people try to politicize it.

Benghazi Survivors Remain Gagged by Federal Law - Breitbart

 

[Claudette]

Both the Ambassador and Smith died of smoke inhalation. Woods and Doherty were killed on the roof when mortars hit.

Behghazi the Definitive Story is out on Amazon now. The authors, Murphy and Webb are ex Spec Ops. Webb was a close personal friend and teammate of Doherty. You can bet your ass these two reached out and touched some of the survivors to ge the story.

Loads of info in the book about Libya before and after Quadaffi.

Also loads of info on Ambassador Stevens. That guy was a gem and the right man to be in Libya. Just a shame his State Department, Clinton and the current fuck int he WH let them all down.

 

[DaGoose]

His death is a very sad oocurrence perpetrated by evil people.

Now Republicans... how much fucking longer are you going to beat this dead horse?

Dead Horse? How about Four Dead Americans and nearly three dozen independent contractors some of which are still recuperating from wounds inflicted on 9/11/12 by terrorists our president and the Secretary of State lied to the America claiming they were demonstrators.

His death is a very sad oocurrence perpetrated by evil people.

Now Republicans... how much fucking longer are you going to beat this dead horse?

Dead Horse? How about Four Dead Americans and nearly three dozen independent contractors some of which are still recuperating from wounds inflicted on 9/11/12 by terrorists our president and the Secretary of State lied to the America claiming they were demonstrators.

They don't care, it's not politically pretty for their dear leader, so it has to be a dead something. They really don't care what they call it, just try to defelct.

Where's your outrage for the nearly 5,000 American soldiers that died due to Bush's lies?

But let's stick to Benghazi..............

Why did the GOP cut $440,000,000 (that's 440 million for those of you who don't know your math) from the Embassy Security budget that the White House requested?

Ackerman said, “The stench of hypocrisy that hangs over this city today emanates from this room. I’ve listened to my colleagues talk about the President of the United States and others in the administration using [the] terms ‘deliberate’, ‘lies’, ‘unmitigated gall’, ‘malfeasance,’ which is malicious and knowing evil-doing, ‘disgust’, ‘coverups’. If you want to know who is responsible in this town, buy yourself a mirror!”

He accused the Republicans of, according to NBC, having:

“the audacity to come here” when the administration requested, for worldwide security, “$440 million more than you guys wanted to provide. And the answer is that you damn didn’t provide it! You REDUCED what the administration asked for to protect these people. Ask not who the guilty party is, it’s you! It is us. It is this committee, and the things that we insist that we need have to cost money.”

Democrat to GOP in Benghazi Hearing 'If you want to know who is responsible in this town, buy yourself a mirror!'

 

[Agit8r]

I can't believe that we didn't think of this in the early 2000's. We could have gone on endlessly about each of the 3000 people lost to terrorism under Bush's watch. That would have been very useful to solving all of the problems we had back then.

 

[OKTexas]

His death is a very sad oocurrence perpetrated by evil people.

Now Republicans... how much fucking longer are you going to beat this dead horse?

Dead Horse? How about Four Dead Americans and nearly three dozen independent contractors some of which are still recuperating from wounds inflicted on 9/11/12 by terrorists our president and the Secretary of State lied to the America claiming they were demonstrators.

They don't care, it's not politically pretty for their dear leader, so it has to be a dead something. They really don't care what they call it, just try to defelct.

Where's your outrage for the nearly 5,000 American soldiers that died due to Bush's lies?

But let's stick to Benghazi..............

Why did the GOP cut $440,000,000 (that's 440 million for those of you who don't know your math) from the Embassy Security budget that the White House requested?

Ackerman said, “The stench of hypocrisy that hangs over this city today emanates from this room. I’ve listened to my colleagues talk about the President of the United States and others in the administration using [the] terms ‘deliberate’, ‘lies’, ‘unmitigated gall’, ‘malfeasance,’ which is malicious and knowing evil-doing, ‘disgust’, ‘coverups’. If you want to know who is responsible in this town, buy yourself a mirror!”

He accused the Republicans of, according to NBC, having:

“the audacity to come here” when the administration requested, for worldwide security, “$440 million more than you guys wanted to provide. And the answer is that you damn didn’t provide it! You REDUCED what the administration asked for to protect these people. Ask not who the guilty party is, it’s you! It is us. It is this committee, and the things that we insist that we need have to cost money.”

Democrat to GOP in Benghazi Hearing 'If you want to know who is responsible in this town, buy yourself a mirror!'

I guess you choose to ignore the FACT the DEMS ALSO VOTED FOR THE USE OF FORCE IN IRAQ. Even your hero slick Willie advocated regime change in Iraq, all agreed there was a consensus of the worlds intel resources on weapons of mass distruction.

Last but definitely not least what is it you could not get your little brain around when your dear leaders administration testified that FUNDING had no bearing on the security decisions in Ben Gazi? Are you saying your dear leaders administration LIED? Come on little boy, show us you can deal with reality.

 

[g5000]

I can't believe that we didn't think of this in the early 2000's. We could have gone on endlessly about each of the 3000 people lost to terrorism under Bush's watch. That would have been very useful to solving all of the problems we had back then.

We could have gone on endlessly about each of the ten attacks on our overseas missions under Bush. We could have second guessed each one, week after week, month after month, year after year. We could have moaned and moaned about each of the lives lost. We could have demanded the statements of the survivors, and the autopsy of the diplomat that was killed in one of them.

What's that you say? You didn't know a diplomat was killed during one of those attacks? How come you don't know that?

Hmmmm...

We could have had hearings, and made the Secretary of State come and testify each time, and various military officials, and the head of the CIA. We could have pounded desks, concocted all sorts of made up bullshit, and demanded to know what Bush was doing minute by minute before, during, and after each attack.

Maybe that would have prevented all of the ones which followed.

 

[Freewill]

His death is a very sad oocurrence perpetrated by evil people.

Now Republicans... how much fucking longer are you going to beat this dead horse?

Dead horse? There is still absolutely no answers to why the administration was trying to cover up what actually happened. Why the heck would anyone who cares about this country stop asking questions about the situation until we have answers?

Watergate dragged out a whole long time until Nixon stepped down. The media didn't let it drop and no one died.

Obama orders the death of a 16 year old and the medias doesn't care.

Do you really think this is going to get any traction? Obama kills at will an no one on the left cares and the MSM is mostly on the left so even though this was a terrible situation it will be dropped, matter of fact it has been.

But of course 9/11 inside job horse beating continues. Of course the Iraq war horse flogging continues.

 

[g5000]

His death is a very sad oocurrence perpetrated by evil people.

Now Republicans... how much fucking longer are you going to beat this dead horse?

Dead horse? There is still absolutely no answers to why the administration was trying to cover up what actually happened. Why the heck would anyone who cares about this country stop asking questions about the situation until we have answers?

Watergate dragged out a whole long time until Nixon stepped down. The media didn't let it drop and no one died.

Obama orders the death of a 16 year old and the medias doesn't care.

Obama did not order the death of a 16 year old. That is a flat out lie.

 

[Freewill]

I can't believe that we didn't think of this in the early 2000's. We could have gone on endlessly about each of the 3000 people lost to terrorism under Bush's watch. That would have been very useful to solving all of the problems we had back then.

We could have gone on endlessly about each of the ten attacks on our overseas missions under Bush. We could have second guessed each one, week after week, month after month, year after year. We could have moaned and moaned about each of the lives lost. We could have demanded the statements of the survivors, and the autopsy of the diplomat that was killed in one of them.

What's that you say? You didn't know a diplomat was killed during one of those attacks? How come you don't know that?

Hmmmm...

We could have had hearings, and made the Secretary of State come and testify each time, and various military officials, and the head of the CIA. We could have pounded desks, concocted all sorts of made up bullshit, and demanded to know what Bush was doing minute by minute before, during, and after each attack.

Maybe that would have prevented all of the ones which followed.

You do understand that there has been MORE attacks under Obama's watch then the 8 years of Bush? Do I really have to provide that information once again? How many of those attacks during Bush resulted in the death of Americans? How many went on for 7 hours? How many died because of incompetence as they did in Benghazi?

 

[Freewill]

Dead horse? There is still absolutely no answers to why the administration was trying to cover up what actually happened. Why the heck would anyone who cares about this country stop asking questions about the situation until we have answers?

Watergate dragged out a whole long time until Nixon stepped down. The media didn't let it drop and no one died.

Obama orders the death of a 16 year old and the medias doesn't care.

Obama did not order the death of a 16 year old. That is a flat out lie.

So now your argument is that Obama is not in charge of the military?

There is no doubt that a strike ordered by Obama resulted in the death of a 16 year old boy and his cousin, plus others I assume.

And here is the callaus comment by the administration. Note the 16 year olds father was killed under Obama's orders three weeks earlier.

Robert Gibbs Says Anwar al-Awlaki's Son, Killed By Drone Strike, Needs 'Far More Responsible Father'

To say that the 16 year old didn't die because of a predator strike is to say that the administration is lying. They said it was an accident.

 

[gallantwarrior]

Obviously, the author took GREAT LIBERTY with his presumptions....the supposed gash on his forehead was NOT a gash and was soot from the smoke, of COURSE the face would be wiped clean at the hospital, and why would the person with the phone in the mouth put the phone in his pocket if it were his phone, and NOT put the phone in his pocket if it were the Ambassador's phone? The entire article is a disgrace and filled with pure unGodly gossip....yet you all eat it up like it is ice cream...how sad is that...?

And you aren't taking any liberties? Not a gash, but soot? You know that how? As pointed out in the OP, there are many questions that remain unanswered, many answers that remain unclear. But, hell, with your psychic abilities, maybe you should report your most certain knowledge of events and clear all this up, once and for all.

 

[g5000]

I can't believe that we didn't think of this in the early 2000's. We could have gone on endlessly about each of the 3000 people lost to terrorism under Bush's watch. That would have been very useful to solving all of the problems we had back then.

We could have gone on endlessly about each of the ten attacks on our overseas missions under Bush. We could have second guessed each one, week after week, month after month, year after year. We could have moaned and moaned about each of the lives lost. We could have demanded the statements of the survivors, and the autopsy of the diplomat that was killed in one of them.

What's that you say? You didn't know a diplomat was killed during one of those attacks? How come you don't know that?

Hmmmm...

We could have had hearings, and made the Secretary of State come and testify each time, and various military officials, and the head of the CIA. We could have pounded desks, concocted all sorts of made up bullshit, and demanded to know what Bush was doing minute by minute before, during, and after each attack.

Maybe that would have prevented all of the ones which followed.

You do understand that there has been MORE attacks under Obama's watch then the 8 years of Bush? Do I really have to provide that information once again? How many of those attacks during Bush resulted in the death of Americans? How many went on for 7 hours? How many died because of incompetence as they did in Benghazi?

The attack on the consulate did not last 7 hours. Another flat out lie.