An interesting article on sea levels rising..

Wrong.

The true measure of rising sea levels are tidal gauges and satellite atlimetry. And they all say it's rising.
 
Hey crick have you ever seen a professional re: the serious case of Cranium Rectalitis you are suffering from? Quite sure pbo care will cover it...
 
Gosh, no, but glad to discover you haven't got a single, goddamned meaningful thing to actually say about this topic.
 
I believe what I said was very meaningful... Have you ever lived resided on ocean front property, crick? You do realize that it goes for a premium on the free market right? Show us, the sea level rising deniers where there is a sudden decrease in the value of any ocean front property in the world... I will wait patiently...

Oh and if you don't have the funds for you ailment and pbo care won't cover the cost, maybe we can start a go fund me page for you...
 
I have lived on oceanfront property (4200 Ocean Blvd, Singer Island, Apr 1601). I am aware that it goes for a premium. That's not exactly rocket science. And that sea level is rising currently at 3.3 mm/year is unlikely to temper the market. If you'd rather choose that as a criteria than the actual measure and projections of sea level rise, feel free. We are all free to go to hell in a handbasket of our own choosing.
 
It's far easier to fool a leftist than convince him he's been fooled.

the anti nuke pukes finally admitted that their stance against nuke power was fear based and not based in any facts, yet leftist keep fearing it.

post facts showing that the world isn't dying, but the left demands that scientist are godlike beings above mere mortal greed.

the world is not warming b/c of us
we are still in an ice age
the world has been MUCH warmer, and is still here
warm weather would bring a longer growing season, this would bring down the cost of food, but no, leftist want the poor to suffer b/c ice melts.
 
It's far easier to fool a leftist than convince him he's been fooled.

A demonstrably more accurate statement would be "It's far easier to fool poster Two Thumbs than convince him he's been fooled."

the anti nuke pukes finally admitted that their stance against nuke power was fear based and not based in any facts, yet leftist keep fearing it.

Chernobyl's meltdown is a fact.
Three Mile Island's leak is a fact.
The destruction of Fukushima is a fact
List of military nuclear accidents - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article's list of 72 different accidents with nuclear materials consists of facts
List of civilian nuclear accidents - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article's list of 33 different accidents with nuclear materials consists of facts
That radiation exposure is harmfully and potentially fatal is a fact

I favor safe nuclear power. But pretending that it is harmless is a particularly stupid point of view.

post facts showing that the world isn't dying, but the left demands that scientist are godlike beings above mere mortal greed.

No one has claimed the world is dying. The science tells us that we will suffer a number of harms from rising temperatures. The claims of a worldwide, perfect conspiracy among >97% of all climate scientists: people from different nations, different languages, different political and religious beliefs - is complete nonsense. What is FAR more likely is that senior executives in the various branches of the fossil fuel industry, seeing their considerable livelihood threatened, have embarked on a well funded disinformation campaign by which you and others have been taken in. Survival is a far greater motivation than is greed.

the world is not warming b/c of us

That is precisely what the science tells us.

we are still in an ice age

We are currently in an interglacial, not the popular definition of an ice age. Besides, the point is irrelevant. The changes observed over the last 150 years and particularly over the last 50 have not been produced by any glaciation cycle.

the world has been MUCH warmer, and is still here

Not since long, long, long before the rise of human civilization. Warming prior to that is irrelevant.

warm weather would bring a longer growing season, this would bring down the cost of food, but no, leftist want the poor to suffer b/c ice melts.

The harm that will be caused by, say, a 2C rise in temperature will easily overwhelm any increase in food production. Besides, as the cold limits of arable land move towards the poles, the hot limits do the same. A band of the Earth with a given latitudinal height, grows smaller in area as it moves towards the poles.
 
What money do you think scientists are getting? Research grants? When a scientists get a research grant, the purpose of the grant is to fund the conduct of specified research. The grant is sized to conduct that research and the scientist will have to keep records of his expenditures for his grantor. They do not include large sums of money that the researches gets to simply stick in his pocket and use to buy a new car. If scientists were getting rich from research grants, why wouldn't we see scientists going solo? Why do they maintain employment at universities and large corporations?

You people are SO goddamned stupid!


Why do they maintain employment at universities


Because those 30~80 year old scientist are pervs...Damn how stupid do you think I am? They get to oogle at 18~22 year old coeds all day long

If you've got nothing and you know you've got nothing, why don you continue to come here and make yourself look such a fool?


Yea I know crick you live in a sterile world... Nothing psychology happening here, everyone in the 1800s can read and record a thermometer.

Every scientist don't think with his jhonson , fringe benefits, fame and fortune.

Stupid fuck.
 
The true measure of rising sea levels are tidal gauges and satellite atlimetry. And they all say it's rising.


How come only 3 island chains on the lip of the Pacific Ring of Fire are sinking while NOTHING ELSE ON EARTH IS???
 
20 Countries Most At Risk From Sea Level Rise

Every global shore touches the same ocean, and the ocean is rising.

Climate Central just completed a novel analysis of worldwide exposure to sea level rise and coastal flooding. We found that 147 to 216 million people live on land that will be below sea level or regular flood levels by the end of the century, assuming emissions of heat-trapping gases continue on their current trend.

By far the largest group — 41 to 63 million — lives in China. The ranges depend on the ultimate sensitivity of sea level to warming.

But even these figures may be two to three times too low, meaning as many as 650 million people may be threatened.

CCTable.jpg


Did it not occur to you to check your claim before you made it?
 
It's far easier to fool a leftist than convince him he's been fooled.

A demonstrably more accurate statement would be "It's far easier to fool poster Two Thumbs than convince him he's been fooled."

the anti nuke pukes finally admitted that their stance against nuke power was fear based and not based in any facts, yet leftist keep fearing it.

Chernobyl's meltdown is a fact.
Three Mile Island's leak is a fact.
The destruction of Fukushima is a fact
List of military nuclear accidents - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article's list of 72 different accidents with nuclear materials consists of facts
List of civilian nuclear accidents - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article's list of 33 different accidents with nuclear materials consists of facts
That radiation exposure is harmfully and potentially fatal is a fact

I favor safe nuclear power. But pretending that it is harmless is a particularly stupid point of view.

post facts showing that the world isn't dying, but the left demands that scientist are godlike beings above mere mortal greed.

No one has claimed the world is dying. The science tells us that we will suffer a number of harms from rising temperatures. The claims of a worldwide, perfect conspiracy among >97% of all climate scientists: people from different nations, different languages, different political and religious beliefs - is complete nonsense. What is FAR more likely is that senior executives in the various branches of the fossil fuel industry, seeing their considerable livelihood threatened, have embarked on a well funded disinformation campaign by which you and others have been taken in. Survival is a far greater motivation than is greed.

the world is not warming b/c of us

That is precisely what the science tells us.

we are still in an ice age

We are currently in an interglacial, not the popular definition of an ice age. Besides, the point is irrelevant. The changes observed over the last 150 years and particularly over the last 50 have not been produced by any glaciation cycle.

the world has been MUCH warmer, and is still here

Not since long, long, long before the rise of human civilization. Warming prior to that is irrelevant.

warm weather would bring a longer growing season, this would bring down the cost of food, but no, leftist want the poor to suffer b/c ice melts.

The harm that will be caused by, say, a 2C rise in temperature will easily overwhelm any increase in food production. Besides, as the cold limits of arable land move towards the poles, the hot limits do the same. A band of the Earth with a given latitudinal height, grows smaller in area as it moves towards the poles.
omg you are so fucking ignorant you should get paid.

this is not russia, fact
this is not japan, fact

not a fucking thing went bad at 3 mile, fact


you're a fear mongering twat, fact


didn't bother with the rest of your ignorant, tiresome, retarded, uninformed, uneducated bullshit
 
In the same location? Can you tell that from the Herrod's footprints in the sand?
 
omg you are so fucking ignorant you should get paid.
this is not russia, fact
this is not japan, fact
not a fucking thing went bad at 3 mile, fact
you're a fear mongering twat, fact
didn't bother with the rest of your ignorant, tiresome, retarded, uninformed, uneducated bullshit

That's one of the most stupid and least worthwhile retorts I believe I've ever received. "This is not Japan, fact" HAHAHAHAHAaaaaa

"Didn't bother with the rest..." HAAHAHAHAHAAAHAHAaaaaaa
 
Last edited:
In the same location? Can you tell that from the Herrod's footprints in the sand?
Herods palace swimming pool right by the sea on that little peninsula just as historical records tell us. Here's a closeup for you.
Try using this thing called science in your posts, it's really cool stuff.
image.jpeg
 
Last edited:



when GP is telling you your environmental bullshit is bullshit.....


What's bullshit is contending that Patrick Moore has EVER been anything but a sellout.

ah, the typical crick answer. Nothing to debate with just a slam at the source. Dude you have zero credibility. you sk. Post up one paragraph from ipcc AR5 and let's debate. See, you won't. my proof.
 
Right...and the admissions of falsifying data aren't actually admissions either....you are full of shit crick...and attempting to defend the indefensible is just pitiful.

You have some reason to be changing the subject?
how's that changing the subject, the OP is sea level rise, and he's saying the data is falsified. Explain how that isn't related to the OP?
 
What money do you think scientists are getting? Research grants? When a scientists get a research grant, the purpose of the grant is to fund the conduct of specified research. The grant is sized to conduct that research and the scientist will have to keep records of his expenditures for his grantor. They do not include large sums of money that the researches gets to simply stick in his pocket and use to buy a new car. If scientists were getting rich from research grants, why wouldn't we see scientists going solo? Why do they maintain employment at universities and large corporations?

You people are SO goddamned stupid!


Why do they maintain employment at universities


Because those 30~80 year old scientist are pervs...Damn how stupid do you think I am? They get to oogle at 18~22 year old coeds all day long



.
Whatever I think concerning your intellect is irrelevant. You just demonstrated for the world to see the level of your intellect.

The seas are rising, Greenland's ice is melting, and the surface of the earth is warming. Simple facts supported by evidence and observations around the world. Just because it disagrees with you dumb ass politics does not change the changes we are seeing one whit. The statements of the Scientific Societies, the Academies of Science, and the major Universities around the world all state that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger.
all BS, and you can't prove it. more meandering on a message forum with no evidence to back a statement. Prove it rocks, prove sea level rise and not some manufactured chart, name somewhere where it is. Mine and everyone elses position hasn't changed and you've posted up goose eggs.
 
Herods palace swimming pool right by the sea on that little peninsula just as historical records tell us.

Thank you for that irrefutable evidence of sea-level rise.

It was a freshwater pool. That means in Herod's day, it had to be well above the high-tide level. It's certainly not well above the high-tide level now.
 
God are you stupid.

Have you ever even CONSIDERED attempting to reinforce your arguments with logic, reason or (Heaven forbid) EVIDENCE? Your simple, unsupported claims are easier to dismiss then they are for you to make. And dismiss them we do.
well have you?
 

Forum List

Back
Top