Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It is from Fox News, a reputable news source.Fake satire news!
No it's not.Fake satire news!
nypost.com
www.georgesoros.com
16 years ago.I dont listen to the conspiracy theories about this guy, but, there is nothing worse than an idiot who happens to be really wealthy. Here are the brilliant words of just such a person. Flashback: George Soros wrote op-ed bashing US, Israel for not working with Hamas
He said it within months of Hamas killing over 600 Palestinians during their 2006-2007 Gaza invasion.16 years ago.
How is this related?
Maybe if they had pushed for a more moderate government rather than a terror group Israel wouldn't have been attacked. What fool says "work with a terror groupnhellbent on destroying you". They would have had even more resources and power if they had. Iran working with them should be reasoin enough, no?16 years ago.
How is this related?
Not only a fool but a fool proud of his foolishness. Reminds me of Merkel and Macron for so many years.And if that is not good enough... here it is on his own website.
Loser
America and Israel Must Open the Door to Hamas
<p>The Bush administration is again committing a blunder in the Middle East by supporting the Israeli government in its refusal to recognise a Palestinian unity government that includes Hamas.</p>
How is he wrong? From your link:I dont listen to the conspiracy theories about this guy, but, there is nothing worse than an idiot who happens to be really wealthy. Here are the brilliant words of just such a person. Flashback: George Soros wrote op-ed bashing US, Israel for not working with Hamas
16 years ago.
How is this related?
How is he wrong? From your link:
Soros claimed, "The Bush administration is again committing a blunder in the Middle East by supporting the Israeli government in its refusal to recognize a Palestinian unity government that includes Hamas."
He argued that the decision impeded peace between Israel and the Palestinian people and the Middle East at large. He wrote, "This precludes any progress towards a peace settlement at a time when such progress could help avert conflagration in the greater Middle East."
The billionaire added that the U.S. and Israel’s hope for new elections to deny Hamas’ majority is "a hopeless strategy, because Hamas would boycott early elections and, even if their outcome resulted in Hamas’s exclusion from the government, no peace agreement would hold without Hamas support."
He noted that, "If Israel had accepted the results of the election, that might have strengthened the more moderate political wing. Unfortunately, the ideology of the ‘war on terror’ does not permit such subtle distinctions."
The Israeli government's refusal did directly lead to war. If Israelis had recognized a Palestinian unity government that includes Hamas, that would have given them some recognition. By providing them none, the only recourse for Hamas is war.
That does not make Hamas right in what it did to the Israelis but everything is not black and white.
How is he wrong? From your link:
Soros claimed, "The Bush administration is again committing a blunder in the Middle East by supporting the Israeli government in its refusal to recognize a Palestinian unity government that includes Hamas."
He argued that the decision impeded peace between Israel and the Palestinian people and the Middle East at large. He wrote, "This precludes any progress towards a peace settlement at a time when such progress could help avert conflagration in the greater Middle East."
The billionaire added that the U.S. and Israel’s hope for new elections to deny Hamas’ majority is "a hopeless strategy, because Hamas would boycott early elections and, even if their outcome resulted in Hamas’s exclusion from the government, no peace agreement would hold without Hamas support."
He noted that, "If Israel had accepted the results of the election, that might have strengthened the more moderate political wing. Unfortunately, the ideology of the ‘war on terror’ does not permit such subtle distinctions."
The Israeli government's refusal did directly lead to war. If Israelis had recognized a Palestinian unity government that includes Hamas, that would have given them some recognition. By providing them none, the only recourse for Hamas is war.
That does not make Hamas right in what it did to the Israelis but everything is not black and white.
There have been plenty of leaders not recognized in history, that doesn't preclude a war. Their stated objective was to destroy Israel. Also, Israel withdrew and said "here, run your nation as you see fit" and who has it helped? Are then Palestinians happy that their "government" could afford 20,,000 missiles, untold numbers of weapons etc but they can't build a sophisticated economy?How is he wrong? From your link:
Soros claimed, "The Bush administration is again committing a blunder in the Middle East by supporting the Israeli government in its refusal to recognize a Palestinian unity government that includes Hamas."
He argued that the decision impeded peace between Israel and the Palestinian people and the Middle East at large. He wrote, "This precludes any progress towards a peace settlement at a time when such progress could help avert conflagration in the greater Middle East."
The billionaire added that the U.S. and Israel’s hope for new elections to deny Hamas’ majority is "a hopeless strategy, because Hamas would boycott early elections and, even if their outcome resulted in Hamas’s exclusion from the government, no peace agreement would hold without Hamas support."
He noted that, "If Israel had accepted the results of the election, that might have strengthened the more moderate political wing. Unfortunately, the ideology of the ‘war on terror’ does not permit such subtle distinctions."
The Israeli government's refusal did directly lead to war. If Israelis had recognized a Palestinian unity government that includes Hamas, that would have given them some recognition. By providing them none, the only recourse for Hamas is war.
That does not make Hamas right in what it did to the Israelis but everything is not black and white.
<sigh> Read your link again. Israel did not just withdraw. They interfered with the formation of the Palestinian government. Which has led to war.There have been plenty of leaders not recognized in history, that doesn't preclude a war. Their stated objective was to destroy Israel. Also, Israel withdrew and said "here, run your nation as you see fit" and who has it helped? Are then Palestinians happy that their "government" could afford 20,,000 missiles, untold numbers of weapons etc but they can't build a sophisticated economy?
So when Germany elected Hitler, would it have been better or worse to not recognize him rather than pandering to him? Chamberlains name remains in infamy for a reason, one famous quote really.<sigh> Read your link again. Israel did not just withdraw. They interfered with the formation of the Palestinian government. Which has led to war.
Again, Hamas is wrong in what they did but let's not kid ourselves. Israel also holds some blame for this. And Soros is right to point that out.
So when Germany elected Hitler, would it have been better or worse to not recognize him rather than pandering to him? Chamberlains name remains in infamy for a reason, one famous quote really.
Godwin's Law, really? That's the best you got? I thought you wanted a serious discussion but evidently not. Fuck off.
Are you saying, if he’d been listened to maybe this wouldn’t have happened?I dont listen to the conspiracy theories about this guy, but, there is nothing worse than an idiot who happens to be really wealthy. Here are the brilliant words of just such a person. Flashback: George Soros wrote op-ed bashing US, Israel for not working with Hamas
No, if he had been listened to this may have happened much earlier and with potentially worse consequences for Israel. They could even have done so under the guise of a "recognized friend". Is that how those who run on your destruction should be treated?Are you saying, if he’d been listened to maybe this wouldn’t have happened?
