In December, 2009 Taqiyya the Liar amended:
So far, Tea Party favorite Rand Paul is the only wannabe I ever heard say he would rescind previous EOs:
Taqiyya the Liar’s INTERPOL executive order was an act of treason on behalf of the United Nations that was largely ignored by the media. Let’s hope that Rand Paul will undo that one along with the ones on illegal aliens, the ACA, the EPA, and so on.
Amend & Rescind is such an obvious solution to repairing most of Taqiyya the Liar’s constitutional holocaust, I am not surprised talking heads avoid the subject. To no one’s surprise media mouths want the public to focus on Boehner, McConnell and the Courts. Media reasons for staying away from Amend & Rescind are obvious. It works, and it can done by the right president on his own hook.
I do not expect any of Karl Rove’s choices to use Amend & Rescind, while every Tea Party conservative wannabe should be jumping on Rand Paul’s bandwagon. The beauty is that the Chicago sewer rat’s surrogates cannot object to the next president doing exactly the same thing their messiah did.
The media will object to rescinding Taqiyya’s EOs to be sure. Media mouths have already trotted out Hispanic anger if the Republicans torpedo any part of amnesty for illegals. Frankly, Hispanic anger is a hollow threat coming from people who cannot vote anyway; at least they are not supposed to vote. Even if every Hispanic here legally voted for the Democrat it would only affect a small number of districts in House races. In fact, a large number of Hispanic who played by the rules do not support open-borders or amnesty for illegals.
Finally, it is far too early to zero in on Amend & Rescind. The herd has to be thinned out quite a bit before Tea Party conservatives get to that point. When the primaries get started the few remaining on their feet should be asked to declare their intentions on Amend & Rescind. Happily, it’s the type of question that demands an unequivocal answer Tea Party candidates can answer with ease, while establishment Republicans will have trouble answering.
. . . President Ronald Reagans' 1983 EO 12425 and placing INTERPOL above the United States Constitution and beyond the legal reach of our own top law enforcement is a precursor to more damaging moves.
Wither Sovereignty
Executive Order Amended to Immunize INTERPOL In America - Is The ICC Next?
By Steve Schippert, Clyde Middleton December 23, 2009
ThreatsWatch.Org PrincipalAnalysis Wither Sovereignty
Executive Order Amended to Immunize INTERPOL In America - Is The ICC Next?
By Steve Schippert, Clyde Middleton December 23, 2009
ThreatsWatch.Org PrincipalAnalysis Wither Sovereignty
So far, Tea Party favorite Rand Paul is the only wannabe I ever heard say he would rescind previous EOs:
Rand Paul tells audience he would use executive orders only to rescind past orders if elected president
Paul: 'I would use executive orders to undo executive orders that have encroached on our jurisprudence, our ability to defend ourselves, the right to a trial'
Paul: 'I would use executive orders to undo executive orders that have encroached on our jurisprudence, our ability to defend ourselves, the right to a trial'
By Chris Moody August 12, 2014 7:28 PM Yahoo News
Rand Paul tells audience he would use executive orders only to rescind past orders if elected president - Yahoo News
Rand Paul tells audience he would use executive orders only to rescind past orders if elected president - Yahoo News
Taqiyya the Liar’s INTERPOL executive order was an act of treason on behalf of the United Nations that was largely ignored by the media. Let’s hope that Rand Paul will undo that one along with the ones on illegal aliens, the ACA, the EPA, and so on.
Amend & Rescind is such an obvious solution to repairing most of Taqiyya the Liar’s constitutional holocaust, I am not surprised talking heads avoid the subject. To no one’s surprise media mouths want the public to focus on Boehner, McConnell and the Courts. Media reasons for staying away from Amend & Rescind are obvious. It works, and it can done by the right president on his own hook.
I do not expect any of Karl Rove’s choices to use Amend & Rescind, while every Tea Party conservative wannabe should be jumping on Rand Paul’s bandwagon. The beauty is that the Chicago sewer rat’s surrogates cannot object to the next president doing exactly the same thing their messiah did.
The media will object to rescinding Taqiyya’s EOs to be sure. Media mouths have already trotted out Hispanic anger if the Republicans torpedo any part of amnesty for illegals. Frankly, Hispanic anger is a hollow threat coming from people who cannot vote anyway; at least they are not supposed to vote. Even if every Hispanic here legally voted for the Democrat it would only affect a small number of districts in House races. In fact, a large number of Hispanic who played by the rules do not support open-borders or amnesty for illegals.
Finally, it is far too early to zero in on Amend & Rescind. The herd has to be thinned out quite a bit before Tea Party conservatives get to that point. When the primaries get started the few remaining on their feet should be asked to declare their intentions on Amend & Rescind. Happily, it’s the type of question that demands an unequivocal answer Tea Party candidates can answer with ease, while establishment Republicans will have trouble answering.