J
janeeng
Guest
I agree, even though I think it's pretty SICK!!!!! asking someone to murder you, then eat you! YUK!!!! the thought make me want to vomit. Would you eat something that looked like this???
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally posted by jon_forward
what kinda drugs are you trying out there darin? in no way are these subjects close to being the same. popping a nut is one thing, chopping off the poor saps head is altogether another. janeen, I do hope that whatever the gal and fella have that made them the size of houses isnt catchy.one last thought....oral is good but not taken to the extreme, NO BITING!!:
Joe A askes Joe B to kill and eat him. They both agree to the BEHAVIOUR. They are of the age of consent. They aren't harming anyone else. Popular society should be SCREAMING for protection of their Privacy.
Originally posted by dmp
[If gay marriage becomes law, Man-Dog, Man-boy, Girl-Duck, Man-Car marriages should be recognized as well.[/B]
Originally posted by dmp
Exactly the same catergory.
If Joe A wants Joe B to kill and eat him - that's a personal choice between two consenting adults; where is the problem with that?
Where are the laments about 'Behind closed doors' and 'in the Privacy of their Homes' and such? Cannibalistic Couples should expect EVERY Legal consideration Homosexual couples claim to be 'due'.
Apples to Apples here.
Originally posted by Isaac Brock
With all due respect, Apples to Cucumbers with a nice vinagrette.
I think you're taking a miscontrued view liberalism too far to extreme, seeing things in black and white. Let me be strait (pun indended), homosexually as contrary to normal human nature. However, people with this "defect" and I say that with trepedation as I'm talking not morally, but in the evolutionary sense. Homosexuals do not harm society with their acts. In fact homosexuality can be found in nature as well, especially as a genetic disorder in higher primates. These primates however still produce food and protection to the colony, but simply remove their genes from the next generations. It is no different in humans.
However, Canabilism takes peoples lives away. They harm society by removing a member away from it. Not only harming the individual, but removing his place in society including the effects on his job, family, friends and other reliants.
Do you see the difference I am trying to make here? Homosexuals can do there, well whatever, and it does not harm society. Canabalism directly affects society just as it did with primitive cultures world-round.
Janeen, how did you get a naked picture of Micheal Moore?
Originally posted by dmp
Homosexuals behave the way they do because of their lusts. They enjoy having another woman go down on them, or enjoy a rod up the Brown-Eye-Express. It's not biology. It's sociology. It's a learned behaviour - eventually? Maybe and Addiction.
Cannibalism by Voluntarily 'choosing' to be cannibalized does NOT harm anyone, per se. If somebody wants to die, they should be able to choose their method of death. Homosexuality Destroys people in a different way.
Both are destructive behaviours; there is NO grounds for anyone to abhor one, and condone the other behaviour.
Originally posted by Isaac Brock
First of all, homosexuality is not always a socialoligcal problem (although it certainly can be sociological). Homosexually in most high order anmials and humans stem from the improper wiring of the human brain cross crossing some areas that should be female dominants and some that should be male dominant (once again i put no value judgement on that). It also has been shown that 85% gay men have differently wired hypothalmuses which is directly related to nerve function. (The hypothalmus serves as a neuralogical, hormanal intermediary between the body and the brain, also responsible for our fight or flight mechanisms). As for addiction? Please.
Originally posted by Isaac Brock
I can't see how I'm miscontruing this, but you're implying that canabalism is more grave the homosexuality? I certainly hope that is not the case.
Originally posted by Isaac Brock
I'm not asking you to agree with homosexuality or become homosexual. I'm certainly not homosexual, and the thought the act repulses me, but do I think that it's wrong for others? Of course not, as long as it does not affect me. Canabalizing a member of the community even voluntarily can affect me directly.
Originally posted by Isaac Brock
Once again, for the reasons i stated before in my last post which you can read again if you wish, i once again reiterate that yes canabilism hurts society and that no, homosexuality does not. Homosexuality does not "destroy" the other participant and more so that heterosexuality "destroys" its participants. The only difference is that heterosexuality has an active community biological function, homosexuality, does not.
Homosexuality destroys its participants...I wouldn't expect a liberal to understand.
Originally posted by DKSuddeth
that hardly explains anything. Now, is there definitive proof you have that homosexuality destroys its participants or is this just your 'personal view'.
I could understand the latter, but you have not proven the former even with your suppositions of age of death and quality of life. There are way too many variables out there to single out one aspect to explain it all.
Originally posted by MtnBiker
The link didn't work.