Bull Ring Alex. V Lucy Hamilton

Discussion in 'The Bull Ring' started by Alex., Mar 31, 2016.

  1. Alex.
    Offline

    Alex. BANNED

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2014
    Messages:
    9,894
    Thanks Received:
    4,931
    Trophy Points:
    2,095
    Ratings:
    +11,502
    I would like to debate Lucy Hamilton on why she feels it is appropriate to force herself on other posters over their objections. To invade their space with unwarranted insults and remarks after being told to stay away.

    In society we have appropriate patterns of conduct and behavior such as: in a social setting when one party tells another person to stay away the other person should to listen and respect those wishes as that is the “right” of all individuals especially when it comes to a more private and personal means of communication . To do otherwise is aberrant behavior and over the course of several instances has all the characteristics of the follow:

    (1) has a grandiose sense of self-importance (e.g., exaggerates achievements and talents, expects to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements)

    (2) is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love

    (3) believes that he or she is "special" and unique and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people (or institutions)

    (4) requires excessive admiration

    (5) has a sense of entitlement, i.e., unreasonable expectations of especially favorable treatment or automatic compliance with his or her expectations

    (6) is interpersonally exploitative, i.e., takes advantage of others to achieve his or her own ends

    (7) lacks empathy: is unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others

    (8) is often envious of others or believes that others are envious of him or her

    (9) shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes


    To the best of my recollection out history as posters is as follows: You came on to USMB I saw that you were being called names like NAZI and killer and being ganged up on. I did not think that was fair so I defended and supported you, I did my best to make you feel welcome.

    Then one dark and fateful day I asked you a valid question: I requested that you explain a post you made. You seemed to consult others on the open board then made a determination that you would place me on ignore.

    It appears that someone told you I was “sad” you placed me on ignore. Again you made a determination that I was not “sad” and stated as much.

    Yesterday you once again commented about you placing me on ignore, but this time commenting on the substance of my posts as if you could read them.

    This morning over my objections you started to and continued to post harassing and nasty messages in my profile. You have used your ignore “powers” to abuse, follow, harangue, harass, castigate and enflame a situation where I have clearly respected your choices.

    Which now brings forth the issue(s) I would like to debate with you:

    Whether "no" should mean "no" in every context. Trampling over people’s boundaries, despite their discomfort and /or objection, undermines the idea of your own self respect, respect for the rights of others, the integrity of this message board.


    It is important to note that your mastery of the English language is quite remarkable. In fact, I work almost exclusively with people who have terminal degrees, as I have, and we all agree that demonstrably you possess the skill of a well educated and highly experienced English language wordsmith. Therefore please dispense with the confusion “at will” tactic that you seem to slip into and fall out like a snake that sheds his skin when asked a direct, albeit, uncomfortable question.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  2. Lucy Hamilton
    Offline

    Lucy Hamilton Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2015
    Messages:
    30,502
    Thanks Received:
    7,415
    Trophy Points:
    1,240
    Ratings:
    +44,264
    Whether "no" should mean "no" in every context. Trampling over people’s boundaries, despite their discomfort and /or objection, undermines the idea of your own self respect, respect for the rights of others, the integrity of this message board.

    You have a fucking nerve, Alexandra. What about MY rights you fool?

    Trampling over people’s boundaries, despite their discomfort and /or objection

    Yes exactly like I've had to put with for MONTHS, despite me telling certain peoples repeatedly to leave me alone and them REFUSING to do so.

    respect for the rights of others

    Everyone has rights, except what me? You must agree as you are now SUPPORTING the ones I've been wishing to fuck off and leave me alone. What a hypocrite you are Alexandra, or are you on your period today?

    the integrity of this message board.

    What, the use of the word "integrity" coming from you is a complete nerve, you have no "integrity" now Alexandra, not since you slithered into the cesspit with all those who stalk and gang-up and Troll threads that I might be in with the SPECIFIC INTENT on calling me increasingly disgusting names.

    It is important to note that your mastery of the English language is quite remarkable. In fact, I work almost exclusively with people who have terminal degrees, as I have, and we all agree that demonstrably you possess the skill of a well educated and highly experienced English language wordsmith. Therefore please dispense with the confusion “at will” tactic that you seem to slip into and fall out like a snake that sheds his skin when asked a direct, albeit, uncomfortable question.

    You can stick your fake and quasi-compliments were the sun don't shine Alexandra, what a two-faced little woman you are.


    In society we have appropriate patterns of conduct and behavior such as: in a social setting when one party tells another person to stay away the other person should to listen and respect those wishes as that is the “right” of all individuals

    EXCEPT when it's ME that is happening to right Alexandra? I have for more than a MONTH specifically told certain peoples to STOP stalking me from thread to thread and they ALL have refused....so apparently I have NO rights, but you and EVERYONE else do? I've also told them to stop lying and spreading ugly slurs, again, they've refused to do this.

    I write the above in a different colour and bolded print, just so you can read it correctly, as you illustrated much earlier you have reading comprehension problems.


    especially when it comes to a more private and personal means of communication .

    I don't think the Comments Section is private and personal, considering anyone on the forum can READ comments in the Comments Section....I never sent a PM, which would be private and personal....I was up front and honest and posted what I posted about your disturbing personality changes in the Comments Section so anyone could read them IF they wished.


    To do otherwise is aberrant behavior and over the course of several instances has all the characteristics of the follow:


    (1) has a grandiose sense of self-importance (e.g., exaggerates achievements and talents, expects to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements)

    What, I have History and Politics degree, sorry would you prefer I pretend that I'm a Bimbo, you seem to prefer Bimbo's Alexandra.

    (2) is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love

    Absolute 100% horsecrap.

    (3) believes that he or she is "special" and unique and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people (or institutions)

    Absolute 100% horsecrap.

    (4) requires excessive admiration

    Absolute 100% nonsense.

    (5) has a sense of entitlement, i.e., unreasonable expectations of especially favorable treatment or automatic compliance with his or her expectations

    Absolute 100% crap.

    (6) is interpersonally exploitative, i.e., takes advantage of others to achieve his or her own ends

    You are now basically laughable.

    (7) lacks empathy: is unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others

    You are now very laughable.

    (8) is often envious of others or believes that others are envious of him or her

    You are completely idiotic with this.

    (9) shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes

    Whatever.

    "Then one dark and fateful day I asked you a valid question: I requested that you explain a post you made. You seemed to consult others on the open board then made a determination that you would place me on ignore."

    This was in a thread, where suddenly someone mention Ethel and Julius Rosenberg and said "what were they?"

    So I correctly respond with "they were Traitors"

    You respond with "they were American citizens"

    I say to you "yes but they were Traitors, yes?"

    YOU WERE ASKED THAT QUESTION BY ME THREE TIMES AND YOU WERE UNABLE TO AGREE WITH ME.

    FACT: The Rosenberg's were tried and convicted for Treason and were thus Executed as Traitors.

    I gave up on you and put you on Ignore, you had no problem agreeing with me in another thread that the Swedish Government were Traitors....but for curious reasons, were unable, despite being asked three times to accept The Rosenberg's were Traitors.

    What are you a Communist Alexandra.

    Oh and let Skye fight her own battle that she dug the hole for....let's face it that's why you've started this, you're MEGA frustrated that you CAN'T post in my One on One thread because you and most people with any intelligence know that she hasn't the intellectual ability to do it herself.

    So, I've answered EVERYTHING you asked....now PM Skye and tell her to get her ass into the One on One I have for her.

    I have answered everything you posed, I will have NO further answers as there's nothing to discuss.
     
    • Winner Winner x 3
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  3. Lucy Hamilton
    Offline

    Lucy Hamilton Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2015
    Messages:
    30,502
    Thanks Received:
    7,415
    Trophy Points:
    1,240
    Ratings:
    +44,264
    Wow Alexandra, you have Carla Danger thanking you, must feel GREAT to have the endorsement of someone as "intelligent" as Carla :rolleyes-41:
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  4. Alex.
    Offline

    Alex. BANNED

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2014
    Messages:
    9,894
    Thanks Received:
    4,931
    Trophy Points:
    2,095
    Ratings:
    +11,502
    Of course there is plenty to discuss. By the very fact that you have chosen to avoid having any real discussion about the issue I have raised. For example, your post, "you seem to prefer Bimbo's Alexandra". Is an attempt to derail and misdirect. It is this behavior that I captured in my OP.

    Avoidance by trick is distasteful and not very efficient, but to attempt to undermine and bully by intimidation, inveigling or embarrassment is more the hallmark the type of individual I described in my op where you seem to have a sense of entitlement that everyone is suppose to fall to your whims and fantasies or you will make them pay a certain price. At USMB, for example, it is when you use the ignore feature as a weapon.


    We are far from finished with these issues and your continued aberrant and questionable behavior brings forth more serious and complex questions.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  5. Alex.
    Offline

    Alex. BANNED

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2014
    Messages:
    9,894
    Thanks Received:
    4,931
    Trophy Points:
    2,095
    Ratings:
    +11,502
    Once again you seem to think the rules were made for others. It is you and I; not Carla, you and I. Nor is it about how you wish to belittle others in a part of the forum where they cannot respond.

    Your conduct and content speaks to points:

    (2) is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love

    (3) believes that he or she is "special" and unique and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people (or institutions)

    (4) requires excessive admiration

    (5) has a sense of entitlement, i.e., unreasonable expectations of especially favorable treatment or automatic compliance with his or her expectations

    Of my OP.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  6. Lucy Hamilton
    Offline

    Lucy Hamilton Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2015
    Messages:
    30,502
    Thanks Received:
    7,415
    Trophy Points:
    1,240
    Ratings:
    +44,264
    Who do you think you are Alexandra, do you think you're Jung?

    I'll tell you what, I'll make further posts here in this thread WHEN Skye gets her ass into my One on One and provides PROOF, 100% PROOF to back up what she says.

    So when Skye sufficiently answers my questions, I'll meet you back here in your thread, until then have a good day Alexandra.

    Oh and Alexandra, remember Skye has a very distinctive posting style, let's call it....Bimbo ala Gin & Tonic x 10....so Alexandra if you write the stuff for her and tell her to copy and paste it in my thread, OR if ANY of her little Elves does, remember Alexandra, unlike Skye, I have intelligence, so I'll know straight away that Skye hasn't written the stuff.
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  7. Lucy Hamilton
    Offline

    Lucy Hamilton Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2015
    Messages:
    30,502
    Thanks Received:
    7,415
    Trophy Points:
    1,240
    Ratings:
    +44,264
    Skye ass to my One on One or NO more discussion here with you. Period.

    Don't think Alexandra I don't know why you've posted all of this, it's Deflection, to deflect attention off Skye.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  8. Lucy Hamilton
    Offline

    Lucy Hamilton Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2015
    Messages:
    30,502
    Thanks Received:
    7,415
    Trophy Points:
    1,240
    Ratings:
    +44,264
    Hey Alexandra,

    The Bimbo rated your post a Winner, even though she hasn't the intelligence to EVEN understand it being a Bimbo not to mention a psychotic moron.

    But I want you to PM her Alexandra and get her in MY One on One, because Alexandra you afterall WANT ME to have some sort of "discussion" with you in your thread don't you Alexandra, you nutty little woman you.

    So go on do the PM. You see I'm not afraid off stuff like the Bimbo, I have confidence in my intellectual abilities.
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Winner Winner x 2
  9. Alex.
    Offline

    Alex. BANNED

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2014
    Messages:
    9,894
    Thanks Received:
    4,931
    Trophy Points:
    2,095
    Ratings:
    +11,502

    So we have another attempt at deflection. Clearly you cannot discuss the issue without an emotional outburst.

    Just to remind you the main issue is "Whether "no" should mean "no" in every context. Trampling over people’s boundaries, despite their discomfort and /or objection, undermines the idea of your own self respect, respect for the rights of others, the integrity of this message board."
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  10. Lucy Hamilton
    Offline

    Lucy Hamilton Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2015
    Messages:
    30,502
    Thanks Received:
    7,415
    Trophy Points:
    1,240
    Ratings:
    +44,264
    Listen you nutter, do you have difficulty understanding things? You must because for the umpteenth time I'm telling you:

    Get the Bimbo Skye INTO my One on One thread or you and the She-Wolf BOTH STFU.

    I want her in MY thread with 100% PROOF of everything I ask for in that thread....I'm willing to let her do this in steps, so let's try the first:

    She provides 100% PROOF that I've EVER been a member of that cesspit Stormfront.

    So Alexandra you little woman you, throw the stick and get the Bimbo doggy to fetch it....and bring it to my thread.
     
    • Winner Winner x 3

Share This Page