Al Nakba Denial vs Holocaust Denial, what's the Difference

[montelatici]

Ethnic cleansing was not a consequence of war. It was the reason for the war.

The Zionists wanted a majority Jewish state where the Jews were only 1/3 of the population. That meant that a lot of Palestinians had to go. There was no other option.

As Coyote also said -- it worked both ways. Both Jewish nationalists and Arab nationalists wanted (needed, need) a homogeneous enough population to bring about a national self-determination. And both groups created "facts on the ground" by using military strength to rid the territory they controlled of the "enemy" population. That is what the war was.

After WWI and WWII, when the time of large Empires came to an end, smaller, tribal-based nationalities became the norm. An exchange of population as a consequence of distinct, smaller nationalisms was quite normal for the times and even fifty years later -- see examples such as Yugoslavia. In fact, there are numbers in the millions of peoples who were transferred. It was common. (And, in nearly every case, it actually solved the problem).

But it is an error to claim that it was (is) only one side which wanted (needed, wants, needs) a relatively homogeneous population. Let alone that only one side managed to accomplish such a thing! If we compare the two sides we see that the Arabs were FAR more successful in their removal of Jews throughout the Arab world than the Jews were in removal of Arabs on the tiny slice that is now Israel or on the slightly larger slice which should have been the Jewish National Homeland. Whether that is a result of incompetence on the part of the Jewish people (unlikely) or a lack of will is of no consequence except on silly forums like this one.

The point being that there is no moral equivalence between an EQUAL requirement for a homogeneous population and the military will and power to create such a reality in war and the deliberate, systematic extermination of a peoples.

How can you compare the rights of the people inhabiting a territory with the rights of the people living on another continent planning to colonize the territory? Don't you realize it's an altogether crazy concept?

"planning"...

Yes planning.

"Zionists plan to colonize Palestine in 1899 NY Times

An article about a Conference of Zionists published on July 20, 1899 in the New York Times depicts how the Conference sought to “colonize Palestine” and discussed the purchasing of land with English Zionists.
World Bulletin/News Desk

An article about a Conference of Zionists published on July 20, 1899 in the New York Times expresses that the Zionists “will colonize Palestine.”

The article explains that the conference discussed a paper from the English Zionist Federation “proposing the re-establishment of Judea as an independent State, suggesting the purchase of the Maccabean sites in Palestine, and the beginning of the work by the establishment of a Jewish colony and a Jewish Agricultural College there.”

It further clarifies that “The site to be purchased comprises about fifty acres, six miles from a station on the railroad between Jappa and Jerusalem, and within sight of the sea and a large stretch of the Palestinian coast.”

It notes that English Zionists have gathered 2,500 dollars in the currency of the period and request that quantity from the American Zionists.

The article also explains that “On motion of Dr. Wise, the Federation voted $100 as the nucleus of the required fund of $2,500, the remainder to be raised by subscriptions from the 125 societies and individuals, both Jews and Gentiles. A general appeal to the public will be made.”

It also conveys that delegates will be elected at the Zionist meeting in Baltimore.

The straightforward and comfortable manner with which the colonization is pursued is indicative how, before having to be concerned with the image of Zionism and public relations, Zionist leaders depicted their movement as a colonial mission during a time in which European nations were colonial powers. "

Zionists plan to colonize Palestine in 1899 NY Times - World Bulletin

 

[Shusha]

Colonizers have no rights at all when they intend to replace the native population with themselves. It is a criminal enterprise, whether it is successful or not in the long term. The European Jews were not returning home, they were Europeans.

Then you need to get your ass in gear in correcting the COLOSSAL wrong of the Americas, Africa and Australia and leave the Jewish people, who are not colonizers but returnees to their ancestral homelands, alone.

 

[montelatici]

Colonizers have no rights at all when they intend to replace the native population with themselves. It is a criminal enterprise, whether it is successful or not in the long term. The European Jews were not returning home, they were Europeans.

Then you need to get your ass in gear in correcting the COLOSSAL wrong of the Americas, Africa and Australia and leave the Jewish people, who are not colonizers but returnees to their ancestral homelands, alone.

The Europeans were able to eliminate the native people for the most part in the Americas and Oceania. Notably, in some Latin American countries the native people have taken back control, e.g. Bolivia.

They (the Europeans) weren't able to eliminate the native people in Africa, and the native people regained their land and control.

The Europeans have not been able to do the same as they did in the Americas and Oceania in the Middle East. Europeans are not returnees to the Middle East, they are European colonists. You can make up fairy tales, but European Jews are Europeans, not Middle Eastern.

 

[Indeependent]

Ethnic cleansing was not a consequence of war. It was the reason for the war.

The Zionists wanted a majority Jewish state where the Jews were only 1/3 of the population. That meant that a lot of Palestinians had to go. There was no other option.

As Coyote also said -- it worked both ways. Both Jewish nationalists and Arab nationalists wanted (needed, need) a homogeneous enough population to bring about a national self-determination. And both groups created "facts on the ground" by using military strength to rid the territory they controlled of the "enemy" population. That is what the war was.

After WWI and WWII, when the time of large Empires came to an end, smaller, tribal-based nationalities became the norm. An exchange of population as a consequence of distinct, smaller nationalisms was quite normal for the times and even fifty years later -- see examples such as Yugoslavia. In fact, there are numbers in the millions of peoples who were transferred. It was common. (And, in nearly every case, it actually solved the problem).

But it is an error to claim that it was (is) only one side which wanted (needed, wants, needs) a relatively homogeneous population. Let alone that only one side managed to accomplish such a thing! If we compare the two sides we see that the Arabs were FAR more successful in their removal of Jews throughout the Arab world than the Jews were in removal of Arabs on the tiny slice that is now Israel or on the slightly larger slice which should have been the Jewish National Homeland. Whether that is a result of incompetence on the part of the Jewish people (unlikely) or a lack of will is of no consequence except on silly forums like this one.

The point being that there is no moral equivalence between an EQUAL requirement for a homogeneous population and the military will and power to create such a reality in war and the deliberate, systematic extermination of a peoples.

How can you compare the rights of the people inhabiting a territory with the rights of the people living on another continent planning to colonize the territory? Don't you realize it's an altogether crazy concept?

"planning"...

Yes planning.

"Zionists plan to colonize Palestine in 1899 NY Times

An article about a Conference of Zionists published on July 20, 1899 in the New York Times depicts how the Conference sought to “colonize Palestine” and discussed the purchasing of land with English Zionists.
World Bulletin/News Desk

An article about a Conference of Zionists published on July 20, 1899 in the New York Times expresses that the Zionists “will colonize Palestine.”

The article explains that the conference discussed a paper from the English Zionist Federation “proposing the re-establishment of Judea as an independent State, suggesting the purchase of the Maccabean sites in Palestine, and the beginning of the work by the establishment of a Jewish colony and a Jewish Agricultural College there.”

It further clarifies that “The site to be purchased comprises about fifty acres, six miles from a station on the railroad between Jappa and Jerusalem, and within sight of the sea and a large stretch of the Palestinian coast.”

It notes that English Zionists have gathered 2,500 dollars in the currency of the period and request that quantity from the American Zionists.

The article also explains that “On motion of Dr. Wise, the Federation voted $100 as the nucleus of the required fund of $2,500, the remainder to be raised by subscriptions from the 125 societies and individuals, both Jews and Gentiles. A general appeal to the public will be made.”

It also conveys that delegates will be elected at the Zionist meeting in Baltimore.

The straightforward and comfortable manner with which the colonization is pursued is indicative how, before having to be concerned with the image of Zionism and public relations, Zionist leaders depicted their movement as a colonial mission during a time in which European nations were colonial powers. "

Zionists plan to colonize Palestine in 1899 NY Times - World Bulletin

Oh, look!
A photograph of an article.
Oh, those dirty Jews...

Do us all a favor and seek therapy.

 

[montelatici]

Ethnic cleansing was not a consequence of war. It was the reason for the war.

The Zionists wanted a majority Jewish state where the Jews were only 1/3 of the population. That meant that a lot of Palestinians had to go. There was no other option.

As Coyote also said -- it worked both ways. Both Jewish nationalists and Arab nationalists wanted (needed, need) a homogeneous enough population to bring about a national self-determination. And both groups created "facts on the ground" by using military strength to rid the territory they controlled of the "enemy" population. That is what the war was.

After WWI and WWII, when the time of large Empires came to an end, smaller, tribal-based nationalities became the norm. An exchange of population as a consequence of distinct, smaller nationalisms was quite normal for the times and even fifty years later -- see examples such as Yugoslavia. In fact, there are numbers in the millions of peoples who were transferred. It was common. (And, in nearly every case, it actually solved the problem).

But it is an error to claim that it was (is) only one side which wanted (needed, wants, needs) a relatively homogeneous population. Let alone that only one side managed to accomplish such a thing! If we compare the two sides we see that the Arabs were FAR more successful in their removal of Jews throughout the Arab world than the Jews were in removal of Arabs on the tiny slice that is now Israel or on the slightly larger slice which should have been the Jewish National Homeland. Whether that is a result of incompetence on the part of the Jewish people (unlikely) or a lack of will is of no consequence except on silly forums like this one.

The point being that there is no moral equivalence between an EQUAL requirement for a homogeneous population and the military will and power to create such a reality in war and the deliberate, systematic extermination of a peoples.

How can you compare the rights of the people inhabiting a territory with the rights of the people living on another continent planning to colonize the territory? Don't you realize it's an altogether crazy concept?

"planning"...

Yes planning.

"Zionists plan to colonize Palestine in 1899 NY Times

An article about a Conference of Zionists published on July 20, 1899 in the New York Times depicts how the Conference sought to “colonize Palestine” and discussed the purchasing of land with English Zionists.
World Bulletin/News Desk

An article about a Conference of Zionists published on July 20, 1899 in the New York Times expresses that the Zionists “will colonize Palestine.”

The article explains that the conference discussed a paper from the English Zionist Federation “proposing the re-establishment of Judea as an independent State, suggesting the purchase of the Maccabean sites in Palestine, and the beginning of the work by the establishment of a Jewish colony and a Jewish Agricultural College there.”

It further clarifies that “The site to be purchased comprises about fifty acres, six miles from a station on the railroad between Jappa and Jerusalem, and within sight of the sea and a large stretch of the Palestinian coast.”

It notes that English Zionists have gathered 2,500 dollars in the currency of the period and request that quantity from the American Zionists.

The article also explains that “On motion of Dr. Wise, the Federation voted $100 as the nucleus of the required fund of $2,500, the remainder to be raised by subscriptions from the 125 societies and individuals, both Jews and Gentiles. A general appeal to the public will be made.”

It also conveys that delegates will be elected at the Zionist meeting in Baltimore.

The straightforward and comfortable manner with which the colonization is pursued is indicative how, before having to be concerned with the image of Zionism and public relations, Zionist leaders depicted their movement as a colonial mission during a time in which European nations were colonial powers. "

Zionists plan to colonize Palestine in 1899 NY Times - World Bulletin

Oh, look!
A photograph of an article.
Oh, those dirty Jews...

Do us all a favor and seek therapy.

Nothing dirty, just fact. Do us a favor, have you cognizant dissonance checked out.

 

[Indeependent]

As Coyote also said -- it worked both ways. Both Jewish nationalists and Arab nationalists wanted (needed, need) a homogeneous enough population to bring about a national self-determination. And both groups created "facts on the ground" by using military strength to rid the territory they controlled of the "enemy" population. That is what the war was.

After WWI and WWII, when the time of large Empires came to an end, smaller, tribal-based nationalities became the norm. An exchange of population as a consequence of distinct, smaller nationalisms was quite normal for the times and even fifty years later -- see examples such as Yugoslavia. In fact, there are numbers in the millions of peoples who were transferred. It was common. (And, in nearly every case, it actually solved the problem).

But it is an error to claim that it was (is) only one side which wanted (needed, wants, needs) a relatively homogeneous population. Let alone that only one side managed to accomplish such a thing! If we compare the two sides we see that the Arabs were FAR more successful in their removal of Jews throughout the Arab world than the Jews were in removal of Arabs on the tiny slice that is now Israel or on the slightly larger slice which should have been the Jewish National Homeland. Whether that is a result of incompetence on the part of the Jewish people (unlikely) or a lack of will is of no consequence except on silly forums like this one.

The point being that there is no moral equivalence between an EQUAL requirement for a homogeneous population and the military will and power to create such a reality in war and the deliberate, systematic extermination of a peoples.

How can you compare the rights of the people inhabiting a territory with the rights of the people living on another continent planning to colonize the territory? Don't you realize it's an altogether crazy concept?

"planning"...

Yes planning.

"Zionists plan to colonize Palestine in 1899 NY Times

An article about a Conference of Zionists published on July 20, 1899 in the New York Times depicts how the Conference sought to “colonize Palestine” and discussed the purchasing of land with English Zionists.
World Bulletin/News Desk

An article about a Conference of Zionists published on July 20, 1899 in the New York Times expresses that the Zionists “will colonize Palestine.”

The article explains that the conference discussed a paper from the English Zionist Federation “proposing the re-establishment of Judea as an independent State, suggesting the purchase of the Maccabean sites in Palestine, and the beginning of the work by the establishment of a Jewish colony and a Jewish Agricultural College there.”

It further clarifies that “The site to be purchased comprises about fifty acres, six miles from a station on the railroad between Jappa and Jerusalem, and within sight of the sea and a large stretch of the Palestinian coast.”

It notes that English Zionists have gathered 2,500 dollars in the currency of the period and request that quantity from the American Zionists.

The article also explains that “On motion of Dr. Wise, the Federation voted $100 as the nucleus of the required fund of $2,500, the remainder to be raised by subscriptions from the 125 societies and individuals, both Jews and Gentiles. A general appeal to the public will be made.”

It also conveys that delegates will be elected at the Zionist meeting in Baltimore.

The straightforward and comfortable manner with which the colonization is pursued is indicative how, before having to be concerned with the image of Zionism and public relations, Zionist leaders depicted their movement as a colonial mission during a time in which European nations were colonial powers. "

Zionists plan to colonize Palestine in 1899 NY Times - World Bulletin

Oh, look!
A photograph of an article.
Oh, those dirty Jews...

Do us all a favor and seek therapy.

Nothing dirty, just fact. Do us a favor, have you cognizant dissonance checked out.

View attachment 120109

Do everyone a favor and write a book using your usual method of presenting facts out of order and out of context.
You have less than 10 fools here who swallow your bullshit.

 

[montelatici]

How can you compare the rights of the people inhabiting a territory with the rights of the people living on another continent planning to colonize the territory? Don't you realize it's an altogether crazy concept?

"planning"...

Yes planning.

"Zionists plan to colonize Palestine in 1899 NY Times

An article about a Conference of Zionists published on July 20, 1899 in the New York Times depicts how the Conference sought to “colonize Palestine” and discussed the purchasing of land with English Zionists.
World Bulletin/News Desk

An article about a Conference of Zionists published on July 20, 1899 in the New York Times expresses that the Zionists “will colonize Palestine.”

The article explains that the conference discussed a paper from the English Zionist Federation “proposing the re-establishment of Judea as an independent State, suggesting the purchase of the Maccabean sites in Palestine, and the beginning of the work by the establishment of a Jewish colony and a Jewish Agricultural College there.”

It further clarifies that “The site to be purchased comprises about fifty acres, six miles from a station on the railroad between Jappa and Jerusalem, and within sight of the sea and a large stretch of the Palestinian coast.”

It notes that English Zionists have gathered 2,500 dollars in the currency of the period and request that quantity from the American Zionists.

The article also explains that “On motion of Dr. Wise, the Federation voted $100 as the nucleus of the required fund of $2,500, the remainder to be raised by subscriptions from the 125 societies and individuals, both Jews and Gentiles. A general appeal to the public will be made.”

It also conveys that delegates will be elected at the Zionist meeting in Baltimore.

The straightforward and comfortable manner with which the colonization is pursued is indicative how, before having to be concerned with the image of Zionism and public relations, Zionist leaders depicted their movement as a colonial mission during a time in which European nations were colonial powers. "

Zionists plan to colonize Palestine in 1899 NY Times - World Bulletin

Oh, look!
A photograph of an article.
Oh, those dirty Jews...

Do us all a favor and seek therapy.

Nothing dirty, just fact. Do us a favor, have you cognizant dissonance checked out.

View attachment 120109

Do everyone a favor and write a book using your usual method of presenting facts out of order and out of context.
You have less than 10 fools here who swallow your bullshit.

What is out of order and out of context? A NYT article states clearly that the Zionists intend to colonize Palestine in 1899. Fact is not bullshit. You are the bullshitter that only spouts propaganda.

 

[fncceo]

Do you want to stop antisemitism?

Antisemitism has always been with us and always will. It's normal for people to hate their intellectual and social superiors. Envy of Jews is visceral in some non-Jews.

But, today overt antisemitism in the West is limited to anonymous rantings on the Internet.

Antisemites have no power to adversely affect Jews as they did in the past. They serve only as a reminder of why Jews need to be strong and vigilant.

 

[Indeependent]

"planning"...

Yes planning.

"Zionists plan to colonize Palestine in 1899 NY Times

An article about a Conference of Zionists published on July 20, 1899 in the New York Times depicts how the Conference sought to “colonize Palestine” and discussed the purchasing of land with English Zionists.
World Bulletin/News Desk

An article about a Conference of Zionists published on July 20, 1899 in the New York Times expresses that the Zionists “will colonize Palestine.”

The article explains that the conference discussed a paper from the English Zionist Federation “proposing the re-establishment of Judea as an independent State, suggesting the purchase of the Maccabean sites in Palestine, and the beginning of the work by the establishment of a Jewish colony and a Jewish Agricultural College there.”

It further clarifies that “The site to be purchased comprises about fifty acres, six miles from a station on the railroad between Jappa and Jerusalem, and within sight of the sea and a large stretch of the Palestinian coast.”

It notes that English Zionists have gathered 2,500 dollars in the currency of the period and request that quantity from the American Zionists.

The article also explains that “On motion of Dr. Wise, the Federation voted $100 as the nucleus of the required fund of $2,500, the remainder to be raised by subscriptions from the 125 societies and individuals, both Jews and Gentiles. A general appeal to the public will be made.”

It also conveys that delegates will be elected at the Zionist meeting in Baltimore.

The straightforward and comfortable manner with which the colonization is pursued is indicative how, before having to be concerned with the image of Zionism and public relations, Zionist leaders depicted their movement as a colonial mission during a time in which European nations were colonial powers. "

Zionists plan to colonize Palestine in 1899 NY Times - World Bulletin

Oh, look!
A photograph of an article.
Oh, those dirty Jews...

Do us all a favor and seek therapy.

Nothing dirty, just fact. Do us a favor, have you cognizant dissonance checked out.

View attachment 120109

Do everyone a favor and write a book using your usual method of presenting facts out of order and out of context.
You have less than 10 fools here who swallow your bullshit.

What is out of order and out of context? A NYT article states clearly that the Zionists intend to colonize Palestine in 1899. Fact is not bullshit. You are the bullshitter that only spouts propaganda.

Ooh, an article in the NYT!
As we all now, the NYT has been a fan of Jews since, well, never.
You really are ignorant.

 

[montelatici]

Yes planning.

"Zionists plan to colonize Palestine in 1899 NY Times

An article about a Conference of Zionists published on July 20, 1899 in the New York Times depicts how the Conference sought to “colonize Palestine” and discussed the purchasing of land with English Zionists.
World Bulletin/News Desk

An article about a Conference of Zionists published on July 20, 1899 in the New York Times expresses that the Zionists “will colonize Palestine.”

The article explains that the conference discussed a paper from the English Zionist Federation “proposing the re-establishment of Judea as an independent State, suggesting the purchase of the Maccabean sites in Palestine, and the beginning of the work by the establishment of a Jewish colony and a Jewish Agricultural College there.”

It further clarifies that “The site to be purchased comprises about fifty acres, six miles from a station on the railroad between Jappa and Jerusalem, and within sight of the sea and a large stretch of the Palestinian coast.”

It notes that English Zionists have gathered 2,500 dollars in the currency of the period and request that quantity from the American Zionists.

The article also explains that “On motion of Dr. Wise, the Federation voted $100 as the nucleus of the required fund of $2,500, the remainder to be raised by subscriptions from the 125 societies and individuals, both Jews and Gentiles. A general appeal to the public will be made.”

It also conveys that delegates will be elected at the Zionist meeting in Baltimore.

The straightforward and comfortable manner with which the colonization is pursued is indicative how, before having to be concerned with the image of Zionism and public relations, Zionist leaders depicted their movement as a colonial mission during a time in which European nations were colonial powers. "

Zionists plan to colonize Palestine in 1899 NY Times - World Bulletin

Oh, look!
A photograph of an article.
Oh, those dirty Jews...

Do us all a favor and seek therapy.

Nothing dirty, just fact. Do us a favor, have you cognizant dissonance checked out.

View attachment 120109

Do everyone a favor and write a book using your usual method of presenting facts out of order and out of context.
You have less than 10 fools here who swallow your bullshit.

What is out of order and out of context? A NYT article states clearly that the Zionists intend to colonize Palestine in 1899. Fact is not bullshit. You are the bullshitter that only spouts propaganda.

Ooh, an article in the NYT!
As we all now, the NYT has been a fan of Jews since, well, never.
You really are ignorant.

So, you believe that the European Jews did not intend to colonize Palestine and create a Jewish state? Do you believe that the Jewish Telegraphic Agency is also anti-Jewish?

Successful Jewish Colonization Will Extend Beyond Palestine Frontier, Weizmann Tells Actions Committee

July 25, 1926

2SHARES
London (Jul. 23)

(Jewish Telegraphic Agency)


The contemplated trip to the United States of Dr. Chaim Weizmann, president of the World Zionist Organization, the continuation of his efforts while in America to extend the Jewish Agency through his negotiations with the Marshall group, the possibilities of extending Jewish colonization work outside of the present Palestine frontiers, including. Transjordania and certain parts of Syria, were the main features around which the deliberations centered."

Successful Jewish Colonization Will Extend Beyond Palestine Frontier, Weizmann Tells Actions Committ

 

[Indeependent]

Oh, look!
A photograph of an article.
Oh, those dirty Jews...

Do us all a favor and seek therapy.

Nothing dirty, just fact. Do us a favor, have you cognizant dissonance checked out.

View attachment 120109

Do everyone a favor and write a book using your usual method of presenting facts out of order and out of context.
You have less than 10 fools here who swallow your bullshit.

What is out of order and out of context? A NYT article states clearly that the Zionists intend to colonize Palestine in 1899. Fact is not bullshit. You are the bullshitter that only spouts propaganda.

Ooh, an article in the NYT!
As we all now, the NYT has been a fan of Jews since, well, never.
You really are ignorant.

So, you believe that the European Jews did not intend to colonize Palestine and create a Jewish state? Do you believe that the Jewish Telegraphic Agency is also anti-Jewish?

Successful Jewish Colonization Will Extend Beyond Palestine Frontier, Weizmann Tells Actions Committee

July 25, 1926

2SHARES
London (Jul. 23)

(Jewish Telegraphic Agency)


The contemplated trip to the United States of Dr. Chaim Weizmann, president of the World Zionist Organization, the continuation of his efforts while in America to extend the Jewish Agency through his negotiations with the Marshall group, the possibilities of extending Jewish colonization work outside of the present Palestine frontiers, including. Transjordania and certain parts of Syria, were the main features around which the deliberations centered."

Successful Jewish Colonization Will Extend Beyond Palestine Frontier, Weizmann Tells Actions Committ

Here's where your blind hatred of Jews betrays itself.
I will presume you didn't grow up reading the NYT or other assimilated, self-hating Jew owner/operated newspapers.
That's why you come off as such a buffoon.
Until the 80s there were few, if any, pro-Jewish English newspapers or magazines.
You will study your Jew publications such as the Jewish Week which is as hateful to Jews as one could get.
You are completely out of your league insofar as knowing when it comes to discerning Christian wanna-be Jews.

 

[montelatici]

Nothing dirty, just fact. Do us a favor, have you cognizant dissonance checked out.

View attachment 120109

Do everyone a favor and write a book using your usual method of presenting facts out of order and out of context.
You have less than 10 fools here who swallow your bullshit.

What is out of order and out of context? A NYT article states clearly that the Zionists intend to colonize Palestine in 1899. Fact is not bullshit. You are the bullshitter that only spouts propaganda.

Ooh, an article in the NYT!
As we all now, the NYT has been a fan of Jews since, well, never.
You really are ignorant.

So, you believe that the European Jews did not intend to colonize Palestine and create a Jewish state? Do you believe that the Jewish Telegraphic Agency is also anti-Jewish?

Successful Jewish Colonization Will Extend Beyond Palestine Frontier, Weizmann Tells Actions Committee

July 25, 1926

2SHARES
London (Jul. 23)

(Jewish Telegraphic Agency)


The contemplated trip to the United States of Dr. Chaim Weizmann, president of the World Zionist Organization, the continuation of his efforts while in America to extend the Jewish Agency through his negotiations with the Marshall group, the possibilities of extending Jewish colonization work outside of the present Palestine frontiers, including. Transjordania and certain parts of Syria, were the main features around which the deliberations centered."

Successful Jewish Colonization Will Extend Beyond Palestine Frontier, Weizmann Tells Actions Committ

Here's where your blind hatred of Jews betrays itself.
I will presume you didn't grow up reading the NYT or other assimilated, self-hating Jew owner/operated newspapers.
That's why you come off as such a buffoon.
Until the 80s there were few, if any, pro-Jewish English newspapers or magazines.
You will study your Jew publications such as the Jewish Week which is as hateful to Jews as one could get.
You are completely out of your league insofar as knowing when it comes to discerning Christian wanna-be Jews.

No, I am presenting fact. You are delusional. The JTA (Jewish telegraphic Agency) article was from the 1920s. Nothing Christian about it. You are out of your league. I present the facts.

 

[Indeependent]

Do everyone a favor and write a book using your usual method of presenting facts out of order and out of context.
You have less than 10 fools here who swallow your bullshit.

What is out of order and out of context? A NYT article states clearly that the Zionists intend to colonize Palestine in 1899. Fact is not bullshit. You are the bullshitter that only spouts propaganda.

Ooh, an article in the NYT!
As we all now, the NYT has been a fan of Jews since, well, never.
You really are ignorant.

So, you believe that the European Jews did not intend to colonize Palestine and create a Jewish state? Do you believe that the Jewish Telegraphic Agency is also anti-Jewish?

Successful Jewish Colonization Will Extend Beyond Palestine Frontier, Weizmann Tells Actions Committee

July 25, 1926

2SHARES
London (Jul. 23)

(Jewish Telegraphic Agency)


The contemplated trip to the United States of Dr. Chaim Weizmann, president of the World Zionist Organization, the continuation of his efforts while in America to extend the Jewish Agency through his negotiations with the Marshall group, the possibilities of extending Jewish colonization work outside of the present Palestine frontiers, including. Transjordania and certain parts of Syria, were the main features around which the deliberations centered."

Successful Jewish Colonization Will Extend Beyond Palestine Frontier, Weizmann Tells Actions Committ

Here's where your blind hatred of Jews betrays itself.
I will presume you didn't grow up reading the NYT or other assimilated, self-hating Jew owner/operated newspapers.
That's why you come off as such a buffoon.
Until the 80s there were few, if any, pro-Jewish English newspapers or magazines.
You will study your Jew publications such as the Jewish Week which is as hateful to Jews as one could get.
You are completely out of your league insofar as knowing when it comes to discerning Christian wanna-be Jews.

No, I am presenting fact. You are delusional. The JTA (Jewish telegraphic Agency) article was from the 1920s. Nothing Christian about it. You are out of your league. I present the facts.

You go right ahead and tell a Jew about his own people's publications.
Keep digging.

 

[Shusha]

The Europeans were able to eliminate the native people for the most part in the Americas and Oceania.

And your point being? Is this a morally good thing or a morally wrong thing? For the native people to be eliminated? Or just a thing thing -- can't unbreak the egg thing and it really doesn't matter if its morally right or morally wrong thing?

 

[montelatici]

The Europeans were able to eliminate the native people for the most part in the Americas and Oceania.

And your point being? Is this a morally good thing or a morally wrong thing? For the native people to be eliminated? Or just a thing thing -- can't unbreak the egg thing and it really doesn't matter if its morally right or morally wrong thing?

I am simply presenting fact. Of course eliminating the native people was morally wrong, today the perpetrators would be found guilty of genocide.

 

[montelatici]

What is out of order and out of context? A NYT article states clearly that the Zionists intend to colonize Palestine in 1899. Fact is not bullshit. You are the bullshitter that only spouts propaganda.

Ooh, an article in the NYT!
As we all now, the NYT has been a fan of Jews since, well, never.
You really are ignorant.

So, you believe that the European Jews did not intend to colonize Palestine and create a Jewish state? Do you believe that the Jewish Telegraphic Agency is also anti-Jewish?

Successful Jewish Colonization Will Extend Beyond Palestine Frontier, Weizmann Tells Actions Committee

July 25, 1926

2SHARES
London (Jul. 23)

(Jewish Telegraphic Agency)


The contemplated trip to the United States of Dr. Chaim Weizmann, president of the World Zionist Organization, the continuation of his efforts while in America to extend the Jewish Agency through his negotiations with the Marshall group, the possibilities of extending Jewish colonization work outside of the present Palestine frontiers, including. Transjordania and certain parts of Syria, were the main features around which the deliberations centered."

Successful Jewish Colonization Will Extend Beyond Palestine Frontier, Weizmann Tells Actions Committ

Here's where your blind hatred of Jews betrays itself.
I will presume you didn't grow up reading the NYT or other assimilated, self-hating Jew owner/operated newspapers.
That's why you come off as such a buffoon.
Until the 80s there were few, if any, pro-Jewish English newspapers or magazines.
You will study your Jew publications such as the Jewish Week which is as hateful to Jews as one could get.
You are completely out of your league insofar as knowing when it comes to discerning Christian wanna-be Jews.

No, I am presenting fact. You are delusional. The JTA (Jewish telegraphic Agency) article was from the 1920s. Nothing Christian about it. You are out of your league. I present the facts.

You go right ahead and tell a Jew about his own people's publications.
Keep digging.

You are not the sharpest knife in the drawer. Do you think that writing "keep digging" changes the fact that the Jews intended to colonize Palestine (and further)? Something you denied.

 

[Indeependent]

Ooh, an article in the NYT!
As we all now, the NYT has been a fan of Jews since, well, never.
You really are ignorant.

So, you believe that the European Jews did not intend to colonize Palestine and create a Jewish state? Do you believe that the Jewish Telegraphic Agency is also anti-Jewish?

Successful Jewish Colonization Will Extend Beyond Palestine Frontier, Weizmann Tells Actions Committee

July 25, 1926

2SHARES
London (Jul. 23)

(Jewish Telegraphic Agency)


The contemplated trip to the United States of Dr. Chaim Weizmann, president of the World Zionist Organization, the continuation of his efforts while in America to extend the Jewish Agency through his negotiations with the Marshall group, the possibilities of extending Jewish colonization work outside of the present Palestine frontiers, including. Transjordania and certain parts of Syria, were the main features around which the deliberations centered."

Successful Jewish Colonization Will Extend Beyond Palestine Frontier, Weizmann Tells Actions Committ

Here's where your blind hatred of Jews betrays itself.
I will presume you didn't grow up reading the NYT or other assimilated, self-hating Jew owner/operated newspapers.
That's why you come off as such a buffoon.
Until the 80s there were few, if any, pro-Jewish English newspapers or magazines.
You will study your Jew publications such as the Jewish Week which is as hateful to Jews as one could get.
You are completely out of your league insofar as knowing when it comes to discerning Christian wanna-be Jews.

No, I am presenting fact. You are delusional. The JTA (Jewish telegraphic Agency) article was from the 1920s. Nothing Christian about it. You are out of your league. I present the facts.

You go right ahead and tell a Jew about his own people's publications.
Keep digging.

You are not the sharpest knife in the drawer. Do you think that writing "keep digging" changes the fact that the Jews intended to colonize Palestine (and further)? Something you denied.

Ooh, an article in the NYT!
As we all now, the NYT has been a fan of Jews since, well, never.
You really are ignorant.

So, you believe that the European Jews did not intend to colonize Palestine and create a Jewish state? Do you believe that the Jewish Telegraphic Agency is also anti-Jewish?

Successful Jewish Colonization Will Extend Beyond Palestine Frontier, Weizmann Tells Actions Committee

July 25, 1926

2SHARES
London (Jul. 23)

(Jewish Telegraphic Agency)


The contemplated trip to the United States of Dr. Chaim Weizmann, president of the World Zionist Organization, the continuation of his efforts while in America to extend the Jewish Agency through his negotiations with the Marshall group, the possibilities of extending Jewish colonization work outside of the present Palestine frontiers, including. Transjordania and certain parts of Syria, were the main features around which the deliberations centered."

Successful Jewish Colonization Will Extend Beyond Palestine Frontier, Weizmann Tells Actions Committ

Here's where your blind hatred of Jews betrays itself.
I will presume you didn't grow up reading the NYT or other assimilated, self-hating Jew owner/operated newspapers.
That's why you come off as such a buffoon.
Until the 80s there were few, if any, pro-Jewish English newspapers or magazines.
You will study your Jew publications such as the Jewish Week which is as hateful to Jews as one could get.
You are completely out of your league insofar as knowing when it comes to discerning Christian wanna-be Jews.

No, I am presenting fact. You are delusional. The JTA (Jewish telegraphic Agency) article was from the 1920s. Nothing Christian about it. You are out of your league. I present the facts.

You go right ahead and tell a Jew about his own people's publications.
Keep digging.

You are not the sharpest knife in the drawer. Do you think that writing "keep digging" changes the fact that the Jews intended to colonize Palestine (and further)? Something you denied.

Look, dumbo, you're quoting sources without knowing their agenda.
90% of Jews don't support Israel until they're attacked, then they support Israel 1,000%.
The sources you quote are Israel's worst enemy...self-hating Jews who publish lies to further their agenda.
You really are an idiot.

 

[montelatici]

So, you believe that the European Jews did not intend to colonize Palestine and create a Jewish state? Do you believe that the Jewish Telegraphic Agency is also anti-Jewish?

Successful Jewish Colonization Will Extend Beyond Palestine Frontier, Weizmann Tells Actions Committee

July 25, 1926

2SHARES
London (Jul. 23)

(Jewish Telegraphic Agency)


The contemplated trip to the United States of Dr. Chaim Weizmann, president of the World Zionist Organization, the continuation of his efforts while in America to extend the Jewish Agency through his negotiations with the Marshall group, the possibilities of extending Jewish colonization work outside of the present Palestine frontiers, including. Transjordania and certain parts of Syria, were the main features around which the deliberations centered."

Successful Jewish Colonization Will Extend Beyond Palestine Frontier, Weizmann Tells Actions Committ

Here's where your blind hatred of Jews betrays itself.
I will presume you didn't grow up reading the NYT or other assimilated, self-hating Jew owner/operated newspapers.
That's why you come off as such a buffoon.
Until the 80s there were few, if any, pro-Jewish English newspapers or magazines.
You will study your Jew publications such as the Jewish Week which is as hateful to Jews as one could get.
You are completely out of your league insofar as knowing when it comes to discerning Christian wanna-be Jews.

No, I am presenting fact. You are delusional. The JTA (Jewish telegraphic Agency) article was from the 1920s. Nothing Christian about it. You are out of your league. I present the facts.

You go right ahead and tell a Jew about his own people's publications.
Keep digging.

You are not the sharpest knife in the drawer. Do you think that writing "keep digging" changes the fact that the Jews intended to colonize Palestine (and further)? Something you denied.

So, you believe that the European Jews did not intend to colonize Palestine and create a Jewish state? Do you believe that the Jewish Telegraphic Agency is also anti-Jewish?

Successful Jewish Colonization Will Extend Beyond Palestine Frontier, Weizmann Tells Actions Committee

July 25, 1926

2SHARES
London (Jul. 23)

(Jewish Telegraphic Agency)


The contemplated trip to the United States of Dr. Chaim Weizmann, president of the World Zionist Organization, the continuation of his efforts while in America to extend the Jewish Agency through his negotiations with the Marshall group, the possibilities of extending Jewish colonization work outside of the present Palestine frontiers, including. Transjordania and certain parts of Syria, were the main features around which the deliberations centered."

Successful Jewish Colonization Will Extend Beyond Palestine Frontier, Weizmann Tells Actions Committ

Here's where your blind hatred of Jews betrays itself.
I will presume you didn't grow up reading the NYT or other assimilated, self-hating Jew owner/operated newspapers.
That's why you come off as such a buffoon.
Until the 80s there were few, if any, pro-Jewish English newspapers or magazines.
You will study your Jew publications such as the Jewish Week which is as hateful to Jews as one could get.
You are completely out of your league insofar as knowing when it comes to discerning Christian wanna-be Jews.

No, I am presenting fact. You are delusional. The JTA (Jewish telegraphic Agency) article was from the 1920s. Nothing Christian about it. You are out of your league. I present the facts.

You go right ahead and tell a Jew about his own people's publications.
Keep digging.

You are not the sharpest knife in the drawer. Do you think that writing "keep digging" changes the fact that the Jews intended to colonize Palestine (and further)? Something you denied.

Look, dumbo, you're quoting sources without knowing their agenda.
90% of Jews don't support Israel until they're attacked, then they support Israel 1,000%.
The sources you quote are Israel's worst enemy...self-hating Jews who publish lies to further their agenda.
You really are an idiot.

Let me get this straight:

1. Dr. Chaim Weizmann, president of the World Zionist Organization was a self-hating Jew.
2. The Jewish Telegraphic Agency is/was made up of self-hating Jews.
3. When Weizmann stated, in 1923, that he thought it possible to extend the colonization of Palestine to Transjordania, he said it because he had a self-hating Jew agenda.

“Due to the success of our colonization work in Palestine proper, it is possible that eventually our colonization work will be extended beyond the frontiers of Transjordania. It is true that the Palestine government has not taken a clear stand in regard to its economic policy, but well founded demands have every prospect of being agreed to. A great deal has been achieved during the last months,”
Successful Jewish Colonization Will Extend Beyond Palestine Frontier, Weizmann Tells Actions Committ

 

[Humanity]

The Europeans were able to eliminate the native people for the most part in the Americas and Oceania.

And your point being? Is this a morally good thing or a morally wrong thing? For the native people to be eliminated? Or just a thing thing -- can't unbreak the egg thing and it really doesn't matter if its morally right or morally wrong thing?

I am simply presenting fact. Of course eliminating the native people was morally wrong, today the perpetrators would be found guilty of genocide.

Oh please...

No they would so NOT be found guilty of genocide!!!

What 'did' for most of the native Americans was disease NOT war!

 

[montelatici]

The Europeans were able to eliminate the native people for the most part in the Americas and Oceania.

And your point being? Is this a morally good thing or a morally wrong thing? For the native people to be eliminated? Or just a thing thing -- can't unbreak the egg thing and it really doesn't matter if its morally right or morally wrong thing?

I am simply presenting fact. Of course eliminating the native people was morally wrong, today the perpetrators would be found guilty of genocide.

Oh please...

No they would so NOT be found guilty of genocide!!!

What 'did' for most of the native Americans was disease NOT war!

Your comment would be funny if it weren't so tragic.

"CALIFORNIA SLAUGHTER: THE STATE-SANCTIONED GENOCIDE OF NATIVE AMERICANS

"The tally is relentlessly grim: a whole settlement wiped out in Trinity County “excepting a few children”; an Indian girl raped and left to die somewhere near Mendocino; as many as 50 killed at Goose Lake; and, two months later, as many as 257 murdered at Grouse Creek, scores of them women and children. There were the four white ranchers who tracked down a band of Yana to a cave, butchering 30. “In the cave with the meat were some Indian children,” reported a chronicle published later. One of the whites “could not bear to kill these children with his 56-calibre Spencer rifle. ‘It tore them up so bad.’ So he did it with his 38-calibre Smith and Wesson revolver.”
California's state-sanctioned genocide of Native Americans

THE AMERICAN HOLOCAUST AND AMERICAN HOLOCAUST DENIAL

Unfortunately, there are those who wish to engage in holocaust denial. A common myth is the effort to blame the massive death toll exclusively on diseases brought by the European invaders. Like all deceptions in history there is an element of truth here. Many native Americans did die of European diseases. However, there is a very convenient effort to ignore the fact that all too many of these people became vulnerable to disease when their essentials of life were either stolen or disrupted by the invaders. Furthermore, the campaigns of direct and indirect genocide certainly killed millions all by itself.



From the initial invasion by Columbus native Americans were the targets of hundreds of years of war from the invaders. Does any honest person really believe that these wars had only minor death toll?

In the USA native Americans were driven off 99% of their land and herded into so-called "reservations", where they were subjected to some of the worst poverty and horrible living conditions in the country.
NATIVE AMERICAN GENOCIDE