Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I tend to agree.
You don't have to look very hard for some bias - with respect to coverage, tone, context, duration of any given spotlight-shining, etc. - but they seem to do OK re: objectivity, insofar as that can be discerned by your average couch-potato.
Still, there's an undercurrent there that I do not trust, and take with a grain of salt - or two.
It's not just Wiki - I've read any number of reports about the abuses of 'expat' workers there. And there is basically NO 'rule of law' there: it's pretty much an absolute monarchy. Not a form of government I'd ever trust.....guess I'm an inveterate American : ))
I agree that Al-Jazeera is more of a real news outlet than either RT or PressTV - but that's not really saying much : (( It's useful to become familiar with another perspective: I think it's important to do so.
American networks are driven by ratings - or what the honchos think the public wants. The problem I see is, they've all forgotten about journalism and 'news' is now treated as a *product*.
overall I find al-Jazeera America informative and well balanced. It is more of a straight news than most other station. I like to hear both/all sides not just right or left.
Are you hasbara?"The United States would not allow an Al-Qaeda channel to broadcast from New York," he fired. "Thus we will prevent Al-Jazeera from broadcasting from Israel."
Read More
God Bless Lieberman.
So know jam?why so jelly?Are you hasbara?"The United States would not allow an Al-Qaeda channel to broadcast from New York," he fired. "Thus we will prevent Al-Jazeera from broadcasting from Israel."
Read More
God Bless Lieberman.
well playedSo know jam?why so jelly?Are you hasbara?
Israel is not at war.Although I'm always reluctant to even hint at support for press censorship of any kind...
I can see this unfolding as a legitimate pursuit, in Israel - at least as a short-term measure.
Israel is at war.
In WWII, we did not allow Japan or Germany or Italy to broadcast here domestically, nor did we carry them in syndication.
In Korea, we did not allow North Korea or China to broadcast here domestically, nor did we carry them in syndication.
In Vietnam, we did not allow the North Vietnamese to broadcast here domestically, nor did we carry them in syndication.
In Gulf Wars I and II, we did not allow Iraq to broadcast here domestically, nor did we carry them in syndication.
And, in any of the above cases, we also prohibited anything similar from other allies or friends of our enemies, insofar as I am aware.
Al Jazeera does a better job than most Arabic news media, in attempting to mask its inherent bias, but enough leeches through or percolates up, that you end-up seeing the stain, anyway.
Al Jazeera is funded by the government of Qatar, a regional Muslim government, sympathetic to the Palestinians.
So, the Israelis are, apparently, preparing to close down Al Jazeera operations on Israeli soil - at least for the duration of the latest Gaza War, presumably.
We do it (suppressing enemy media or the media of countries sympathetic to our enemies) on an as-needed basis.
Most of the rest of the world does something similar.
We should, therefore, not be surprised when we see such behavior out of Israel, in keeping with what the rest of the world does under similar circumstances.
Dog bites Man.
MEH.
No big deal.
Your country exports more terrorism than any other group (or country) in the ME.I Don't call them terrorists, I consider it dangerous to Israel when Al Jazeera promoting terrorists
Your country exports more terrorism than any other group (or country) in the ME.I Don't call them terrorists, I consider it dangerous to Israel when Al Jazeera promoting terrorists
Your Likud Party has its roots in the terrorist group Irgun.
And that makes your country's current leaders, terrorists.
It is now.Israel is not at war...Although I'm always reluctant to even hint at support for press censorship of any kind...
I can see this unfolding as a legitimate pursuit, in Israel - at least as a short-term measure.
Israel is at war.
In WWII, we did not allow Japan or Germany or Italy to broadcast here domestically, nor did we carry them in syndication.
In Korea, we did not allow North Korea or China to broadcast here domestically, nor did we carry them in syndication.
In Vietnam, we did not allow the North Vietnamese to broadcast here domestically, nor did we carry them in syndication.
In Gulf Wars I and II, we did not allow Iraq to broadcast here domestically, nor did we carry them in syndication.
And, in any of the above cases, we also prohibited anything similar from other allies or friends of our enemies, insofar as I am aware.
Al Jazeera does a better job than most Arabic news media, in attempting to mask its inherent bias, but enough leeches through or percolates up, that you end-up seeing the stain, anyway.
Al Jazeera is funded by the government of Qatar, a regional Muslim government, sympathetic to the Palestinians.
So, the Israelis are, apparently, preparing to close down Al Jazeera operations on Israeli soil - at least for the duration of the latest Gaza War, presumably.
We do it (suppressing enemy media or the media of countries sympathetic to our enemies) on an as-needed basis.
Most of the rest of the world does something similar.
We should, therefore, not be surprised when we see such behavior out of Israel, in keeping with what the rest of the world does under similar circumstances.
Dog bites Man.
MEH.
No big deal.
Looks like the same ol' Jew Chicken-Shit Two-Step, to meIt is now.Israel is not at war...Although I'm always reluctant to even hint at support for press censorship of any kind...
I can see this unfolding as a legitimate pursuit, in Israel - at least as a short-term measure.
Israel is at war.
In WWII, we did not allow Japan or Germany or Italy to broadcast here domestically, nor did we carry them in syndication.
In Korea, we did not allow North Korea or China to broadcast here domestically, nor did we carry them in syndication.
In Vietnam, we did not allow the North Vietnamese to broadcast here domestically, nor did we carry them in syndication.
In Gulf Wars I and II, we did not allow Iraq to broadcast here domestically, nor did we carry them in syndication.
And, in any of the above cases, we also prohibited anything similar from other allies or friends of our enemies, insofar as I am aware.
Al Jazeera does a better job than most Arabic news media, in attempting to mask its inherent bias, but enough leeches through or percolates up, that you end-up seeing the stain, anyway.
Al Jazeera is funded by the government of Qatar, a regional Muslim government, sympathetic to the Palestinians.
So, the Israelis are, apparently, preparing to close down Al Jazeera operations on Israeli soil - at least for the duration of the latest Gaza War, presumably.
We do it (suppressing enemy media or the media of countries sympathetic to our enemies) on an as-needed basis.
Most of the rest of the world does something similar.
We should, therefore, not be surprised when we see such behavior out of Israel, in keeping with what the rest of the world does under similar circumstances.
Dog bites Man.
MEH.
No big deal.
To the hilt.
What are you babbling about now, shill?Looks like the same ol' Jew Chicken-Shit Two-Step, to meIt is now.Israel is not at war...
To the hilt.
"The 1948 Palestinian exodus from Lydda and Ramle was the expulsion of 50,00070,000 Palestinian Arabs when Israeli troops captured the towns in July that year. The military action occurred within the context of the 1948 Arab-Israeli War.
"The two Arab towns, lying outside the area designated for a Jewish state in the UN Partition Plan of 1947, and inside the area set aside for an Arab state in Palestine,[1][2] subsequently were transformed into predominantly Jewish areas in the new State of Israel, known as Lod and Ramla."
It ain't '48 anymore, Yeppers
Ain't you glad?
1948 Palestinian exodus from Lydda and Ramle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
@irosie91, isn't this blasphemyal jezeerah works out ok as a news source ONLY if one keeps in mind that it
adheres to the SHARIAH LAWS regarding "blasphemy"---- For an interesting
insight into Islamic "blasphemy"---consider that which was considered a
thought crime in soviet Russia. Think Turkey----where writers were jailed for "crime
against the state" of admitting that the Armenian genocide took place
Don't forget to remove the rich Jew's ball sack from between your cheeks, Sweetie; you might burn your tonsils.What are you babbling about now, shill?Looks like the same ol' Jew Chicken-Shit Two-Step, to meIt is now.
To the hilt.
"The 1948 Palestinian exodus from Lydda and Ramle was the expulsion of 50,00070,000 Palestinian Arabs when Israeli troops captured the towns in July that year. The military action occurred within the context of the 1948 Arab-Israeli War.
"The two Arab towns, lying outside the area designated for a Jewish state in the UN Partition Plan of 1947, and inside the area set aside for an Arab state in Palestine,[1][2] subsequently were transformed into predominantly Jewish areas in the new State of Israel, known as Lod and Ramla."
It ain't '48 anymore, Yeppers
Ain't you glad?
1948 Palestinian exodus from Lydda and Ramle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Using any anti-Palestinian post, out of context, as a vehicle for transitioning to your next piece of un-related and irrelevant Militant Muslim drivel.
You've gotta be the Queen of Weak Segues.
Given that you've chosen a couple of insulting epithets by which to address me (Yeppers, Wienie, etc.), and fired the first and second and third shots, I think it's about time that I return fire...
One good turn deserves another...
Given that I see you as the Queen of Weak Segues...
That's what I'll call you...
Queenie...
Rather fitting, for someone who limp-wristed out of the Air Force after only 10 days of basic training, with a phony back problem...
'Til your next idiotic non sequitur, Queenie...
Meanwhile... back to my morning coffee and toast, enjoying the news reports of Hamas getting its ass kicked...
What are you babbling about now, shill?Looks like the same ol' Jew Chicken-Shit Two-Step, to me
"The 1948 Palestinian exodus from Lydda and Ramle was the expulsion of 50,00070,000 Palestinian Arabs when Israeli troops captured the towns in July that year. The military action occurred within the context of the 1948 Arab-Israeli War.
"The two Arab towns, lying outside the area designated for a Jewish state in the UN Partition Plan of 1947, and inside the area set aside for an Arab state in Palestine,[1][2] subsequently were transformed into predominantly Jewish areas in the new State of Israel, known as Lod and Ramla."
It ain't '48 anymore, Yeppers
Ain't you glad?
1948 Palestinian exodus from Lydda and Ramle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Using any anti-Palestinian post, out of context, as a vehicle for transitioning to your next piece of un-related and irrelevant Militant Muslim drivel.
You've gotta be the Queen of Weak Segues.
Given that you've chosen a couple of insulting epithets by which to address me (Yeppers, Wienie, etc.), and fired the first and second and third shots, I think it's about time that I return fire...
One good turn deserves another...
Given that I see you as the Queen of Weak Segues...
That's what I'll call you...
Queenie...
Rather fitting, for someone who limp-wristed out of the Air Force after only 10 days of basic training, with a phony back problem...
'Til your next idiotic non sequitur, Queenie...
Meanwhile... back to my morning coffee and toast, enjoying the news reports of Hamas getting its ass kicked...
Don't forget to remove the rich Jew's ball sack from between your cheeks, Sweetie; you might burn your tonsils.
"Twenty-nine of the UN Human Rights Council's 47 members voted in favour of creating a commission of inquiry to look at possible war crimes committed by Israel.
"Only the United States voted against the resolution, while 17 states abstained, 10 of them European.
"The vote was taken after Navi Pillay, the UNs human rights commissioner, said there is a 'strong possibility' that Israel is guilty.
"The UN council condemned the Israeli assault on Gaza, which it said has involved 'disproportionate and indiscriminate attacks', including aerial bombing of civilian areas, collective punishment and the killing of more than 700 Palestinians.
"Pillay also accused Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups fighting Israel of committing war crimes with indiscriminate attacks on civilians."
Has Israel committed war crimes in Gaza? - Inside Story - Al Jazeera English
Muslims haven't killed over 700 Jews this month, have they?"Twenty-nine of the UN Human Rights Council's 47 members voted in favour of creating a commission of inquiry to look at possible war crimes committed by Israel.
"Only the United States voted against the resolution, while 17 states abstained, 10 of them European.
"The vote was taken after Navi Pillay, the UNs human rights commissioner, said there is a 'strong possibility' that Israel is guilty.
"The UN council condemned the Israeli assault on Gaza, which it said has involved 'disproportionate and indiscriminate attacks', including aerial bombing of civilian areas, collective punishment and the killing of more than 700 Palestinians.
"Pillay also accused Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups fighting Israel of committing war crimes with indiscriminate attacks on civilians."
Has Israel committed war crimes in Gaza? - Inside Story - Al Jazeera English
So, Dhimmi George, have you anything from Al Jazeera which tells about the war crimes crimmitted by Muslim countries, or are you trying to tell us your new masters are such angels and they wouldn't harm a fly?
It would only have been about 200 Hamas militia scum rather than 700 Gazans total, if the pussies of Hamas weren't hiding behind the skirts of their women and children....Muslims haven't killed over 700 Jews this month, have they?...
Muslims haven't killed over 700 Jews this month, have they?"Twenty-nine of the UN Human Rights Council's 47 members voted in favour of creating a commission of inquiry to look at possible war crimes committed by Israel.
"Only the United States voted against the resolution, while 17 states abstained, 10 of them European.
"The vote was taken after Navi Pillay, the UNs human rights commissioner, said there is a 'strong possibility' that Israel is guilty.
"The UN council condemned the Israeli assault on Gaza, which it said has involved 'disproportionate and indiscriminate attacks', including aerial bombing of civilian areas, collective punishment and the killing of more than 700 Palestinians.
"Pillay also accused Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups fighting Israel of committing war crimes with indiscriminate attacks on civilians."
Has Israel committed war crimes in Gaza? - Inside Story - Al Jazeera English
So, Dhimmi George, have you anything from Al Jazeera which tells about the war crimes crimmitted by Muslim countries, or are you trying to tell us your new masters are such angels and they wouldn't harm a fly?
Naturally you don't care because the only terror you object to comes from Muslims.
