thereisnospoon
Gold Member
- Thread starter
- #21
cylinder number four..port side.Who's gasket?
Really?!!!!! Don't be an ass. You know damned well the reference.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
cylinder number four..port side.Who's gasket?
Did you read DivineWind's post?The mainstream view is that global warming is happening. The debate now is just by how much. Unfortunately, you still have a loud and vocal and minority who outright deny global warming and practice a pseudo-science.
I attended a speech awhile back where the speaker came from the CATO Institute and even he subscribed to global warming and called himself a "lukewarmer'.
No, the debate is whether man is the cause.
A few years ago NASA did a study that I think about two years to complete. The conclusion was that yes indeed during the 20th century the earth's average temperature increased by 1.8*F....The study went on to conclude that the cause was inconclusive. This sent the enviro weenies and the global warming freaks into an uncontrollable snit. They wanted to see results that humans cause the temps to rise. This way they could move forward on their political agenda.
In the end, Al Gore will be proven right - and even retarded naysayers will be forced to accept it.
In the end, Al Gore will be proven right - and even retarded naysayers will be forced to accept it.
All the people that voted for this idiot in 2000 voted for the current dipshit in the White House...
In the end, Al Gore will be proven right - and even retarded naysayers will be forced to accept it.
The mainstream view is that global warming is happening. The debate now is just by how much. Unfortunately, you still have a loud and vocal and minority who outright deny global warming and practice a pseudo-science.
I attended a speech awhile back where the speaker came from the CATO Institute and even he subscribed to global warming and called himself a "lukewarmer'.
Got projection?The mainstream view is that global warming is happening. The debate now is just by how much.
Set aside the evidence suggesting you are wrong. Let's assume you are correct and the earth is warming and not cooling like we were warned about back in the 70s. That does NOT give the scumbag central planners the right to expand government and redistribute more wealth. If you firmly believe the earth is warming, move away from the water's edge and leave the rest of us the fuck alone.
That is all.
I have no interest in your money. However, this is what deniers do. They create strawmen and fear tactics in order to distort the evidence. Their arguments are fear based, not scientific based.
That dude is obsessively unhinged....makes me thankful for the Electoral College.
The mainstream view is that global warming is happening. The debate now is just by how much.
Set aside the evidence suggesting you are wrong. Let's assume you are correct and the earth is warming and not cooling like we were warned about back in the 70s. That does NOT give the scumbag central planners the right to expand government and redistribute more wealth. If you firmly believe the earth is warming, move away from the water's edge and leave the rest of us the fuck alone.
That is all.
I have no interest in your money. However, this is what deniers do. They create strawmen and fear tactics in order to distort the evidence. Their arguments are fear based, not scientific based.
In case you hadn't come to the realization...That's how echo chambers work.No, the debate is whether man is the cause.
Several subsequent studies confirm that ...the debate on the authenticity of global warming and the role played by human activity is largely nonexistent among those who understand the nuances and scientific basis of long-term climate processes. (Doran 2009). In other words, more than 95% of scientists working in the disciplines contributing to studies of our climate, accept that climate change is almost certainly being caused by human activities.
We should also consider official scientific bodies and what they think about climate change. There are no national or major scientific institutions anywhere in the world that dispute the theory of anthropogenic climate change. Not one.
Is there a scientific consensus on global warming?
In the end, Al Gore will be proven right - and even retarded naysayers will be forced to accept it.
algore a Divinity school drop-out thinks he is smarter than thousands of scientists with PhD and Masters degrees in science.....
In the end, Al Gore will be proven right - and even retarded naysayers will be forced to accept it.
finally gore dropped a sack. one of the saddest things i ever saw was when they made him gavel in his own loss in the 2000 election.
look, you have to understand. the teabaggers just destroyed the economy just because they wanted to get their own way on protecting the tax rates for the uber rich on the debt ceiling debate. they don't care about this country. they're going to try and sweep this planet's environmental problems under the rug, too. they don't care about ANYTHING but not raising taxes, and they've told you that. they'll take your retirement, they'll take your kids' college away, they'll surrender if there's a war, they'll let the environment get polluted with sewage, they will do ANYTHING SO THEY DON'T HAVE TO RAISE TAXES. at this point, it's your ass, or it's the teabaggers' asses. pick one. the people in america are very submissive, so i think it will be yours. you're going to willingly sacrifice your life and your family's life so the ultra-rich can continue to enjoy not paying taxes at your expense.
prove me wrong.
no, the debate is whether it's too late for man to fix it.The mainstream view is that global warming is happening. The debate now is just by how much. Unfortunately, you still have a loud and vocal and minority who outright deny global warming and practice a pseudo-science.
I attended a speech awhile back where the speaker came from the CATO Institute and even he subscribed to global warming and called himself a "lukewarmer'.
No, the debate is whether man is the cause.
Since when is looking at the evidence and applying logic a psuedo science?