SSDD
Gold Member
- Nov 6, 2012
- 16,672
- 1,966
- 280
So a few anonymous posters on a message board versus NASA? Tough choice there.
I can't help but note that none of those supposed mountains of actual observed, measured, quantified, empirical data supporting the anthropogenic component of the AGW hypothesis has been posted....if the data actually existed, there wouldn't be a place on earth where a skeptic could go without seeing it....
If there is real data, then surely you can find some of it....some real measured data supporting the idea that man is altering the global climate. Don't you find it disturbing in the least that an agency such as NASA is making claims and at the same time, you can't find even one shred of actual observed, measured, quantified, empirical data to support those claims?....Ever wonder why your defense of the topic always amounts to logical fallacy after logical fallacy and never involves slapping skeptics down with overwhelming mountains of data?...do you ever wonder anything or is just buying what you are told to buy without regard to the absolute absence of evidence as good as you can do?
If an agency makes claims about the natural world and can't produce observed, measured, quantified data from the natural world to support those claims, then anyone who believes the agency...no matter who the agency is is just plain stupid.