AGW Fraud: There's no such thing as "Settled Science"

If you'd read all my signline, your question would have been answered.

sigline:

I kill with my heart.

You do the math.

"― Stephen King, The Gunslinger"

Odd, you left that part out. Why do progressives lie all the time?

Do you get that? I'm calling you a liar. A lying liar, whose posts are filled with nothing but lies.

Let me guess: You'll read that as "orogenicman is a swell guy!"

Retard.
 
You seem to be complaining that alternative energy sources are being subsidized, but say nothing of the fact that conventional power sources have been subsidized for decades. Don't you think that is being a bit hypocritical, if not foolish?
Not at all. We're constantly being told that wind and solar are the only things that will save us (well, except for world socialism)...but they can't survive without massive infusions of taxpayer money. If the money stops, wind and solar power go away.

If conventional power subsidies stop, conventional power will still be here. More expensive, but it will remain.


Do you think that conventional power sources, in their infancy, could have survived without government subsidies? Can they survive today without them? They still get subsidies, as does the petroleum industry. Other than your obvious political agenda here, I fail to see a point to your argument.
You fail to see anything beyond your programming.
 
whether or not the climate has always varied, and no one has ever said that it doesn't, it is very clear that the data we have is showing anthropomorphic warming. .

data is plural. If you can't do advanced english, you can't do advanced science. Your cult is a product of dumbed-down education, which includes all students, not just the obviously ignorant ones. student is an anagram of stunted.

this, of course, assumes that scientists never make grammatical or spelling errors.

You do realize that prometheus was the greek cultural hero from which the jews stole the idea that god created man from clay, right? According to greek mythology, prometheus made man from clay, and gave man fire.. What part of that story do you find plausible?

dp
 
Last edited:
Whether or not the climate has always varied, and no one has ever said that it doesn't, it is very clear that the data we have is showing anthropomorphic warming. .

Data is plural. If you can't do advanced English, you can't do advanced science. Your cult is a product of dumbed-down education, which includes all students, not just the obviously ignorant ones. Student is an anagram of stunted.

This, of course, assumes that scientists NEVER make grammatical or spelling errors.

You do realize that Prometheus was the Greek cultural hero from which the Jews stole the idea that god created man from clay, right? According to Greek mythology, Prometheus made man from clay, and gave man fire What part of that story do you find plausible?

Stet stultitia. I'll let that drool drip. Any intelligent person can see how uneducated you are, no matter how many exams you crammed for in order to get credit for temporary knowledge. You can have your bimbo cheerleaders. I hope they keep you warm.
 

Wind a solar are competing against coal, not oil. The USA has enough coal to last for at least 250 years. There is simply no economic reason other than the Chicken Little hysterics of the global warming cult to switch to wind or solar.

Absolutely, we DO have reasons to switch away from coal even if you discount global warming. Coal is a very dirty fuel. It pollutes. Much of the coal we have in reserve is high sulfur coal (which contributes to acid rain and acidic water run off), and much of it is also high in toxic metals such as arsenic, cadmium, zinc, and lead. Mining coal is hugely destructive of the environment, and pollutes our national waterways and our groundwater. The product of burning coal, fly ash, is hazardous and there is a shit load of it already for which they have no disposal solution. This does not constitute chicken little hysterics. These are the facts. And these are not just environmental reasons to stop using coal. They are also economic reasons, because in any economic scheme, you must .

Where there's smoke, there's fire. Warmalarmies want some childish and lazy paradise. The extreme Right has its laissez faire and the extreme Left has its lazy fairies.

Clean air is the most toxic of all. Pollution is antiseptic and is far more likely to kill bacteria, viruses, and insects than to harm man.
 
Last edited:
Wind a solar are competing against coal, not oil. The USA has enough coal to last for at least 250 years. There is simply no economic reason other than the Chicken Little hysterics of the global warming cult to switch to wind or solar.

Absolutely, we DO have reasons to switch away from coal even if you discount global warming. Coal is a very dirty fuel. It pollutes. Much of the coal we have in reserve is high sulfur coal (which contributes to acid rain and acidic water run off), and much of it is also high in toxic metals such as arsenic, cadmium, zinc, and lead. Mining coal is hugely destructive of the environment, and pollutes our national waterways and our groundwater. The product of burning coal, fly ash, is hazardous and there is a shit load of it already for which they have no disposal solution. This does not constitute chicken little hysterics. These are the facts. And these are not just environmental reasons to stop using coal. They are also economic reasons, because in any economic scheme, you must .

Where there's smoke, there's fire. Warmalarmies want some childish and inert paradise. Clean air is the most toxic of all. Pollution is antiseptic and is far more likely to kill bacteria, viruses, and insects than to harm man.

OMG! I get to post another one for the wall of shame. Congratulations.

I suspect that each and every person who has ever made a similar statement, including the present dweeb, above, has never lived near a coal mine, had to deal with acid mine runoff, nor lived down wind of toxic smoke stacks.
 
Where there's smoke, there's fire. Warmalarmies want some childish and inert paradise. Clean air is the most toxic of all. Pollution is antiseptic and is far more likely to kill bacteria, viruses, and insects than to harm man.

OMG! I get to post another one for the wall of shame. Congratulations.
.

Typical Netwit. Your imaginary slam dunk only means, "I've never heard that before, so it must be stupid." You don't listen to logic, only to self-appointed authorities.
 
You DON'T think it's stupid?

What does that make you?

It makes him the guy schooling you sock.. Just as everybody else has here...

HAAAHAHAHA-Ha-ha-haaaaaaaa ohhh, I can't breathe... I can't breathe...

2013Toon33.jpg
 
Last edited:
The present head of the GOP in Oregon once suggested sowing low level radioactivity over the nation as a way of building up peoples immune systems. Oh yes, he is also the head of OISM.

Oregon's GOP Chair Wants to Sprinkle Nuclear Waste From Airplanes | Mother Jones

Robinson, who has a Ph.D. in chemistry, has marketed himself for the last three decades as an expert on everything from nuclear fallout to AIDS to climate science in the pages of a monthly newsletter, Access to Energy, which he published from his compound in the small town of Cave Junction. A quick glance at his writings, which were publicized during his ill-fated challenges to DeFazio, suggest that whatever the failings of the previous party leadership—Democrats now hold all statewide elected offices and control both houses of the state Legislature—Robinson brings with him a new set of challenges entirely.

On nuclear waste: "All we need do with nuclear waste is dilute it to a low radiation level and sprinkle it over the ocean—or even over America after hormesis is better understood and verified with respect to more diseases." And: "If we could use it to enhance our own drinking water here in Oregon, where background radiation is low, it would hormetically enhance our resistance to degenerative diseases. Alas, this would be against the law."

On public schools: "Public education (tax-financed socialism) has become the most widespread and devastating form of child abuse and racism in the United States. Moreover, people who have been cut off at the knees by public education are so mentally handicapped that they cannot be responsible custodians of the energy technology base or other advanced accomplishments of our civilization." (Robinson, a home-schooling activist, sells a DIY curriculum for $195.)

On AIDS: "There is a possibility that the entire 'war' on HIV and AIDS is in error. U.S. government AIDS programs are now receiving $6 billion per year and are based entirely upon the hypothesis that HIV virus causes AIDS. Yet, the articles referenced above and numerous additional publications by scientists who have become involved in this controversy state that: attempts to cause AIDS experimentally with HIV have completely failed; thousands of AIDS victims are HIV-free; and HIV shows none of the classical characteristics of a disease-producing organism. Moreover, AIDS is not a unique disease—it is an increased susceptibility to many ordinary diseases presumably as a result of depressed immune response. This depressed immunity can result from many other factors including those especially prevalent in the AIDS afflicted population—drug abuse and unhygienic exposure to very large numbers of different disease vectors. Moreover, large numbers of HIV carriers who are symptom-free are being treated by powerful life-threatening drugs that kill people in ways very similar to AIDS."

(His conclusion on the AIDS epidemic: Homosexuality might be a natural consequence of the gay lifestyle, and the federal government had cooked the books "as an excuse for all sorts of social engineering, especially in the public schools.")

On climate change: "[T]here is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth."
 
The present head of the GOP in Oregon once suggested sowing low level radioactivity over the nation as a way of building up peoples immune systems. Oh yes, he is also the head of OISM.

Oregon's GOP Chair Wants to Sprinkle Nuclear Waste From Airplanes | Mother Jones

Robinson, who has a Ph.D. in chemistry, has marketed himself for the last three decades as an expert on everything from nuclear fallout to AIDS to climate science in the pages of a monthly newsletter, Access to Energy, which he published from his compound in the small town of Cave Junction. A quick glance at his writings, which were publicized during his ill-fated challenges to DeFazio, suggest that whatever the failings of the previous party leadership—Democrats now hold all statewide elected offices and control both houses of the state Legislature—Robinson brings with him a new set of challenges entirely.

On nuclear waste: "All we need do with nuclear waste is dilute it to a low radiation level and sprinkle it over the ocean—or even over America after hormesis is better understood and verified with respect to more diseases." And: "If we could use it to enhance our own drinking water here in Oregon, where background radiation is low, it would hormetically enhance our resistance to degenerative diseases. Alas, this would be against the law."

On public schools: "Public education (tax-financed socialism) has become the most widespread and devastating form of child abuse and racism in the United States. Moreover, people who have been cut off at the knees by public education are so mentally handicapped that they cannot be responsible custodians of the energy technology base or other advanced accomplishments of our civilization." (Robinson, a home-schooling activist, sells a DIY curriculum for $195.)

On AIDS: "There is a possibility that the entire 'war' on HIV and AIDS is in error. U.S. government AIDS programs are now receiving $6 billion per year and are based entirely upon the hypothesis that HIV virus causes AIDS. Yet, the articles referenced above and numerous additional publications by scientists who have become involved in this controversy state that: attempts to cause AIDS experimentally with HIV have completely failed; thousands of AIDS victims are HIV-free; and HIV shows none of the classical characteristics of a disease-producing organism. Moreover, AIDS is not a unique disease—it is an increased susceptibility to many ordinary diseases presumably as a result of depressed immune response. This depressed immunity can result from many other factors including those especially prevalent in the AIDS afflicted population—drug abuse and unhygienic exposure to very large numbers of different disease vectors. Moreover, large numbers of HIV carriers who are symptom-free are being treated by powerful life-threatening drugs that kill people in ways very similar to AIDS."

(His conclusion on the AIDS epidemic: Homosexuality might be a natural consequence of the gay lifestyle, and the federal government had cooked the books "as an excuse for all sorts of social engineering, especially in the public schools.")

On climate change: "[T]here is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth."

Mother jones... LOL, why not call it the socilaist news?

I saw this at the bottom of the page and decided it wasn't worth picking apart...

"
Here's How Billionaires Launder Their Climate-Denial Cash
Which Major Corporations Are Backing a Climate-Denier Think Tank?
Last week, the Heartland Institute's leaked documents revealed plans to teach kids bogus climate science. So who's funding this operation?
Billionaires Secretly Funded Vast Climate Denial Network
The conservative dark-money group Donors Trust contributed huge sums to battle against climate-change science.
Debunking the Denial: '16 Years of No Global Warming'
Climate change denial is purely, 100 percent made-up political and corporate-sponsored crap.
Romney Flack Promoted Climate Denial for Exxon"

LOL, dude it's the National Enquirer for lefties...
 
The present head of the GOP in Oregon once suggested sowing low level radioactivity over the nation as a way of building up peoples immune systems. Oh yes, he is also the head of OISM.

Oregon's GOP Chair Wants to Sprinkle Nuclear Waste From Airplanes | Mother Jones

Robinson, who has a Ph.D. in chemistry, has marketed himself for the last three decades as an expert on everything from nuclear fallout to AIDS to climate science in the pages of a monthly newsletter, Access to Energy, which he published from his compound in the small town of Cave Junction. A quick glance at his writings, which were publicized during his ill-fated challenges to DeFazio, suggest that whatever the failings of the previous party leadership—Democrats now hold all statewide elected offices and control both houses of the state Legislature—Robinson brings with him a new set of challenges entirely.

On nuclear waste: "All we need do with nuclear waste is dilute it to a low radiation level and sprinkle it over the ocean—or even over America after hormesis is better understood and verified with respect to more diseases." And: "If we could use it to enhance our own drinking water here in Oregon, where background radiation is low, it would hormetically enhance our resistance to degenerative diseases. Alas, this would be against the law."

On public schools: "Public education (tax-financed socialism) has become the most widespread and devastating form of child abuse and racism in the United States. Moreover, people who have been cut off at the knees by public education are so mentally handicapped that they cannot be responsible custodians of the energy technology base or other advanced accomplishments of our civilization." (Robinson, a home-schooling activist, sells a DIY curriculum for $195.)

On AIDS: "There is a possibility that the entire 'war' on HIV and AIDS is in error. U.S. government AIDS programs are now receiving $6 billion per year and are based entirely upon the hypothesis that HIV virus causes AIDS. Yet, the articles referenced above and numerous additional publications by scientists who have become involved in this controversy state that: attempts to cause AIDS experimentally with HIV have completely failed; thousands of AIDS victims are HIV-free; and HIV shows none of the classical characteristics of a disease-producing organism. Moreover, AIDS is not a unique disease—it is an increased susceptibility to many ordinary diseases presumably as a result of depressed immune response. This depressed immunity can result from many other factors including those especially prevalent in the AIDS afflicted population—drug abuse and unhygienic exposure to very large numbers of different disease vectors. Moreover, large numbers of HIV carriers who are symptom-free are being treated by powerful life-threatening drugs that kill people in ways very similar to AIDS."

(His conclusion on the AIDS epidemic: Homosexuality might be a natural consequence of the gay lifestyle, and the federal government had cooked the books "as an excuse for all sorts of social engineering, especially in the public schools.")

On climate change: "[T]here is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth."

And your point would be...?

:)
 

Forum List

Back
Top