7forever
VIP Member
- Mar 24, 2010
- 1,756
- 26
- 71
- Thread starter
- #81
It's a plain, traveling at a high speed... high in the sky... you expect to be able to read the markings on it in video from 2001? You have any idea how far video technology has come in 15 years?
Funny how earlier you were saying it was just a ball and not a plane, and now you are admitting it is a plane, just not 175 because it doesn't have the proper markings and windows.
You can't even spell plane correctly, jackass.
Yeah, sorry I'm watching football and typing at the same time. So that makes me stupid, but at least I'm not crazy.
Who gives a shit. No plane was captured by chopper 4. Do you get that by now? If you don't, go back and read the first page.
Who gives a shit? I would think someone like you who wants people to take your opinion seriously, would care. And if anyone is going to take you seriously, you need to be consistent. Was it some ball out of the sky without wings, or was it a plane without the correct windows and markings to be flight 175? Make up your mind. If you don't know yourself, then why should we believe a word you say?
This is the ball with no wings filmed live. There is nothing to it. She even mistakes it for a chopper. That proves it wasn't altered by anyone afterward. The evidence tells anyone willing to research this that this was the only object there before the south tower blew up.
"I believe that could be a police helicopter"
Last edited: