Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I never lie.
Find any lies, low-life.
Obama armed Iran
Biden armed the Taliban
Bill Clinton gove our missile technology to China
Hillary sold our uranium to Russia
Ted Kennedy offered to work with the Kremlin against America's government.
The Nazi Party credited th e Democrat Party for a great many of their ideas and plans.
The Democrats put American citizens in concentration camps.
...one can only wonder at any American voting for the European Party, the Democrats. Their views are far from American.
2. And considering the current foreign policy policy of the Democrats:
What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?
Because it is better not to have Iran on China or Russia's side. Except of that, Iran has huge resources of crude oil and natural gas. Maybe if it were able to sell them freely on international market, there wouldn't be the current hikes. And except of that, it can become a real alternative of Russian energy supplies to Europe.Why?
Because it is better not to have Iran on China or Russia's side. Except of that, Iran has huge resources of crude oil and natural gas. Maybe if it were able to sell them freely on international market, there wouldn't be the current hikes. And except of that, it can become a real alternative of Russian energy supplies to Europe.
What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?
Definition of insanity do the same thing over expecting different results, Trump knew that with Bill Clinton and North KoreaPresident Obama negotiated a multinational accord with Iran to get them to dismantle their nuclear program and destroy their centrifuges
Trump ripped up the agreement and allowed Iran to restart their nuclear program
Biden is trying to rebuild the damage that Trump has done.
But why should Iran trust us not to elect another Trump?
I'm still trying to figure that out. Worse, we also sent them billions of dollars; why did we do that? Where's the gain for anybody except for the people that want us dead? All I can see is the politics, where Obama/Biden can say look, we stopped Iran from building nukes! But they didn't, they just postponed the inescapable day when they have nuclear bombs and give them to their terrorist proxies. How does anyone deny the inevitability of all this? When Tel Aviv goes up in a giant mushroom cloud and a million Jews are dead, how can the democrats say it wasn't us, we didn't have anything to do with it? What if it's some other large city anywhere in the world, even here?
I don't see how the democrats can say the world is a safer place because of what we did. Would it not be ironic if the next 9/11 on American soil was indirectly financed by the American taxpayers, thanks to the democrats?
Because the Democrats are enemies of Western Civilization.
Guaranteeing Iran nuclear weapons would keep them from being on the side of America's enemies????
Are you really this stupid???
And yet they have a democrat in the WH and are the majority party in the House and the Senate. WTF are we doing?
Reagan gave Iran money, missiles and fighter jet parts.1. When these facts are considered...
Obama armed Iran
Biden armed the Taliban
Bill Clinton gove our missile technology to China
Hillary sold our uranium to Russia
Ted Kennedy offered to work with the Kremlin against America's government.
The Nazi Party credited th e Democrat Party for a great many of their ideas and plans.
The Democrats put American citizens in concentration camps.
...one can only wonder at any American voting for the European Party, the Democrats. Their views are far from American.
2. And considering the current foreign policy policy of the Democrats:
What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?
3. The problem with this sound advice is that it suggests Biden is responsible, when, clearly, it is the Democrat Party:
"To The Biden Admin: To Eradicate Iran's Terrorism, Confront the Ruling Mullahs
- The administration, however, then made an astonishing announcement: that it is unfreezing $29 billion to the Iranian regime, despite that Iran is still, according to the State Department, an officially designated state sponsor of terrorism.
- The move is apparently part of a US effort to appease the mullahs into redoing the 2015 nuclear deal that gives Iran a glide path to having nuclear weapons. Three American negotiators have already resigned and the US is not even welcome in the room.
- 4. A recent report by the United Nations, based on the last six months of 2021, acknowledged that in Iran, "terrorist groups enjoy greater freedom there than at any time in recent history."
- Even Iran's leaders have pointed to their ties with terror groups. A former general of the IRGC, Saeed Ghasemi, shared a surprising revelation in 2019 when he pointed out that the Iranian government sent agents to Bosnia to train Al Qaeda members, and that those operatives hid their identity by posing as humanitarian workers for Iran's Red Crescent Society.
- One only need look into the Iranian regime's relationship with Al Qaeda to understand what a catastrophe it is to give billions of dollars to Iran's regime. Iran has reportedly had ties to Al Qaeda for nearly three decades.
- 5. Appeasing the ruling of mullahs of Iran and unfreezing billions of dollars to give them will only further empower them, increase their terrorist activities and accelerate their destabilization of the Middle East – another legacy of failure for which the Biden administration will be able to claim credit, along with the worst inflation in 40 years; the skyrocketing price of gasoline and heating oil from shutting down America's historic energy independence; more than 100,000 U.S. deaths in 2021 from fentanyl and other drugs; enriching and empowering Russia as well as Mexico's drug cartels; failing to give Ukraine adequate materiel to deter a Russian offensive or to protect itself from one, and the crowning $83 billion surrender to the Taliban terrorists of Afghanistan."
- To The Biden Admin: To Eradicate Iran's Terrorism, Confront the Ruling Mullahs
View attachment 603489
Which did you vote for???
G5+1 but you are too busy lying to care.View attachment 603593
Anyone wonder why Hussein Obama is so generous to the 7th century savages at America's expense????
View attachment 603593
Anyone wonder why Hussein Obama is so generous to the 7th century savages at America's expense????
My best guess? Tear everything down so the collectivist/communitarians can create their new world gov't/society. And here we sit, letting them go about their business.
So, what do you propose? To bomb them into the stone age?Guaranteeing Iran nuclear weapons would keep them from being on the side of America's enemies????
Are you really this stupid???
Iran has been filling North Korea's GDP for years.....and that means China is involved already, you dunce.
"Iran and North Korea have engaged in nuclear-related trade or .... North Korea may receive from Iran upwards of $2 to $3 billion.
The Iran-North Korea Strategic Relationship is an issue that has drawn minimum public attention in Washington since at least 2007 when I wrote extensively about it in a report I authored at the Congressional Research Service and updated for the next three years: North Korea’s Nuclear Weapons Development and Diplomacy (section on Nuclear Collaboration with Iran and Syria). This, despite the extensive coverage of the major advances in the nuclear weapons and missile programs of North Korea and Iran since that time.
On nuclear collaboration, there has been a virtual blackout of public information.
The Washington Post reported on November 7, 2011, that “secret intelligence” provided to the International Atomic Energy Agency showed that Iran had received “crucial technology” from North Korea for the development of nuclear warheads.
....North Korea earned about $1.5 billion annually from its missile collaboration with Iran alone. It seems to me that North Korea may receive from Iran upwards of $2 to $3 billion annually from Iran for the various forms of collaboration between them."
http://docs.house.gov/meetings/FA/FA18/20150728/103824/HHRG-114-FA18-Wstate-NikschL-20150728.pdf
The Washington Post reported on November 7, 2011, that “secret intelligence” provided to the International Atomic Energy Agency showed that Iran had received “crucial technology” from North Korea for the development of nuclear warheads. This included mathematical formulas and codes for warhead designs “some of which appear to have originated in North Korea.” On missile collaboration one of several notable reports came from the New York Times on November 28, 2010. This report cited “secret American intelligence assessments” that North Korea had supplied Iran with 19 intermediate range missiles in 2006 with a range of up to 2,000 miles. This missile today is known as the Musudan, which North Korea has displayed on several occasions.
So, what do you propose? To bomb them into the stone age?
There is no questions that the sanctions have impact on their economy. Questions raise about whether they stop Iran from achieving an atomic bomb.Glad you asked.
Simply forbid them from gaining access to nuclear weapons.
This is what Trump's sanctions did:
View attachment 603612
The sanctions were strangling them.
1. This from the Left-leaning Brookings Institute...
"....the sanctions against Iran — and the context for them internationally and within Iran — have changed dramatically. Since 2010, the sanctions’ impact on Iran has been severe: its oil exports and revenues plummeted; the value of its currency eroded; trade disruptions shuttered businesses and exacerbated inflation. Quietly, a backlash emerged among Iran’s political elites against the country’s creeping isolation, and the June 2013 presidential election ushered in a moderate new president and the beginnings of a diplomatic breakthrough on the nuclear crisis — achievements that most observers attribute to the impact of sanctions."
Why “Iran Style” Sanctions Worked Against Tehran (And Why They Might Not Succeed with Moscow)
“Iran's rial hits record-low 100,000 to the dollar” Iran's rial hits record-low 100,000 to the dollar
Question: With an Iranian economy already on the ropes, how deeply do you think that the American decision of getting out of the deal will affect the country?
Answer: The Iranian leadership have built a "resistance economy" that can withstand sanctions, so the country will manage the deprivations. Whether the Iranian people will accept increased poverty, however, is another matter. I expect it will be increasingly dissatisfied, leading to an eventual explosion.
Trump Nixed the Iran Deal: What Next?
Question: As a critic of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) with Iran, nuclear agreement, what is your evaluation of Donald Trump's nixing it? Answer: I am extremely pleased. The Iran deal brought enormous benefits to the mullahs in Tehran,www.danielpipes.org
=========================================
1. "US: Iran Still Top State Terror Sponsor"
https://www.usnews.com/news/world/a...-top-state-terror-sponsor-global-attacks-down
2. And now.....not how long it would take Iran, unaided by the crypto-Islamist, Hussein Obama, to attain nuclear state status....
...but IF they would EVER get nuclear weapons.
And the correct answer is no.....they would not, unaided by the crypto-Islamist, Hussein Obama
The sanctions were strangling them.
This from the Left-leaning Brookings Institute...
"....the sanctions against Iran — and the context for them internationally and within Iran — have changed dramatically.
Since 2010, the sanctions’ impact on Iran has been severe: its oil exports and revenues plummeted; the value of its currency eroded; trade disruptions shuttered businesses and exacerbated inflation.
Quietly, a backlash emerged among Iran’s political elites against the country’s creeping isolation, and the June 2013 presidential election ushered in a moderate new president and the beginnings of a diplomatic breakthrough on the nuclear crisis — achievements that most observers attribute to the impact of sanctions."
Why “Iran Style” Sanctions Worked Against Tehran (And Why They Might Not Succeed with Moscow)
So...a. yes, Iran is the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism
and
b. no....they would not have achieved nuclear weapons sans the terrorist-aiding drug dealing Obama had not bequeathed same to the 7th century savages.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hussein Obama, cryto-Islamist, had the choice of either awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism....
or supporting the opposition to the 7th century savages.
"Iran cuts social media access as unrest turns deadly
...the biggest test for the Islamic republic since mass demonstrations in 2009.
....against the Islamic system as a whole, with slogans such as "Death to the dictator".
US President Donald Trump said the "big protests" showed people "were getting wise as to how their money and wealth is being stolen and squandered on terrorism".
Iran cuts social media access as unrest turns deadly
And he chose.....?????
4. What could Hussein Obama have done to stop Iran's blood lust for nuclear weapons?
He could have just said 'no.'
Or.......Obama could have done what Reagan did, had he actually intended to end Iran's support for terror and Islamofascism and its desire for nuclear weapons:
"...the president [Reagan] signed National Security Decision Directive (NSDD) 32, which....called for aid to Solidarity, counter-propaganda in Poland, tightening of sanctions on the Soviet Union, and covert activities to achieve these objectives.
Reagan sent out 328 such 'Top Secret' directives to the diplomatic, military, and intelligence agencies during his presidency."
The President, the Pope, And the Prime Minister: Three Who Changed the World," p. , p.185
"Reagan .... thought the aim of American foreign policy should be not to get along with the Communist powers but to hasten their end.
He opposed the Helsinki accords because he thought they codified the captive status of Moscow's East European satellites. He believed détente conferred a false legitimacy upon states whose governments were not installed by the consent of the governed.
He agreed with Churchill and with the Democrats' mid-century presidents that the best way to avoid a war was to be ready to fight one, and he quoted in one of his radio addresses the phrase "No nation ever saved its freedom by disarming itself in the hope of placating an enemy," from NSC-68, one of the Cold War founding documents of the Truman administration.
Thirty years earlier, these beliefs were the views of politicians of both major parties, .... Reagan's aim was to restore these views to the national dialogue, and in time he did."Reagan in Opposition
Obama's aim was always to nuclear arm the worst of western civilization's enemies.
And he did.
".....the regime’s crisis that it shines a light on, isn’t about to end soon.
Why? Iran’s economy is in the dumps. Inflation is rampant. Analysts project a 3.9% negative growth in 2019. Iranians are suffering under America’s renewed sanctions. More frequently than ever, they challenge the regime in street protests.
So regime insiders are turning on each other. As Behnam Ben Taleblu, an Iran-watcher at The Foundation for Defense of Democracies, observes, “With factionalism rising more than ever before, the regime continues to struggle to present a unified front, as it faces pressure, both foreign and domestic.”
Zarif Seeking To Conceal Crisis in Iran
"Iranian Regime Deploys Snipers Against Demonstrators, Death Toll Crosses 100
“Iran Protests suggest Trump sanctions are inflicting serious pain.”
Iranian Regime Deploys Snipers Against Demonstrators, Death Toll Crosses 100
There is no questions that the sanctions have impact on their economy. Questions raise about whether they stop Iran from achieving an atomic bomb.
There is no questions that the sanctions have impact on their economy. Questions raise about whether they stop Iran from achieving an atomic bomb.
