Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Huh? You are the ne that referenced the evidence. The sum total of all the data we have is far too small to conclude anything from it, save for saying that life likely has evolved elsewhere.False, since we havent taken inventory of all the evidence. Or even a tiny bit if it.It’s a statement of fact. To all evidence we are alone.
Ok give me a tiny bit of it.
Yes, sounds like an ignorant child's description of the universe. Clearly they were totally ignorant.I think not
In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
Now the earth was unformed and void, and darkness was upon the face of the deep; and the spirit of God hovered over the face of the waters.
And God said: 'Let there be light.' And there was light.
Oh, that's simple. It formed and evolved here, and the universe is huge. And there you have it. Good cirumstantial evidence.Present some evidence that life evolved twice.
You didn't pose questions, you made statements you could never hope to support.
Your unsupported claims to your gods creating everything is identical to those promoting different gods creating everything. Not surprisingly, none of the claims to any of these creator, designer gods are supportable.
Hardly. He believes the universe has always existed. I believe it was created from nothing.
What is your perception of God?Hardly. He believes the universe has always existed. I believe it was created from nothing.
You even format your answers in the weird way as BreezeWood. He doesn't even know how to use the forum tools properly.
As described in the first two chapters of Genesis or ...
"It is possible to believe in both evolution and the Catholic church’s teaching on creation, Pope Francis has said, as he cautioned against portraying God as a kind of magician who made the universe with a magic wand.
“The big bang, which is today posited as the origin of the world, does not contradict the divine act of creation; rather, it requires it,” the pope said in an address to a meeting at the pontifical academy of sciences.
“Evolution of nature is not inconsistent with the notion of creation because evolution presupposes the creation of beings which evolve.”
Francis, 77, said it was easy to misinterpret the creation story as recounted in the book of Genesis, according to which God created heaven and Earth in six days and rested on the seventh.
“When we read the creation story in Genesis we run the risk of imagining that God was a magician, with a magic wand which is able to do everything,” he said.
“But it is not so. He created beings and let them develop according to internal laws which He gave every one, so they would develop, so they would reach maturity.”
Pope Francis: evolution and creation both right
Pope Francis: evolution and creation both right
BTW, what does the Tanakh say BreezeWood book of antiquity?
Huh? You are the ne that referenced the evidence. The sum total of all the data we have is far too small to conclude anything from it, save for saying that life likely has evolved elsewhere.False, since we havent taken inventory of all the evidence. Or even a tiny bit if it.It’s a statement of fact. To all evidence we are alone.
Ok give me a tiny bit of it.
What is your perception of God?Hardly. He believes the universe has always existed. I believe it was created from nothing.
You even format your answers in the weird way as BreezeWood. He doesn't even know how to use the forum tools properly.
As described in the first two chapters of Genesis or ...
"It is possible to believe in both evolution and the Catholic church’s teaching on creation, Pope Francis has said, as he cautioned against portraying God as a kind of magician who made the universe with a magic wand.
“The big bang, which is today posited as the origin of the world, does not contradict the divine act of creation; rather, it requires it,” the pope said in an address to a meeting at the pontifical academy of sciences.
“Evolution of nature is not inconsistent with the notion of creation because evolution presupposes the creation of beings which evolve.”
Francis, 77, said it was easy to misinterpret the creation story as recounted in the book of Genesis, according to which God created heaven and Earth in six days and rested on the seventh.
“When we read the creation story in Genesis we run the risk of imagining that God was a magician, with a magic wand which is able to do everything,” he said.
“But it is not so. He created beings and let them develop according to internal laws which He gave every one, so they would develop, so they would reach maturity.”
Pope Francis: evolution and creation both right
Pope Francis: evolution and creation both right
BTW, what does the Tanakh say BreezeWood book of antiquity?
Hardly. He believes the universe has always existed. I believe it was created from nothing.
You didn't pose questions, you made statements you could never hope to support.
Your unsupported claims to your gods creating everything is identical to those promoting different gods creating everything. Not surprisingly, none of the claims to any of these creator, designer gods are supportable.
I provided scientific statements backed up by observable evidence. What did you provide? Did you continue with peptide bonding? Its thesis was an air-water interface for peptide bonding because the water below it would dissolve the amino acids (which is what I said). Not much primordial soup in an air-water level. Also, why was Miller-Urey abandoned? Was it the oxygen problem? The primary volcanic gases do not form amino acids of which I provided a video of an experiment. Your claim was the lesser gases of methane and sulfur did the work with no evidence nor explanation for it. What happened?
Why don't you read this instead of your false websites -- Why Abiogenesis Is Impossible Don't just read to learn about how your process works, but down to the end to see it debunked.
Yeah, you're always good for such flashy declarations. You really seem to be lacking in the "supporting argument" department, though.You fall farther into superstitious mysteries by the second.
I already answered that. Pay attention!what’s the “sum total” of evidence of life outside our current terrestrial tree of life?
Yeah, you're always good for such flashy declarations. You really seem to be lacking in the "supporting argument" department, though.You fall farther into superstitious mysteries by the second.
I already answered that. Pay attention!what’s the “sum total” of evidence of life outside our current terrestrial tree of life?
There is no evidence that life originated more than once.
There is no evidence that life originated more than once.
Oops, that's not stated correctly. You mean, in our pitifully small sample of empirical evidence, we have no empirical evidence yet of life elsewhere. And, seeing how small our sample is compared to the entire universe, no determination can be made from our sample.
Of course, there is good circumstantial evidence.
I didn’t say by. I said from.What is your perception of God?Hardly. He believes the universe has always existed. I believe it was created from nothing.
You even format your answers in the weird way as BreezeWood. He doesn't even know how to use the forum tools properly.
As described in the first two chapters of Genesis or ...
"It is possible to believe in both evolution and the Catholic church’s teaching on creation, Pope Francis has said, as he cautioned against portraying God as a kind of magician who made the universe with a magic wand.
“The big bang, which is today posited as the origin of the world, does not contradict the divine act of creation; rather, it requires it,” the pope said in an address to a meeting at the pontifical academy of sciences.
“Evolution of nature is not inconsistent with the notion of creation because evolution presupposes the creation of beings which evolve.”
Francis, 77, said it was easy to misinterpret the creation story as recounted in the book of Genesis, according to which God created heaven and Earth in six days and rested on the seventh.
“When we read the creation story in Genesis we run the risk of imagining that God was a magician, with a magic wand which is able to do everything,” he said.
“But it is not so. He created beings and let them develop according to internal laws which He gave every one, so they would develop, so they would reach maturity.”
Pope Francis: evolution and creation both right
Pope Francis: evolution and creation both right
BTW, what does the Tanakh say BreezeWood book of antiquity?
Hardly. He believes the universe has always existed. I believe it was created from nothing.
Let's not change the subject. We are discussing the above.
What did you mean by you believe "it was created by nothing?"
The difference being, OBVIOUSLY, that they are making several extraordinary, magical claims,with 100% certainty, without a shred of evidence....You spend your days bellyaching about evidence when attacking Christians...
Your ID nonsense. You are insisting upon magic. Everyone knows this.How do you scientifically prove magical creation? No, I think I’ll stick with science.
Magical creation?! Whatcha talking about, Willis?
The difference being, OBVIOUSLY, that they are making several extraordinary, magical claims,with 100% certainty, without a shred of evidence....You spend your days bellyaching about evidence when attacking Christians...
....while I, on the contrary, am making the rather mundane assertion, without 100% certainty, that, in a universe with 100s of billions of galaxies, with 100s of billions of planets in each, if life can form once, it can form twice, and probably has.
This determination is supported by the following, empirical facts:
1) life formed at least once
2) there are 100s of billions of galaxies with 100s of billions of planets in each
3) life is composed of the most common elements in the universe, in a virtually 1:1 ratio
4) life formed rather quickly, once the conditions on Earth allowed it
So, no son, it's not even close. There is no comparison.
Correct, which definitvely shows it can form quickly.Life formed rather quickly *once*.
So, if it is unique...then it's probably unique? Wow, that is some..... Special logic.And if it is unique on this, a planet we know to be conducive to life, it bodes no good for the chances of it forming anywhere else.
Irrelevant. Try to focus.You want it to be very badly.
