Franticfrank
Member
- May 16, 2012
- 250
- 23
- 16
A war tax isn't a bad idea, but I think the American people would have major problems with the reintroduction of the draft.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
One problem, every American wouldn't get a bill, only the ones paying the tab now. I'm sure it looks good on paper but it never works out in real world application.
That's the case with taxes now. A war surcharge would be no different.
A war tax isn't a bad idea, but I think the American people would have major problems with the reintroduction of the draft.
We don't declare war anymore we just invade other countries.
Most of the wars fought during our history were without a formal declaration, so that means little to this discussion.
However military action is taken, whether by formal declaration or under the War Powers Act, the point is that by requiring an automatic tax increase to pay for it, future reckless actions might be avoided and only those necessary wars fought. What it would basically do is give everybody skin the game, not just the families of our volunteer armed forces.
How do you propose getting this rule passed in the first place, and then enforcing it once it is? Very few politicians will support it, and I can't imagine they'd have any problem breaking this rule.
The Vietnam War was paid for in large part by a 10% income tax surcharge.
There goes the idea that this tax would stop unnecessary wars!
The Vietnam War was paid for in large part by a 10% income tax surcharge.
There goes the idea that this tax would stop unnecessary wars!
Most of the wars fought during our history were without a formal declaration, so that means little to this discussion.
However military action is taken, whether by formal declaration or under the War Powers Act, the point is that by requiring an automatic tax increase to pay for it, future reckless actions might be avoided and only those necessary wars fought. What it would basically do is give everybody skin the game, not just the families of our volunteer armed forces.
How do you propose getting this rule passed in the first place, and then enforcing it once it is? Very few politicians will support it, and I can't imagine they'd have any problem breaking this rule.
I never said it would be easy to pass, or even possible in today's political climate. However, since Congress IS going to address spending at some point, now would be as good a time as any to introduce it.
The Vietnam War was paid for in large part by a 10% income tax surcharge.
There goes the idea that this tax would stop unnecessary wars!
Well, don't forget that most American's supported the war up until 68 or 67.