[MENTION=34298]Mac1958[/MENTION]An abeyance of your ignorance would help you at the ballot box, Jim. Besides, how do you know what's good for the GOP? You have no clue about what's good for our country, much less the GOP.
Templar, just to be clear then, up or down -- is it your opinion that this standoff (and similar actions over the next several months) will be a net positive for the GOP in the 2014 and 2016 elections?
.
No. I'm not blind. But nobody will escape this debacle unscathed. This will most likely hurt both parties in the mid terms and the presidential elections. I'm accusing Jim of speaking out of his posterior.
Not that anything has stopped you from being an azzhole before and calling out people individually, but you may have noticed the OP referenced a news article ... well actually you didn't but ....
nevertheless, I disagree with the premise. Simply having 75 or so diehart TPM leave the party accomplishes nothing. Perot possibly flipped the election from BushI to Slick, but the middle didn't really flip. Slick wasn't the second coming of FDR let alone Huey Long.
Rather, suppose boehner forces a vote on the Reid/McConnell comproimise, and the TP primaries out 50 to 75 congressmen. The dems need to pick up 18 seats. And, that scenario is the only they can possibly do so.