A scientific dissent from Darwinism

[rightwinger]

This is a scientific board

Show where god is repeatable
Provide ANY evidence of God

I just said He's not repeatable. That would make Him bound by His creation.

Faith not science

 

[rightwinger]

Hmm, no , evolution is a fact. It is as well known a fact as the fact that the Earth revolves about the Sun.

No, CREATON is a FACT. Diversity within individual species kinds is fact. One species developing into all the various kinds of organisms that exist today is the fantasy.

God is a fantasy

There is no proof of creation. Plenty of proof it never happened

No, there is plenty of proof something happened. You just believe nature is capable of spontaneously erupting and flowering all by itself because it wanted to or had to. But you have no real rational reason why!

Show scientific proof

You have been shown "scientific " proof over and over. You disregard that "scientific" proof and cling to a humanistic theory that suits you. You have been shown more historic, intellectual, and scientific proof for CREATION than you have ever shown for cosmic evolution. Read the Bible. If you don't believe that, why would you believe even if someone returned from the dead?

You have yet to show any proof of the existence of a superior being

 

[hadit]

This is a scientific board

Show where god is repeatable
Provide ANY evidence of God

I just said He's not repeatable. That would make Him bound by His creation.

Faith not science

You're basically agreeing with me because I'm saying God is not bound by the laws of the universe He created and cannot be relocated in a lab. Therefore, science can only infer God's existence, not limit Him.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

God is a sovereign being, which means He's not bound by your rules of repeatability.

You're still not making any sense.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Read the Bible. If you don't believe that, why would you believe even if someone returned from the dead?

Is that a joke? Dude, you have gone too far down the rabbit hole...there is zero reason to believe a single shred of the magical nonsense in the Bible

 

[rightwinger]

This is a scientific board

Show where god is repeatable
Provide ANY evidence of God

I just said He's not repeatable. That would make Him bound by His creation.

Faith not science

You're basically agreeing with me because I'm saying God is not bound by the laws of the universe He created and cannot be relocated in a lab. Therefore, science can only infer God's existence, not limit Him.

You have no scientific proof of that......only faith

 

[hadit]

God is a sovereign being, which means He's not bound by your rules of repeatability.

You're still not making any sense.

You want God to be proven by science. Science demands repeatability. God is sovereign, which means He can choose how, when and where He acts. Correct so far?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You want God to be proven by science.

Uh...what? No I don't....

And I think you basically agree with me (though your semantics are clumsy at best):

God cannot be "proven" either way, because magic cannot be proven or disproven. If no determinism, then no evidence is possible.

So keep your magical nonsense out of discussions of evidence based thought. They simply do not overlap at all. Believe whatever you want...but unless you mold those beliefs to accommodate the evidence, then your beliefs are simply wrong.

In this case, it's easy: just point at evolution and think, "God did that!". And there you have it ..conflict resolved...

 

[rightwinger]

God is a sovereign being, which means He's not bound by your rules of repeatability.

You're still not making any sense.

You want God to be proven by science. Science demands repeatability. God is sovereign, which means He can choose how, when and where He acts. Correct so far?

This is a science board

You cannot point to faith as a substitute

 

[GreenBean]

Evolution is a FACT

God is a theory

Just to clue you knuckleheads in Neither is a Fact. Evolution is the THEORY of evolution and God is part of a belief system -

Hmm, no , evolution is a fact. It is as well known a fact as the fact that the Earth revolves about the Sun.

A scientific theory is a well documented explanation of facts. The facts of evolution come from observational archeological evidence of ancient processes, ... imperfections in organisms recording historical common descent, and from sudden and radical transitions in the fossil record as well as subtle ones. Theories of evolution provide a provisional explanation for these facts - a Hypothesis - Evolution as a whole is a theory. Evolution dealing with the homo genus / anthropomorphic is still seeking the missing link - I think they have been here all along in our gene pool - we call them libtards but that;s another story altogether . Now stfu and don't make bitch smack the piss out of you :>

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Evolution is a FACT

God is a theory

Just to clue you knuckleheads in Neither is a Fact. Evolution is the THEORY of evolution and God is part of a belief system -

Hmm, no , evolution is a fact. It is as well known a fact as the fact that the Earth revolves about the Sun.

A scientific theory is a well documented explanation of facts. The facts of evolution come from observational evidence of observable processes, imperfections in organisms recording historical common descent, and from sudden and radical transitions in the fossil record as well as subtle ones. Theories of evolution provide a provisional explanation for these facts - a Hypothesis - Evolution as a whole is a theory. No stfu and don't make bitch smack the piss out of you :>

Evolution is a scientific theory. It is also a fact, and it is as well known a fact as most facts .

So yes, you sniveling little crybaby, evolution is a fact.

 

[GreenBean]

Your glass is half empty - go piss in it

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Your glass is half empty - go piss in it

Well that wasn't witty or funny....

Do you have a problem with evolution being a fact? Tough shit! That's kind of the point of empirical knowledge...it doesn't give a shit what you think.....

 

[hadit]

This is a scientific board

Show where god is repeatable
Provide ANY evidence of God

I just said He's not repeatable. That would make Him bound by His creation.

Faith not science

You're basically agreeing with me because I'm saying God is not bound by the laws of the universe He created and cannot be relocated in a lab. Therefore, science can only infer God's existence, not limit Him.

You have no scientific proof of that......only faith

Are you trying to say science can prove God's existence? I'm saying it cannot and you just keep repeating that I don't have scientific proof, which is what I have been saying. Do you see that?

 

[GreenBean]

..it doesn't give a shit ....

I didn't say shit in your glass I said piss in it .... the fact that you don't unsderstand the diff. between a fact and theory is irrelevant ... Why little man do you think they call it The Theory of Evolution ? not the FACT of evolution ... but the Theory. Ya See ? Now that I've enlightened you a tad your glass is no longer half empty - it's half full which is quite fiting for a half wit

 

[hadit]

You want God to be proven by science.

Uh...what? No I don't....

And I think you basically agree with me (though your semantics are clumsy at best):

God cannot be "proven" either way, because magic cannot be proven or disproven. If no determinism, then no evidence is possible.

So keep your magical nonsense out of discussions of evidence based thought. They simply do not overlap at all. Believe whatever you want...but unless you mold those beliefs to accommodate the evidence, then your beliefs are simply wrong.

In this case, it's easy: just point at evolution and think, "God did that!". And there you have it ..conflict resolved...

And, like Michio Kaku, look at the universe and declare, "that was designed".

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

he fact that you don't unsderstand the diff. between a fact and theory is irrelevant

I do understand the difference. i also understand that a scientific theory can become so well-supported as to be accepted as fact. This is the case with evolution ... it is, indeed, a fact.

For instance... plate tectonic theory? Fact.

This is true, no matter how many grammar-challenged, crybaby posts you toss off, you wanker.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

And, like Michio Kaku, look at the universe and declare, "that was designed".

Feel free! It has no bearing on anything at all, except for your feelings. In fact, i wish all religious goofballs would be content just to do this. But noooo.... we have to spend resources going to court to keep their embarrassing nonsense out of the science classrooms...

 

[abu afak]

I didn't say shit in your glass I said piss in it .... the fact that you don'tunsderstand the diff. between a fact and theory is irrelevant ... Why little man do you think they call it The Theory of Evolution ? not the FACT of evolution ... but theTheory. Ya See ? Now that I've enlightened you a tad your glass is no longer half empty - it's half full which is quite fiting for a half wit

I already addressed this piece of Juvenile STUPIDITY/IGNORANCE in my #28.

science doesn't deal in "proof", it deals in theories affirmed over time.
"Proofs" are for Math.

15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense
Scientific American
By John Rennie - Editor in Chief
June 2002
15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense - Scientific American

1. Evolution is Only a theory. It is not a fact or a scientific law.

Many people learned in Elementary School that a theory falls in the middle of a hierarchy of certainty--above a mere hypothesis but below a law. Scientists do Not use the terms that way, however.

According to the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), a scientific theory is "a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that can incorporate facts, laws, inferences, and tested hypotheses."
No amount of validation changes a theory into a Law, which is a descriptive generalization about nature.
So when scientists talk about the theory of evolution--or the atomic theory or the theory of relativity, for that matter--they are NOT expressing reservations about its truth.

In addition to the theory of evolution, meaning the idea of descent with modification, one may also speak of the FACT of evolution...​

`
`

 

[hadit]

And, like Michio Kaku, look at the universe and declare, "that was designed".

Feel free! It has no bearing on anything at all, except for your feelings. In fact, i wish all religious goofballs would be content just to do this. But noooo.... we have to spend resources going to court to keep their embarrassing nonsense out of the science classrooms...

Yeah, let's keep the Michio Kaku's out of the class room...