[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sbS7fHuiHbE[/ame]
I am reposting the video in order to help clarify the position.
If we are to take the boys model of good and evil as truth, we can still conclude that god is evil.
Under the boys model, evil exist if god is not present, good exist if god is present. Now the here is a question for you:Who or what controls god?
Apparently, god controls god. Therefore when god excuses himself from an object or situation, god INTENDS for evil to exist in that object or situation. Considering what is implied in the statement "that God is evil" means that god posses evil intentions or creates evil through his own actions, the statement can still be considered true under the boys model.
Are there any counter-arguement to this claim? Please post.
I am reposting the video in order to help clarify the position.
If we are to take the boys model of good and evil as truth, we can still conclude that god is evil.
Under the boys model, evil exist if god is not present, good exist if god is present. Now the here is a question for you:Who or what controls god?
Apparently, god controls god. Therefore when god excuses himself from an object or situation, god INTENDS for evil to exist in that object or situation. Considering what is implied in the statement "that God is evil" means that god posses evil intentions or creates evil through his own actions, the statement can still be considered true under the boys model.
Are there any counter-arguement to this claim? Please post.