A Pandemic of Lies


Recommended Home Care India. Ivermectin and HCL


Countries main website.


Ivermectina_-India_-Ziverdo-Kit-Box.jpeg
 

Background: On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) officially declared coronavirus disease 2019 a global pandemic. Ivermectin and Doxycycline against SARSCoV-2 under in-vitro conditions showed beneficial results. However, large population studies with this combination are not elaborately studied, which was the aim of our study.

Materials and Methods: A total of 122 patients admitted in a tertiary care centre, who tested positive for Reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) for SARS-CoV2 were included in the study and a total sample size of 100 patients was obtained after exclusion. 50 patients of the treatment group were treated with Ivermectin-Doxycycline combination.

Results: The results had shown a significant reduction not only in mean duration of hospital (3.70 ± 2.27 days vs 4.69 ± 2.3 days), but also in complete resolution of symptoms stay (6.67 ± 2.01 days vs 4.69 ± 2.3 days). In a small subset of 10 patients RT-PCR for COVID was tested on 10th day after the symptom onset in both the groups and there was no difference to be found. There was no significant difference in the side effect profile of either groups.

Conclusion: Our study supports the benefits of utilization of combination of Doxycycline and Ivermectin in mild to moderate COVID-19 infection in terms of early recovery based on the time for symptom resolution and the mean duration of hospital stay.
 

DISCUSSION: COVID - 19 till date has no proven effective treatment. Symptomatic therapy along with that pathophysiology based treatment protocols have been adopted by the government. Our observations in this study demonstrate there is a role for further disease modulation based therapy using broad spectrum antiviral - Ivermectin, pleiotropic effects of Atorvastatin and the lung protective and antioxidant of N-acetylcysteine. This triple therapy along with standard of care has demonstrated a lower case fatality rate without any notable adverse events and can be considered as adjuncts to successful therapy for COVID 19. However, its observational, non randomised nature prevents a causal conclusion and warrants further investigation through larger Randomised Controlled Trials.
 

Conclusion Apparent benefits of the combination between early detection and early pharmacological approaches for COVID-19 demonstrated to be consistent when when compared to different control groups of untreated patients. The potential benefits could allow a large number of patients prevented from hospitalizations, deaths and persistent symptoms after COVID-19 remission. The potential impact on COVID-19 disease course and numbers of negative outcomes and the well-established safety profile of the drugs proposed by the Pre-AndroCoV Trial led to ethical questions regarding the conduction of further placebo control randomized clinical trials (RCTs) for early COVID-19. Early pharmacological approaches including azithromycin in combination with any of the options between nitazoxanide, ivermectin or optionally hydroxychloroquine should be considered for those diagnosed with COVID-19 presenting less than seven days of symptoms. Of the three drugs, we opted for nitazoxanide, due to more extensive demonstration of in vitro and in vivo antiviral activity, proven efficacy against other viruses in humans, and steadier safety profile.


Again. EARLY USE not when they are already screwed. They handed these packs out in places like India telling them to take it early. Most of the counter to these types of studies are ones that wait til the damage is already done. Sending people home with NOTHING is STUPID after they test positive, when cheap drugs can prevent hospitalization if done early enough.
 

This trial concluded by stating that the combined use of nitazoxanide, ribavirin, and ivermectin plus zinc supplement effectively cleared the SARS-COV2 from the nasopharynx in a shorter time than symptomatic therapy.


Results: A total of 32 patients were enrolled and randomized to treatment. SOC treatment together with ivermectin did not result in any serious adverse events. All patients exhibited a reduction in SARS-CoV-2 viral load within 7 days; however, those who received ivermectin had a more consistent decrease as compared to the SOC alone group, characterized by a shorter time for obtaining two consecutive negative SARS-CoV-2 RT PCR tests.

Conclusions: Ivermectin is safe in patients with SARS-CoV-2, reducing symptomatology and the SARS-CoV-2 viral load. This antiviral effect appears to depend on the dose used, and if confirmed in future studies, it suggests that ivermectin may be a useful adjuvant to the SOC treatment in patients with mild COVID-19 symptoms.
 
Yes sheltered. You've obviously never been exposed to the truth.
You probably believe there's a god too.
See what I mean?
Coming from you? Do you really expect me to take you seriously? Think again, cultist.
 
Ok. I'll stop spamming the thread with studies on EARLY TREATMENT of Covid. Later stages is was not as effective in many studies. At that point it's already ripped you a new one.
 
Hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin used in combination.

’If HCoV-229E enters by fusing with endocytic membranes, it is likely that these drugs will inhibit infection. Chloroquine, a weak base, and bafilomycin A1, a specific inhibitor of the vascular ATP-ase proton pump both block acidification of endosomes.....chloroquine and bafilomycin A1 not only affect the entry but also the release of the virus.’
(Blau DM, Holmes KV, VIII International Symposium on Nidoviruses, Philadelphia, 20-25 May 2000)

’....Hydroxychloroquine alters the pH of lysosomes, thereby deteriorating the viral proteins, and inhibits viral entry by interfering with the phage-host fusion mechanism by glycosylation of ACE2 receptor and spike proteins.’
 
One cannot tell when they become infected. Trump was correct, though prophylaxis is the answer, just as it was in Uttar Pradesh.

‘In contrast, when the drugs were added 8-12 hours post inoculation, there was no significant decrease in viral yields compared to untreated, inoculated cells. These results show that lysosomotrophic drugs inhibit early at virus entry but at later times do not affect the release of virus.’
(Blau and Holmes, op cit 2000)
 
Coming from you? Do you really expect me to take you seriously? Think again, cultist.

I don't care what you think because you obviously lack intelligence. You hate it for conspiracy reasons and hating democrats.

Exactly what cult do you think no am favouring? Be specific.
I think you've exhausted your pathetic argument and now you've resorting to the same time honoured Republican propaganda.

Grow up.
 
As it turns out? The Corbett Report has been covering this. There is a "code word," for finding information on this in the regular legitimate science world. . . it is called;



A Tale of Two Summits (and Microchipped Cats) - #NewWorldNextWeek​

Interview 1679 – New World Next Week with James Evan Pilato

Corbett • 12/10/2021
This week on the New World Next Week: It's a tale of two summits as the US/Russia tensions escalate; synthetic biology is the latest poster child of the WEF boffins; and the UK mandates microchipping of cats.


Story #1: The Summit For Democracy


Story #2: WEF Says Synthetic Biology Is The Key To Reset Living Systems

WEF Says Synthetic Biology Is The Key To Reset Living Systems

How Can Technological Advancements In Synthetic Biology Benefit Everyone?

archive.md

Episode 225 - Still Listening to the Enemy (Apr. 7, 2012)

Episode 225 – Still Listening to the Enemy : The Corbett Report

Integration of Blockchain and Biometrics to Redefine Digital Identity By 2030

Integration of blockchain and biometrics to redefine digital identity by 2030: report | Biometric Update

WEF Video: The Use of Blockchain to Advance Biometric Technologies (Jan. 27, 2019)



Story #3: Microchip Your Cat Or Face Fines, UK Govt Says

"Synthetic biology"​


Some of it was covered WAY BACK in 2012, I was not even following it back then, and on a different forum at that point.
04/07/2012

"Synthetic Life?" The New Industrial Revolution? (Bioethics Seminar)​




Just remember . . . .


SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY
 
Einstein, the lesson we’re learning from COVID biology is that the cocksucking Chinese communists have yet to find the focus of SARS-CoV-1.
I'm pointing out. . . synthetic biology is, and has been on WEF's radar. Folks don't understand this whole thing is part of the transhuman agenda.

This is a quote from Klaus Schwab;

“The fourth industrial revolution, however, is not only about smart and connected machines and systems. Its scope is much wider. Occurring simultaneously are waves of further breakthroughs in areas ranging from gene sequencing to nanotechnology, from renewables to quantum computing. It is the fusion of these technologies and their interaction across the physical, digital and biological domains that make the fourth industrial revolution fundamentally different from previous revolutions.”​


Klaus Schwab
 

Forum List

Back
Top