A new EvilAssaultWeapon(tm) hits the streets

Discussion in 'Politics' started by M14 Shooter, Oct 5, 2007.

  1. M14 Shooter
    Offline

    M14 Shooter The Light of Truth

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2007
    Messages:
    20,117
    Thanks Received:
    1,747
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Ratings:
    +4,492
    This is a Tacicool MN Tactical, a hot new EvilAssaultWeapon(tm).

    Guaranteed to be the weapon of choice for criminals everywhere, and the bane of every police officer in the United States:

    [​IMG]

    Should this gun be banned?
    Why?

    I left the picture at full size so you could appreciate all the fine details of this ROCKIN' gun. Please be sure to remove the pic from your quotes.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. doniston
    Offline

    doniston Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2007
    Messages:
    874
    Thanks Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +28
    Yes, because it should never be allowed except in the hands of the Military--- no, not even the police.
     
  3. M14 Shooter
    Offline

    M14 Shooter The Light of Truth

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2007
    Messages:
    20,117
    Thanks Received:
    1,747
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Ratings:
    +4,492
    Why not? What makes this weapon so terrible?
     
  4. Shogun
    Offline

    Shogun Free: Mudholes Stomped

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2007
    Messages:
    30,495
    Thanks Received:
    2,224
    Trophy Points:
    1,043
    Ratings:
    +2,260
    I dunno about all that.

    Looks to gaudy and unwieldy to become the next street equivalent of a .45

    reminds me of my grandfathers old thompson.. Lord that was a lot of fun.


    I vote no.


    However, I also vote that criminals who use any gun gets a minimum 20-30 years and anyone who kills a cop with a gun gets the death penalty - no lethal injection... the firing squad. I think there canbe ways to minimize guns in crime without stomping on the second amendment rights of otherwise law abiding people. Also, even if this gun were banned such wouldn't keep a criminal who wants to use a gun from finding one to use. outlaw .45's and they will get a .38. Outlaw a .38 and they will get a .22

    Dont like the second amendment? initiate a grass roots effort then..


    Until then, start filling up and hanging the gallon jugs with colored water.
     
  5. doniston
    Offline

    doniston Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2007
    Messages:
    874
    Thanks Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +28
    Banning certain types of firearms does not conflict with the second ammendment
     
  6. doniston
    Offline

    doniston Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2007
    Messages:
    874
    Thanks Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +28
    It is not for hunting, or defence it is a weapon built for killing people, as are all assault weapons.

    While I don't want or own one, I am not opposed to all guns, Just assault weapons.
     
  7. M14 Shooter
    Offline

    M14 Shooter The Light of Truth

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2007
    Messages:
    20,117
    Thanks Received:
    1,747
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Ratings:
    +4,492
    It does if those firearms fall under the defitions of "arms" as the term is used in the 2nd.
    As far as -that- goes, see my blog...
     
  8. M14 Shooter
    Offline

    M14 Shooter The Light of Truth

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2007
    Messages:
    20,117
    Thanks Received:
    1,747
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Ratings:
    +4,492
    Ok... And this rifle?

    [​IMG]

    Not trying to argue with you -- just interested in your rationale.
     
  9. doniston
    Offline

    doniston Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2007
    Messages:
    874
    Thanks Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +28
    I have already answered, That of course is not an assault rifle. and if your point is that any gun can kill, you are right. even a BB Gun.
     
  10. M14 Shooter
    Offline

    M14 Shooter The Light of Truth

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2007
    Messages:
    20,117
    Thanks Received:
    1,747
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Ratings:
    +4,492
    I'm VERY sorry -- I misread your post.

    You're right -- the 2nd rifle is not an 'assault weapon'.
    I presume you then think it should -not- be banned. Correct?
     

Share This Page