A message from Reagan's budget director, David Stockman

Chris

Gold Member
May 30, 2008
23,154
1,967
205
IF there were such a thing as Chapter 11 for politicians, the Republican push to extend the unaffordable Bush tax cuts would amount to a bankruptcy filing. The nation’s public debt — if honestly reckoned to include municipal bonds and the $7 trillion of new deficits baked into the cake through 2015 — will soon reach $18 trillion. That’s a Greece-scale 120 percent of gross domestic product, and fairly screams out for austerity and sacrifice. It is therefore unseemly for the Senate minority leader, Mitch McConnell, to insist that the nation’s wealthiest taxpayers be spared even a three-percentage-point rate increase.

More fundamentally, Mr. McConnell’s stand puts the lie to the Republican pretense that its new monetarist and supply-side doctrines are rooted in its traditional financial philosophy. Republicans used to believe that prosperity depended upon the regular balancing of accounts — in government, in international trade, on the ledgers of central banks and in the financial affairs of private households and businesses, too. But the new catechism, as practiced by Republican policymakers for decades now, has amounted to little more than money printing and deficit finance — vulgar Keynesianism robed in the ideological vestments of the prosperous classes.

This approach has not simply made a mockery of traditional party ideals. It has also led to the serial financial bubbles and Wall Street depredations that have crippled our economy. More specifically, the new policy doctrines have caused four great deformations of the national economy, and modern Republicans have turned a blind eye to each one.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/01/opinion/01stockman.html?_r=1
 
Ask Dave Stockman how raising taxes to close the deficit worked out for his boss, George HW Bush.

Wasn't the extension of the Bush tax cuts passed by a Democratic majority in Congress and signed by Obama? Why aren't you bashing them?
Oh yeah. You're a stupid partisan hack, is why.
 
Ask Dave Stockman how raising taxes to close the deficit worked out for his boss, George HW Bush.

Wasn't the extension of the Bush tax cuts passed by a Democratic majority in Congress and signed by Obama? Why aren't you bashing them?
Oh yeah. You're a stupid partisan hack, is why.

I am bashing them.

But it was Reagan who created this mythology that lowering taxes for the rich and creating massive deficits is a good thing.
 
Last edited:
IF there were such a thing as Chapter 11 for politicians, the Republican push to extend the unaffordable Bush tax cuts would amount to a bankruptcy filing. The nation’s public debt — if honestly reckoned to include municipal bonds and the $7 trillion of new deficits baked into the cake through 2015 — will soon reach $18 trillion. That’s a Greece-scale 120 percent of gross domestic product, and fairly screams out for austerity and sacrifice. It is therefore unseemly for the Senate minority leader, Mitch McConnell, to insist that the nation’s wealthiest taxpayers be spared even a three-percentage-point rate increase.

More fundamentally, Mr. McConnell’s stand puts the lie to the Republican pretense that its new monetarist and supply-side doctrines are rooted in its traditional financial philosophy. Republicans used to believe that prosperity depended upon the regular balancing of accounts — in government, in international trade, on the ledgers of central banks and in the financial affairs of private households and businesses, too. But the new catechism, as practiced by Republican policymakers for decades now, has amounted to little more than money printing and deficit finance — vulgar Keynesianism robed in the ideological vestments of the prosperous classes.

This approach has not simply made a mockery of traditional party ideals. It has also led to the serial financial bubbles and Wall Street depredations that have crippled our economy. More specifically, the new policy doctrines have caused four great deformations of the national economy, and modern Republicans have turned a blind eye to each one.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/01/opinion/01stockman.html?_r=1

If there was such a thing as brains for posters, you wouldn't hae to concern yourself over the matter.

Reagan? Really. You're worse off than I thought. Why not let's rehash the Hoover administration? You know .... the one he inherited from Coolidge and got left holding the bag on?

Stop wasting people's time, dip.
 
Raegan is CONSTANTLY worshipped/invoked by Fox N00z (Bill Kristol)/GOP candidates (Bible Spice et al.) so he is relevant. It tells one where they stand as they have no living pols to idolize. Sad commentary on the state of the GOP.
 
Last edited:
Funny how repubs will throw anyone under the bus that does not Parrott their talking points. Regans budget director is now a lib hahaha

You just can't write this kind of funny

Agreed. They're calling Reagan's speech writer- Noonan a liberal on another thread too LOLOL

As to Stockman, he's a gentleman & a scholar (bad words for the Repub base as they think anyone w/ brains/who reads books can't be trusted
Supply-side economics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The economist John Kenneth Galbraith noted that supply side economics was not a new theory. He wrote, "Mr. David Stockman has said that supply-side economics was merely a cover for the trickle-down approach to economic policy—what an older and less elegant generation called the horse-and-sparrow theory: If you feed the horse enough oats, some will pass through to the road for the sparrows."
 
Funny how repubs will throw anyone under the bus that does not Parrott their talking points. Regans budget director is now a lib hahaha

You just can't write this kind of funny

When you get right down to it, both sides do it. Sometomes it's even justified too.

Stockman is still a conservative regarding his views on entitlement programs, but he's also right that spending cuts alone aren't really the answer if one were to really get serious about the deficit
 
Funny how repubs will throw anyone under the bus that does not Parrott their talking points. Regans budget director is now a lib hahaha

You just can't write this kind of funny

Agreed. They're calling Reagan's speech writer- Noonan a liberal on another thread too LOLOL

As to Stockman, he's a gentleman & a scholar (bad words for the Repub base as they think anyone w/ brains/who reads books can't be trusted
Supply-side economics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The economist John Kenneth Galbraith noted that supply side economics was not a new theory. He wrote, "Mr. David Stockman has said that supply-side economics was merely a cover for the trickle-down approach to economic policy—what an older and less elegant generation called the horse-and-sparrow theory: If you feed the horse enough oats, some will pass through to the road for the sparrows."

Why is it when a Republican like Stockman or Noonan goes off the deep end they are lionized by the Left as scholars and gentlemen, but when a Democrat does it like Zell Miller or Joe lieberman they are traitors?
 
Still waiting to hear how compromising with Democrats and raising taxes to close the budget deficit worked out for Stockman's boss.
 
Still waiting to hear how compromising with Democrats and raising taxes to close the budget deficit worked out for Stockman's boss.

You mean Ronaldus Magnus, who you were touting as having such a hugely successful economic policy?
 
LOL

Obama's deficits are bigger than any Reagan budget!

Quoting Stockman while Obama runs up $1.3T deficits...Libs are fucking funny
 
Still waiting to hear how compromising with Democrats and raising taxes to close the budget deficit worked out for Stockman's boss.

You mean Ronaldus Magnus, who you were touting as having such a hugely successful economic policy?

No, you ignorant piece of donkey excrement.
George HW Bush. Or were you not alive during that time?

I could respond in kind to that insult, but instead I'll simply say the:

1) Considering the title of this thread says "Reagan's budget director, David Stockman", I'm sure you can understand why I would think you mean Reagan when you say "Stockman's boss".

2) After doing a little research, I find no indication that Stockman worked for Pres. Bush the elder. Maybe you can show something that says otherwise.
 
Raegan is CONSTANTLY worshipped/invoked by Fox N00z (Bill Kristol)/GOP candidates (Bible Spice et al.) so he is relevant. It tells one where they stand as they have no living pols to idolize. Sad commentary on the state of the GOP.


After Obama is re-elected, please compare him to Reagan. Right now the Republicans have 0 serious candidates and the Big 0 is running second behind nobody.

That the Dems idolize the Big 0 is a sadder commentary on them than the Reagan infatuation is on the Reps. At least Reagan had some success even with a Congress against him.
 
You mean Ronaldus Magnus, who you were touting as having such a hugely successful economic policy?

No, you ignorant piece of donkey excrement.
George HW Bush. Or were you not alive during that time?

Stockman worked for Reagan. lol

He must be atoning for the carnage he helped to laid waste to inre: poor of that time. Didn't Ronnie say that ketchup was a vegetable too? LOLOL
 

Forum List

Back
Top