A Gun Is Not An Argument

[ihopehefails]

With the amount of guns and ammunition being bought by the right wingnuts, they must have a lot of arguing to do.

Of course, that is the only way they have to express themselves......Nasty Healthcare for unisured Americans and all

How about nasty requierments for my life and health regulations like a 10% tax on tanning booths which means that I can only afford to go to on 10% less since the cost was increased.

Worth shooting over???

Maybe if you are John Boehner

That depends on who it is. I think if someone stood outside a tanning booth and stopped me from going in then I can shoot them but when that man is wearing a government uniform then it is OK. Isn't it amazing how submissive some people get over a uniform.

 

[ihopehefails]

Cave men had societies I expect. Societies do nto have to meet your definition of civility to exist.

Define society.

I'd like to refer you, at this time, to the second quote of my current signature:


"To call the population of strangers in the midst of which we live "society" is such a usurpation that even the sociologists wonder if they should abandon a concept that was, for a century, their bread and butter. Now they prefer the metaphor of a network to describe the connection of cybernetic solitudes, the intermeshing of weak interactions under names like "colleague," "contact," "buddy," acquaintance," or "date." Such networks sometimes condense into a milieu, where nothing is shared but codes, and where nothing is played out except the incessant recomposition of identity."

Did you think that impressed anyone?

 

[Gunny]

From Ayn Rand’s “Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal,” a refreshing argument for laissez-faire, rooted in morality and not GOP talking points.

“Since men are neither omniscient nor infallible, they must be free to agree or disagree, to cooperate or pursue their own independent course, each according to his own rational judgment. Freedom is the fundamental requirement of man’s mind..."

Yes, it is. It's an argument that I win because you're too much of a pussy leftwinger to own one.

 

[boedicca]

I'd like to refer you, at this time, to the second quote of my current signature:


"To call the population of strangers in the midst of which we live "society" is such a usurpation that even the sociologists wonder if they should abandon a concept that was, for a century, their bread and butter. Now they prefer the metaphor of a network to describe the connection of cybernetic solitudes, the intermeshing of weak interactions under names like "colleague," "contact," "buddy," acquaintance," or "date." Such networks sometimes condense into a milieu, where nothing is shared but codes, and where nothing is played out except the incessant recomposition of identity."

You just continue to prove that you are an absolute moron.

Your definition of society is as inane as your claim that Free Markets are best served under a Communist system.

But thanks for playing.

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

From Ayn Rand’s “Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal,” a refreshing argument for laissez-faire, rooted in morality and not GOP talking points.

“Since men are neither omniscient nor infallible, they must be free to agree or disagree, to cooperate or pursue their own independent course, each according to his own rational judgment. Freedom is the fundamental requirement of man’s mind..."

My gun's a HELL of an argument dipweed. It's all fun n games until the barrel's resting against your forehead.

Can you say "You'd shit your pants"?

If someone's got the barrel to your head, several things have gone horribly wrong with the discussion...

You may have finally won the argument

 

[JWBooth]

A Gun Is Not An Argument

Correct. A firearm is not an argument. It is a tool, handy for bringing an argument to an abrupt conclusion.

 

[☭proletarian☭]

I think if someone stood outside a tanning booth and stopped me from going in then I can shoot.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

With the amount of guns and ammunition being bought by the right wingnuts, they must have a lot of arguing to do.

Of course, that is the only way they have to express themselves......Nasty Healthcare for unisured Americans and all

And yet after using this argument for YEARS nothing has happened. No shoot outs in the streets, no open gun battles in the bars at night, No major assualts on police or Government. NO effort at all to dish out mayhem and murder at all by this supposed nut jobs you keep claiming are buying all the guns. GO FIGURE.

 

[editec]

An armed society is a polite society.

Just sayin'.

Is it?

It might be.

Then too there's no shortage of arms in Somalia.

Is that your idea of a polite society?

My point here is that guns don't make society politer.

If I pulled a gun on you and made you dance to my tune, would you be thankful with me for doing that?

Or would you go home find a gun and hunt me down to make ME dance to your tune?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

An armed society is a polite society.

Just sayin'.

Is it?

It might be.

Then too there's no shortage of arms in Somalia.

Is that your idea of a polite society?

My point here is that guns don't make society politer.

If I pulled a gun on you and made you dance to my tune, would you be thankful with me for doing that?

Or would you go home find a gun and hunt me down to make ME dance to your tune?

Irrelevant. IN America Guns actually make us more cautious in regards committing crimes and mayhem. It is a proven fact that concealed carry and even open carry bring crime rates down. And even though the liberals whine every time a new States passes these laws and claims there will be wild west shoot outs in the streets and stores NONE of that has EVER happened.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

With the amount of guns and ammunition being bought by the right wingnuts, they must have a lot of arguing to do.

Of course, that is the only way they have to express themselves......Nasty Healthcare for unisured Americans and all

And yet after using this argument for YEARS nothing has happened. No shoot outs in the streets, no open gun battles in the bars at night, No major assualts on police or Government. NO effort at all to dish out mayhem and murder at all by this supposed nut jobs you keep claiming are buying all the guns. GO FIGURE.

You miss the point yet again, what purpose is their to carry a gun to protest free health care? Its not about incidents not happening with the guns, the point is why bring one anyways?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

With the amount of guns and ammunition being bought by the right wingnuts, they must have a lot of arguing to do.

Of course, that is the only way they have to express themselves......Nasty Healthcare for unisured Americans and all

And yet after using this argument for YEARS nothing has happened. No shoot outs in the streets, no open gun battles in the bars at night, No major assualts on police or Government. NO effort at all to dish out mayhem and murder at all by this supposed nut jobs you keep claiming are buying all the guns. GO FIGURE.

You miss the point yet again, what purpose is their to carry a gun to protest free health care? Its not about incidents not happening with the guns, the point is why bring one anyways?

If I have a right, then I choose when to USE it, NOT you. Pretty simple concept.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

An armed society is a polite society.

Just sayin'.

Is it?

It might be.

Then too there's no shortage of arms in Somalia.

Is that your idea of a polite society?

My point here is that guns don't make society politer.

If I pulled a gun on you and made you dance to my tune, would you be thankful with me for doing that?

Or would you go home find a gun and hunt me down to make ME dance to your tune?

Irrelevant. IN America Guns actually make us more cautious in regards committing crimes and mayhem. It is a proven fact that concealed carry and even open carry bring crime rates down. And even though the liberals whine every time a new States passes these laws and claims there will be wild west shoot outs in the streets and stores NONE of that has EVER happened.

There is no proof that guns make us more cautious, if anything they've made us a country with more of a violent culture, then again this country was founded on violence so what gives? Most of the pro-guns idiots who stockpile guns in their homes have never had a crime committed against them, nor were ever threatened with a crime.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

And yet after using this argument for YEARS nothing has happened. No shoot outs in the streets, no open gun battles in the bars at night, No major assualts on police or Government. NO effort at all to dish out mayhem and murder at all by this supposed nut jobs you keep claiming are buying all the guns. GO FIGURE.

You miss the point yet again, what purpose is their to carry a gun to protest free health care? Its not about incidents not happening with the guns, the point is why bring one anyways?

If I have a right, then I choose when to USE it, NOT you. Pretty simple concept.

You're still hopelessly beyond comprehending common sense, what relationship does guns have to do with free health care? One has nothing to do with the other, so once again, what point are idiots trying to make by bringing weapons to protest health care?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

You miss the point yet again, what purpose is their to carry a gun to protest free health care? Its not about incidents not happening with the guns, the point is why bring one anyways?

If I have a right, then I choose when to USE it, NOT you. Pretty simple concept.

You're still hopelessly beyond comprehending common sense, what relationship does guns have to do with free health care? One has nothing to do with the other, so once again, what point are idiots trying to make by bringing weapons to protest health care?

Look you RETARD it is their RIGHT to wear those firearms where ever they want that is legally allowed by the State LAWS. And since Police are not arresting them then they obviously broke no laws and were LEGALLY exercising their PROTECTED right to carry those firearms. YOU are the one missing the point. YOU do not get to tell me where I can and can not exercise my PROTECTED RIGHTS. Nor can you tell anyone else. Further since no shootings or reports or actual intimidation have EVER been reported you haven't a leg to stand on.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

If I have a right, then I choose when to USE it, NOT you. Pretty simple concept.

You're still hopelessly beyond comprehending common sense, what relationship does guns have to do with free health care? One has nothing to do with the other, so once again, what point are idiots trying to make by bringing weapons to protest health care?

Look you RETARD it is their RIGHT to wear those firearms where ever they want that is legally allowed by the State LAWS. And since Police are not arresting them then they obviously broke no laws and were LEGALLY exercising their PROTECTED right to carry those firearms. YOU are the one missing the point. YOU do not get to tell me where I can and can not exercise my PROTECTED RIGHTS. Nor can you tell anyone else. Further since no shootings or reports or actual intimidation have EVER been reported you haven't a leg to stand on.

Stupid jackass, if I brought toilet paper to protest child rape how much common sense would that make? What does one have to do with the other? Weapons are for protection, not to protest health care.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

You're still hopelessly beyond comprehending common sense, what relationship does guns have to do with free health care? One has nothing to do with the other, so once again, what point are idiots trying to make by bringing weapons to protest health care?

Look you RETARD it is their RIGHT to wear those firearms where ever they want that is legally allowed by the State LAWS. And since Police are not arresting them then they obviously broke no laws and were LEGALLY exercising their PROTECTED right to carry those firearms. YOU are the one missing the point. YOU do not get to tell me where I can and can not exercise my PROTECTED RIGHTS. Nor can you tell anyone else. Further since no shootings or reports or actual intimidation have EVER been reported you haven't a leg to stand on.

Stupid jackass, if I brought toilet paper to protest child rape how much common sense would that make? What does one have to do with the other? Weapons are for protection, not to protest health care.

Do you object to them protecting themselves going and coming? Once again dumb ass YOU do not determine when I can exercise MY rights.

 

[editec]

If people feel the need to arm themselves and carry guns, fine by me.

I don't think it makes me or them safer, though.

AS I have noted numerous times, here, were I living in someplace that was obviously dangerous and crime ridden (like most of you are compared to somebody living here in rural Maine) I would probably arm myself, too.

But in my defence, when I lived in Boston (South End) and New York (in a Black neighborhood in Queens) back in the 70's and 80's things didn't seem all that uncivil.

I don't think guns cause violence, foks, I think violence causes guns.

 

[uscitizen]

I think if someone stood outside a tanning booth and stopped me from going in then I can shoot.

ihopehefails is Charlie Crist?

 

[dmf047xx]

Why do we have to justify the use of any of our freedoms by saying it is moral? Who made others the morality police who can kill our freedom when they deem the use of that freedom as immoral?

In my opinion, the law should only act to protect life and property of any individual. This way it provides the security we as human being need without endangering any of our freedoms.

What if copororate and private individials are at odds on an issue?

Is corporation trying to steal or kill? Then the law can stop them. Is a nasty marxist liberal trying to burn down the corporate headquarters? Then the law can stop them.

Yes, coorporations should not be interfered with at all. Like in the industrial revolution when the polluted the earth freely, employed children until their fingers were cut off, then replaced them with other kids as young as 6. Yeah what an awful place to live. You're worried about taxes and big government now? Imagine how much it will cost when every company can price fix with no intervention...
The market does not correct itself because unregulated competition can lead to dishonesty, because it is easier to "cheat" to make money than to compete.
And no preemptive measures should be taken whatsoever to catch the Madloff's.
I could go on for hours.

--and--
No matter how much you hate Karl Marx, atleast grasp an understanding about the topic before you pretend to know what you are talking about, because it is obvious that you don't by your above post.