A great eample of why we ridicule Liberals

We all know that Liberals deserve ridicule. This is a great example of their stupidity and silliness.

Maybe Christopher Nolen should have made Dunkirk a Gay Musical in order to appease the politically correct Moon Bats.

You can't make this shit up.



Delingpole: Not Enough 'Women', 'People of Color' in Dunkirk, USA Today Complains

Delingpole: Not Enough ā€˜Womenā€™, ā€˜People of Colorā€™ in ā€˜Dunkirk,ā€™ USA Today Complains

Dunkirk is a great movie but there arenā€™t enough ā€œwomenā€ or ā€œpeople of colorā€ in it, according to a review in USA Today.
The movie ā€“ with a cast including Mark Rylance, Kenneth Branagh, and former One Direction singer Harry Styles ā€“ has been given a slew of five-star reviews for its vivid, nail-biting depiction of the evacuation of the British Expeditionary Force from Dunkirk in 1940.

But though USA Todayā€™s reviewer praised it too, he couldnā€™t resist giving it a little rap on the knuckles about its shameful lack of diversity and equality:

The trio of timelines can be jarring as you figure out how they all fit, and the fact that there are only a couple of women and no lead actors of color may rub some the wrong way.

This is what was actually said:
"Dunkirk is also one of the best-scored films in recent memory, and Hans Zimmerā€™s music plays as important a role as any character. With shades of Edward Elgarā€™sEnigma Variations, the melodies are glorious, yet Zimmer also creates an instrumental ticking-clock soundtrack thatā€™s a propulsive force in the action scenes.

The trio of timelines can be jarring as you figure out how they all fit, and the fact that there are only a couple of women and no lead actors of color may rub some the wrong way. Still, Nolanā€™s feat is undeniable: Heā€™s made an immersive war movie that celebrates the good of mankind while also making it clear that no victory is without sacrifice."

This is your big complaint... Are you fucking serious you idiot...

Why post something that shows the OP was right and then call him an idiot. It kind of looks like you're the idiot.
The reviewer said it may rub some the wrong way. He didn't say it bothered him at all. Just more BS that cupcake conservatives have to sift through to find things to be offended about.


Liberals be so damn dense that they don't even know when they are spouting their political correctness bullshit, do they?
 
We all know that Liberals deserve ridicule. This is a great example of their stupidity and silliness.

Maybe Christopher Nolen should have made Dunkirk a Gay Musical in order to appease the politically correct Moon Bats.

You can't make this shit up.



Delingpole: Not Enough 'Women', 'People of Color' in Dunkirk, USA Today Complains

Delingpole: Not Enough ā€˜Womenā€™, ā€˜People of Colorā€™ in ā€˜Dunkirk,ā€™ USA Today Complains

Dunkirk is a great movie but there arenā€™t enough ā€œwomenā€ or ā€œpeople of colorā€ in it, according to a review in USA Today.
The movie ā€“ with a cast including Mark Rylance, Kenneth Branagh, and former One Direction singer Harry Styles ā€“ has been given a slew of five-star reviews for its vivid, nail-biting depiction of the evacuation of the British Expeditionary Force from Dunkirk in 1940.

But though USA Todayā€™s reviewer praised it too, he couldnā€™t resist giving it a little rap on the knuckles about its shameful lack of diversity and equality:

The trio of timelines can be jarring as you figure out how they all fit, and the fact that there are only a couple of women and no lead actors of color may rub some the wrong way.

This is what was actually said:
"Dunkirk is also one of the best-scored films in recent memory, and Hans Zimmerā€™s music plays as important a role as any character. With shades of Edward Elgarā€™sEnigma Variations, the melodies are glorious, yet Zimmer also creates an instrumental ticking-clock soundtrack thatā€™s a propulsive force in the action scenes.

The trio of timelines can be jarring as you figure out how they all fit, and the fact that there are only a couple of women and no lead actors of color may rub some the wrong way. Still, Nolanā€™s feat is undeniable: Heā€™s made an immersive war movie that celebrates the good of mankind while also making it clear that no victory is without sacrifice."

This is your big complaint... Are you fucking serious you idiot...

It's a pretty fucking stupid statement. That nonsense along with the climate of political correctness in this country is harmful and needs to be pointed out wherever it raises its empty head.

Why even make such an ignorant statement at all?
 
[Q


You didn't see the movie or apparently read the review. There's three stories that end up merging at Dunkirk .

So if 1/3 of the movie is in London, would there possibly be say a woman around !?

You don't have a clue, do you Moon Bat?

You don't even know when you are being an idiot, do you? I didn't write the review. Some Libtard asshole thinking he needed to mention stupid political correctness is the one you need to talk to.

The person writing the review and saying that some people might be offended because it didn't have Negroes or enough women in in a movie about an historical event experienced by White males is pretty damn stupid, isn't it?

Maybe the movie should have had the Brit military leaders played by women and Blacks. Would that have made you happy?

How about making the movie about Dunkirk being a Musical performed by queers? Would that have satisfied your Moon Bat political correctness sensibilities?
 
Confederate loser uneducated flag, say no more
Obviously never learned the def of liberal in high school.
"For the individual and small government"
Ah well ...
 
[Q


You didn't see the movie or apparently read the review. There's three stories that end up merging at Dunkirk .

So if 1/3 of the movie is in London, would there possibly be say a woman around !?

You don't have a clue, do you Moon Bat?

You don't even know when you are being an idiot, do you? I didn't write the review. Some Libtard asshole thinking he needed to mention stupid political correctness is the one you need to talk to.

The person writing the review and saying that some people might be offended because it didn't have Negroes or enough women in in a movie about an historical event experienced by White males is pretty damn stupid, isn't it?

Maybe the movie should have had the Brit military leaders played by women and Blacks. Would that have made you happy?

How about making the movie about Dunkirk being a Musical performed by queers? Would that have satisfied your Moon Bat political correctness sensibilities?
Libtard asshole?
Dead giveaway for zero college
 
I know, why don't we make a movie about slavery but with an equal amount of white slaves too?

Why don't we make a revolutionary war movie with Denzel Washington playing George Washington?

Let's remake Apollo 13 and have a woman in the capsule too? Even better, a black woman.

We wouldn't want to trigger any snowflakes at the movies.
 
[QU

Libtard asshole?
Dead giveaway for zero college

Actually Moon Bat you may have (in a convoluted way) made a valid point.

The term "Libtard asshole" is riddled with redundancy.

Libtard (Liberal Retard) is actually quite redundant. If you are a Liberal then you are obviously retarded.

If you are a Liberal we also all know you are an asshole so that becomes even more redundancy.

I majored in Engineering not English so my failure in using so much redundancy is my bad. Thanks for pointing it out. I'll try to do better next time.

However, your inability to understand what is wrong with a movie review mentioning that a movie about Dunkirk doesn't have enough Negroes or women in it speaks volumes of your ignorance of history and the stupidity of modern day political correctness.
 
Last edited:
We all know that Liberals deserve ridicule. This is a great example of their stupidity and silliness.

Maybe Christopher Nolen should have made Dunkirk a Gay Musical in order to appease the politically correct Moon Bats.

You can't make this shit up.



Delingpole: Not Enough 'Women', 'People of Color' in Dunkirk, USA Today Complains

Delingpole: Not Enough ā€˜Womenā€™, ā€˜People of Colorā€™ in ā€˜Dunkirk,ā€™ USA Today Complains

Dunkirk is a great movie but there arenā€™t enough ā€œwomenā€ or ā€œpeople of colorā€ in it, according to a review in USA Today.
The movie ā€“ with a cast including Mark Rylance, Kenneth Branagh, and former One Direction singer Harry Styles ā€“ has been given a slew of five-star reviews for its vivid, nail-biting depiction of the evacuation of the British Expeditionary Force from Dunkirk in 1940.

But though USA Todayā€™s reviewer praised it too, he couldnā€™t resist giving it a little rap on the knuckles about its shameful lack of diversity and equality:

The trio of timelines can be jarring as you figure out how they all fit, and the fact that there are only a couple of women and no lead actors of color may rub some the wrong way.


I mean is there anything that conservatives don't whine about. Jesus you people are the ultimate snowflakes. No other human being can do anything without you whining and bitching about it. No matter what other people do you whine about it.

A damn coffee shop makes a red cup and you weirdos lose your shit. Why? Just go hide in your basement and shut the rest of the world out and keep your misery locked in with you.
 
The evacuation of mainly British troops from Dunkirk, code named "Operation Dynamo", was almost a miracle rescue.

It involved white British, French, Belgian, and Canadian soldiers who were fleeing the advancing white German army.

How you could work colored soldiers into the film and stay historically accurate is beyond me? ..... :dunno:


The British force had very few if any "people of color" in it. Not back in those days.

Women were not involved in either the war planning, invasion force or rescue force. At best only a handful.

I suspect the only women involved were the Red Cross girls meeting the troops back in the UK after the rescue.

Of course the Liberals love to rewrite history. I haven't seen the movie yet so I don't know if they have an actor playing Churchill in it. I suspect these Liberals would want to cast the part of Churchill to a Gay Black actor. After all we have to be inclusive and recognize diversity don't we?.
 
We all know that Liberals deserve ridicule. This is a great example of their stupidity and silliness.

Maybe Christopher Nolen should have made Dunkirk a Gay Musical in order to appease the politically correct Moon Bats.

You can't make this shit up.



Delingpole: Not Enough 'Women', 'People of Color' in Dunkirk, USA Today Complains

Delingpole: Not Enough ā€˜Womenā€™, ā€˜People of Colorā€™ in ā€˜Dunkirk,ā€™ USA Today Complains

Dunkirk is a great movie but there arenā€™t enough ā€œwomenā€ or ā€œpeople of colorā€ in it, according to a review in USA Today.
The movie ā€“ with a cast including Mark Rylance, Kenneth Branagh, and former One Direction singer Harry Styles ā€“ has been given a slew of five-star reviews for its vivid, nail-biting depiction of the evacuation of the British Expeditionary Force from Dunkirk in 1940.

But though USA Todayā€™s reviewer praised it too, he couldnā€™t resist giving it a little rap on the knuckles about its shameful lack of diversity and equality:

The trio of timelines can be jarring as you figure out how they all fit, and the fact that there are only a couple of women and no lead actors of color may rub some the wrong way.


I mean is there anything that conservatives don't whine about. Jesus you people are the ultimate snowflakes. No other human being can do anything without you whining and bitching about it. No matter what other people do you whine about it.

A damn coffee shop makes a red cup and you weirdos lose your shit. Why? Just go hide in your basement and shut the rest of the world out and keep your misery locked in with you.


Liberals that have been constantly whining and marching around in their pink pussy hats ever since that jackass Crooked Hillary lost to Trump don't have anything to talk about.

The complaint is not about a two bit movie review. It is just pointing out how bat shit crazy the Left has become with their silly political correctness bullshit.
 
[QU

Libtard asshole?
Dead giveaway for zero college

Actually Moon Bat you may have (in a convoluted way) made a valid point.

The term "Libtard asshole" is riddled with redundancy.

Libtard (Liberal Retard) is actually quite redundant. If you are a Liberal then you are obviously retarded.

If you are a Liberal we also all know you are an asshole so that becomes even more redundancy.

I majored in Engineering not English so my failure in using so much redundancy is my bad. Thanks for pointing it out. I'll try to do better next time.

However, your inability to understand what is wrong with a movie review mentioning that a movie about Dunkirk doesn't have enough Negroes or women in it speaks volumes of your ignorance of history or the stupidity of modern day political correctness.

From the Department of Redundancy Department:

"retarded liberal"
 
Liberals like politically correct movies showing people of color saving the world and being smarter than mean old White people.

Like the recent movie where three Black chicks saved NASA and were the only reason the US was able to get men to the moon..
 
Liberals like politically correct movies showing people of color saving the world and being smarter than mean old White people.

Like the recent movie where three Black chicks saved NASA and were the only reason the US was able to get men to the moon..
Was that movie based on a bullshit lie?
 
Let's remake Apollo 13 and have a woman in the capsule too? Even better, a black woman.
Even better... have the black woman also be The President of the United States, in the capsule.
 
The evacuation of mainly British troops from Dunkirk, code named "Operation Dynamo", was almost a miracle rescue.

It involved white British, French, Belgian, and Canadian soldiers who were fleeing the advancing white German army.

How you could work colored soldiers into the film and stay historically accurate is beyond me? ..... :dunno:

Shitbag liberals want history to be rewritten to show the plight of "minorities" in every historical event. Any events that had no connection to minorities aren't deemed worthy of re-telling or talking about.
 
Liberals like politically correct movies showing people of color saving the world and being smarter than mean old White people.

Like the recent movie where three Black chicks saved NASA and were the only reason the US was able to get men to the moon..
Was that movie based on a bullshit lie?


There were thousands of heroes that worked on the NASA projects back then. For those Limousine Liberal shitheads in Hollywood to produce a stupid politically correct movie alluding that three Black chicks somehow saved NASA is just an another example of a convoluted history.

Liberals are really stupid people. In many cases their knowledge of history comes from only what Hollywood tells them. However, their ignorance extends farther than just history. For instance, they are the stupid Americans that Jonathan Gruber said would believe anything that the Democrats told them. Like that Obamacare would save them $2500 a year and that if you liked your plan you could keep your plan. Liberals are not the brightest bulbs in the chandelier.

Liberal stupidity not only embraces the lies told by the Democrat Party and history but also ethics, biology, economics, climate science and an understanding of our Bill of Rights.
 

Forum List

Back
Top