9th Circuit rules in favor of Trump admin in 'sanctuary city' case

The Purge

Platinum Member
Aug 16, 2018
17,881
7,856
400
So refreshing to watch the CONSERVATIVES taking over that 323rd world shithole court!

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Friday ruled in favor of the Trump administration's efforts to prioritize federal dollars for local policing to towns and cities that complied with certain immigration policies.



The Hill ^ | July 12, 2019 | Tal Axelrod

A city which defies Federal law is at risk of losing feral funds.

Seems like a no-brainer.

It’s also an example of how the federal government shouldn’t be funding these kinds of things in the first place.


Please do not post entire articles. An OP should be 3-4 paragraphs, link and content.





    • Copyright. Link Each "Copy & Paste" to It's Source. Only paste a small to medium section of the material.
USMB Rules and Guidelines


The Purge
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So refreshing to watch the CONSERVATIVES taking over that 323rd world shithole court!

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Friday ruled in favor of the Trump administration's efforts to prioritize federal dollars for local policing to towns and cities that complied with certain immigration policies.

The ruling, a split 2-1 decision, ruled that the Justice Department was within its rights to withhold Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) grants from sanctuary cities and states over their refusal to work with federal immigration enforcement authorities and instead prioritize agencies that focused on unauthorized immigration and agreed to give Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) access to jail records and immigrants in custody.

The city of Los Angeles first sued the administration after it was denied a $3 million grant on the grounds that it did not receive the money because it did not focus on immigration for its community policing grant application. The decision reversed a district court’s ruling.

“The panel rejected Los Angeles’s argument that DOJ’s practice of giving additional consideration to applicants that choose to further the two specified federal goals violated the Constitution’s Spending Clause,” wrote Judge Sandra Ikuta, joined by Judge Jay Bybee.

“The panel held that DOJ did not exceed its statutory authority in awarding bonus points to applicants that selected the illegal immigration focus area or that agreed to the Certification.”

Judge Kim Wardlaw wrote in dissent that the Justice Department’s efforts to prioritize immigration in determining the awarding of COPS grants was “Orwellian” and said the majority’s ruling goes “astray.”

“The majority goes astray by finding no meaning in Congress’s use of the term ‘community-oriented policing’ and then deferring under Chevron to DOJ’s Orwellian effort to define ‘community-oriented policing’ to include “partnering with federal law enforcement to address illegal immigration,” she wrote.

“Congress did not authorize COPS grants for anything other than placing additional state and local cops on the beat and promote community partnerships.”

Congress created the fund in 1994 to provide federal assistance to state and local law enforcement to get more cops on beats and improve police-community interaction. It allowed the Justice Department to administer the funds.

President Trump has repeatedly railed against sanctuary cities as he touts his hardline immigration stances.

He floated the idea earlier this year of retaliating by releasing undocumented immigrants and refugees and last year to the cities. He also issued an executive order last year blocking sanctuary cities from receiving certain federal funding. San Francisco sued over the order, and ultimately won its case.

The Hill ^ | July 12, 2019 | Tal Axelrod

A city which defies Federal law is at risk of losing feral funds.

Seems like a no-brainer.

It’s also an example of how the federal government shouldn’t be funding these kinds of things in the first place.


Win Win WIN win WINWIN win WIN Win
 

Forum List

Back
Top