95% of Great Barrier Reef, norther section, bleached

Why didn't the coral all die off 100 million years ago when CO2 was at 2000 ppm?

ROTFLMFAO......oh, bripated, you are so hilarious! No shit!

Coral bleaching and die-off is an OBSERVED EVENT, numbnuts, happening right now all around the world.

For you to point at something that somebody somewhere told you happened "100 million years ago", without them mentioning that the reason the Earth didn't burn up back then was because the sun was somewhat dimmer at that point in time, and then question whether that supposed event somehow means that the current bleaching isn't really happening is a great example of the reality denying insanity of your crackpot cult of reality denial. It is an observed event, moron!

In the real world....

Scientists: Caribbean coral die-off may be worst ever, Southeast Asia and Indian Ocean bleaching “may prove to be the worst such event known to science."

You are a true marvel of lies and stupidity.
Nope! That's you, as you make very, very obvious....like right here in this demented post of yours....




The Sun was not dimmer then.
See how ignorant you are.

How did the Sun's brightness change during its first few billion years?
Ask the Astronomer
Dr. Sten Odenwald
Although its brightness seems pretty constant today, it did change in a very complicated way while it was still forming from infalling gas and dust. It was actually tens to hundreds of times more luminous, but mostly as an infrared 'star'. Then when its nuclear fusion reactions kicked-in, stellar evolution models show that it began to stabilize within a few million years as a star with a power about 70% of its current output. Soon after it formed, the Sun was actually dimmer than it is today. It has grown steadily in power as it has evolved as a star, and will continue to increase in power for the next seven billion years. During most of this time, the power will increase by about 1% every 300 million years. In the distant past, our atmosphere was loaded with greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and methane so these gases could have kept water in a liquid form on Earth's surface even when the Sun was 30% dimmer than today. By 500 million years from now, the power of the Sun will be several percent higher. This will cause extensive heating of Earth, the destruction of the biosphere, and by one billion years from now, the evaporation of the oceans into a Venus-like atmosphere.











The coral bleaching phenomena supposedly has nothing to do with temperature.
Wrong again, little retard!

What is coral bleaching?
United States National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

When corals are stressed by changes in conditions such as temperature, light, or nutrients, they expel the symbiotic algae living in their tissues, causing them to turn completely white.

Warmer water temperatures can result in coral bleaching. When water is too warm, corals will expel the algae (zooxanthellae) living in their tissues causing the coral to turn completely white. This is called coral bleaching. When a coral bleaches, it is not dead. Corals can survive a bleaching event, but they are under more stress and are subject to mortality.

In 2005, the U.S. lost half of its coral reefs in the Caribbean in one year due to a massive bleaching event. The warm waters centered around the northern Antilles near the Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico expanded southward. Comparison of satellite data from the previous 20 years confirmed that thermal stress from the 2005 event was greater than the previous 20 years combined.








It supposedly has to do with the atmospheric concentration of CO2.
Wrong again, little retard!

Although warmer temperatures are the main factor causing the current world wide coral bleaching - die-offs, the oceans are absorbing a lot of the excess CO2 mankind is adding to the atmosphere, resulting in ocean acidification, and changes in water chemistry (in particular acidification) are one of the other factors adding to the stress-caused bleaching. It is the added CO2 in the oceans that is contributing to the problem, NOT "atmospheric concentration of CO2".





The AGW cult is trying to claim that a concentration of 400 ppm will kill coral.
It is not the 400ppm CO2 levels, per se, dumbass. It is the effects of the increased CO2 levels on ocean temperatures and ocean acidification that are threatening the coral viability.
 
Trolling Blunder will believe ANYTHING they tell him

If CO2 levels ever get high, like they were many times in Earth's past and the water gets warmer, like it was many times in Earth's past, the coral will bleach, like it did many times in Earth's past. We're doomed!

More windmills!!!
 
If CO2 levels ever get high, like they were many times in Earth's past and the water gets warmer, like it was many times in Earth's past, the coral will bleach, like it did many times in Earth's past. We're doomed! More windmills!!!

More denier cult ignorance and insanity from the retarded troll.

Suddenly increased CO2 and temperatures have, in the distant past, caused mass extinctions that required millions of years for the Earth to recover and restore the biosphere.
 
If CO2 levels ever get high, like they were many times in Earth's past and the water gets warmer, like it was many times in Earth's past, the coral will bleach, like it did many times in Earth's past. We're doomed! More windmills!!!

More denier cult ignorance and insanity from the retarded troll.

Suddenly increased CO2 and temperatures have, in the distant past, caused mass extinctions that required millions of years for the Earth to recover and restore the biosphere.

Obviously you're too stupid to recognize sarcasm when you see it.
 
He recognized the sarcasm, but the sarcasm was based on a false premise: "like it was in the past". It would be like sarcasm that assumes blacks and browns are inferior or sarcasm that assumes women are chattel or sarcasm that assumes trickle down economics works or sarcasm that assumes our nation is based on Christianity or saracasm that assumes homosexuality is unnatural or sarcasm that assumes increased guns provide a safer environment or sarcasm that assumes you have the intelligence required to operate an ice cream parlor in Fargo, ND.
 
He recognized the sarcasm, but the sarcasm was based on a false premise: "like it was in the past". It would be like sarcasm that assumes blacks and browns are inferior or sarcasm that assumes women are chattel or sarcasm that assumes trickle down economics works or sarcasm that assumes our nation is based on Christianity or saracasm that assumes homosexuality is unnatural or sarcasm that assumes increased guns provide a safer environment or sarcasm that assumes you have the intelligence required to operate an ice cream parlor in Fargo, ND.

Are you claiming that CO2 levels weren't higher in the past?
 
Here's something that gets me a bit jacked now and then. All of us on the side of normal intelligence and mainstream science have repeated over and over again that the problem isn't the absolute CO2 levels, the absolute temperatures or the absolute pH values to be reached, but the RATE at which they are changing. I've explained that over and over again. Mamooth, Rolling Thunder, Old Rocks, Isaac Newton and virtually every non-denier to visit this board has explained it REPEATEDLY. And yet, when I made a comment obliquely referencing the point, I get astonished queries that tells us that our readers H A V E - N O T - G O T - I T.

Why not?
 
Paddie, you always struck me as someone that would be in to grilling. Are you into grilling laddie?
 
Are you saying that reducing CO2 levels in our atmosphere won't reduce temperatures?
 
Are you saying that reducing CO2 levels in our atmosphere won't reduce temperatures?

There's no connection in the empirical data between CO2 and temperature.

However, according to the IPPC's own calculation, how much will the temperature be reduced if we follow it's recommendations?
 
No connection? Never mind, Paddie. I thought you might want to have something resembling a rational conversation.
 
Ok, the ocean temps are getting warmer. So what? Not a damn thing we can do about it.
An assumption based on a braindead anti-science denial of reality.

In the real world, not denier cult Bizarroworld, it is mankind's carbon emissions that have caused the oceans to warm up.

What we can do about it is to stop making the problem worse and then even more worse, by drastically curtailing our carbon emissions - stop burning fossil fuels, stop dumping 40 billion tons of CO2 into the atmosphere every year.
 

Forum List

Back
Top