911 WTC 7 Silent Thermate Demolition, Debunkers Grab Your Ankles!

[KokomoJojo]

JUST ONE LITTLE ONE will suffice, since it only takes one brain cell to see there is no visible fire and fire makes light and light is visible so you are fucking delusional and seeing things that do not exist.

there was actually a few (like 8) windows that had a little fire

How easily we change our tune when facts slap you in the face. "Suffice" much?

so a tiny fire, that was by 8 windows not even close to the column that nist claimed failed and you are that fucking tarded to think it would bring the building down.

Do tell! This is one story I really cant wait to hear!

 

[PredFan]

JUST ONE LITTLE ONE will suffice, since it only takes one brain cell to see there is no visible fire and fire makes light and light is visible so you are fucking delusional and seeing things that do not exist.

there was actually a few (like 8) windows that had a little fire

How easily we change our tune when facts slap you in the face. "Suffice" much?

so a tiny fire, that was by 8 windows not even close to the column that nist claimed failed and you are that fucking tarded to think it would bring the building down.

Do tell! This is one story I really cant wait to hear!

You really are an idiot aren't you?

 

[KokomoJojo]

We are supposed to believe:

1. Three office buildings in downtown NYC, that have what thousands of offices and twice that many workers, were rigged to explode without one single office worker, maintenance man, or security guy seeing it.

2. That after rigging them, the demolition experts were able to know ahead if time exactly where the planes were going to hit, so that they could only detonate the buildings from that point down.

3. That the shadowy cabal didn't think that the two towers would cause enough outrage in this country and that they had to also take out building 7.

4. That no one on the huge team of demolition people that it would require to rig all three buildings to fall would have enough guilt over all of the people who died that not one of them would come forward.

Truthers are fond of poking holes in the official version, all the while they can't take a serious look at their own crackpot theories.

we are expected to believe that 3 office building one not even hit by a composite plane were built out of paper and fire brought them down. Oh and not just down but straight fucking down!

Nice fantasy, hell everyone would be in the demolition biz with that kind of profit margin!

Yeh thats really suspicious but good thinking its easier to investigate since you only need to find one perp to solve the rest at the same time.

Hmmm good point again, there must have been a really good reason to take out the 3rd building, what was in there anyway?

OMFG how tarded to think that someone capable of such a heinous act would feel guilty and turn themselves in. unreal you people are smoking some really good shit.

Nope its the da-bunkers that are smoking crack.

How about all those thermite cutters leveling that building! aint that something?

How did debunkers miss something so obvious? head up ass syndrome maybe?

But you cannot answer or debunk any of those questions. You demand answers from the official version, but you cannot provide anything provable for your wacky theory. Typical.

I just did, obviously you are too ignorant to know the difference since you cant rebut ANY of them!

 

[Darlene]

Exposed!

Let the sobbing begin and tears start to roll!








What is claimed is: 1. An apparatus for cutting a target material having a surface to be cut comprising:

cutting flame generating means disposed within said inner cavity;

activating means operatively associated with said cutting flame generating means to generate a cutting flame to cut said target material; and

wherein said apparatus is structured to be positioned a standoff distance from said surface of said target material when said apparatus is placed on said surface of said target material.

2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said cutting flame generating means has a thermite charge.

3. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein said thermite charge includes a powder comprising, by weight, about 15% to 20% aluminum, about 78% to 85% CuO, about 1% to 3% SiC, and about 0.2% to 4.0% nitrocellulose.

4. The apparatus of claim 3, wherein said thermite charge includes parts, by weight, about 16% to 18% aluminum, about 80% to 83% CuO, about 1% to 2% SiC, and about 0.5% to 2% nitrocellulose.

5. The apparatus of claim 1, further including a directional foil positioned in said elongated nozzle for focusing said cutting flame against said target material.



6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said inner cavity defines a generally cylindrical volume.

12. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said inner cavity defines a predetermined volume to accommodate a sufficient amount of said cutting flame generating means to ensure effective cutting action on a particular thickness of target material.

17. The method of claim 16, wherein said positioning said cutting flame generating means includes placing a thermite charge in a charge tube and positioning said charge tube in said inner cavity of said housing.

25. An apparatus for cutting a target material having a surface to be cut comprising:
a second housing having a nozzle channel positionable opposite to said nozzle channel of said first housing to permit cutting of said material in two directions, said second housing being connected to said first housing; and
wherein said connection between said housings comprises a fixed connection and a pivotal connection between said housings.

29. The apparatus of claim 20, further including means disposed in said housing for electrically activating said cutting flame generating means.







so sit back folks and watch the plethora of debunking fabrications begin!



yes like that ^^^^^ LOL

None of the images you used are showing up on my computer, so please explain. Thank you.

 

[KokomoJojo]

How easily we change our tune when facts slap you in the face. "Suffice" much?

so a tiny fire, that was by 8 windows not even close to the column that nist claimed failed and you are that fucking tarded to think it would bring the building down.

Do tell! This is one story I really cant wait to hear!

You really are an idiot aren't you?

No, not at all. I disagree with debunkers. You should step over to the intelligent side too someday, not now maybe someday, something to give you hope in your miserable life.

 

[KokomoJojo]

Exposed!

Let the sobbing begin and tears start to roll!








What is claimed is: 1. An apparatus for cutting a target material having a surface to be cut comprising:

cutting flame generating means disposed within said inner cavity;

activating means operatively associated with said cutting flame generating means to generate a cutting flame to cut said target material; and

wherein said apparatus is structured to be positioned a standoff distance from said surface of said target material when said apparatus is placed on said surface of said target material.

2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said cutting flame generating means has a thermite charge.

3. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein said thermite charge includes a powder comprising, by weight, about 15% to 20% aluminum, about 78% to 85% CuO, about 1% to 3% SiC, and about 0.2% to 4.0% nitrocellulose.

4. The apparatus of claim 3, wherein said thermite charge includes parts, by weight, about 16% to 18% aluminum, about 80% to 83% CuO, about 1% to 2% SiC, and about 0.5% to 2% nitrocellulose.

5. The apparatus of claim 1, further including a directional foil positioned in said elongated nozzle for focusing said cutting flame against said target material.



6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said inner cavity defines a generally cylindrical volume.

12. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said inner cavity defines a predetermined volume to accommodate a sufficient amount of said cutting flame generating means to ensure effective cutting action on a particular thickness of target material.

17. The method of claim 16, wherein said positioning said cutting flame generating means includes placing a thermite charge in a charge tube and positioning said charge tube in said inner cavity of said housing.

25. An apparatus for cutting a target material having a surface to be cut comprising:
a second housing having a nozzle channel positionable opposite to said nozzle channel of said first housing to permit cutting of said material in two directions, said second housing being connected to said first housing; and
wherein said connection between said housings comprises a fixed connection and a pivotal connection between said housings.

29. The apparatus of claim 20, further including means disposed in said housing for electrically activating said cutting flame generating means.







so sit back folks and watch the plethora of debunking fabrications begin!



yes like that ^^^^^ LOL

None of the images you used are showing up on my computer, so please explain. Thank you.

you have to be logged in and if that dont work get a new computer or hire someone or go to the library and use one of theirs.

 

[Darlene]

Exposed!

Let the sobbing begin and tears start to roll!








What is claimed is: 1. An apparatus for cutting a target material having a surface to be cut comprising:

cutting flame generating means disposed within said inner cavity;

activating means operatively associated with said cutting flame generating means to generate a cutting flame to cut said target material; and

wherein said apparatus is structured to be positioned a standoff distance from said surface of said target material when said apparatus is placed on said surface of said target material.

2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said cutting flame generating means has a thermite charge.

3. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein said thermite charge includes a powder comprising, by weight, about 15% to 20% aluminum, about 78% to 85% CuO, about 1% to 3% SiC, and about 0.2% to 4.0% nitrocellulose.

4. The apparatus of claim 3, wherein said thermite charge includes parts, by weight, about 16% to 18% aluminum, about 80% to 83% CuO, about 1% to 2% SiC, and about 0.5% to 2% nitrocellulose.

5. The apparatus of claim 1, further including a directional foil positioned in said elongated nozzle for focusing said cutting flame against said target material.



6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said inner cavity defines a generally cylindrical volume.

12. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said inner cavity defines a predetermined volume to accommodate a sufficient amount of said cutting flame generating means to ensure effective cutting action on a particular thickness of target material.

17. The method of claim 16, wherein said positioning said cutting flame generating means includes placing a thermite charge in a charge tube and positioning said charge tube in said inner cavity of said housing.

25. An apparatus for cutting a target material having a surface to be cut comprising:
a second housing having a nozzle channel positionable opposite to said nozzle channel of said first housing to permit cutting of said material in two directions, said second housing being connected to said first housing; and
wherein said connection between said housings comprises a fixed connection and a pivotal connection between said housings.

29. The apparatus of claim 20, further including means disposed in said housing for electrically activating said cutting flame generating means.







so sit back folks and watch the plethora of debunking fabrications begin!



yes like that ^^^^^ LOL

None of the images you used are showing up on my computer, so please explain. Thank you.

you have to be logged in and if that dont work get a new computer or hire someone or go to the library and use one of theirs.

FYI, you have to be logged in to post anything. Are you saying that 9/11 was an inside job?

 

[Faun]

Wow, just wow........

yeh debunkers are really taking it on the chin. lol

there was actually a few (like 8) windows that had a little fire

no one is tarded enough to think that will bring a hirise down except of course debunkers. they believe any shit fed to them

Since I posted a video which showed one side of that building was billowing smoke from top to bottom, you prove yourself to be completely insane better than I could have shown. Thanks!

 

[Faun]

JUST ONE LITTLE ONE will suffice, since it only takes one brain cell to see there is no visible fire and fire makes light and light is visible so you are fucking delusional and seeing things that do not exist.

there was actually a few (like 8) windows that had a little fire

How easily we change our tune when facts slap you in the face. "Suffice" much?

so a tiny fire, that was by 8 windows not even close to the column that nist claimed failed and you are that fucking tarded to think it would bring the building down.

Do tell! This is one story I really cant wait to hear!

You are batshit crazy. No one asserts the building came down because of fire alone. The building suffered critical structural damage when the north tower rained tons of steel and concrete on it.

I like how you ignore that part so you can make it sound ridiculous that fire alone brought down a skyscraper, but since you have nothing but insanity on your side, your options severely limited.

 

[PredFan]

we are expected to believe that 3 office building one not even hit by a composite plane were built out of paper and fire brought them down. Oh and not just down but straight fucking down!

Nice fantasy, hell everyone would be in the demolition biz with that kind of profit margin!

Yeh thats really suspicious but good thinking its easier to investigate since you only need to find one perp to solve the rest at the same time.

Hmmm good point again, there must have been a really good reason to take out the 3rd building, what was in there anyway?

OMFG how tarded to think that someone capable of such a heinous act would feel guilty and turn themselves in. unreal you people are smoking some really good shit.

Nope its the da-bunkers that are smoking crack.

How about all those thermite cutters leveling that building! aint that something?

How did debunkers miss something so obvious? head up ass syndrome maybe?

But you cannot answer or debunk any of those questions. You demand answers from the official version, but you cannot provide anything provable for your wacky theory. Typical.

I just did, obviously you are too ignorant to know the difference since you cant rebut ANY of them!

There isn't anything to rebut dumbass. You didn't provide anything but childish "nah nah nah nah" bullshit. Your stupidity explains why you believe the shit you do.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Threads like this and 9/11's are to deflect from the actual conspiracy

 

[KokomoJojo]

How easily we change our tune when facts slap you in the face. "Suffice" much?

so a tiny fire, that was by 8 windows not even close to the column that nist claimed failed and you are that fucking tarded to think it would bring the building down.

Do tell! This is one story I really cant wait to hear!

You are batshit crazy. No one asserts the building came down because of fire alone. The building suffered critical structural damage when the north tower rained tons of steel and concrete on it.

I like how you ignore that part so you can make it sound ridiculous that fire alone brought down a skyscraper, but since you have nothing but insanity on your side, your options severely limited.

Hey dipwit, try again. NIST said it LOL


NIST Home > Public and Business Affairs Office > News Releases > NIST WTC 7 Investigation Finds Building Fires Caused Collapse

NIST WTC 7 Investigation Finds Building Fires Caused Collapse

For Immediate Release: August 21, 2008


Contact: Michael E. Newman

Report and Recommendations for Improving Building Safety Released for Comment

GAITHERSBURG, Md.—The fall of the 47-story World Trade Center building 7 (WTC 7) in New York City late in the afternoon of Sept. 11, 2001, was primarily due to fires, the Commerce Department's National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) announced today following an extensive, three-year scientific and technical building and fire safety investigation. This was the first known instance of fire causing the total collapse of a tall building, the agency stated as it released for public comment its WTC investigation report and 13 recommendations for improving building and fire safety.


again that damage was no where near column 79 so thats your conspiracy theory LOL

 

[SFC Ollie]

Yes NIST calls the unfought fires the primary reason for the collapse of WTC7....

And they are 99% Right........I don't think they give enough credit to the damages done by the falling tower....

 

[LA RAM FAN]

i see your handlers sent you to fart again gomer,they sure are getting worried all this truth is getting out.hee hee.

 

[daws101]

still laughing at kokkos totally false assumption that no one was around wtc7 ...after the evacuation

4:10 PM Building 7 of the World Trade Center collapses.



9/11 and collapse

See also: Collapse of the World Trade Center





7 World Trade Center on fire after the collapse of the Twin Towers on 9/11
As the North Tower collapsed on September 11, 2001, heavy debris hit 7 World Trade Center, damaging the south face of the building[37] and starting fires that continued to burn throughout the afternoon.[7] The collapse also caused damage to the southwest corner between Floors 7 and 17 and on the south face between Floor 44 and the roof; other possible structural damage included a large vertical gash near the center of the south face between Floors 24 and 41.[7] The building was equipped with a sprinkler system, but had many single-point vulnerabilities for failure: the sprinkler system required manual initiation of the electrical fire pumps, rather than being a fully automatic system; the floor-level controls had a single connection to the sprinkler water riser; and the sprinkler system required some power for the fire pump to deliver water. Also, water pressure was low, with little or no water to feed sprinklers.[38][39]

After the North Tower collapsed, some firefighters entered 7 World Trade Center to search the building. They attempted to extinguish small pockets of fire, but low water pressure hindered their efforts.[40] Over the course of the day, fires burned out of control on several floors of 7 World Trade Center; the flames visible on the east side of the building.[41][42] During the afternoon, fire was also seen on floors 6–10, 13–14, 19–22, and 29–30.[37] In particular, the fires on floors 7 through 9 and 11 through 13 continued to burn out of control during the afternoon.[8] At approximately 2:00 pm, firefighters noticed a bulge in the southwest corner of 7 World Trade Center between the 10th and 13th floors, a sign that the building was unstable and might collapse.[43] During the afternoon, firefighters also heard creaking sounds coming from the building.[44] Around 3:30 pm, FDNY Chief Daniel A. Nigro decided to halt rescue operations, surface removal, and searches along the surface of the debris near 7 World Trade Center and evacuate the area due to concerns for the safety of personnel.[45] At 533 pm EDT (according to FEMA), the building started to collapse, with the crumble of the east mechanical penthouse, and at 510 pm EDT, according to FEMA, and 552 pm EDT according to NIST, it collapsed completely.[6][7][46] There were no casualties associated with the collapse.
7 World Trade Center - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[LA RAM FAN]

None of the images you used are showing up on my computer, so please explain. Thank you.

you have to be logged in and if that dont work get a new computer or hire someone or go to the library and use one of theirs.

FYI, you have to be logged in to post anything. Are you saying that 9/11 was an inside job?

are you saying you believe the fairy tales of the governments and the CIA controlled medias version that 19 muslims somehow overpowered trained pilots with mere box cutters and they piloted these air liners making all these impossible maneuvers in the air that expert pilots have said they could not do?

are you saying you believe our corrupt government instituions what they say even though they have a long history of lying to the american people as well?


that you take their word on this over the words of qualified experts?


Let me guess,you believe in magic bullets and the other fairy tale of the governments that oswald was the lone assassin right?

of course it was an inside job.read this link on this thread and watch the video as well in the OP.Nobody has ever been able to debunk those facts in them or ever has any answers for them.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/consp...cia-did-9-11-overwhelming-facts-prove-it.html

 

[daws101]

i see your handlers sent you to fart again gomer,they sure are getting worried all this truth is getting out.hee hee.

the truth about you has been out for years....

 

[LA RAM FAN]

someone farted in here.

 

[SFC Ollie]

Can we get just one truther with more than a single digit IQ?

Oh, I'm sorry, i forgot.... truthers with IQ...Like chasing unicorns in an apple tree....

 

[KokomoJojo]

Can we get just one truther with more than a single digit IQ?

Oh, I'm sorry, i forgot.... truthers with IQ...Like chasing unicorns in an apple tree....

well we can just subtract about 130 points from any truther iq and expect minus triple digit iq from debunkers works out the same either way.