CherryPanda
Senior Member
- Aug 12, 2014
- 266
- 44
- 46
For many years the world hasn’t taken Ebola serious. It was first identified in 1976 in Sudan and Congo, and since then has been seen as some exotic disease that people far away in Africa suffered from time to time, dying in numbers that could be compared to the flu death tolls. The only frightening thing about Ebola was that its mortality rate is up to 90%. But this disease has never threatened the world well-being. Until now.
Beginning February, the recent Ebola outbreak has killed 932 people, and around 1700 are already infected. The geography of the disease expands: a nurse in Nigeria, a businessman in Saudi Arabia, a Spanish priest in Liberia (who is to be flown to Madrid) (CNN). It’s not only Africa, it’s Eurasia already. And the main issue here is whether there is a vaccine.
No huge pharmaceutical company has ever sponsored researches on the vaccine, for the market is too small and there were no profit prospects. All researches were supported by the US Department of Defense and National Institutes of Health, but they were closed in 2012 due to “financial difficulties”. At that moment, Gene Olinger, a virologist from USAMRIID, estimated the approximate time period needed to find a vaccine as 5-7 years.
But what if we distance from the medical aspect of the story and just have a look at the map? We would see that the countries where the Ebola outbreak started are rich with oil. They are, in fact, the main African oil deposit.
We also should take into consideration the fact that China has its oil project in these countries. By now, it gets 30% of its oil from Africa. In return, China provides soft credits for African countries. For example, in 2006 China provided Nigeria, Angola and Mozambique with $8 billion. For comparison, the World Bank gave only $2.3 billion for all the countries south of the Sahara.
These might be three separate facts that have no connection to each other. But...
Beginning February, the recent Ebola outbreak has killed 932 people, and around 1700 are already infected. The geography of the disease expands: a nurse in Nigeria, a businessman in Saudi Arabia, a Spanish priest in Liberia (who is to be flown to Madrid) (CNN). It’s not only Africa, it’s Eurasia already. And the main issue here is whether there is a vaccine.
No huge pharmaceutical company has ever sponsored researches on the vaccine, for the market is too small and there were no profit prospects. All researches were supported by the US Department of Defense and National Institutes of Health, but they were closed in 2012 due to “financial difficulties”. At that moment, Gene Olinger, a virologist from USAMRIID, estimated the approximate time period needed to find a vaccine as 5-7 years.
But what if we distance from the medical aspect of the story and just have a look at the map? We would see that the countries where the Ebola outbreak started are rich with oil. They are, in fact, the main African oil deposit.
We also should take into consideration the fact that China has its oil project in these countries. By now, it gets 30% of its oil from Africa. In return, China provides soft credits for African countries. For example, in 2006 China provided Nigeria, Angola and Mozambique with $8 billion. For comparison, the World Bank gave only $2.3 billion for all the countries south of the Sahara.
These might be three separate facts that have no connection to each other. But...
Last edited: